Do men who choose to not get married/children get to live life for themselves?

[Archibault]

I read Winston's thrend and it gave me ideas to continue. I don't think having children or having a wife is for everyone to be honest. If some religious people want to have children or follow a monogamous woman then they should do so. However, I support those MGTOW guys and others who seem to be charting a new path.


I have realized that growing up; most people live for their parents. They don't get to do whatever they want since they have to follow what their parents, teachers, and classmates say. At the same time, people who choose to have children live for their children. Their decision is based on "What is best for the children" as opposed to "What is best for me."

Meanwhile, it seems that once men get to work (maybe a have a small business), there's very little they can't do. For instance, there's this guy who lives this sort of "bachelor lifestyle." He can travel to many cheap countries, easily get laid, go to the best restaurants, dedicate himself to his passions, maybe write music or learn a new language. It seems that for most people, this "window of opportunity" is only available when they are in their 20's when they are free from their parents but also their children. Once they have children, it seems their priorities shift, and they have to settle for whatever job they can get.

Most people assumed that you need to be "rich" to live for yourself. But I think this not to be true. I believe there comes the point where you have enough money to live a good life, maybe living off your investments, among other ways.

[Gali]

Yes water is wet

[Archibault]

I read Winston's thrend and it gave me ideas to continue. I don't think having children or having a wife is for everyone to be honest. If some religious people want to have children or follow a monogamous woman then they should do so. However, I support those MGTOW guys and others who seem to be charting a new path.

I'm not a religious person. Having or not having children has nothing to do with your beliefs, anyway. If your religion tells you to have/not have kids and this is your primarily reason, that's a shitty reason as far as reasons go.

Anyway most people who SAY they have kids for religious reasons really don't... it's not to please God, or their parents, or their Supreme Leader; it's their own selfish desires. People mostly just have kids to pass on their DNA. It's inherently selfish. If DNA didn't matter, way more people would file for adoption instead. But they don't, because genes matter. Religion is kind of bollocks and hardly comes into play. It's just what they want you to think.

I see man.Children seem important to you and I support the idea, however, the whole "wife" and settling down is such a "American" concept that I find it unappealing.

I wonder, would you support a guy who want to have multiple children with different women? And not marry none of them? Assume he can support the children. I know a guy like that, he's not from a Western country though.

[fschmidt]

I see man.Children seem important to you and I support the idea, however, the whole "wife" and settling down is such a "American" concept that I find it unappealing.

Marriage is a universal concept in all civilized societies in history.

I wonder, would you support a guy who want to have multiple children with different women? And not marry none of them? Assume he can support the children. I know a guy like that, he's not from a Western country though.

Only decaying or decayed cultures allow this. This is because such behavior is dysgenic.