Lucas88 is right about white women

[Lucas88]

@Lucas88 You said Superior Aesthetics,I have noticed that mediterenneans have more feminine and more delicate'pretty'traits than Nordics,more exotic too as anthropologst carleton coon said about southern europeans being then the most delicate european race.

I find Germanics and Slavs to have somewhat 'bland'facial features,and not refined like mediterenneans.Mediterenneans are generally speaking,Mulattos of east african and nordic ANE european stock going back to prehistoric times.with a indo-european element outside semitic groups like Levantines.

In the UK and other Northern European countries, too many people including the women either look too plain due to their melanin-deficient pasty skin complexion or too much like coarse-looking and troll-like "barbarians". I used to joke that British people look too much like Neanderthals for me to find them attractive but now I know that they get their troll-like barbarian looks from the abundance of Eastern Hunter-Gatherer and Ancient North Eurasian blood which was brought into Northern Europe by the Yamnaya-related Indo-European Bell Beaker population. The Bell Beaker population was considerably brutish, barbaric and troll-like.

Southern Europeans usually have a greater proportion of Anatolian Farmer admixture and less Indo-European admixture and so they tend to have softer and more delicate features as well as good tanning genetics. For me, the average Albanian, Italian or Greek girl is far more attractive than the average British, German or Swedish girl. I always feel like I am surrounded by more attractive people when I'm in Southern Europe.

[galii]

Best looking latinas are basically Europeans it seems.

Peak Thalia

[kangarunner]

In the UK and other Northern European countries, too many people including the women either look too plain due to their melanin-deficient pasty skin complexion or too much like coarse-looking and troll-like "barbarians".

The Bell Beaker population was considerably brutish, barbaric and troll-like.

THE NORTHMAN !!!!!

[Lucas88]

Best looking latinas are basically Europeans it seems.

Peak Thalia

Thalía belongs to the Sodi family and is therefore mostly of Italian ancestry. She's Mediterranean, not pale Anglo White.

Many of the best-looking Latinas in Colombia are mixed. Paisas are widely regarded as incredibly beautiful and they typically have significant amounts of both European and indigenous ancestry and about 10-20% African admixture, the latter to bring out the ass.

[galii]

@Lucas88

Apparently many Swedes can get a tan.

Profile photo for John Martin
John Martin
·
Follow
Teacher (2018–present)Updated Apr 30
Related
Why among all the northern European people the Scandinavians are the only ones who are so blonde but yet get so easily and uniformly suntanned?
The answer is found in the History of European Genetics. The aboriginal people of Stone Age Europe had swarthy complexion and blue eyes. The Neolithic Farmers mixed with the European Hunter Gatherers (WHG) and created “Old Europeans.” The Old Europeans were thus dark haired and swarthy olive complexioned and brown-green-blue eyed. Then the Indo-Europeans invaded from the east and mixed with the Old Europeans. The result was that in Northern Europe, (Scandinavia, Germany and Slavic countries) the dark gene from the Old Europeans was high enough to cause many persons to tan easily.

The massive invasion during the Bronze Age (3000–1000 BC) by Indo-Europeans exterminated most of the male WHG’s and Neolithic Farmers in the fertile regions of Europe and took local women as wives or concubines. In Northern Europe, with the cold-damp weather, rugged mountains, and deep forests, large numbers of WHG survived, adopted agriculture, and increased their power. Thus, Old Europeans* had more power to resist the Indo-European invaders compared to their cousins of Southern and Western Europe. When the Indo-Europeans entered Northern Europe, they found that they could not exterminate the aboriginal Old European males and thus mixed with them.

Today the genetic makeup of Germanic peoples are almost evenly divided between R1b, R1a, and I1/I2. (R1b and R1a are Indo European markers, while I1 and I2 are “Old European” markers). In Southern and Western Europe I1/I2 are ~ 10-20%, except in the Balkans ~ 50%.

According to archaeological findings, the Bronze Age invaders were tall, muscular, fair skinned, Brown-blonde-reddish haired, and with brown-green-blue eyes. The WHG’s were heavily built with sallow/olive complexion and brown or blue eyes. The result was a mix of the WHG with the Indo-European invaders and explains why many Germanic, Celtic, and Slavic peoples have swarthy or sallow skin with blue eyes and can easily tan.

Celtic peoples have the highest numbers of light skinned people in Europe. This might be explained by the fact that most of the male Old Europeans were exterminated and the Indo-European invaders brought their women with them. Thus, continued invasions by Indo-Europeans caused minimal mixing. Celtic peoples carry around 70–80% R1b and this might explain why they are lighter skinned than the Germanic and Slavic peoples.

So it is no surprise why so many Germans and Scandinavians turn brown when exposed to the sun. This is because they carry 30–40% DNA from the WHG.*** As far as to why so many Germanic peoples have blonde hair, can be explained by genetic drift or elite domination. Anyway, the result is a blonde, blue-eyed population that tans very easily!

*Old Europeans are a mix of WHG and Neolithic Farmers.

** I1 and I2 in Sweden is 40% and ~ 30% in the rest of the Germanic countries. In the Balkans it's ~50% I2a1b.

https://www.quora.com/Are-Scandinavians ... -the-Irish

[69ixine]

I agree with you but where I find you wrong is in absolute peak beauty, yes white woman age and wear quicker compared to some other races but the most beautiful breathtaking features are found on white women in their peak. Even the old poster Contraire realized this, I don't care what feature it is. Weather you like big or small, eyes. tits, butts, pretty puss, legs, hips, hair color, even some of them when their skin burns they get this sheeny glow that blows all other groups away. The window is short for most like you say but the most beautiful ones when they peak it is like holy shit with the incredible features.

I can agree that there is a minority of Caucasian girls with elite beauty (e.g., brunettes with good enough tanning genetics to have a natural tanned skin complexion, a cute neotenous face, and a good well-formed figure with decent ass), but those types are a tiny minority of genetic outliers vs. the vast majority of melanin-deficient and weird-looking White girls. I perceive that the bulk of ordinary females from the White race tend to be somewhat uglier and more masculine than their ethnic/non-White counterparts while at the same time an exalted elite of Caucasian women sport exceptional looks. The White race is one of extremes.

However, I don't believe for one second that elite White women can compete with elite Latinas. High-quality Latinas have a special hybrid genetic makeup which combines the best aesthetic features of various races and grow up in a culture which selects for beauty and so elite Latinas (e.g., Colombian models, Miss Bumbum Brazil participants, etc.) are simply on another level. I might see a highly attractive genetic outlier Caucasian brunette from time to time and desire her, but then when I come across a high-quality Latina sometimes even on the same day, the bonerification is far more extreme to the point where I feel like a wild animal and only decades of civilized education stop me from outright mounting her in the street and in broad daylight.

As for White girls supposedly looking fantastic in their peak, I grew up in the UK and went to the beach with teenage females classmates and their milk-bottle legs and lobster-red burned complexion still looked ugly as fcuk despite them being in their peak. Lol! No sheeny glow masked their pasty ugliness. Lol! And very few of them had hips or ass that could compete with a Colombian schoolgirl of the same age. Almost all Colombian girls have some degree of African admixture ffs. They got the booty gene!

Good post.Mixed latinas look better than white women on the same level of looks.So do Mulattas.

Indian/pakistani Sindhi/Sinhalese women are also on a whole nother level if they look good,which most do.

It's insane how almost EVERY indian woman is at the very least pretty,and many times sexy on top of that.they have something endearing and more ancient about them in their looks.

Their Hair Genetics are out of this world.Their big almond feminine eyes,their fuller lips,their softer features etc Desi women have less deep set eyes than all other eurasians except east asians,people call them (and have called me)bug eyed as a insult,but it's actually a beautiful and endearing and FEMININE trait.

And the nice thing about being White guys like me and you,is we are heavily desired in latin america and South asia among browner women due to the beauty standard,and the fact men don't really value the Darker women as much,while in South Asia she would have issues even finding a mate.

Being from the west and more openminded me and you can see their superior beauty!lol

[Lucas88]

@Lucas88

Apparently many Swedes can get a tan.

Profile photo for John Martin
John Martin
·
Follow
Teacher (2018–present)Updated Apr 30
Related
Why among all the northern European people the Scandinavians are the only ones who are so blonde but yet get so easily and uniformly suntanned?
The answer is found in the History of European Genetics. The aboriginal people of Stone Age Europe had swarthy complexion and blue eyes. The Neolithic Farmers mixed with the European Hunter Gatherers (WHG) and created “Old Europeans.” The Old Europeans were thus dark haired and swarthy olive complexioned and brown-green-blue eyed. Then the Indo-Europeans invaded from the east and mixed with the Old Europeans. The result was that in Northern Europe, (Scandinavia, Germany and Slavic countries) the dark gene from the Old Europeans was high enough to cause many persons to tan easily.

The massive invasion during the Bronze Age (3000–1000 BC) by Indo-Europeans exterminated most of the male WHG’s and Neolithic Farmers in the fertile regions of Europe and took local women as wives or concubines. In Northern Europe, with the cold-damp weather, rugged mountains, and deep forests, large numbers of WHG survived, adopted agriculture, and increased their power. Thus, Old Europeans* had more power to resist the Indo-European invaders compared to their cousins of Southern and Western Europe. When the Indo-Europeans entered Northern Europe, they found that they could not exterminate the aboriginal Old European males and thus mixed with them.

Today the genetic makeup of Germanic peoples are almost evenly divided between R1b, R1a, and I1/I2. (R1b and R1a are Indo European markers, while I1 and I2 are “Old European” markers). In Southern and Western Europe I1/I2 are ~ 10-20%, except in the Balkans ~ 50%.

According to archaeological findings, the Bronze Age invaders were tall, muscular, fair skinned, Brown-blonde-reddish haired, and with brown-green-blue eyes. The WHG’s were heavily built with sallow/olive complexion and brown or blue eyes. The result was a mix of the WHG with the Indo-European invaders and explains why many Germanic, Celtic, and Slavic peoples have swarthy or sallow skin with blue eyes and can easily tan.

Celtic peoples have the highest numbers of light skinned people in Europe. This might be explained by the fact that most of the male Old Europeans were exterminated and the Indo-European invaders brought their women with them. Thus, continued invasions by Indo-Europeans caused minimal mixing. Celtic peoples carry around 70–80% R1b and this might explain why they are lighter skinned than the Germanic and Slavic peoples.

So it is no surprise why so many Germans and Scandinavians turn brown when exposed to the sun. This is because they carry 30–40% DNA from the WHG.*** As far as to why so many Germanic peoples have blonde hair, can be explained by genetic drift or elite domination. Anyway, the result is a blonde, blue-eyed population that tans very easily!

*Old Europeans are a mix of WHG and Neolithic Farmers.

** I1 and I2 in Sweden is 40% and ~ 30% in the rest of the Germanic countries. In the Balkans it's ~50% I2a1b.

https://www.quora.com/Are-Scandinavians ... -the-Irish

Fascinating information. I love reading about population genetics.

Yes, especially Sweden and Norway have higher proportions of I1a (highlighted in light green) and considerably less R1b than other Northern European countries such as England, Scotland, Ireland, Netherlands and even Denmark according to these pie charts:



Whenever I've seen walking videos of Sweden, I notice a preponderance of pale-skinned people, but I suppose that a sizeable minority of Swedes have the potential to tan if they get enough sun.

Germans and Austrians have always seemed hit and miss when it comes to tanning genetics whenever I've encountered them on holiday in Southern Europe. About half look like pasty dorks while the other half tan decently like Arnold Schwarzenegger.

[69ixine]

Best looking latinas are basically Europeans it seems.

Peak Thalia

Looks like a dude with those deep set eyes.

[Lucas88]

And the nice thing about being White guys like me and you,is we are heavily desired in latin america and South asia among browner women due to the beauty standard,and the fact men don't really value the Darker women as much,while in South Asia she would have issues even finding a mate.

Being from the west and more openminded me and you can see their superior beauty!lol

Indeed, brother. I've never cared about artificial beauty standards. They are merely culturally informed and have no objective basis in reality. I myself genuinely prefer darker mestizas and even mulatas. I also regard it as a major convenience that Latino men are now lusting after blondes and especially Slavic women in droves and don't perceive the types of Latinas that I like as particularly special. It only serves to take away some of the competition. I don't care about impressing other men and I've never wanted a trophy wife. I pursue what I desire sexually and couldn't give a damn if anybody thinks that my mestizas and mulatas are "low-status". I just love big ass. Lol!

Best looking latinas are basically Europeans it seems.

Peak Thalia

Looks like a dude with those deep set eyes.

To be honest, even most Latina transformers (aka T-gurls) look way hotter and more feminine than the typical White American or British female. LMAO!

[69ixine]

@Lucas88 I also don't care what other men think about my girls.

that is so cucked to care about that.As long as she gets me hard and treats me well,who cares?

I'm attracted to this pheno most(the aishwarya rai pheno,classic Gracile 'indid'type)







Actress Eesha Rebba and English Sikh punjabi model Neelam Gill,and a Rajasthani Tribal girl.

if I could nut in a similar woman's p***y while kissing her everyday,I could care less if I had no legs,I'd be a happy man!

I'm the kind of guy that does NOT want attention nor attention on my female,dirty as Ninjas trying to get with her!

As for T-gurls.Indian T-gurls are sexy,I wish I could f**k some Hijras in india when I go on my trip there lol I'm a christian so I will abstain,but Damn it sucks how Ethnic T-gurls are even hotter than most western foids.




Eesha love me in your room

[69ixine]

Lucas88 is a hot stud that bangs all the latinas!lol

Ay!Ay!





I'm the kina guy that doesn't try with women unless it's arranged marriage,I just go straight to the hookers lol this is my theme song lol AY!

[Lucas88]

@galii

Hey, I remembered that link that you posted on Swedish ancestral populations and the ability of modern Swedes to tan better due to the higher frequency of I1 ancestry.

A subset of the Swedish population definitely has a unique phenotype which combines golden tanned skin with extremely blonde hair. This musical duo from the 80s perfectly captures that look:








Even though I'm the forum's biggest Latina lover, those Swedish girls look attractive, have a unique glow to them, and certainly have charisma.

Granted this musical duo is from the 80s. People actually went outside and enjoyed the sun back then and so I imagine more people in Sweden had a healthy tan.

Here's a modern video just for reference:




Better version

[Moretorque]

@galii

Hey, I remembered that link that you posted on Swedish ancestral populations and the ability of modern Swedes to tan better due to the higher frequency of I1 ancestry.

A subset of the Swedish population definitely has a unique phenotype which combines golden tanned skin with extremely blonde hair. This musical duo from the 80s perfectly captures that look:








Even though I'm the forum's biggest Latina lover, those Swedish girls look attractive, have a unique glow to them, and certainly have charisma.

Granted this musical duo is from the 80s. People actually went outside and enjoyed the sun back then and so I imagine more people in Sweden had a healthy tan.

Here's a modern video just for reference:




Better version

Just like I told you the most beautiful features are on certain WHITE WOMEN. Some white women just have features that are more beautiful, no they do not wear well over time but when certain ones peak their beauty is unmatched.

[Lucas88]

Just like I told you the most beautiful features are on certain WHITE WOMEN. Some white women just have features that are more beautiful, no they do not wear well over time but when certain ones peak their beauty is unmatched.

Lili & Susie certainly look decent, and Swedish women are definitely on average more attractive than Anglo women, but for the obvious reason no White woman can compare to the magnificence of this:





It's just science, bro - the science of maximal gluteal hypertrophy.

[WanderingProtagonist]

Just like I told you the most beautiful features are on certain WHITE WOMEN. Some white women just have features that are more beautiful, no they do not wear well over time but when certain ones peak their beauty is unmatched.

Lili & Susie certainly look decent, and Swedish women are definitely on average more attractive than Anglo women, but for the obvious reason no White woman can compare to the magnificence of this:





It's just science, bro - the science of maximal gluteal hypertrophy.

Eww man....She repulses me, this is exactly why I dont like girls that look like this...Ghetto as f**k. I guess if thats what you like from a sexual standpoint, go for it. But I do not like ghettofied looking women. In fact white women today try to imitate this look, Go to Onlyfans or tiktok there are tons of white girls with bodies similar to this, it's not just Latino or black women anymore. But regardless I hate this shitty hood rat bitch look of the 21st century. When people say that White women can't compete with Latinos or black women because they don't have bodies like this, all I have to do is pull up a bunch of vids off onlyfans or tiktok and prove them dangerously wrong. Because there are white girls who have the same type of bodies and yes they can compete with this. But the fact still remains I hate the hood rat bitch look. Take me back to the 1990s, 1980s, 1970s hell even the 60s or 40s when women actually looked like normal beautiful people and not like they were trying out for a shitty Nicki MInaj CITY GIRLS music video.