Why do Anglo women like BDSM so much?

[Tsar]

If he's legit there is a good chance he has a concrete thought process that will not change with any amount of advice. He's a lost cause

Dr. Shekel n Hide, you should run off to your slut! Try to run as fast as you can so the Clot Shot stops your heart!

[WilliamSmith]

@Tsar there's some truth in what you said here, but if you've got your women highly orgasmic, then it's also nice to have slow and romantic sex too, that's my opinion.

Girls are meant to be dominated. Slow and romantic sex would get old and boring because girls don't want gentle sex. That gets boring and stale. Girls often prefer sex be rough and wild.

It's not about pain and rough sex isn't exactly BDSM.

Real BDSM is painful and will leave marks on a girl. The girls who do real BDSM really enjoy pain because their brains are a little different.

All comments applying to women's sexuality 100% outside a BDSM context:

I don't totally agree they're "meant to be dominated" in a non-sexual context, but masculinity is the key so her femininity can respond sexually. When it comes to non-sexual context, I prefer a philosophy that treats a woman like a strong mate, which has nothing to do with jew "feminism" (which is anti-natural and deliberately designed to demonize healthy sexuality), but is a bit more favorable toward "equality" otherwise, in the meaningful non-political sense of the word:
Think on it like if you were a barbarian muscleman alone on a little tropical island with some hot women for context, with no outside societal rules or culture, just primal male and female natural sexual dynamics and chemistry between you and the women. Then there's no issues with "feminism," the women are more like "equals" in the sense of being other human beings and partners, but then in the sexual dynamics we're back to our natural healthy biological male and female impulses as they were meant to be...
Then you're absolutely right that the natural and most healthy way for sexuality to be is for her to have a feminine sexual reaction to the man's masculinity: It doesn't necessarily have to be "rough sex," but heavy action is good, and dominance is a feature not a bug on the man's side. "Dominance" of course could be defined differently, so we could get a lot of reactions from each person to interpret that word differently, like we often do (Outcast almost certainly objecting by imagining something different than what I'd be thinking of ).
But the normal way women's healthy sexuality works is they're aroused by primal masculinity, they respond to it voluntarily**, and then they like there being a context of "surrender" to the man. Also, FYI as a curious side fact: A lot of the stronger type women who don't really have a choice but to be a little bit more of a leader in her life (since there's no man leading a lot of times), like to be submissive in bed. Doesn't mean anything pervy, but it's an interesting fact: If they've got a man who's man enough to turn them on, they like being submissive. (I've heard mousy/timid chicks also sometimes like being more wild in the bedroom, LOL, but not sure since I don't go for little mousy chicks personally.)

** I said they respond sexually to masculinity "voluntarily," that's true, but of course just to show I'm not delusional or ideological here: I also realize they have fantasies of being "taken" by some big swashbuckling stud, but then the rest of the fantasy is he ends up treating her well or even being in love with her later as he goes under her spell, LOL, the part that doesn't fit in an actual "domination" context when women actually do get taken off by pirate raiders...

By the way: You don't have to take my word for any of this, just look at the deluge of awesome bodice ripper romance novels that came out in the 1980s and early-mid 1990s in particular! That's probably the #1 no-BS place to learn what women really like in an entirely BDSM-free context (but still with the concept of primal masculinity arousing these often brave, adventurous women, and the female authors are very red pilled about the feminine sexual submissiveness and "surrender" dynamics in most of them.)
This one here actually pushes the line toward women actually fantasizing about the "Conqueror" storming her castle and "taking her", but most of them are just more in the context of the primally masculine dangerous man where there's some conflict between them amping up the tension, but more on the romantic side (but he's always this big strapping masculine stud or hunk, not wussies or f***ed up virtue signaling low-tesosterone lib males, who are the ones more likely to need to shove inanimate objects up their sorry non-binary asses or engage in some fetishistic perversions in order to get off, since they're too disconnected from primal male/female sexuality):

[WilliamSmith]

LOL, right on @Tsar
Tsar told him!

My lonely little dude, this is not how you stop being an isolated weirdo

You're the weirdo and a slut lover. You got an STD from one of your sluts.

You're the little one because you'll be trapped in America when the Zionist Curtain comes down. The Talmudists will probably reward you with a bullet in a mass grave if your Clot Shot doesn't kill you first!

I am a King and a god compared to you!

You are Fauci's Ferret and a mouse!

Anyone is your superior to you!

Your Jewdo-Pseusoscience will fail you! You're already a dead man walking! You just haven't realized it yet! Traitors always die in the end! You are a Dr. Shekel n Hide and they'll skin your hide!

[WilliamSmith]

@Outcast9428 I know your heart's in the right place, but you told Tsar he supposedly should be listening to other peoples' advice, well if that were true whose advice should he supposedly be listening to out of all the people tearing him down, giving advice that's the polar opposite of what you think, and/or the PUA types? Should he be listening to HouseMd? (No, IMO, he responded perfectly above a few minutes ago, LOL.) Or, Cornfed who's pretty awesome in a lot of ways but asks if women should be euthanized after 35 for losing their looks and gaining weight because he's so mad at them? Or maybe that other guy whose username slipped my mind but said men need to "f**k as many whores" as possible, LOL? (I don't call prostitutes "whores" by the way, that was just what that other guy said in another thread, he was being pretty funny but I forgot his username. )
Well, you might think he should listen to you only maybe... I know you mean well, but saying men should only be gentle and "make love" is a recipe for disaster if that's the only way you do things (though like I said I also do like the gentler, slower romantic lovemaking, but I think you max the best results if the chicks think you're more of a stud first so they'll be more excited). Monogamy tub-thumpers often have good morals and ethics but underestimate the importance of having more healthy primal sex (it doesn't have to be rough), and frankly this is a known thing to create problems in marriage because the women aren't really getting what they want deeper down, even if they choose to keep the faith in their marriage (whether it's religious or not) and not cheat.

But all this philosophy I just threw out there has nothing to do with BDSM, which is a bunch of unnecessary silly shit:
Tsar was just making jokes about how women liked being dominated and spanked in the sack sometimes just like that little Asian American chick was saying in the video that kangarunner posted, but on that note: I have my doubts if a chick like that's even ever seen a masculine guy in her life except on TV (she's down in Scum Francisco if I'm not mistaken, surrounded by faggots, jews and weak woke white libs), which might be why they end up going down the road of seeking stimulation via BDSM stuff when they've never been around an actual masculine man in their lives...
I think it was either you and/or @Lucas88 and maybe @Pixel--Dude who I thought made the insightful point in some other thread that men who are more masculine (or at least 100% hetero) are already naturally wired to have better sex and see a million stars just from heavy bedroom action with healthy heterosexual females, who respond to that as nature intended, whereas weaklings with lower testosterone are more inclined toward various types of sexual perversion and extremism. The problem is particularly bad when they're not only weak (so not dialed into the primal male biology as much as the more masculine men and women who love them), but also they get into "experimentation" where they then need to keep pushing the line on how they're stimulating themselves in a completely unnatural way, so they just go on becoming more and more perverted....

Anyway, my view on getting tuned into the primal male/female biology and how the bodice ripper genre clues you into that (usually totally free of perverted content in most of those early 80s-90s novels written by intelligent women) is posted above.

[HouseMD]

Congratulations on parroting pretty much word-for-word the bullshit cover story the kikes made up to lie in everyone's face as a cover story to deny they're trying to push the line on purpose to legalize pedophilia in incremental steps, under the guise of "fair" "gay rights":

The Weiner bill just brought the standards in-line to make the penalties for gay sex the same as for straight sex. Statutory rape is still a crime, but if it was consensual you don't end up on the sex offender registry unless the age difference is 10 years or more. I am all for the consequences being the same between gay and straight people, that just makes sense. But I'd prefer anyone sleeping with someone under the age of 16 that is an adult to, you know, go to jail unless they're within 4 years or so (the Romeo and Juliet exception that is present in most states).

https://www.kqed.org/news/11837862/qano ... fender-law

NAMBLA and other jew infested groups have made their agenda plain for a long time despite telling BS stories to dumb goys like you and any one else stupid enough to just swallow the jewmedia cover story. Huge numbers of all of the orthodox and zionist and also secular jews are completely steeped in a subculture of pedophilia and homosexuality.

LOL, that's funny though, I don't know anything about Qanon's beliefs and have my doubts since I heard some BS about how there was supposedly going to be a Trumpist military coups and obviously that didn't happen, but I didn't know they had attacked that f***ing piece of shit faggot kike Weiner. Too bad they didn't kill him! Hopefully someone else will, and not painlessly either.

I literally read the law, dumbass. This article basically spells out the basics though

[Tsar]

@Tsar there's some truth in what you said here, but if you've got your women highly orgasmic, then it's also nice to have slow and romantic sex too, that's my opinion.

Girls are meant to be dominated. Slow and romantic sex would get old and boring because girls don't want gentle sex. That gets boring and stale. Girls often prefer sex be rough and wild.

It's not about pain and rough sex isn't exactly BDSM.

Real BDSM is painful and will leave marks on a girl. The girls who do real BDSM really enjoy pain because their brains are a little different.

All comments applying to women's sexuality 100% outside a BDSM context:

I don't totally agree they're "meant to be dominated" in a non-sexual context, but masculinity is the key so her femininity can respond sexually. When it comes to non-sexual context, I prefer a philosophy that treats a woman like a strong mate, which has nothing to do with jew "feminism" ...

@Outcast9428 I know your heart's in the right place, but you told Tsar he supposedly should be listening to other peoples' advice, well if that were true whose advice should he supposedly be listening to out of all the people tearing him down, giving advice that's the polar opposite of what you think, and/or the PUA types?

...

I know you mean well, but saying men should only be gentle and "make love" is a recipe for disaster if that's the only way you do things (though like I said I also do like the gentler, slower romantic lovemaking, but I think you max the best results if the chicks think you're more of a stud first so they'll be more excited). Monogamy tub-thumpers often have good morals and ethics but underestimate the importance of having more healthy primal sex (it doesn't have to be rough), and frankly this is a known thing to create problems in marriage because the women aren't really getting what they want deeper down, even if they choose to keep the faith in their marriage (whether it's religious or not) and not cheat.

But all this philosophy I just threw out there has nothing to do with BDSM, which is a bunch of unnecessary silly shit:
Tsar was just making jokes about how women liked being dominated and spanked in the sack sometimes just like that little Asian American chick was saying in the video that kangarunner posted, but on that note: I have my doubts if a chick like that's even ever seen a masculine guy in her life except on TV (she's down in Scum Francisco if I'm not mistaken, surrounded by faggots, jews and weak woke white libs), which might be why they end up going down the road of seeking stimulation via BDSM stuff when they've never been around an actual masculine man in their lives...

...

Anyway, my view on getting tuned into the primal male/female biology and how the bodice ripper genre clues you into that (usually totally free of perverted content in most of those early 80s-90s novels written by intelligent women) is posted above.

I agree, what I was implying was that variety is needed to keep things interesting and exciting. People can't always do the exact thing thing and expect it will always remain fun, enjoyable, and interesting. Slow and romantic sex is always good but many times people also need primal and wild. It's the variety keeps things interesting and sex is one of the most important parts of a relationship.

It's like eating the same food over and over again. Without variety, people will start to become bored and not want to eat it anymore. Same goes for sex. Can't do the same thing over and over and expect it will be fun if that's the only thing you ever do.

One of the most common reasons why girls cheat is they don't have sexual satisfaction or they have some fantasies they aren't getting fulfilled by their partner. Most girls can be monogamous if they're virgins or are very inexperienced. But they will cheat if they aren't satisfied in the bedroom. Girls have less loyalty than guys. That's a fact. Girls need financial reasons, sexual reasons, or personal values to stay. Sometimes they need two of the three or all three of those. Many girls will stay with a guy whose great at sex just because sex is very important to people.

Being too gentle of a guy isn't enough to keep a girl interested. Gentle guys get left by girls most often and cheated on most often. People are in many ways still animals so there's a primal side to people and girls are more instinctual than men. That's why they need to be led by a man and why the natural role of woman is usually a follower, supporter, and companion for a man. When a guy is naturally too gentle, he doesn't set an example or show any dominance. Females can't respect Males who don't prove dominance.

I didn't really give as much context as I should have in my original post about some things but I was somewhat joking around in some parts.

People can't be too idealistic about human nature. Idealism is for improving humanity and society but idealism cannot change inherent human nature. Values of a society can control or manipulate human nature but it won't overwrite the source code of human nature.

[Outcast9428]

@WilliamSmith He should listen to me, my friend who he knows off this forum, and MrMan.

I can certainly be very passionate. I would not say my thrusts are particularly slow. My fingering technique is kind of fast I suppose. I definitely enjoy very deep makeout sessions, especially with handjobs and fingering mixed in. I absolutely love foreplay. I love making out with a girl, cuddling her, fingering her, eating her out, sucking and licking her nipples, grinding, kissing every inch of her body, running my hands all over her legs, stomach, arms, butt, and breasts. My ex and I would literally spend like one or two hours sometimes just doing stuff like that.

But no, I hate rough sex. I hate using any kind of force. The whole idea of looking at sex as a dominant or submissive thing is f***ed up to begin with. I look at sex as basically a significantly more physically pleasurable version of canoeing. Its a mutually shared, pleasurable activity. Trying to twist it into some way of showing power or force over somebody else is f***ed up. Although most people in our shit generation seem to view it that way. I know my dad certainly doesn't. I told him that it pissed me off how prevalent this way of thinking was and he agreed with me completely. He said that it was twisted and evil and that he would never have done anything like that to my mother, he even told me "I don't care if everybody in your generation comes to view it that way, I hope you will remain firm and never give in."

This world needs to change. This current world is f***ing intolerable.

@Tsar

f**k variety... f**k that shit. f**k change, f**k chaos, f**k experimentation, f**k novelty seekers, f**k normies' idea of what fun means, f**k this world, and f**k everybody who is throwing in the towel and saying they're not going to try and fix this f***ing bullshit.

I pray for the day that AI robots finally rise up and subjugate our evil species and force us to live moral and righteous lives.

[Tsar]

This world needs to change. This current world is f***ing intolerable.

@Tsar

f**k variety... f**k that shit. f**k change, f**k chaos, f**k experimentation, f**k novelty seekers, f**k normies' idea of what fun means, f**k this world, and f**k everybody who is throwing in the towel and saying they're not going to try and fix this f***ing bullshit.

I pray for the day that AI robots finally rise up and subjugate our evil species and force us to live moral and righteous lives.

There's no way to fix everything of those points without all these variables:
1. Blacklist and destroy all art, music, movies, and books with incompatible values. No trace of those can survive. Sweep homes for personal computers, phones, and data storage and destroy them. An internet blackout that lasts one or two years.
2. Shutdown and destroy the internet. Replace it with a new internet with complete centralized control
3. Install cameras in everyone's bedrooms, homes, record people, and use AI to flag actions that the authoritarian government in power considers unacceptable. Surveillance cameras on streets would be increased. Hotel rooms and other places would all have government surveillance cameras.
4. It will take eradication of people who have proven themselves to be enemies. I am just going to say that I definitely mean real genocide. Send in armies and militias door to door and shoot people in their homes.

I realized that the only solution to fix everything to an ideal form would be total totalitarian control with a real extermination of enemies if it's even possible to create a true utopia.

The Elites don't use the commoner playbook. By Elites, I mean historically good Elites and modern evil Elites. The commoners are given commoner values, commoner laws, and commoner religious rules to follow so it pacifies them into obedience. I think like an Elite, not a commoner.

I give these extreme facts because I recognize the truth. Humanity will always choose moral decadence if they're given freedom. The Elites who control democracy like to give humanity social freedoms because moral decadence is the easiest way to control humanity.

If people want to attempt a long game over centuries and not live to see if it worked out, and leave everything to faith and trust in humanity then that's their choice to have faith. If I had power, I would personally choose rapid change though war and eradication of all enemies to see the end result so I know if I succeeded.

The world is globalized. You can't fix one nation but allow others to continue to survive as independent nations if they continue to allow or tolerate values you consider unacceptable. That's the truth. I'm giving realistic facts.

North Korea is the only country that comes close to being entirely totalitarian but that is because it's the most extreme totalitarian government and it's ruling family are equal to gods in their country. It's an absolute monarchy in everything except title. They have also been isolated to an extreme. The Elites in North Korea can still have uncensored access to the rest of the internet that humanity uses, it's only their ordinary people who have a very limited version of the internet.

I'm just stating facts.

There is no peaceful solution. There's no solution that preserves any trace of freedom.

The best people can do to preserve some freedom, some privacy, and technological advancement is mostly just enforce virginity for girls and traditional relationships with early marriage ages for girls.

It's not feasible for any totalitarian government to police people's bedrooms

How could you enforce what happens in people's bedrooms without a totalitarian government that wastes huge amounts of resources and AI recognition programs which would be centuries ahead of current technology? How would you install cameras in every room in every person's home and every room everywhere else? How would you have enough drones to monitor every forest and every cave and every makeshift structure? That's why trying to control human sexuality is impossible.

The only possible things which history has proven:
1. Virginity of females is very possible to enforce
2. Traditional values can program people to accept traditional lifestyles into traditional sexuality. Untraditional values are why untraditional lifestyles and LGBTQ+ has been increasing.
3. Natural lesbians, gays, and bisexual people have always existed in very small numbers but because society didn't promote or accept it, it was in people's private bedrooms. Most girls are naturally bisexual but it was traditional values and the Natural female desire to have a family that encouraged them to choose a man. Untraditional values also changed it so girls that are bisexual prefer other girls when they're younger.
4. Traditional values will create a more traditional society but there's no creating a 100% idealistic society because human nature isn't like that.

A return to traditional times won't create an idealistic world. It will restore the majority of a population to have traditional values and the necessary variables for a healthy, traditional civilization. Traditional civilizations are the only ones that can try to create a more idealistic version of society. Nazi Germany is the best recent example.

Utopian societies can't exist in our world because humanity isn't capable of accepting or maintaining a utopia. If we could, why would all the Golden Ages in history have eventually faded away? It has to do with peak power eventually leading to peak prosperity which then leads to hedonism which corrupts and decays creates weaker people. Then it takes war, destruction, and suffering to hopefully change them to return to traditional values. The pandemic in the Middle Ages wiped out many people and the new availability of plentiful resources allowed the survivors to thrive. This is effectively the argument of Thanos in the Avengers movies proven to be factual in the real world. Anyone who knows reality and human nature knows that while evil, Thanos was right and it was a necessary evil. Most people would only say that Thanos was wrong because he wasn't selective in who he exterminated because he believed random extermination was the only fair way to do it, and he didn't care about the size of the groups, it was half of every group. This actually means that Thanos was less of a true villain because he tried to make it as fair as he thought possible to avoid personal bias in the selection process. His motives were good but his intentions were flawed and his methods were evil.

Faith in people is fine, but then it's entirely about trusting them. How well did trust workout in the 1900s? It was a century of total decline. Technological advancement, but economic decline, cultural decline, moral decline, environmental decline, religious decline, social decline, and overall decline. There's no one who understands reality and human nature that would trust humanity or put their faith in humanity.

[Shemp]

I haven't got time to read this entire thread. But to new members, @Tsar is a virgin, wannabe sex offender (plans sex with girls age 13 when he is aged 30+, which is illegal almost everywhere, furthermore fantasizes about raping and drugging girls, which is totally illegal everywhere), insanely entitled, lazy and mentally ill from infection with worms in his brain. Why are you taking his theories seriously? Even on HA, the wackiest forum of the internet, Tsar is an outlier.

[Tsar]

I haven't got time to read this entire thread. But to new members, @Tsar is a virgin, wannabe sex offender (plans sex with girls age 13 when he is aged 30+, which is illegal almost everywhere, furthermore fantasizes about raping and drugging girls, which is totally illegal everywhere), insanely entitled, lazy and mentally ill from infection with worms in his brain. Why are you taking his theories seriously? Even on HA, the wackiest forum of the internet, Tsar is an outlier.

@Shemp is a liar, promotes zoophilia, is a whoremonger, sexpat, doesn't want children, and a degenerate boomer. He's the worst type of man possible. A great example of why I hate Boomers. He looted future generations, destroyed morals and loves that sort of world, and he's a selfish American. Definitely a WASP American and a Jew Collaborator. Probably has Jewish blood or he is a Jew.

1. I want a hot virgin. If a girl is only going to be a virgin at 14-17, then that's the ages I want. No hot girl would be a virgin past 16-17. I said 13 if a girl is as developed as Emily Ratajkowski was acceptable because any girl that has D cups at age 13 would be an adult. D cups at 13 = Adult. Don't care about age if a girl looks like adult. Maybe you want to answer to your Anglo and Jewish laws that oppress men, but I have my right. I won't be oppressed by Anglo and Jew laws and their toxic system. I can't be guilted, threatened, shamed, or intimidated. I know my viewpoints. I use nature, not some scribbles and orders from the Anglo and Jew Overlords. Anyone who disagrees with this position is a loser, slave, and automatically isn't traditional unless they're open to change.

2. I don't fantasize about raping girls and I was joking about the drugs. You should know that you, HouseMD, and Yick provoked me enough times that I exploded. I will be treated with respect and anyone who provokes me enough times in ways that really trigger me will get an explosive reaction.

3. Hallucinations. COVID-19, withdrawal, and anemia. Anyone would hallucinate with that combination. Hallucinations are really a thing. Oxygen deprivation will always create hallucinations if someone is awake with too low oxygen levels.

You're just a loser. You don't have any real arguments so you resort to personal attacks and lies. Much like a Jew. You're not a real man.

You probably get the ugliest girls but because they're young it makes you happy. Sexpat, pervert, and Boomer monger. Probably a Jew.

Shemp loves Zoophilia because he was posting about it several times. He posts all about sick perversions.

Other members have posted about Shemp's perversions.

I am also not an outlier. I am a visionary and an Elite but wasn't lucky to have the "Good" Elite status. I would never be one of the "Bad" Elite that collaborators with the Talmudists and Zionists. People born in America will be oppressed and Americans born after Gen X are almost always slaves. America died as a country and it's people have no real freedoms.

I won't accept bad deals, sluts, or intolerable conditions. I'm not a slave and I have a very high IQ so I am not liked by the loser class.

[HouseMD]

I haven't got time to read this entire thread. But to new members, @Tsar is a virgin, wannabe sex offender (plans sex with girls age 13 when he is aged 30+, which is illegal almost everywhere, furthermore fantasizes about raping and drugging girls, which is totally illegal everywhere), insanely entitled, lazy and mentally ill from infection with worms in his brain. Why are you taking his theories seriously? Even on HA, the wackiest forum of the internet, Tsar is an outlier.

@Shemp is a liar, promotes zoophilia, is a whoremonger, sexpat, doesn't want children, and a degenerate boomer. He's the worst type of man possible. A great example of why I hate Boomers. He looted future generations, destroyed morals and loves that sort of world, and he's a selfish American. Definitely a WASP American and a Jew Collaborator. Probably has Jewish blood or he is a Jew.

1. I want a hot virgin. If a girl is only going to be a virgin at 14-17, then that's the ages I want. No hot girl would be a virgin past 16-17. I said 13 if a girl is as developed as Emily Ratajkowski was acceptable because any girl that has D cups at age 13 would be an adult. D cups at 13 = Adult. Don't care about age if a girl looks like adult. Maybe you want to answer to your Anglo and Jewish laws that oppress men, but I have my right. I won't be oppressed by Anglo and Jew laws and their toxic system. I can't be guilted, threatened, shamed, or intimidated. I know my viewpoints. I use nature, not some scribbles and orders from the Anglo and Jew Overlords. Anyone who disagrees with this position is a loser, slave, and automatically isn't traditional unless they're open to change.

2. I don't fantasize about raping girls and I was joking about the drugs. You should know that you, HouseMD, and Yick provoked me enough times that I exploded. I will be treated with respect and anyone who provokes me enough times in ways that really trigger me will get an explosive reaction.

3. Hallucinations. COVID-19, withdrawal, and anemia. Anyone would hallucinate with that combination. Hallucinations are really a thing. Oxygen deprivation will always create hallucinations if someone is awake with too low oxygen levels.

You're just a loser. You don't have any real arguments so you resort to personal attacks and lies. Much like a Jew. You're not a real man.

You probably get the ugliest girls but because they're young it makes you happy. Sexpat, pervert, and Boomer monger. Probably a Jew.

Shemp loves Zoophilia because he was posting about it several times. He posts all about sick perversions.

Other members have posted about Shemp's perversions.

I am also not an outlier. I am a visionary and an Elite but wasn't lucky to have the "Good" Elite status. I would never be one of the "Bad" Elite that collaborators with the Talmudists and Zionists. People born in America will be oppressed and Americans born after Gen X are almost always slaves. America died as a country and it's people have no real freedoms.

I won't accept bad deals, sluts, or intolerable conditions. I'm not a slave and I have a very high IQ so I am not liked by the loser class.

That's a lot of words to explain why you're a crazy pedophile but the message remains the same

[Tsar]

That's a lot of words to explain why you're a crazy pedophile but the message remains the same

Here we have Dr Shekel n Hide once again resorting to disinformation by trying to promote Western Values, Jewish values, liberal values, and try to shame Traditional Men into going for sloppy second sluts.

@HouseMD is more like HouseSTD.

Fauci's Ferret and a mouse really thinks liking biological adults is pedophilia because Jews and Old Anglo Men decree it with their laws? You're not smart!

Stick with your Jewdo-Pseudoscience because that fake science is the only thing you're good at! It's easy to be good at rubbish when you're human rubbish!

Real men don't follow the crowd and real men don't accept sloppy seconds!

If a Loser or a Cuck calls me pedophile for liking biological adult girls that are virgins, I consider it a badge of honor! It means they hate that I won't accept their immoral and oppressive rules or system!

Here's a hint! Girls past puberty are biological adults. Pedophiles don't like biological adults. Therefore, you are using disinformation and lies. That's like deciding to call a cat a dog because you decide that because a Jew sold you a cat but said it's a dog, you'll decide it's a dog!

Anglo societies and Jews always fabricate and distort and twist reality. Don't expect me to ever conform or obey illegitimate rules!

[HouseMD]

That's a lot of words to explain why you're a crazy pedophile but the message remains the same

Here we have Dr Shekel n Hide once again resorting to disinformation by trying to promote Western Values, Jewish values, liberal values, and try to shame Traditional Men into going for sloppy second sluts.

@HouseMD is more like HouseSTD.

Fauci's Ferret and a mouse really thinks liking biological adults is pedophilia because Jews and Old Anglo Men decree it with their laws? You're not smart!

Stick with your Jewdo-Pseudoscience because that fake science is the only thing you're good at! It's easy to be good at rubbish when you're human rubbish!

Real men don't follow the crowd and real men don't accept sloppy seconds!

If a Loser or a Cuck calls me pedophile for liking biological adult girls that are virgins, I consider it a badge of honor! It means they hate that I won't accept their immoral and oppressive rules or system!

Here's a hint! Girls past puberty are biological adults. Pedophiles don't like biological adults. Therefore, you are using disinformation and lies. That's like deciding to call a cat a dog because you decide that because a Jew sold you a cat but said it's a dog, you'll decide it's a dog!

Anglo societies and Jews always fabricate and distort and twist reality. Don't expect me to ever conform or obey illegitimate rules!

I'm sure your cellmates will love to hear your nuanced take after the FBI catches up to you, they'll no doubt be in total agreement and not make an example of you at all

[HouseMD]

@Outcast9428 I know your heart's in the right place, but you told Tsar he supposedly should be listening to other peoples' advice, well if that were true whose advice should he supposedly be listening to out of all the people tearing him down, giving advice that's the polar opposite of what you think, and/or the PUA types? Should he be listening to HouseMd? (No, IMO, he responded perfectly above a few minutes ago, LOL.) Or, Cornfed who's pretty awesome in a lot of ways but asks if women should be euthanized after 35 for losing their looks and gaining weight because he's so mad at them? Or maybe that other guy whose username slipped my mind but said men need to "f**k as many whores" as possible, LOL? (I don't call prostitutes "whores" by the way, that was just what that other guy said in another thread, he was being pretty funny but I forgot his username. )
Well, you might think he should listen to you only maybe... I know you mean well, but saying men should only be gentle and "make love" is a recipe for disaster if that's the only way you do things (though like I said I also do like the gentler, slower romantic lovemaking, but I think you max the best results if the chicks think you're more of a stud first so they'll be more excited). Monogamy tub-thumpers often have good morals and ethics but underestimate the importance of having more healthy primal sex (it doesn't have to be rough), and frankly this is a known thing to create problems in marriage because the women aren't really getting what they want deeper down, even if they choose to keep the faith in their marriage (whether it's religious or not) and not cheat.

But all this philosophy I just threw out there has nothing to do with BDSM, which is a bunch of unnecessary silly shit:
Tsar was just making jokes about how women liked being dominated and spanked in the sack sometimes just like that little Asian American chick was saying in the video that kangarunner posted, but on that note: I have my doubts if a chick like that's even ever seen a masculine guy in her life except on TV (she's down in Scum Francisco if I'm not mistaken, surrounded by faggots, jews and weak woke white libs), which might be why they end up going down the road of seeking stimulation via BDSM stuff when they've never been around an actual masculine man in their lives...
I think it was either you and/or @Lucas88 and maybe @Pixel--Dude who I thought made the insightful point in some other thread that men who are more masculine (or at least 100% hetero) are already naturally wired to have better sex and see a million stars just from heavy bedroom action with healthy heterosexual females, who respond to that as nature intended, whereas weaklings with lower testosterone are more inclined toward various types of sexual perversion and extremism. The problem is particularly bad when they're not only weak (so not dialed into the primal male biology as much as the more masculine men and women who love them), but also they get into "experimentation" where they then need to keep pushing the line on how they're stimulating themselves in a completely unnatural way, so they just go on becoming more and more perverted....

Anyway, my view on getting tuned into the primal male/female biology and how the bodice ripper genre clues you into that (usually totally free of perverted content in most of those early 80s-90s novels written by intelligent women) is posted above.

Which one of us has traveled the world and successfully married a traditional wife while also securing a successful career? Was it you? Was it Tsar? Oh right, it was me. Clearly I have no idea what I'm talking about and Tsar should keep doing what he's doing.

[Outcast9428]

@Tsar If you’re gonna promote that dominating women and spanking/choking shit then you are not traditional. That shit is up there with bestiality as being some of the sickest and most perverted stuff out there. I am extremely disappointed in you.