2020 Presidential Election Fraud - Stop the Steal Updates

[Winston]

Should be no big surprise that SCOTUS would swat away this nonsense of states trying to overturn the results of other states. Anecdote: I have a relative who is a lawyer whose team was going to be involved in defending Georgia's election results from this crazy play by Texas. Fortunately for them it was all over before it had begun.

I would certainly be interested in knowing the relative's arguments. The substance of the Texas (supported by 21 other states) suit -- that four states went outside procedures specified by the U.S. Constitution in selecting electors -- seems indefensible. You do understand that the suit was dismissed on a technicality of standing -- that states are not covered by the Equal Protection Clause? And you do understand that no court to date has looked at the actual evidence of fraud?

That's what Guhji keeps missing. The evidence and proof is there, but if the courts don't want to look at it because they don't wanna get involved and don't wanna upset the deep state, that's not our fault or the fault of truth. That's the courts fault. Not the plaintiff's fault or the Trump team's fault. Refusing to look at something is their fault. It doesn't mean that something is not true. I'm sure deep down, Guhji and flowerthief know that there's widespread fraud. Nothing in politics is clean. Everything is dirty, and that goes for both sides of this fiasco.

[Winston]

Jeffrey Daugherty talks about the coming Civil War that may be a hot war, meaning an armed conflict, as states start considering seceding from the US.

[Winston]

YouTube comment. So true.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DiUzRdJI-YY

"Thepro
The public should sue and have the “Supreme court” disbanded and the election system re-organized and made transparent. These court justices/bureaucrats for life do nothing for the most part, and the one time they are needed, they ignore hard evidence and wont even look at the election fraud cases, dismissing them in hours. Meanwhile, we are watching testimonies, accounts, and interviews of election volunteers and poll watchers who witnessed fraud, suspect behavior, and biased behavior by election officials. We even seen videos of fraud happening with usb keys being hidden and passed and suitcases of bad Biden ballots being pulled out from hiding, and officials preventing GoP watchers from viewing their mischief. I’m sure there is a lot more fraud that we don’t see and it warrants a deep investigation at each ballot processing center. Lets see ALL the videos, examine and validate each ballot! These Supreme court justices wont even spend a workday to review and consider these election fraud cases that will define our nation. However, whenever one of them passes on, it’s like a funeral for some great fuckin savior of humanity and our tax dollars goes to cover a weeks worth of elaborate funeral proceedings when they couldn’t even devote a day to review possible mass election fraud cases that affect our freedom. These so called Supreme court justices, ultimate judges are just useless political bureaucrats on high horses, and do not care about “justice” or the people at all. The laziness and ineptitude of these life long ultimate judges is making a mockery of our Constitution and the nation. We should be able to vote out the useless justices if they will not do their fuckin jobs. It doesn’t matter whether they are liberal or conservative leaning, nominated by an Elephant or Jackass; What matters is that they do the jobs that our tax dollars pay them to do. They do almost nothing during their lazy tenure, and the one time that we need them, they turn us down in record time. Their graves deserve to be spat on, f**k you very much for upholding the Constitution, you lazy, injudicious, political f***s. I want a tax refund for covering your salary and fancy week long funeral expenses. You didn’t deserve it."

[gsjackson]

Should be no big surprise that SCOTUS would swat away this nonsense of states trying to overturn the results of other states. Anecdote: I have a relative who is a lawyer whose team was going to be involved in defending Georgia's election results from this crazy play by Texas. Fortunately for them it was all over before it had begun.

I would certainly be interested in knowing the relative's arguments. The substance of the Texas (supported by 21 other states) suit -- that four states went outside procedures specified by the U.S. Constitution in selecting electors -- seems indefensible. You do understand that the suit was dismissed on a technicality of standing -- that states are not covered by the Equal Protection Clause? And you do understand that no court to date has looked at the actual evidence of fraud?

That's what Guhji keeps missing. The evidence and proof is there, but if the courts don't want to look at it because they don't wanna get involved and don't wanna upset the deep state, that's not our fault or the fault of truth. That's the courts fault. Not the plaintiff's fault or the Trump team's fault. Refusing to look at something is their fault. It doesn't mean that something is not true. I'm sure deep down, Guhji and flowerthief know that there's widespread fraud. Nothing in politics is clean. Everything is dirty, and that goes for both sides of this fiasco.

Guhji has been pretty consistent in saying he thinks the courts won't act, regardless of the strength of the case. I don't know if he believes it, but flowerthief seems to be implying that the suits are without merit, when no court has even looked at the merits.

[Winston]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdoiQk5ykAg

Preacher
There is no longer any need whatsoever in this country to have a judicial branch of government or to hold elections. Think about it...this is an accurate statement.
Six months ago I would have considered that a scary statement. Now I consider the idea of a US election or just convening the SCOTUS to be even more frightening.

WHEN TYRANNY BECOMES LAW,
REBELLION BECOMES DUTY.

-George Washington

[Winston]

Why can't SCOTUS at least order the state supreme courts to hear the case? At least then they could pass the buck.

[Tsar]

Why can't SCOTUS at least order the state supreme courts to hear the case? At least then they could pass the buck.

It is intentional. Elections are a myth. It is Selection. Then the people think they have a choice. In reality the Elites control everything.

Why do you think America is terrible for everyone except the elites?

When most people are angry, upset, or apathetic then you know it is a dying civilization and a terrible place. People distract themselves with consumerism, hedonism, and outmatching each other. America is one of the few places like that in the world.

[Tsar]

Jeffrey Daugherty talks about the coming Civil War that may be a hot war, meaning an armed conflict, as states start considering seceding from the US.

It would make sense. Maybe Hunger Games was also to condition the people to eventually rebel. However, I do not see Americans ever truly standing up to the government. They are all afraid of imprisonment and death. Not to mention many are being kept intentionally poor, hungry, and anyone with children usually do not fight a government.

The American Empire is global but even the homeland of America is more like an Empire compared to a nation-state. The 50 States should be broken into different nations.

[Guhji]

Should be no big surprise that SCOTUS would swat away this nonsense of states trying to overturn the results of other states. Anecdote: I have a relative who is a lawyer whose team was going to be involved in defending Georgia's election results from this crazy play by Texas. Fortunately for them it was all over before it had begun.

I would certainly be interested in knowing the relative's arguments. The substance of the Texas (supported by 21 other states) suit -- that four states went outside procedures specified by the U.S. Constitution in selecting electors -- seems indefensible. You do understand that the suit was dismissed on a technicality of standing -- that states are not covered by the Equal Protection Clause? And you do understand that no court to date has looked at the actual evidence of fraud?

That's what Guhji keeps missing. The evidence and proof is there, but if the courts don't want to look at it because they don't wanna get involved and don't wanna upset the deep state, that's not our fault or the fault of truth. That's the courts fault. Not the plaintiff's fault or the Trump team's fault. Refusing to look at something is their fault. It doesn't mean that something is not true. I'm sure deep down, Guhji and flowerthief know that there's widespread fraud. Nothing in politics is clean. Everything is dirty, and that goes for both sides of this fiasco.

Guhji has been pretty consistent in saying he thinks the courts won't act, regardless of the strength of the case. I don't know if he believes it, but flowerthief seems to be implying that the suits are without merit, when no court has even looked at the merits.

"Justices Kavanaugh, Barrett and Gorsuch were missing in action in a Friday night order from the Supreme Court denying the state of Texas’ lawsuit against Pennsylvania and three other battleground states."

I figured it would be AT LEAST these three. They were Never Trumpers to begin with. I told you Jackson, that ACB was suspect, did I not? I have stated from the beginning that this election would be decided by politics, not principle. Was there ENOUGH fraud to overturn the election result? Maybe yes, but it really doesn't matter in the real world. Winston, and others, continue to live fairy tale world. It's what makes him such a laughable character, and so easy to pick apart in an argument. The legal power, the media, the deep pockets, Big Tech and so forth are all on the Left, and so they get to decide what happens in this world. Who wins and who loses.

That said, Trump should have seen all this coming. He's just too smart to be fooled. I'm sure he's got something else up his sleeve.

[gsjackson]

Don't know where SCOTUS is coming from, but at this point maybe it should be assumed that they're unwilling to get involved, even though the suits coming from Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia and Arizona won't have any problem with standing. I hope what Trump has up his sleeve is the U.S. military, because if we actually do get President Harris I may have seen the last of my home country.

[Winston]

"Justices Kavanaugh, Barrett and Gorsuch were missing in action in a Friday night order from the Supreme Court denying the state of Texas’ lawsuit against Pennsylvania and three other battleground states."

Why would three justices be missing? What happened to them? Did they refuse to show up or call in sick? If so why?

Top law expert Alan Dershowitz said the SCOTUS case was always extremely unlikely to go anywhere. But he says the Pennsylvania case is strong and likely to be won by the Trump legal team. Also, the Wisconsin Supreme Court is willing to hear the case. And many Republican Congressmen are willing to file suit too.

[Tsar]

Don't know where SCOTUS is coming from, but at this point maybe it should be assumed that they're unwilling to get involved, even though the suits coming from Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia and Arizona won't have any problem with standing. I hope what Trump has up his sleeve is the U.S. military, because if we actually do get President Harris I may have seen the last of my home country.

I think it could work and improve America. If Trump could get the military to help him stage a bloodless coup d'etat and become President for life, temporarily disband Congress, restrict the Supreme Court to only being involved in certain matters, and really get things done then America could improve. America is too broken already it isn't like Trump can break it. If anything, a dictator like Trump could be an improvement in government in the US compared to the dysfunctional fake republic system of government.

America is my birth country but I never considered it my home country. After all, how could I?

[Guhji]

"Justices Kavanaugh, Barrett and Gorsuch were missing in action in a Friday night order from the Supreme Court denying the state of Texas’ lawsuit against Pennsylvania and three other battleground states."

Why would three justices be missing? What happened to them? Did they refuse to show up or call in sick? If so why?

Top law expert Alan Dershowitz said the SCOTUS case was always extremely unlikely to go anywhere. But he says the Pennsylvania case is strong and likely to be won by the Trump legal team. Also, the Wisconsin Supreme Court is willing to hear the case. And many Republican Congressmen are willing to file suit too.

They've been sequestered by the FBI due to threats made on their families by right wing paramilitary groups sympathetic to Trump. Check out 'banned videos' on Infowars. It's all there.

[Guhji]

Don't know where SCOTUS is coming from, but at this point maybe it should be assumed that they're unwilling to get involved, even though the suits coming from Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia and Arizona won't have any problem with standing. I hope what Trump has up his sleeve is the U.S. military, because if we actually do get President Harris I may have seen the last of my home country.

Relax, man. Your life is not going to change much no matter who is President lol.

[gsjackson]

Don't know where SCOTUS is coming from, but at this point maybe it should be assumed that they're unwilling to get involved, even though the suits coming from Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia and Arizona won't have any problem with standing. I hope what Trump has up his sleeve is the U.S. military, because if we actually do get President Harris I may have seen the last of my home country.

Relax, man. Your life is not going to change much no matter who is President lol.

Not going back to the U.S. would be a significant change. Enjoying from afar a military coup in the U.S. would be a significant change.

If Trump's not an agent of change -- just Deep State business as usual -- why have they tried everything imaginable to remove him from office?