I decided I'm going to lay over 100 women ;)

[Outcast9428]

@MarcosZeitola

Shame, I read your old post on "faux traditionalists" and was proud of you for pointing that out. But having "side adventures" while you were married is very faux traditionalist. There is no "mostly faithful." You are faithful or you're not.

You're right, and I do remember that old post...

viewtopic.php?f=37&t=29144

I don't think this necessarily contradicts my points, however. The "faux traditionalist" I referred to is a man who wants to "have his cake and eat it too". He wants to complain about modern society, but he's a sterile husk of a man. He does not contribute, does not reproduce, he holds on to certain 'values' that he claims matter to him but he does not practice what he preaches.

A traditional, old-fashioned man would marry, and he'd bring home the bacon to his wife and family. If he has the time and resources, he may have an affair or two. A mistress, perhaps. It's quite common for a man to this, and still be a solid husband. Throughout history any man of means and substance usually had more than one woman, for a variety of reasons. Many maintained secret second families even; I have one myself, as a matter of fact, as of me writing this I have six biological children and next year will welcome two more, bringing the "grand total" to eight. A pretty solid score for a man in the 21th century, I'd say.

The "faux-traditionalist", more than anything, is a man who more or less is the male equivalent of the crazy cat-lady feminist: all high on morals and with very strong viewpoints, but ultimately a genetic dead-end who has a huge wash-list of complaints and reasons as to why he is a genetic dead-end but... goes nowhere, in the end.

Bottom line: don't be a faux-traditionalist. Be a Genghis Khan, be a Shaka Zulu or Attila. Not a neckbeard or a catlady with slightly better morals and a lot of creative excuses to explain away the emptiness and pointlessness of his existence.

Ghenghis Khan and Attila the Hun are you f***ing kidding me? You mean history's biggest thugs and degenerates? A thug who happened to lead an army is not a traditionalist just because he happened to live in the past. These men have no legacy except rape and murder. You might as well have pointed to MS-13 members or street thugs as great examples of traditionalists because they are anti-feminists.

All of this sounds like quintessential, faux traditionalist, right-leaning liberal nonsense. "I'm a man of means so I deserve multiple women!" Bullshit, the church would've had half your wealth forfeited in the past. Many right-leaning liberals seem under the impression that rich men were allowed mistresses in the past but this wasn't true. The church was just as aggressive about policing the behavior of rich men as they were of peasants. That's the primary reason why Christianity is special. The rules apply equally, you can't get away with being a degenerate while claiming that its your right as a certain kind of man.

https://www.eurocanadians.ca/2020/04/ke ... ility.html

A faux traditionalist would, yes, be the kind of guys who complain about women wanting providers. I don't expect nor want my woman to work. But I usually don't see this nearly as often as I see men who refuse to be loyal to one woman and then make a pathetic excuse to biology as for why they cannot remain faithful.

I saw my father remain faithful his entire marriage without any effort and I remained faithful to my ex girlfriend without any effort either. The shame of cheating on my woman would be the equivalent of cutting my hand off.

The "faux-traditionalist", more than anything, is a man who more or less is the male equivalent of the crazy cat-lady feminist: all high on morals and with very strong viewpoints, but ultimately a genetic dead-end who has a huge wash-list of complaints and reasons as to

That is a very faux traditionalist thing for you to say. Real traditionalists are about morality first, above everything. Real traditionalists have always been about overcoming humanity's bestial nature and sublimating it for the sake of building a more advanced civilization. Liberals have always been about giving into our bestial nature and returning to the law of the jungle where to the victor goes the spoils. Liberals are obsessed with tearing down all the rules of civilization and returning us to a more bestial type system of existence. Your philosophy sounds more in line with liberal philosophy even if you are a provider to your woman then it sounds in line with traditionalism.

My ex had a boyfriend who was just like that. He wanted her to be a stay at home wife and be the provider, but he had no standards for himself and cheated on her several times. He was always flirting with other women whenever he got the chance. Eventually my ex left him because of his behavior. After she left him, he ran off and slept with dozens of women, almost impregnating one. It used to piss me off while we were dating how many times I'd say something to her and found out that rat bastard had said the exact same thing to her. Thankfully, my ex told me at the time she knew I was genuine about it and that her ex was just a fake. That we had a lot of superficial similarities but no similarities deep down.

[Outcast9428]

@Lucas88

I wasn't saying @WilliamSmith is comfortable with it. I'm saying that the women he is talking about are the kind of women men are talking about when they say modern, Western women, in many cases, are just garbage. Literally trying to sleep with their boyfriend's best friend. That is such subhuman behavior it boggles my mind that they think men are such unprincipled and disloyal beasts that they'd go along with something like that. Women like this are often the kind who call men pigs but they are the real pigs.

If I were him, I would've told his friends about their girlfriends' behavior. These women cannot be trusted and should be kicked to the curb.

[Voyager1]

For me it's not a quantity issue but a quality issue. If I found one good one I'd keep her for several years before moving on to the next one.

100 women in 10 years means changing almost every month. That could be exhaustive.

Shemp has a good deal - a paid escort who he was even able to take with him to Moldova. He will tire of her eventually then move to the next one. Nothing wrong with that. She is being compensated.

[HouseMD]

I don't know, man. I could have easily gone just for numbers but I realized that quality of sex far outstrips quantity of partners as a goal. The number of women that can meet my standards is pretty low, so more women inevitably just leads to more disappointment compared to keeping a good one or two around at any given time.

[Outcast9428]

All of this sounds like quintessential, faux traditionalist, right-leaning liberal nonsense. "I'm a man of means so I deserve multiple women!" Bullshit, the church would've had half your wealth forfeited in the past. Many right-leaning liberals seem under the impression that rich men were allowed mistresses in the past but this wasn't true. The church was just as aggressive about policing the behavior of rich men as they were of peasants. That's the primary reason why Christianity is special. The rules apply equally, you can't get away with being a degenerate while claiming that its your right as a certain kind of man.

Nah, that's pretty fundamentally untrue. If you go into history and you look at noblemen and Kings, you'll see that pretty much every Christian King in history had mistresses and fathered bastard offspring by those mistresses. Same with all those Christian noblemen. Richard the Lionheart had a son by a mistress, his brother had a ton of mistresses too. All those Crusaders who went to "Free the Holy Land" f***ed around like crazy in the Middle-East, too, which is why even today Syria has a president with bright blue eyes lol. Hell, even among popes there are about a dozen who are recorded to have had mistresses, sexual relationships, even children. One Pope even made his own grandson a cardinal, and this happened only about 500 years ago lol.

The rules never applied equally. Only in idealistic Biblical parables but not in actual history.

That is a very faux traditionalist thing for you to say. Real traditionalists are about morality first, above everything. Real traditionalists have always been about overcoming humanity's bestial nature and sublimating it for the sake of building a more advanced civilization. Liberals have always been about giving into our bestial nature and returning to the law of the jungle where to the victor goes the spoils. Liberals are obsessed with tearing down all the rules of civilization and returning us to a more bestial type system of existence. Your philosophy sounds more in line with liberal philosophy even if you are a provider to your woman then it sounds in line with traditionalism.

Not exactly. I say liberals want to tear down existing rules and replace them by frankly ridiculous ones in which that "bestial nature" is subdued and rewards are given for low-testosterone men who are pushovers. Hence the whole "transgender" obsession and the feminization of young boys. They want young men to be soft-spoken little cuckolds and not manly men who take what is theirs. "Bestial nature" scares the shit out of them actually, they do not know how to handle it at all so they seek to eradicate it.

My ex had a boyfriend who was just like that. He wanted her to be a stay at home wife and be the provider, but he had no standards for himself and cheated on her several times. He was always flirting with other women whenever he got the chance. Eventually my ex left him because of his behavior. After she left him, he ran off and slept with dozens of women, almost impregnating one. It used to piss me off while we were dating how many times I'd say something to her and found out that rat bastard had said the exact same thing to her. Thankfully, my ex told me at the time she knew I was genuine about it and that her ex was just a fake. That we had a lot of superficial similarities but no similarities deep down.

I'm not "always flirting with other women whenever I get the chance, though. I do have my share of adventures, little side-quests here and there and will continue to do so. Variety is the spice of life. The greatest of Christian Kings throughout history and even the popes, bishops and priests historically couldn't keep it in their pants, either, which goes to show that morality, while important, is not absolute when it comes to men's sexual behavior. There need to be standards obviously but there are grades, there are layers, and levels to all of this.

As for me being a "right-leaning liberal", I am not sure if I agree with that assessment. Afterall for a man to be 'liberal' he would have to give certain rights to women. I'm not all too enthusiastic about giving them any. But then I've personally always been more "Taliban" than "Crusader Kings" anyway.

That is not true, Kevin Macdonald looked at 18 kings in England’s history from 1100 to about 1500 or so and found that only 8 of them had mistresses and that most of those 8 were before 1300. The more control the church had the more aggressive they became about policing the noblemen and royalty. King Henry VIII had to completely establish his own church just to get away from the Catholic Church’s attempts to control his sexual behavior.

People like to mention the popes but they can only think of the Borgias.

Liberals make fun of trannies all the time, you’re confusing liberals with progressives. Being high in testosterone doesn’t make you act like a beast. Nobody should feel proud of themselves for resembling a chimpanzee in behavior.

That whole “it’s cool if men are promiscuous but not if women are” is the bread and butter of right leaning liberal ideology. That whole bullshit about keys and locks is something they are obsessed with. There is no lesser degree of moral evil when a man sleeps around compared to when a woman does. Every man who sleeps around is empowering the same behavior from women. A man who sleeps around supports women acting like whores whether he vocally says so or not.

[CaptainSkelebob]

Ive become a bit of a traditionalist myself lately in a manner of speaking
I have already achieved this guys dream and banged over 100 women
Probably got kids everywhere
But now Ive decided I want a Thai bride
Someone who is completely subservient to me and knows a womans role in the household......................... and I'd probably still bang other women on the side.

[Outcast9428]

Ive become a bit of a traditionalist myself lately in a manner of speaking
I have already achieved this guys dream and banged over 100 women
Probably got kids everywhere
But now Ive decided I want a Thai bride
Someone who is completely subservient to me and knows a womans role in the household......................... and I'd probably still bang other women on the side.

Then you’re not a traditionalist. You’re just another degenerate pretending to be. Quite frankly men like you don’t deserve a wife.

[Outcast9428]

Christ alive, to go from Hungary to this forum just goes to show how rotten to the core Anglo countries really are. In Hungary I had no trouble finding conservatives who walk the talk and are fully committed to it. My tour guide was ranting about how men who slept around ruin girls for the rest of us and how he doesn’t want to clean up another man’s shit. Hungary was the first society I’ve ever seen where hookups are disapproved of by the majority of society. It’s not even just “the conservatives” who dislike them there. In Hungary being anti hookups is just the default.

Then I come to this stinking, God forsaken place and none of the so called conservatives here are capable of following even the most basic principles of being a conservative and brag about cheating on their wives.

@Lucas88 All I can say is that I vastly prefer guys like you over this disgusting bunch of hypocrites who act entitled to cheating on their wives.

[HouseMD]

Christ alive, to go from Hungary to this forum just goes to show how rotten to the core Anglo countries really are. In Hungary I had no trouble finding conservatives who walk the talk and are fully committed to it. My tour guide was ranting about how men who slept around ruin girls for the rest of us and how he doesn’t want to clean up another man’s shit. Hungary was the first society I’ve ever seen where hookups are disapproved of by the majority of society. It’s not even just “the conservatives” who dislike them there. In Hungary being anti hookups is just the default.

Then I come to this stinking, God forsaken place and none of the so called conservatives here are capable of following even the most basic principles of being a conservative and brag about cheating on their wives.

@Lucas88 All I can say is that I vastly prefer guys like you over this disgusting bunch of hypocrites who act entitled to cheating on their wives.

Weird, Hungary wasn't like that at all when I went there a few years back. I mean it was somewhat conservative, sure, but the women were actually pretty wild. Hungary didn't have such a high abortion rate because they were keeping it in their pants, my friend.

[flowerthief01]

That whole “it’s cool if men are promiscuous but not if women are” is the bread and butter of right leaning liberal ideology. That whole bullshit about keys and locks is something they are obsessed with. There is no lesser degree of moral evil when a man sleeps around compared to when a woman does. Every man who sleeps around is empowering the same behavior from women. A man who sleeps around supports women acting like whores whether he vocally says so or not.

THIS. It was always obvious to me that that lock and key nonsense was an excuse to justify what they already wanted to do or were already doing. And I'm not even a conservative.

Then you’re not a traditionalist. You’re just another degenerate pretending to be. Quite frankly men like you don’t deserve a wife.

A degenerate and worse. "Probably" having kids everywhere (or even anywhere) and not knowing it is unethical and reprehensible to begin with, and anyone who "lays over 100 women" is that by definition, because how then would you even know where kids of yours might be? Even knowing that there's just one kid you're not taking care of drops my respect for a person (man or woman, it doesn't matter) by a thousand leagues.

Oh wait...does that include our dear leader? *hand on mouth in shock* If that were so then there would be no mystery how a forum started by a degenerate got to become full of degenerates.

[Outcast9428]

Christ alive, to go from Hungary to this forum just goes to show how rotten to the core Anglo countries really are. In Hungary I had no trouble finding conservatives who walk the talk and are fully committed to it. My tour guide was ranting about how men who slept around ruin girls for the rest of us and how he doesn’t want to clean up another man’s shit. Hungary was the first society I’ve ever seen where hookups are disapproved of by the majority of society. It’s not even just “the conservatives” who dislike them there. In Hungary being anti hookups is just the default.

Then I come to this stinking, God forsaken place and none of the so called conservatives here are capable of following even the most basic principles of being a conservative and brag about cheating on their wives.

@Lucas88 All I can say is that I vastly prefer guys like you over this disgusting bunch of hypocrites who act entitled to cheating on their wives.

Weird, Hungary wasn't like that at all when I went there a few years back. I mean it was somewhat conservative, sure, but the women were actually pretty wild. Hungary didn't have such a high abortion rate because they were keeping it in their pants, my friend.

Damn it must have changed fast. I went to the nightclubs and bars there and it was the tamest nightlife experiences I’d ever had. I didn’t see anybody hooking up or grinding or anything. The people were mostly young people too. Almost all of them looked 18-25 or so.

[HouseMD]

Christ alive, to go from Hungary to this forum just goes to show how rotten to the core Anglo countries really are. In Hungary I had no trouble finding conservatives who walk the talk and are fully committed to it. My tour guide was ranting about how men who slept around ruin girls for the rest of us and how he doesn’t want to clean up another man’s shit. Hungary was the first society I’ve ever seen where hookups are disapproved of by the majority of society. It’s not even just “the conservatives” who dislike them there. In Hungary being anti hookups is just the default.

Then I come to this stinking, God forsaken place and none of the so called conservatives here are capable of following even the most basic principles of being a conservative and brag about cheating on their wives.

@Lucas88 All I can say is that I vastly prefer guys like you over this disgusting bunch of hypocrites who act entitled to cheating on their wives.

Weird, Hungary wasn't like that at all when I went there a few years back. I mean it was somewhat conservative, sure, but the women were actually pretty wild. Hungary didn't have such a high abortion rate because they were keeping it in their pants, my friend.

Damn it must have changed fast. I went to the nightclubs and bars there and it was the tamest nightlife experiences I’d ever had. I didn’t see anybody hooking up or grinding or anything. The people were mostly young people too. Almost all of them looked 18-25 or so.

Were you in Budapest? That was the party capital of Europe around 10 years ago, sad to hear if it's fallen so far. Though I guess it does show that degeneracy can be reversed if so.

[Outcast9428]

Christ alive, to go from Hungary to this forum just goes to show how rotten to the core Anglo countries really are. In Hungary I had no trouble finding conservatives who walk the talk and are fully committed to it. My tour guide was ranting about how men who slept around ruin girls for the rest of us and how he doesn’t want to clean up another man’s shit. Hungary was the first society I’ve ever seen where hookups are disapproved of by the majority of society. It’s not even just “the conservatives” who dislike them there. In Hungary being anti hookups is just the default.

Then I come to this stinking, God forsaken place and none of the so called conservatives here are capable of following even the most basic principles of being a conservative and brag about cheating on their wives.

@Lucas88 All I can say is that I vastly prefer guys like you over this disgusting bunch of hypocrites who act entitled to cheating on their wives.

Weird, Hungary wasn't like that at all when I went there a few years back. I mean it was somewhat conservative, sure, but the women were actually pretty wild. Hungary didn't have such a high abortion rate because they were keeping it in their pants, my friend.

Damn it must have changed fast. I went to the nightclubs and bars there and it was the tamest nightlife experiences I’d ever had. I didn’t see anybody hooking up or grinding or anything. The people were mostly young people too. Almost all of them looked 18-25 or so.

Were you in Budapest? That was the party capital of Europe around 10 years ago, sad to hear if it's fallen so far. Though I guess it does show that degeneracy can be reversed if so.

Yup I was in Budapest. Even Budapest feels conservative. My tour guide also talked about how families should not have two careers and that women should be at home while we were standing on a crowded bus .

[WilliamSmith]

Wow, look at all these thought-provoking responses, LOL, I'll have to put some time into this and get back to the replies later, but for now I just return to the general subject...

Actually, here's a question for all you guys:

What is your personal code when it comes to this, your set of rules and ethics about what you will or won't do if you're like me and @Lucas88 and @E Irizarry R&B Singer and the others who think this is OK?

The guys who claim they lost count and probably have unknown kids sprinkled all over the world don't have much of any rules.

@MarcusZeitola sounds like he does have principles, and yet talks "conquests" and seems to say it's OK even if he's cheating on his long-term relationship babe if I read that right, LOL, which I myself wouldn't do.

@Pixel--dude, what about you?

My own rules are:

No lying.

No being mean to the women, including no attempts to do any mind games, dirty tricks, get them too drunk. (In other words, no being mean, minimize odds of "buyer remorse" in the chicks even if I manage to lay them on date #1.)

No nailing married women or women in serious relationships.

Oh, and I use condoms every time without exceptions, but I don't ever want to have it on my conscience to tell a chick to get an abortion, which means:
I don't have to be monogamous ever, but if I get any of the women knocked up then I have to take care of our kid that pops up and be present as a good father, even though I don't have to let the woman get me by the balls or do any other compliant beta male BS. I wonder if I get a chick knocked up then, if I should try to marry her in a open relationship that also has a rock-solid prenuptial contract to protect my financial assets from her, and also stop her from being able to unreasonably take the kids completely away in event of a divorce....
(That's probably the #1 thing against doing this: There's some wisdom in having the prudential restraint to only nail women who you wouldn't mind having a kid with and think would be a good mother, just in case the condoms and whatever birth control she might be on don't get the job done... Well I'll still aim to do that, it's possible, but I'm in such a good mood since deciding to do this instead of just the 2-3 girlfriends/FWBs thing, that I might end up bending the rules a bit and laying a lot of women who wouldn't exactly make ideal partners in raising a kid, even if they knew it was an open relationship going into it...)

The only other thing I have against this is that I'm a little nervous since such an alarmingly high percentage of the normie population are vax lemmings... I don't exactly hold it against them (and don't want them all to die just because they took the clotshots, unlike Cornfed), but I want to give women massive orgasms and don't want vaxxed hotties dropping dead on me in bed from premature myocarditis when I was just trying to get them excited showing them a good time, that would be a total nightmare...

Not really a rule, but one other caveat: I think I have a decent knack for ID'ing and dodging potential female psychos, but of course it's possible I'd have a bad surprise there.
But I think the risk/reward tradeoff is still in my favor, and chances are pretty good I'd survive an assault even if I landed a few nuts.... We shall see!

One more thing...

Now that I'm undertaking this noble quest, pretty sure thing I'll be laying quite a few more white women than I otherwise would've been (not that I don't like white women, but since I want to leave with my black girlfriend to the Caribbean if we're still together, and/or leave to East or South East Asia otherwise, I wasn't expecting to be landing as many)...

I still like white women so that's fine, but I also need to think about the ethics of whether I should also be laying jewish girls too. I noticed in days of youre that they tend to like me and are pretty easy lays usually (not that I've been trying for quite awhile). So I'm sure they'd obviously be all for the lay, but I wonder if I should hold off and pass on them because of my own views. (As I said elsewhere, some of my views could theoretically be construed as having ever so slightly "antisemitic" undertones. But most of the chicks who like getting nailed by confident alpha types wouldn't give a shit about my moral principles anyway regardless of what they claim, unless possibly they were after a serious relationship, but that won't apply in our case....)

Deep thoughts, deep thoughts....

[E Irizarry R&B Singer]

I've been thinking about it *very* maturely, and I've decided I'm going to nail over 100 women.

Some other veteran womanizers gave me the idea.
Some older gents I've been talking to, and guys like Casanova have done that, and after putting some thought into it, I think it's a good idea for me to do it too.
We even have one on here on Happier Abroad with a 100+ count: @E Irizarry R&B Singer.
Thanks for the extra inspiration man.

I've got a brutal hangover (again), but I'm in a good mood, and am so horny I can barely think straight, even though my vision's kinda blurry.
But I don't want to have to keep going on these intermittent intemperate Mel Gibson-ish outbursts because of being so upset from watching warmongering sexually perverted satanic jews and homosexuals turn everything into a world of shit, and have to feel bad about it so much.

So I decided to make a really good decision and commit to a much better alternative: I'm going to nail over 100 women, instead of just lazily having 2-3 girlfriends and friends with benefits types.

It's going to be fun.

Also, if I have any sons at some point, then I can teach them everything I know so they know what they're doing with women, even if they don't want to go after the women as much as me.

For me, no "p4p" allowed though (I get it a lot of you guys who go for that are just horny and that's OK but I don't like it, and I worry too much about the women and could just never stick it in a woman who was being paid rather than one who actually wanted me to jump her bones), I'll have to only bag the chicks who actually want to jump in the sack with me, same as now.

Also, I'm of Scottish heritage and no way in hell am I going for any of this "sugar daddying" nonsense or SMV BS either.

I like romance the best, but I still want to lay a lot of women. I love one of my girlfriends (she loves me too) and I'm willing to stay together indefinitely if she wants, but I still want more women on the side even if we do.

Women, women, women!!!
*maniacal laughter*

I was already obsessed with women and sex, but gotta admit I wasn't really shouldering my fair share of the burden when it comes to laying the women in quantity, and I decided that needs to change. Especially with so many MGTOW going into "monk mode" and so many formerly hetero men turning into a bunch of mentally and physiologically screwed up homos and trannies, all those millions of ovulating women who desperately want a real man inside them bad are just going to be getting more and more desperate, frustrated, and neurotic in these times, so it's time I stepped up and gave more of them what they all want.


I was also joking that I wished I'd been more of a "Don Juan" when I was younger now that I know what a bunch of horny sensuality-addicted little monsters women love to be if they can get away with it without everyone being mean to them, LOL, so working my way up toward 100+ should help me put my $$ where my mouth is there and actually become more of a genuine ladies' man who really has an even more smooth and relaxed sense of total confidence leading the women and giving 'em what they all want.

You're quite welcome, mate. @ the beginning of Spring '23, I'm returning to one of my honeycomb hideout countries to smash 50 pros in 5-6 months. I will try to fck all of them bareback, too. A couple of rules to barebacking:

- Never smash a gal that has kaposi sarcoma that you can visibly see. That's early to mid stages of the host having an HIV infection which will move to advanced within months to years depending on how the host takes care of themselves, t-cell count, etc. In my best Andrew Tate voice, "Those whores sometimes get tattoos to cover it up so no one can see they got it! :shock:"

- Never smash a gal and you got open wounds on your c*ck. All herpes and HIV need to get into the bloodstream and now you're infected. *sigh* It`s always easier to give a gal HIV then to get it as a heterosexual male.

- Always and always ASK THE FEMALE TO STICK OUT THEIR TONGUE and look for lesions or any abnormal patterns on their tongue. "The tongue tells a bard's tale of days of old" as I like to say!