Dan Cilley Creates New Forum Website Allowing Discussion of Pure Virgin Females

[CaptainSkelebob2]

A man being with a teenage girl who is physically mature enough to have children if he rightly married her with her father's permission and treats her well is not perverted like a man having sex with another man, including men who have fake vaginas.

Oh so now your defending this borderline pedo shit too??? That figures coming from a sky fairy worshipping religious nutjob like you. #Ashamed

[88jose88]

A man being with a teenage girl who is physically mature enough to have children if he rightly married her with her father's permission and treats her well is not perverted like a man having sex with another man, including men who have fake vaginas.

quoted,so the authorities can see this and take the right actions regarding you.You're sick dude.

consensual sex between two adults is not nearly the same as having sex with a child.

I'm actually shocked and disappointed so many people are on this pedo's side,people are showing their true colors.@Pixel--Dude even wished him a good luck with his pedo forum,and he's a moderator lol

this place deserves to die.

[Lucas88]

I'm actually shocked and disappointed so many people are on this pedo's side,people are showing their true colors.@Pixel--Dude even wished him a good luck with his pedo forum,and he's a moderator lol

I'm sure that @Pixel--Dude was being sarcastic when he said that (like in a "good, now leave us alone" kind of way).

I speak with Pixel--Dude often in real life and let me tell you that he doesn't have a good impression of Dancilley. Just to clarify, he has nothing personal against the guy, but at the same time he doesn't like how Dan uploads videos that resemble stalking (as other users have commented) or how he once uploaded footage of himself beating up an old man in the street during a supposed "citizen's arrest". Pixel--Dude also recently removed a thread made by Dan titled "how p*dophilia will save America".

Sorry but Dancilley is a liability and a disgrace to the forum. He might be autistic or mentally ill but that doesn't excuse his behavior. Until now the guy has mostly flown under Pixel--Dude's radar with maybe one warning, but Pixel--Dude has told me that he's walking on thin ice and will probably get banned soon.

Former user Tsar was told by @Winston not to talk about teen girl stuff anymore and he respectfully refrained from doing it. But Dan has already been warned about this yet still continues to blatantly post about the topic and even made a thread called "how p*dophilia will save America". I personally don't think that Winston and Pixel--Dude should put up with this shit any longer.

[WanderingProtagonist]

I agree with you, fella. This dancilley comes on here talking about underaged girls and posting his creepy stalker videos. What does this fuckwit expect to happen??? He deserves all the mobbing he gets, thats what I say fellas. I know happierabroad is full of nutters and social rejects but we can really do without this repulsive jimmy saville knockoff. I say ban this pedo motherf***er.

When people backpack and tour other countries, they record their adventures, does that make them a stalker because they have people on their video they recorded? They don't get these people's permission to do it either. When I've seen him recording his videos to me it's no different from all the other videos I see on youtube of people recording themselves out in public. You have videos of people who record themselves doing pranks on unexpecting people sometimes even scare attempts. But people find these videos funny instead of accusing the person of stalking or being creepy. Sure Dan makes it easier for people to punch him like a bag because of his looks and some of his interest. "I know happier abroad is full of nutters and social rejects." Exactly, you are one of them. After all no normal healthy minded man I know talks about f***ing trans people while acting like just because some of them removed their dicks, it still passes as "hetero-sex" with them. You gay ass hypocrite. You f**k confused men that believe they are women. Nothing normal about that. Sure I thought about pursuing them myself but not the ones that cut it off. Regardless I wouldn't have been calling myself a full blown hetero male knowing that I wouldn't be. The ones removing their dicks doesn't make it any less gay. You're still gay.

Fella, have you even seen this fruitloops video? He literally talks about stalking those girls as he's doing it!!! Its clear that he's just a f***ing creep who makes those girls feel uncomfortable with his autistic comments and creepy stalker shit. I cant believe some people are defending that shit.

And no, fella. Being attracted to feminine ladyboys doesn't make me gay. The ladyboys I like look like feminine models and have pussies. I like them because they look more feminine than women. Gays are attracted to cock. So I'm not f***ing gay, fella.

Besides. You cant talk. I remember you writing something on here about you using transgender dating sites to date transgenders. If I'm a homo for liking ladyboys then so are you fella!!! Mwaaahaaaahaaaahaaaaa!!! At least I'm man enough to be honest with myself about what I like.

That's exactly what I said. I admitted that I pursued them, the only difference between me and you is that I'm not a closet gay pretending to be straight about it "at least I'm honest about it" no you aren't, if you were honest you would admit that you are still pursuing men who live as women, it's not that confusing. "Oh it's because they don't have cocks!" You're still pursuing a male, them removing their dicks doesn't mean they are automatically women. That's just liberal bullshit. Dick or no dick, they are biologically men, therefore you having sex with them means you f***ed a male. I pursued transsexuals when I was desperate and couldn't meet actual women, and while I know they call themselves "trans-Women" I still stand by the fact that they are males and not real women no matter how hard they want to persuade people into believing it. Just like those Female to Male trans people who claim to be men and then get pregnant while trying to sell the idea "Oh look see how men can really get pregnant?" No the f**k they can't, that's still a goddamn woman.

And no I'm not defending Dan at all, I was just explaining how some people record what they do in public often times involving them recording others. I honestly never even paid Dan that much attention so I don't remember him saying he stalks women or whatever. He has incel like traits except not all incels do what he's doing.

[WanderingProtagonist]

I'm actually shocked and disappointed so many people are on this pedo's side,people are showing their true colors.@Pixel--Dude even wished him a good luck with his pedo forum,and he's a moderator lol

I'm sure that @Pixel--Dude was being sarcastic when he said that (like in a "good, now leave us alone" kind of way).

I speak with Pixel--Dude often in real life and let me tell you that he doesn't have a good impression of Dancilley. Just to clarify, he has nothing personal against the guy, but at the same time he doesn't like how Dan uploads videos that resemble stalking (as other users have commented) or how he once uploaded footage of himself beating up an old man in the street during a supposed "citizen's arrest". Pixel--Dude also recently removed a thread made by Dan titled "how p*dophilia will save America".

Sorry but Dancilley is a liability and a disgrace to the forum. He might be autistic or mentally ill but that doesn't excuse his behavior. Until now the guy has mostly flown under Pixel--Dude's radar with maybe one warning, but Pixel--Dude has told me that he's walking on thin ice and will probably get banned soon.

Former user Tsar was told by @Winston not to talk about teen girl stuff anymore and he respectfully refrained from doing it. But Dan has already been warned about this yet still continues to blatantly post about the topic and even made a thread called "how p*dophilia will save America". I personally don't think that Winston and Pixel--Dude should put up with this shit any longer.

Well they can ban him if they want to ban him. So far he hasn't responded to any of these back and forth post we've made. So I take it he's content with being on his own website and probably won't care if he gets banned from here at this point which is why I assume he made his own platform. I honestly find a lot of stuff hilarious now and days with the world going to shit the way it is. There are a lot of people who are just saying "f**k it" and doing whatever now, truly feels like the end of times.

I'm sure the authorities would love to take down Dancily, he is after all a severely mentally ill white guy that's making it that much more easier to be a target. It's not like he's a top dog Jew or Joe Biden that have immunity to do whatever they want kill, human trafficking, harvesting organs, etc it's all above the law if you are running the world. But I don't care if Dancily stays or gets suspended. Only reason I even bother to come here is because my own life is garbage and its hard to find people to talk to about stuff. When I saw his post the one that Pixel deleted, I thought he was just trolling/bullshitting around for attention. It was dumb and risky but hell, he has his own platform now so he probably won't post such topics here anymore.

[MrMan]

And no, fella. Being attracted to feminine ladyboys doesn't make me gay. The ladyboys I like look like feminine models and have pussies. I like them because they look more feminine than women.

'Than women' is a subtle admission that these men are not women. You call them 'boys' when you call them 'ladyboys'. Have any of these boys you've been with been underage? Did you use the back hole all the other gay dudes used pre-op on some of these fellas?

[MrMan]

Oh so now your defending this borderline pedo shit too???

Marrying a 16 or 17 year old isn't pedophilia. That term refers to children, prepubescent. Those kids aren't old enough to bare children without it damaging them beyond the normal amount. That's pretty sick, too, and I don't even see the appeal. But 18-year-olds are teens, too, and are legal in a lot of places. 17, 18, 19, it's all arbitrary.

I didn't encourage Dan Cilly to marry a 17-year-old, though that is legal in a lot of places with parental permission. A girl can be a virgin at 18, 19, 20 or older. There is no need to marry a minor, even if it is legal with parental permission. I used to post that sort of stuff in response to Tsar, too.

But there are cultures where men marry girls in their teens, and many of us had ancestors married in their teens. I noticed one when doing genealogy research. It's not immoral for a 16-year-old to marry, just somewhat against current social norms. We have no grounds to judges tribespeople who do that or our ancestors.

But men having sex with men is just plain wrong, even with mentally ill men who pay doctors to give them drugs and do the evil of performing castrations and fake vagina surgeries. A man marrying and having sex with a female is natural. Sex with a trans man isn't natural, which is clearly the case because a doctor made the hole.

[MrMan]

A man being with a teenage girl who is physically mature enough to have children if he rightly married her with her father's permission and treats her well is not perverted like a man having sex with another man, including men who have fake vaginas.

quoted,so the authorities can see this and take the right actions regarding you.You're sick dude.

consensual sex between two adults is not nearly the same as having sex with a child.

I'm actually shocked and disappointed so many people are on this pedo's side,people are showing their true colors.@Pixel--Dude even wished him a good luck with his pedo forum,and he's a moderator lol

this place deserves to die.

Why would it be moral for an 18-year-old to get married on the day of her 18th birthday, but immoral the day before? In a lot of places, teens can marry with parental permission. It's an issue of very recently-developed social norms in the west and not morality. You can quote my post. No big deal. I am not breaking the law or encouraging anyone to break the law.

There is no reason for a man wanting to marry a virgin to focus on underaged girls. Cilley's forum looks like a bait and switch. If he likes them young, legal 18-year-olds don't look that much different from 17-year-olds either.

Ethically, a man should get permission from her father to marry her anyway.

Marrying a 17-year-old and a man having sex with a man are not even in the same ballpark. The latter is perversion. Sex with a man's surgical hole is just warped and sick.

[WanderingProtagonist]

A man being with a teenage girl who is physically mature enough to have children if he rightly married her with her father's permission and treats her well is not perverted like a man having sex with another man, including men who have fake vaginas.

quoted,so the authorities can see this and take the right actions regarding you.You're sick dude.

consensual sex between two adults is not nearly the same as having sex with a child.

I'm actually shocked and disappointed so many people are on this pedo's side,people are showing their true colors.@Pixel--Dude even wished him a good luck with his pedo forum,and he's a moderator lol

this place deserves to die.

What the hell are you getting hysterical about? So f***ing what if I wished him good luck with his site. What does that prove?

This place deserves to die? What do you mean by that? If you don't like it here then you know where the door is.

That's why I keep saying, Dan probably won't be back now that he's got his own place to talk about what he wants to talk about, although risky but still. I guess everyone suggest we attack him for it instead

[WanderingProtagonist]

A man being with a teenage girl who is physically mature enough to have children if he rightly married her with her father's permission and treats her well is not perverted like a man having sex with another man, including men who have fake vaginas.

quoted,so the authorities can see this and take the right actions regarding you.You're sick dude.

consensual sex between two adults is not nearly the same as having sex with a child.

I'm actually shocked and disappointed so many people are on this pedo's side,people are showing their true colors.@Pixel--Dude even wished him a good luck with his pedo forum,and he's a moderator lol

this place deserves to die.

What the hell are you getting hysterical about? So f***ing what if I wished him good luck with his site. What does that prove?

This place deserves to die? What do you mean by that? If you don't like it here then you know where the door is.

That's why I keep saying, Dan probably won't be back now that he's got his own place to talk about what he wants to talk about, although risky but still. I guess everyone suggest we attack him for it instead

Probably. On his forum he can talk about whatever he wants, but here he has to play by Winston's rules. I've warned him about making threads about this kind of thing before and had to remove a couple of them.

I think Dan is weird and I don't understand his fascination with the kinds of "women" that he likes. But I don't see what the above hysteria was about with certain people crying about how not joining the witch hunt somehow makes you an advocate for unsavoury behaviour

I don't care what DanSilly does on his own forum. If he's happier over there talking about whatever he wants to talk about then why should I have anything else to say about it other than what I said? Lol

I feel that people in general honestly can't at times help what they are attracted to. Even when age comes into the matter. It's taboo in all sure but at the end of the day people sometimes struggle with these things. Me personally I have given up on pursuing anyone at all period. I think when a person hits rock bottom and really hard it's even worse for them. They end up indulging in all kinds of addictions or developing all sorts of interest in things that may not be normal or according to society standards morally right. I think as the world falls completely apart there are going to be a lot of people doing shit that isn't all that natural...I even heard someone say that if the hunger gets really bad people might start cannibalizing each other...I don't think it'll get to that point but there are actual tribes alive today that eat human flesh.

I also remember seeing a video on youtube about these African soldiers that did that...They would kill their enemies and then eat them raw....It was disturbing as hell. Other than that I wish I was still a teenager, I honestly miss hitting on older women. I use to do it all the damn time because I was attracted to women that were old enough to be my mother...Now I see these same older women today as used up nobodies that made a career out of screwing around...They don't spark the interest like they use to in the early 90s. But neither do any of the 18 year olds and early 20 somethings....I just find little appeal in females anymore because the modern era has made so many of them less attractive....You end up with a liberal woman you'll regret every bit of it, especially if she's white.

[WanderingProtagonist]

I feel that people in general honestly can't at times help what they are attracted to. Even when age comes into the matter. It's taboo in all sure but at the end of the day people sometimes struggle with these things. Me personally I have given up on pursuing anyone at all period. I think when a person hits rock bottom and really hard it's even worse for them. They end up indulging in all kinds of addictions or developing all sorts of interest in things that may not be normal or according to society standards morally right. I think as the world falls completely apart there are going to be a lot of people doing shit that isn't all that natural...I even heard someone say that if the hunger gets really bad people might start cannibalizing each other...I don't think it'll get to that point but there are actual tribes alive today that eat human flesh. I also remember seeing a video on youtube about these African soldiers that did that...They would kill their enemies and then eat them raw....It was disturbing as hell. I wish I was still a teenager, I honestly miss hitting on older women. Lord knows I use to do it all the damn time.

I don't think social conventions are really a bad thing. I think we do need universally agreed upon morals and principles by which everyone should stick by. I think consent is a big part of this. I don't have anything against gays like @Mr.Mistoffelees f***ing each other behind closed doors and I don't give a crap about people like @CaptainSkelebob2 sleeping with ladyboys because among all parties their is consent.

When it comes to the topic of people attracted to children, I think it's morally reprehensible because a child cannot consent. They do not even know what they are consenting to. It's abuse and it's wrong.

For the record, I don't think @dancilley fits the above description. Even though he made a thread which I had to delete about how "pedophilia" will save America. Something like that. He's attracted to teenagers, not prepubescent children. The term that best describes him is Hebophile. Or something like that.

I'm still not condoning what he advocates for though. Personally I think a grown man in his 30s dating anyone younger than 20 years old is a bit f***ing dodgy. Even if they are "biologically developed" mental development in females still doesn't finish maturing until at least 25 years old. That's why most countries have universally agreed that anyone under the age of 18 should still be considered a child, because mentally they still are!

In my opinion, and I mean no disrespect when I say this, but grown men who are into young girls should grow the f**k up themselves and find someone closer to their own age. They're just behaving like silly fantasists.

Well I strongly disagree with this. If a man wants a date slightly under 18 and if he's legally allowed to then I don't see how that constitute as problematic. I don't see how it makes him less mature and not everyone wants someone their own age either, I don't want a damn 37 year old woman. Telling a man he shouldn't be messing around with 18 year olds is laughable. The only reason other nations are saying 18 and up it's because they do what America sorry ass tells them to.

But throughout history men have always chose younger females over older ones and this include men that can kick your ass too. Choosing a younger female doesn't disqualify a man as being someone who "needs to grow up." I call false on that under 18 means a person is still a child too. This is why Africans and Muslims are running wild all over Europe. They don't think this way in their society. And these men will go after younger girls, but who's ballsey enough to tell them they can't? Sure as hell isn't the white boys who are getting colonized like a bunch of stupid bitches fearing the word "You're racist."

By 13 you are considered a grown man in Africa, not a child. And it's because of that mentality they come from a tougher environment than all these coddled ass mutha fuckers in White countries who can't even see that they are being invaded and shit by Islamic males and Africans because they don't have the foresight to defend their territory against men who were taught these things much younger. Even Vietnamese kids are smart enough to pick up a rifle and fight an invader trying to colonize them.

You know how old Dante Masemune was in Japan when he lead his fathers army to battle and whooped ass everywhere he went? He was only 14 years old dude, not 20, not 30, 14 years old commanding a military and winning all over Japan. That "they are still kids" stuff is a bunch of nonsense. People are only kids because the Gov have kept people stuck in that mindset that they are children until they tell you when you can finally be a grown up. But you have "kids" who can build stuff now, owning their own businesses, and everything. I've known 16 year olds who live on their own. In China most kids are way ahead of kids in every other country because their parents teach them EVERYTHING at an early age. That is why they have such an advantage because they aren't coddled even in a communist country.

In actuality age really don't mean shit. Unless you really are a child and or act like one. But by the time most people are 12 years of age, they aren't all nearly as stupid, fragile, confused or incapable of understanding as people paint them out to be. I knew what sex was at age 11 because my uncle always sat us down and had the talk about it. We didn't need the gov permission to learn about this shit, that was up to the men in my family to teach us how important it was and I grew up very smart about it which is why I don't have kids out of wedlock or anything. Some people learn faster than others do. When I was about 16 or 17 I chased women in their 30s for marriage because I felt that I was responsible enough to have a wife much older than myself. My attitude was, f**k what society thought. Adult women in their 30s was sexy to me. But I would never pursue a 37 or 40+ year old in my late 30s...I'd prefer a 20 or whatever the legal age I'm allowed to have. But since I don't care about dating or pursuing anymore...I'm on the fence. I haven't dated since I was 17 years old. I'm going to die old and alone. And I had three cats before, so I guess that makes me the male version of a Cat lady.

[dancilley]

A man being with a teenage girl who is physically mature enough to have children if he rightly married her with her father's permission and treats her well is not perverted like a man having sex with another man, including men who have fake vaginas.

quoted,so the authorities can see this and take the right actions regarding you.You're sick dude.

consensual sex between two adults is not nearly the same as having sex with a child.

I'm actually shocked and disappointed so many people are on this pedo's side,people are showing their true colors.@Pixel--Dude even wished him a good luck with his pedo forum,and he's a moderator lol

this place deserves to die.

Why would it be moral for an 18-year-old to get married on the day of her 18th birthday, but immoral the day before? In a lot of places, teens can marry with parental permission. It's an issue of very recently-developed social norms in the west and not morality. You can quote my post. No big deal. I am not breaking the law or encouraging anyone to break the law.

There is no reason for a man wanting to marry a virgin to focus on underaged girls. Cilley's forum looks like a bait and switch. If he likes them young, legal 18-year-olds don't look that much different from 17-year-olds either.

Ethically, a man should get permission from her father to marry her anyway.

Marrying a 17-year-old and a man having sex with a man are not even in the same ballpark. The latter is perversion. Sex with a man's surgical hole is just warped and sick.

A pedophile is someone who is sexually interested in prepubescent children. Puberty is defined by the U.S. government at medlineplus.gov as normally occurring during the ages of 10-14 for girls.

Pubescent means "arriving at or having reached puberty."

So prepubescent means before puberty...which means age nine and younger for girls.

The mainstream media has programmed society to believe that it is wrong to desire girls under 18 because that is pedophilia, and pedophilia is morally wrong.

But pedophilia is being attracted to girls aged nine and younger.

What people have to realize, is that girls reach sexual maturity by age 14, and menstruate at age 12 on average...so they strongly desire sex...but the parents want to make sure she spends her virginity on the best man possible. It's likely that she will not be able to judge and vet males as well as her parents can, that's why it's only legal to have sex with a young teen girl if you get married first (which requires a parent's and judge's permission). They just want to ensure the male is good enough for her to spend her virginity on. They don't want her selling herself short, and definitely obviously want to prevent an adult male from taking advantage of her naivete, and convincing her that he is good enough for her, and pressuring her into having sex with him or something like that so that she physically engages with him, but will regret it later. They want to prevent her from being deflowered and dumped and single again...because she can no longer marry very high quality men at that point (the best quality men only marry virgins).

But yeah, I think most people don't actually think the above, but just think it is 100% wrong for a girl under 18 to date at all, or at least 16. And they may believe she can only date teen males.

But in my opinion, we need to help girls get married as early as they can express desire of their own to, so that they can safely express their sexual desires. It's depressing to be single and alone, and feel desire for a mate...this causes the female to go out and find a mate. Society needs to prevent this from happening, so that the female does not find a mate who will casually deflower her, and then leave her single and non-virgin.

Being a pure virgin is what makes a girl valuable. That's why there are statutory rape laws in place to protect them...so they don't lose their virginity. When a girl loses her virginity outside of wedlock, it is a big loss. She can no longer marry a high-value man. That's why anyone who has sex with a girl under the age of consent will go to prison for years. It's serious. But if a woman has sex with a boy, it's not a big deal, because being a virgin is not what makes a boy valuable. The virginity of a girl is extremely valuable because high-value males pass up all females who are no longer a virgin. As a girl, once you have "been around the block," you are trash for marriage purposes. No one wants to seriously date you for marriage; if you have a boyfriend, he will date you indefinitely without marrying you because he is not passionate enough about you and is on the lookout for someone better (a virgin). If you are a virgin though, you still have a chance at life.

When a man takes a female's virginity outside of wedlock, he is disrespecting that girl. I used to be vaguely conscious of this, that if a male does not want to marry a female, but instead has sex out of wedlock, he is disrespecting her. I thought that used to be common sense in our society. For decades now, that has disappeared, and all females now seem to not think of their purity as valuable. There is programming that encourages promiscuity and expressing yourself sexually with whomever you want, and that placing value on female purity is archaic and just not something that matters anymore. This is programming though, and not what actually matters to people. If people were to lie down and just think about what matters in life, and not be constantly watching TV or YouTube videos or whatever, then they would realize what I have realized. Maybe they need someone like me to tell them that they actually do desire pure virgin girls. It actually was a gay black man in jail who introduced these ideas to me. He actually told me, "Trust me, you do" (desire a 15-year old) when I told him about the crime (of which I was wrongly convicted).

We need to break through the programming. Ask yourself, "If I could, would I date girls under 18? What age would I date? If it were socially acceptable, would I pursue junior high girls? Are they actually sexually arousing to me...or does a female suddenly become sexually arousing when she is 16, 17, or 18? Do I want to marry a 13- or 14-year-old because she is more pure than a 16- or 17-year-old? Do I want to marry the purest girl possible so that I can have the best odds of creating a strong marriage with her, as opposed to an uncooperative one? Do I want to settle for a 16-year-old who may be still a vaginal virgin, but who has reached second or third base? Are girls in junior high too immature for marriage...or is marriage, reproduction, and being a good wife and mother automatic to them if they find the right man? Am I willing to encounter resistance from society when I tell people I am attracted to menstruating females (ages 12 on average and up)? Am I willing to be threatened by some men, and shamed by women? Am I willing to possibly lose my job over this? Am I willing to have evil people produce hateful videos about me online that are slanderous? Or, do I acknowledge that I am attracted to females 12 and up, but I would rather choose to avoid all the resistance from society, and will just choose to only date 18 and up? Or, am I an NPC/normie and it is impossible for me to think for myself, so I will always believe 100% that it is wrong to date females under 18, and I will always think of men who do so as pedophiles? Do I realize that preventing a sexually mature person from engaging in sexual activity is unreasonable...or do I think it's fine to deprive a girl from so, and force her to masturbate and menstruate for years until age 16 or 18? Does wasting reproductive potential matter? Does producing a baby make a person happy? Does producing as many babies as a person possibly can make them happier? Do women who waited until they were in their 30's and largely infertile and struggling to conceive regret not getting married as early as possible?

[WanderingProtagonist]

Well, I am done with this topic...It's rather boring now. And that is a lot of writing...
I read some of it but, I don't know what else to add to all of it really. So, I'll go and make a thread about war movies instead.
I said my long winded bit to counter Pixel dude's response about age and maturity, etc. Because I felt that he overlooks the fact that age doesn't make a person an adult when they reach a specific age and are old enough to be self aware of things in the world. By age 13 most people already know what sex is...Saying a 17 year old can't consent is absurd as hell. And I'm 100 percent positive every man on this site that got laid didn't wait until they were 24+ and f***ed some girl of the same age or made sure that every lay they had was with a woman the same age as themselves. Most men at least want a girl that's 18 or 20 years old. Especially wealthy males. That's the whole reason why they always divorce their old one and get a younger one. I heard Putin did something like that.

[kangarunner]

@dancilley I remember when you put on your Gab channel, "Live The Best Life Possible". I think that's something worth striving for. I hope you do just that but please stay within the law. I think everyone here wants to see you be the best person you can be.

[dancilley]

When it comes to the topic of people attracted to children, I think it's morally reprehensible because a child cannot consent. They do not even know what they are consenting to. It's abuse and it's wrong.

For the record, I don't think @dancilley fits the above description. Even though he made a thread which I had to delete about how "pedophilia" will save America. Something like that. He's attracted to teenagers, not prepubescent children. The term that best describes him is Hebophile. Or something like that.

I'm still not condoning what he advocates for though. Personally I think a grown man in his 30s dating anyone younger than 20 years old is a bit f***ing dodgy. Even if they are "biologically developed" mental development in females still doesn't finish maturing until at least 25 years old. That's why most countries have universally agreed that anyone under the age of 18 should still be considered a child, because mentally they still are!

A child under the age of consent cannot consent, unless she is married (in most states where it is legal to have sex with a minor if you are married to her). A child can consent if a parent and judge have approved the marriage, and sexual intercourse happens in a state where there is a marriage exception to statutory rape. It is legal to have sex with a minor to whom an adult is married (in most states).

Everyone is attracted to teenagers, but they are uncomfortable going there mentally. They may find it difficult to admit that they are attracted to teenagers. You are not attracted to teenagers? You weren't attracted to girls in high school?

Females don't have to be mentally mature in order to marry and produce babies and take care of them. Doing so is automatic--it's the most natural thing, like breathing air or drinking water when you're thirsty, or eating food when you are hungry. You are just parroting what the mainstream media says. The mainstream media wants everyone to believe that teen girls are incapable of being a good mother, that childbirth is a medical emergency, that raising children requires nearly a million dollars per child, etc. Only if a female is mentally abnormal--a sociopath or psychopath or schizophrenic or something like that--would she be unfit to be a mother. But normal, healthy girls of menstruating age won't have a problem taking care of children. What's so difficult about that? Does that require a lot of brain power? Maturity that only older females possess? Girls aren't able to take care of children? They will neglect them and let them die?

All women are children anyway. Females are not really designed to navigate the outside world; they are designed to be at home and have someone else guide them (their father or husband). They cannot handle the stress of the "real world." They thrive when indoors and protected from the elements. If they have a job, it is usually indoors. They thrive when at home under the financial care and physical protection of a man (living in a safe location isolated from crime). If limited to the home environment where they don't worry about finances at all because the husband takes care of that, then females thrive. They don't have to have a fully developed frontal lobe or whatever; the man requires that in order to be competitive in the employment marketplace; the female does not require the brainpower and discipline that managing money and going to work each day requires. The female gets to stay home, and the sounds and actions of her baby automatically cause her to act to provide appropriate care for the baby.

When a man goes to work, it feels good if he applies energy and action toward the production of income (resources). In other words, when he goes out and "makes a killing" and "brings home the bacon," it makes him feel good. When a woman does the same, it doesn't make her feel good, but she rather feels a sense of resentment and sadness that she has to be the one to do that (because a man is expected to). What makes her feel good is if she is around other females and men and is accepted and feels attractive. Purely making money doesn't make women happy because it's not built into them to; that's the man's job. Women are biologically programmed to receive resources from men. When at work, women do not work hard, unless to show off and get attention so that a potential husband takes notice. They cannot just focus on the work and earn money. They always have to be around other people and talking. They hate working. At least when a man works, he is motivated to work because when he earns the money and sees that paycheck, he gets to attract females and support his family. All women are oriented toward receiving attention and resources from a man; when a female is in a social environment, what gratifies her is when men are attracted to her, and women are friendly to her and provide emotional support. The proof of this is that women do not do jobs in which people are not close by (unless they are a masculine, lesbian female). If they are working as a telephone customer service representative at home, she very probably has a child in the home with her, but again, she is working a job where she is talking to people. They are very rarely truck drivers, security guards at night, firefighters, welders, electricians, plumbers, electrical linemen, etc. They don't have passion to really get their hands dirty and earn money. They may be a nurse who works 12-hour shifts, but they only do that because it is a last resort because they are too old to attract a husband who can fully provide financially for her, so they have to work, but their job is in a hospital where they are around a lot of people, and nurse jobs are by default 12-hour shifts; they can't work shorter shifts. All females who are married and who have a husband who makes good enough money stay home; they do not work. You may see women work as waitresses, but they are single or they are a single mother, and again, they are around a lot of people. It is very unnatural for a female to work outside the home. They must be under a huge amount of stress working outside the home and not being married. They are in a state of crisis and are hoping to market themselves to a potential husband. And if they are married and working outside the home, they aren't just working for extra income--what they are doing, is hoping to find a better husband who would earn enough money that would enable them to stay home. In a lot of cases, women just don't get married unless they can find a husband who would enable them to stay home; because what's the point of being married if she has to go to work each day? The husband doesn't want her to be around other men anyway.

The female is simply a vessel through which the man produces children, and she should also be a good cook. She provides domestic comfort (as Coach Red Pill said--R.I.P. by the way). What makes a wife not good is if she is a drug addict, alcoholic, marijuana addict, adulterer, etc. If she is pure and totally focused on the husband and family, everything is good. Aging from 13 to 18 will not improve a female's ability to be a good wife and mother. It will probably have the opposite effect due to if she has had experience with other males already, whom will attempt to communicate with her and distract her, or at least will interfere with her ability to pair-bond and give her husband undivided attention.