Why are Asians & Middle Class people so Cliquish, Closed, Rigid, and Judgmental?

[yick]

Maybe I belong in Latin America or something? Some people say I would fit in there.

If you can survive and thrive in Angeles City then you will be just fine in most of Latin America. It's similar (apparently, I have never been to the Philippines...)

What are the most dangerous places in the world? (1990-2017)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53clMMQ-jJs

and?

[Gali]

Maybe I belong in Latin America or something? Some people say I would fit in there.

If you can survive and thrive in Angeles City then you will be just fine in most of Latin America. It's similar (apparently, I have never been to the Philippines...)

What are the most dangerous places in the world? (1990-2017)
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=11016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53clMMQ-jJs

and?

Latin America is a bit more dangerous than Philippines and Angeles City I guess too.

viewtopic.php?t=11016&start=45
https://www.stickmanbangkok.com/readers ... e-to-live/

Though it was quite an experience in AC for me. lol.

Why Angeles City Sucks - 15 Reasons
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=11016

Funny seems google does not show the happier abroad part in link when you past it. Seems it is part of the censoring.

[yick]

Maybe I belong in Latin America or something? Some people say I would fit in there.

If you can survive and thrive in Angeles City then you will be just fine in most of Latin America. It's similar (apparently, I have never been to the Philippines...)

What are the most dangerous places in the world? (1990-2017)
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=11016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53clMMQ-jJs

and?

Latin America is a bit more dangerous than Philippines and Angeles City I guess too.

viewtopic.php?t=11016&start=45
https://www.stickmanbangkok.com/readers ... e-to-live/

Though it was quite an experience in AC for me. lol.

Why Angeles City Sucks - 15 Reasons
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=11016

Funny seems google does not show the happier abroad part in link when you past it. Seems it is part of the censoring.

Well, Latin America is a big place and you can't compare Rio to Trelew in Argentina or San Salvador to Cordoba or
a city run by the drug cartels to Lima - not every city and town in Latin America is dangerous and full of crime - though that isn't to say there aren't parts of Latin American that aren't dangerous because they're most certainly are.

That wasn't my point anyway, my point was that Winston has enough street smarts that kept himself safe in Angeles City to be able to keep himself relatively safe in a lot of Latin America - if he picks wisely he should be fine. If he went to live in Lima or Sao Paulo - nobody would think anything other than he was local - there are far safer options than these two places though.

[kangarunner]

Btw guys, such as Guhji. This isn't just about me. Middle class people in general are closed and cliquish, even to others of their own kind. Even if the others look good or dress good. It's their DEFAULT disposition and has nothing to do with me. They carry that disposition everywhere they go around them. It's in their body language and aura. Has nothing to do with me and is not personal. It's their DEFAULT disposition and we can all see that if we observe them in public. My question is: Why? Is it because they are all business and paranoid of strangers? If so, why? Why can't they be open?

However, I notice that this only applies to middle class Asian girls from Taiwan or Hong Kong. The ones that are mainland Chinese are usually a lot more friendly and sociable to me if they know me or their parents have connections with mine. So there is a difference between mainland Chinese and Taiwanese/HK. Why is that?

Maybe clique is not the right word. It may be human nature to just have small groups of close friends who are on the same path as you that you navigate life with.

On your comment on mainland Chinese, my best friend from high school is the son of Chinese immigrants (first generation American). He worked on Wall St, very successful guy.....He's not a cliquish person at all. He likes to talk to and meet a lot of different people. But he's not your typical Asian American (hyper-focused on money and status climbing).

[Gali]

If you can survive and thrive in Angeles City then you will be just fine in most of Latin America. It's similar (apparently, I have never been to the Philippines...)

What are the most dangerous places in the world? (1990-2017)
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=11016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53clMMQ-jJs

and?

Latin America is a bit more dangerous than Philippines and Angeles City I guess too.

viewtopic.php?t=11016&start=45
https://www.stickmanbangkok.com/readers ... e-to-live/

Though it was quite an experience in AC for me. lol.

Why Angeles City Sucks - 15 Reasons
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=11016

Funny seems google does not show the happier abroad part in link when you past it. Seems it is part of the censoring.

Well, Latin America is a big place and you can't compare Rio to Trelew in Argentina or San Salvador to Cordoba or
a city run by the drug cartels to Lima - not every city and town in Latin America is dangerous and full of crime - though that isn't to say there aren't parts of Latin American that aren't dangerous because they're most certainly are.

That wasn't my point anyway, my point was that Winston has enough street smarts that kept himself safe in Angeles City to be able to keep himself relatively safe in a lot of Latin America - if he picks wisely he should be fine. If he went to live in Lima or Sao Paulo - nobody would think anything other than he was local - there are far safer options than these two places though.

Here is a realistic comparison. Additional negatives for Winson is he does not speak the language and is older now and has to learn a lot of things there first. Plus it is quite far away.

https://www.numbeo.com/crime/compare_ci ... 2=Medellin

check the violent crime

[yick]

What are the most dangerous places in the world? (1990-2017)
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=11016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53clMMQ-jJs

and?

Latin America is a bit more dangerous than Philippines and Angeles City I guess too.

viewtopic.php?t=11016&start=45
https://www.stickmanbangkok.com/readers ... e-to-live/

Though it was quite an experience in AC for me. lol.

Why Angeles City Sucks - 15 Reasons
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=11016

Funny seems google does not show the happier abroad part in link when you past it. Seems it is part of the censoring.

Well, Latin America is a big place and you can't compare Rio to Trelew in Argentina or San Salvador to Cordoba or
a city run by the drug cartels to Lima - not every city and town in Latin America is dangerous and full of crime - though that isn't to say there aren't parts of Latin American that aren't dangerous because they're most certainly are.

That wasn't my point anyway, my point was that Winston has enough street smarts that kept himself safe in Angeles City to be able to keep himself relatively safe in a lot of Latin America - if he picks wisely he should be fine. If he went to live in Lima or Sao Paulo - nobody would think anything other than he was local - there are far safer options than these two places though.

Here is a realistic comparison. Additional negatives for Winson is he does not speak the language and is older now and has to learn a lot of things there first. Plus it is quite far away.

https://www.numbeo.com/crime/compare_ci ... 2=Medellin

check the violent crime

Medellin has over four million people and Angeles has 530000 people, hardly a fair comparison, never mind realistic.

Let's try another city in Colombia with a similar population... Ibague - 590000 people and I want to live there or it is definitely one of my top three choices....

https://www.numbeo.com/crime/compare_ci ... Comparison

That looks a lot better for Winston, doesn't it?

[Gali]

and?

Latin America is a bit more dangerous than Philippines and Angeles City I guess too.

viewtopic.php?t=11016&start=45
https://www.stickmanbangkok.com/readers ... e-to-live/

Though it was quite an experience in AC for me. lol.

Why Angeles City Sucks - 15 Reasons
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=11016

Funny seems google does not show the happier abroad part in link when you past it. Seems it is part of the censoring.

Well, Latin America is a big place and you can't compare Rio to Trelew in Argentina or San Salvador to Cordoba or
a city run by the drug cartels to Lima - not every city and town in Latin America is dangerous and full of crime - though that isn't to say there aren't parts of Latin American that aren't dangerous because they're most certainly are.

That wasn't my point anyway, my point was that Winston has enough street smarts that kept himself safe in Angeles City to be able to keep himself relatively safe in a lot of Latin America - if he picks wisely he should be fine. If he went to live in Lima or Sao Paulo - nobody would think anything other than he was local - there are far safer options than these two places though.

Here is a realistic comparison. Additional negatives for Winson is he does not speak the language and is older now and has to learn a lot of things there first. Plus it is quite far away.

https://www.numbeo.com/crime/compare_ci ... 2=Medellin

check the violent crime

Medellin has over four million people and Angeles has 530000 people, hardly a fair comparison, never mind realistic.

Let's try another city in Colombia with a similar population... Ibague - 590000 people and I want to live there or it is definitely one of my top three choices....

https://www.numbeo.com/crime/compare_ci ... Comparison

That looks a lot better for Winston, doesn't it?

Not really because Wisnton would never go there.
Actually 95% of Angeles Sexpats would go to Medellin if they would go to LA. Though many actually did because Asia is not possible. I know my sexpats from AC. lol

It is better to compare sin cities with sin cities. AC is number 2 in that category after Pattaya.

[yick]

Latin America is a bit more dangerous than Philippines and Angeles City I guess too.

viewtopic.php?t=11016&start=45
https://www.stickmanbangkok.com/readers ... e-to-live/

Though it was quite an experience in AC for me. lol.

Why Angeles City Sucks - 15 Reasons
viewtopic.php?f=5&t=11016

Funny seems google does not show the happier abroad part in link when you past it. Seems it is part of the censoring.

Well, Latin America is a big place and you can't compare Rio to Trelew in Argentina or San Salvador to Cordoba or
a city run by the drug cartels to Lima - not every city and town in Latin America is dangerous and full of crime - though that isn't to say there aren't parts of Latin American that aren't dangerous because they're most certainly are.

That wasn't my point anyway, my point was that Winston has enough street smarts that kept himself safe in Angeles City to be able to keep himself relatively safe in a lot of Latin America - if he picks wisely he should be fine. If he went to live in Lima or Sao Paulo - nobody would think anything other than he was local - there are far safer options than these two places though.

Here is a realistic comparison. Additional negatives for Winson is he does not speak the language and is older now and has to learn a lot of things there first. Plus it is quite far away.

https://www.numbeo.com/crime/compare_ci ... 2=Medellin

check the violent crime

Medellin has over four million people and Angeles has 530000 people, hardly a fair comparison, never mind realistic.

Let's try another city in Colombia with a similar population... Ibague - 590000 people and I want to live there or it is definitely one of my top three choices....

https://www.numbeo.com/crime/compare_ci ... Comparison

That looks a lot better for Winston, doesn't it?

Not really because Wisnton would never go there.
Actually 95% of Angeles Sexpats would go to Medellin if they would go to LA. Though many actually did because Asia is not possible. I know my sexpats from AC. lol

It is better to compare sin cities with sin cities. AC is number 2 in that category after Pattaya.

Nothing to do what Winston wants - you are comparing the second biggest city in Colombia to a city with 550000 people and hey presto - the second biggest city in Colombia has a higher crime rate - London has a higher crime rate than Angeles City as well so what does that prove?

[Gali]

Well, Latin America is a big place and you can't compare Rio to Trelew in Argentina or San Salvador to Cordoba or
a city run by the drug cartels to Lima - not every city and town in Latin America is dangerous and full of crime - though that isn't to say there aren't parts of Latin American that aren't dangerous because they're most certainly are.

That wasn't my point anyway, my point was that Winston has enough street smarts that kept himself safe in Angeles City to be able to keep himself relatively safe in a lot of Latin America - if he picks wisely he should be fine. If he went to live in Lima or Sao Paulo - nobody would think anything other than he was local - there are far safer options than these two places though.

Here is a realistic comparison. Additional negatives for Winson is he does not speak the language and is older now and has to learn a lot of things there first. Plus it is quite far away.

https://www.numbeo.com/crime/compare_ci ... 2=Medellin

check the violent crime

Medellin has over four million people and Angeles has 530000 people, hardly a fair comparison, never mind realistic.

Let's try another city in Colombia with a similar population... Ibague - 590000 people and I want to live there or it is definitely one of my top three choices....

https://www.numbeo.com/crime/compare_ci ... Comparison

That looks a lot better for Winston, doesn't it?

Not really because Wisnton would never go there.
Actually 95% of Angeles Sexpats would go to Medellin if they would go to LA. Though many actually did because Asia is not possible. I know my sexpats from AC. lol

It is better to compare sin cities with sin cities. AC is number 2 in that category after Pattaya.

Nothing to do what Winston wants - you are comparing the second biggest city in Colombia to a city with 550000 people and hey presto - the second biggest city in Colombia has a higher crime rate - London has a higher crime rate than Angeles City as well so what does that prove?

Of course it is about his wants. You said LA is good for him but you do not know him like I do. He would go to sexpat areas where crime is higher.

Anyway for the sake of argument check out these cities: There are many big cities who have far less crime than Angeles.


Angeles
Crime index 41
Safety scale 48

compare the range
extreme example
Doha, Katar

Crime index 11
Safety index 88

[yick]

Here is a realistic comparison. Additional negatives for Winson is he does not speak the language and is older now and has to learn a lot of things there first. Plus it is quite far away.

https://www.numbeo.com/crime/compare_ci ... 2=Medellin

check the violent crime

Medellin has over four million people and Angeles has 530000 people, hardly a fair comparison, never mind realistic.

Let's try another city in Colombia with a similar population... Ibague - 590000 people and I want to live there or it is definitely one of my top three choices....

https://www.numbeo.com/crime/compare_ci ... Comparison

That looks a lot better for Winston, doesn't it?

Not really because Wisnton would never go there.
Actually 95% of Angeles Sexpats would go to Medellin if they would go to LA. Though many actually did because Asia is not possible. I know my sexpats from AC. lol

It is better to compare sin cities with sin cities. AC is number 2 in that category after Pattaya.

Nothing to do what Winston wants - you are comparing the second biggest city in Colombia to a city with 550000 people and hey presto - the second biggest city in Colombia has a higher crime rate - London has a higher crime rate than Angeles City as well so what does that prove?

Of course it is about his wants. You said LA is good for him but you do not know him like I do. He would go to sexpat areas where crime is higher.

Anyway for the sake of argument check out these cities: There are many big cities who have far less crime than Angeles.


Angeles
Crime index 41
Safety scale 48

compare the range
extreme example
Doha, Katar

Crime index 11
Safety index 88

No, the orginal point was Latin America vs the Philippines for safety, you dragged up a massive city, one of the biggest in Latin America against a small city of 500000 people to make your point. There are some very dangerous places in Latin America and cities far safer than anywhere in the Philippines, and do you not think there are whores for Winston to go to in Ibague - course there are! They're everywhere in Colombia and most of Latin America. Except in Ibague, he would be a lot safer than he would be in Angeles.

Now that's true, I don't know Winston as well as you, can't say that's a massive regret.

[Guhji]

Winston mentioned that whores were finding him too ugly to do business with. I think the P4P game may have passed him already.

[Gali]

Medellin has over four million people and Angeles has 530000 people, hardly a fair comparison, never mind realistic.

Let's try another city in Colombia with a similar population... Ibague - 590000 people and I want to live there or it is definitely one of my top three choices....

https://www.numbeo.com/crime/compare_ci ... Comparison

That looks a lot better for Winston, doesn't it?

Not really because Wisnton would never go there.
Actually 95% of Angeles Sexpats would go to Medellin if they would go to LA. Though many actually did because Asia is not possible. I know my sexpats from AC. lol

It is better to compare sin cities with sin cities. AC is number 2 in that category after Pattaya.

Nothing to do what Winston wants - you are comparing the second biggest city in Colombia to a city with 550000 people and hey presto - the second biggest city in Colombia has a higher crime rate - London has a higher crime rate than Angeles City as well so what does that prove?

Of course it is about his wants. You said LA is good for him but you do not know him like I do. He would go to sexpat areas where crime is higher.

Anyway for the sake of argument check out these cities: There are many big cities who have far less crime than Angeles.


Angeles
Crime index 41
Safety scale 48

compare the range
extreme example
Doha, Katar

Crime index 11
Safety index 88

No, the orginal point was Latin America vs the Philippines for safety, you dragged up a massive city, one of the biggest in Latin America against a small city of 500000 people to make your point. There are some very dangerous places in Latin America and cities far safer than anywhere in the Philippines, and do you not think there are whores for Winston to go to in Ibague - course there are! They're everywhere in Colombia and most of Latin America. Except in Ibague, he would be a lot safer than he would be in Angeles.

Now that's true, I don't know Winston as well as you, can't say that's a massive regret.

No he would only choose the hot spots regarding whores. Period. That is the same reason he, me and many others chose the shithole AC because it is almost the easiest place on earth regarding that.

[Gali]

Winston mentioned that whores were finding him too ugly to do business with. I think the P4P game may have passed him already.

I do not think he said it in that way but I get your point.lol.

[yick]

Not really because Wisnton would never go there.
Actually 95% of Angeles Sexpats would go to Medellin if they would go to LA. Though many actually did because Asia is not possible. I know my sexpats from AC. lol

It is better to compare sin cities with sin cities. AC is number 2 in that category after Pattaya.

Nothing to do what Winston wants - you are comparing the second biggest city in Colombia to a city with 550000 people and hey presto - the second biggest city in Colombia has a higher crime rate - London has a higher crime rate than Angeles City as well so what does that prove?

Of course it is about his wants. You said LA is good for him but you do not know him like I do. He would go to sexpat areas where crime is higher.

Anyway for the sake of argument check out these cities: There are many big cities who have far less crime than Angeles.


Angeles
Crime index 41
Safety scale 48

compare the range
extreme example
Doha, Katar

Crime index 11
Safety index 88

No, the orginal point was Latin America vs the Philippines for safety, you dragged up a massive city, one of the biggest in Latin America against a small city of 500000 people to make your point. There are some very dangerous places in Latin America and cities far safer than anywhere in the Philippines, and do you not think there are whores for Winston to go to in Ibague - course there are! They're everywhere in Colombia and most of Latin America. Except in Ibague, he would be a lot safer than he would be in Angeles.

Now that's true, I don't know Winston as well as you, can't say that's a massive regret.

No he would only choose the hot spots regarding whores. Period. That is the same reason he, me and many others chose the shithole AC because it is almost the easiest place on earth regarding that.

Yes! Your original point was the safety aspect.

What are the most dangerous places in the world? (1990-2017)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53clMMQ-jJs

Where was the mention of availability of whores? - and which city has more whores, Manila or Angeles? I doubt it's hard to get whores in Manila if whores are the only goal.

[Gali]

Nothing to do what Winston wants - you are comparing the second biggest city in Colombia to a city with 550000 people and hey presto - the second biggest city in Colombia has a higher crime rate - London has a higher crime rate than Angeles City as well so what does that prove?

Of course it is about his wants. You said LA is good for him but you do not know him like I do. He would go to sexpat areas where crime is higher.

Anyway for the sake of argument check out these cities: There are many big cities who have far less crime than Angeles.


Angeles
Crime index 41
Safety scale 48

compare the range
extreme example
Doha, Katar

Crime index 11
Safety index 88

No, the orginal point was Latin America vs the Philippines for safety, you dragged up a massive city, one of the biggest in Latin America against a small city of 500000 people to make your point. There are some very dangerous places in Latin America and cities far safer than anywhere in the Philippines, and do you not think there are whores for Winston to go to in Ibague - course there are! They're everywhere in Colombia and most of Latin America. Except in Ibague, he would be a lot safer than he would be in Angeles.

Now that's true, I don't know Winston as well as you, can't say that's a massive regret.

No he would only choose the hot spots regarding whores. Period. That is the same reason he, me and many others chose the shithole AC because it is almost the easiest place on earth regarding that.

Yes! Your original point was the safety aspect.

What are the most dangerous places in the world? (1990-2017)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=53clMMQ-jJs

Where was the mention of availability of whores? - and which city has more whores, Manila or Angeles? I doubt it's hard to get whores in Manila if whores are the only goal.

The availability of cheap pros and buffet like bars in AC is better than in Manilla or Medellin as it is concentrated in one area. Pattaya is the only place in the world you can compare to it.

Medellin has a lot of good sides and still having the most pro action in LA. That is why it is seen as the best place in LA for most AC type of guys.

I think you should not go so deep into the topic because you can not understand how AC guys think.