Outcast9428 wrote: ↑January 27th, 2023, 11:21 pm
Lucas88 wrote: ↑January 27th, 2023, 11:00 am
You always assert that people who reject Christianity do so simply because they want to justify their own "sexual degeneracy", but as usual you are just utterly clueless and are simply projecting your own myopic and neurotic assumptions onto everybody else. You're a fool with a big mouth to speak (and preach) but without ears to listen. We don't reject Christianity because we want to have harems with dozens of women. Some people reject Christianity because its doctrines are completely irrational or because its "god" is utterly psychopathic and insane and its scriptures are chock-full of perverse, heinous, barbaric and immoral stuff or because the religion is psychologically abusive with its culture of fear and psychological manipulation.
Empty words and claims coming from somebody who clearly supports sexual degeneracy. If you weren't such a strong supporter of sexual liberalism maybe your claims would have some credibility. Acting like the New Testament bible supports blood sacrifice is bullshit ripped straight out Roman era accusations against Christianity. The fact of the matter is, I have never met somebody who had a major problem with Christianity, who did not support sexual liberalism. I'll let you know a secret though, there was a time when I an anti-Christian Agnostic too. I recognize every single argument you've made, and I know its all a lump of exaggerated bullshit. You've intentionally exaggerated the importance of the Old Testament to Christian morality... Yes there are passages written in the Old Testament with some pretty bad stuff in it, that's why Jesus came. Jesus was literally a complete pacifist... Which, you've indicated is a huge reason why you don't like Christianity. Your own criticisms of Christianity have contradictions in them. You say you don't like Christianity because its "psychopathic, perverse, and immoral." Yet you also say you don't like Christianity because it promotes weakness because it teaches pacifism and is excessively moralistic. Well, you can't have both. Either our doctrines are immoral and psychopathic or they are weak and pacifistic. Which one is it? Cause you can't be both at the same time.
But what you are telling people about the supposed need to accept "Christ" in order to have good things in life isn't even factually true. You are just lying to people and insulting their intelligence. The truth is that plenty of non-believers find a perfectly good spouse and live decent lives without that Christian nonsense. In non-Christian countries people who have never read the Bible and don't know anything about Jewsus still find happiness. But, of course, Christians always have to lie because their whole religion is founded on absurdities, lies and delusions.
If you're talking about people from countries that adhere to other religions, then it usually seems like God is fairly forgiving towards people who live a virtuous life but aren't consciously aware of his teachings. At the end of the day, Jesus did say that love is more important then faith. If someone lives a very Christian life despite not actually being identified as Christian, then God is going to prefer them over a person who identifies as Christian but lives a sinful life. But its still very important to have faith.
That being said, that mostly applies to people who live in countries where Christianity is generally unknown. It does not apply to intentional atheists, or crypto atheists, living in Christian or secular nations, who are well aware of Christ and openly despise his teachings.
Yes @willymonfrete believe it or not, you have to work in order to have nice things in life. You can't just sit around on your ass all day and expect to get anything. What is this nonsense about thinking you're going to go to hell for getting a certain haircut or using perfume? I've never seen anybody say that in my life, and I'm pretty sure I could ask all the Christians in my life right now "hey would you go to hell if you get a fade haircut?" And 100% of them would say no. You can ask MrMan right now if you're gonna go to hell for that and I'm pretty sure he would say no. So cut it out with your bullshit. You probably just got some people who simply thought it looked stupid and are exaggerating the incident.
This is why I said in another thread that modern people are pathetic... "Oh my God you expect me to work! How dare you!" Yes society expects you do what virtually 100% of the population has done in every previous generation to this one. You are not going to get a great sex life, material comfort, and guaranteed food and water while not having to anything for it. And good luck with finding any system on Earth that is going to tolerate some of y'all's unbelievable levels of laziness.
So if a girl is not a perfect, 10/10 virgin with a perfect personality you aren't going to work for a woman? Its no wonder your life is a mess. Imagine the reaction of any employer if I walked in and said "I expect you to pay me $500,000 a year or I won't work for you? And meanwhile I'm applying to watch security cameras all day? If you are going to demand a 10/10 looking virgin wife with a perfect personality then you better be a 10/10 looking virgin with a perfect personality yourself... Which, based on what you've written on this forum, I can tell you you definitely don't have. I don't have a perfect personality either, nobody does.
Do you understand how utterly unrealistic it is to be demanding a beautiful virgin who also has a high sex drive in today's largely secular world? You shit on religion and yet the only system in the world that could actually provide you with what you want is a hyper-religious, theocratic type society where everybody has to follow "all those stupid little rules" that you complain about? You could go a century into the past and you still would have struggled to find what you are talking about. Your best chance of finding something like that is a country like Saudi Arabia or Iran, but then you would actually be expected to work... Imagine that, having to hold up your end of the bargain in order to get nice things.
Yes,a woman has to be a 10/10 virgin with a nice personality for me to commit to her,because all relationships are transactional,and 'love'is a idealistic myth,and marriage is slavery.if your wife loved you she wouldn't foce you to work hard,she'd be fine living a minimalist lifestyle with a normal income in nature.but she wants it all,at your expense.
I'm not fooled by affection,a tool used by manipulators to disarm and control you,due to 'male mother need' .
I think you do not understand because you are so narrow minded and solipstistic due to your christian beliefs:
1.I want easy sex with beautiful women,and that can be had with prostitutes and the occassional tinder slut.
2.I don't want to work harder then what is necessary for my enjoyment,since i work to live and not vice-versa....especially without comensurate compensation,because otherwise it's slavery,which modern marriage truly is,because 'sex' and 'affection'will never compensate for drudgery and stress for the rest of your life.
a slavemaster cough cough wife will force you to be a real workhorse for her sole benefit,because no woman is capable of loving a man.
marriage is not comensurate compensation,and relationships are transcactional,just like prostitution.unconditional love doesn't exist except between you and God(for me that's the ultimate hermetic/advaita principle or 'Spanda',for you that's your abrahamic God)
I want STRESS-free life,I have had stress since a kid,your beloved jew on a stick never helped me even as a kid,didn't stop me from getting beat everyday at home,or bullied,or with a dying mother in poverty,despite me begging him and having faith.
3.I do want to work for what I want,and that is eventual expatriation to various countries and sleeping with cheap beautiful prostitutes,occasional fwbs,doing psychedelics,not slavery to a aging bitch that had other men's semen in her(and that alters her forever,and her dna is joined to him forever),and I have no right over.
4.some pentecostals do say fade haircuts,perfume,and even deoderant are sins.I was a pentecostal,and they think literally everything is from satan.
5.Abrahamic religions like islam and ypour version of xtianity,opress women,and I do not want any part in that.I don't want to force women to do anything.
I don't like to be forced to do anything,so why would i want to coerce women to do what I want them to do?it's sick sociopqaths like you that seek to coerce people to follow your version of morality.
female nature has been exposed by feminism,so it is also a blessing in disguise.
6.in holland,I used prostitutes for years,I was very happy,I was able to spend money on entertainment and certain psychedelics which made me happy.
7.I don't like any religion of fear and guilt,under Egyptian/Shaivite religion or enkiism or khemeticism,whatever you want to call it as they are all somewhat valid,and all have corresponding truths,though my interest is most in hermeticism and a khemetic lifestyle,with a epistemological basis in spanda kashmir shaivism,there are consequences of your actions,but not the slavish restrictions inhibiting the natural nature of humanity.
8.I don't 'shit on religion'I don't want to coerce people by force,fear or guilt to live up to a standard that they are not happy with it.
I believe in religion,and a ultimate spiritual principle,'vibrationless timeless spaceless vibration'-Spanda-shiva-shakti,whatever you want to label it as.
I follow 'the laws of Ma'at 'or basic caste obligation free dharma for hindu converts,and a khemetic lifestyle as my personal moral code I strive to attain for.nothing more or less.I don't need a sociopathic jewish subversive religion to tell me what is good above the wisdom of the gentile gods.