2020 Presidential Election Fraud - Stop the Steal Updates

[Winston]

LIVE: Sidney Powell’s Election Hearing in Georgia (Dec. 7) | NTD

[Winston]

Has this been posted? The Governor of Georgia's prospective son in law dies in a car explosion and then the Governor announces he is not going to do anything about the rampant election fraud. Maybe the idea is that his daughter would have been next.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... -aide.html

Thats terrible. Guhji and flowerthief00, if the deep state has nothing to hide and there's no fraud then why would they kill someone as a warning to Governor Kemp?

[Winston]

Jenna Ellis explains how Trump can win by Constitutional action from the state legislatures.

[flowerthief00]

The latest:
- Georgia's Secretary of State investigated Giuliani's "smoking gun" video and found nothing out of the ordinary.
- Sidney Powell's case was dismissed in Georgia. (also in Wisconsin)
- Georgia has recertified for Biden after 3 counts.

Trump has now lost 48 out of 49 court cases. What a joke.

[gsjackson]

The latest:
- Georgia's Secretary of State investigated Giuliani's "smoking gun" video and found nothing out of the ordinary.
- Sidney Powell's case was dismissed in Georgia. (also in Wisconsin)
- Georgia has recertified for Biden after 3 counts.

Trump has now lost 48 out of 49 court cases. What a joke.

There are only five judges who count. Bush lost in every lower court in 2000, then SCOTUS decided the election.

[Guhji]

The latest:
- Georgia's Secretary of State investigated Giuliani's "smoking gun" video and found nothing out of the ordinary.
- Sidney Powell's case was dismissed in Georgia. (also in Wisconsin)
- Georgia has recertified for Biden after 3 counts.

Trump has now lost 48 out of 49 court cases. What a joke.

There are only five judges who count. Bush lost in every lower court in 2000, then SCOTUS decided the election.

#FoxNews
Supreme Court rejects GOP challenge to Biden's Pennsylvania election win.

Again, IT'S OVER.

[Cornfed]

The State of Texas has filed directly to SCOTUS.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/08/us/p ... sults.html

[Winston]

The State of Texas has filed directly to SCOTUS.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/08/us/p ... sults.html

Why? Texas is already in Trump's pocket. It's a red state.

[Guhji]

The State of Texas has filed directly to SCOTUS.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/08/us/p ... sults.html

Yes, and SCOTUS will reject this case as well. I'll say it again, the "conservative" Justices are not really so conservative.

[Cornfed]

The State of Texas has filed directly to SCOTUS.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/08/us/p ... sults.html

Why? Texas is already in Trump's pocket. It's a red state.

That's the point. They are arguing that because other states allowed fraud the Texas votes were cancelled out. BTW, other red states are joining.

[Cornfed]

The State of Texas has filed directly to SCOTUS.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/08/us/p ... sults.html

Yes, and SCOTUS will reject this case as well. I'll say it again, the "conservative" Justices are not really so conservative.

Quite possibly, which is why Trump should have sought a military solution to the coup.

[gsjackson]

The State of Texas has filed directly to SCOTUS.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/08/us/p ... sults.html

Why? Texas is already in Trump's pocket. It's a red state.

That's the point. They are arguing that because other states allowed fraud the Texas votes were cancelled out. BTW, other red states are joining.

Correct, and it's a quick solution to jurisdictional questions. Suits between states go directly to SCOTUS.

As for which of the five conservative justices might defect, let's see. The three appointed by Trump were all involved in deciding the 2000 election in favor of the Republican candidate. Kavanaugh was absolutely savaged by Democrat lies during his confirmation hearings. Gorsuch's mother was run out of Washington by the Deep State. Barrett owes her career as a federal judge to Trump.

I'm guessing Thomas would like absolutely nothing better than to block the path to the presidency of the man he was addressing when speaking of being the victim of a "high-tech lynching." Alito has long taken personal offense at the high-handed assaults on the dignity of the judiciary of Obama appointees.

So you're big on predictions, Guhji. Tell us which one will betray his/her country?

[Winston]

Situation Update, Dec. 8th – All ballots after Nov. 3rd are NULL AND VOID; Texas files lawsuit with SCOTUS to nullify rigged elections in FOUR swing states

https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-12-08- ... -void.html#

[flowerthief00]

Correct, and it's a quick solution to jurisdictional questions. Suits between states go directly to SCOTUS.

As for which of the five conservative justices might defect, let's see. The three appointed by Trump were all involved in deciding the 2000 election in favor of the Republican candidate. Kavanaugh was absolutely savaged by Democrat lies during his confirmation hearings. Gorsuch's mother was run out of Washington by the Deep State. Barrett owes her career as a federal judge to Trump.

I'm guessing Thomas would like absolutely nothing better than to block the path to the presidency of the man he was addressing when speaking of being the victim of a "high-tech lynching." Alito has long taken personal offense at the high-handed assaults on the dignity of the judiciary of Obama appointees.

So you're big on predictions, Guhji. Tell us which one will betray his/her country?

So for a Supreme Court justice to rule on existing law such that Trump's path to the presidency is blocked would be to "defect" and "betray his/her country"? I'm pretty sure the Supreme Court does not work this way

Expanding mail-in balloting was a dirty ploy by the Dems, but a legal one. This Texas-led effort of some states to nullify certified results of other states reeks of desperation, like a wild half-court shot at the buzzer. If it succeeds I'll eat my hat.

[gsjackson]

Correct, and it's a quick solution to jurisdictional questions. Suits between states go directly to SCOTUS.

As for which of the five conservative justices might defect, let's see. The three appointed by Trump were all involved in deciding the 2000 election in favor of the Republican candidate. Kavanaugh was absolutely savaged by Democrat lies during his confirmation hearings. Gorsuch's mother was run out of Washington by the Deep State. Barrett owes her career as a federal judge to Trump.

I'm guessing Thomas would like absolutely nothing better than to block the path to the presidency of the man he was addressing when speaking of being the victim of a "high-tech lynching." Alito has long taken personal offense at the high-handed assaults on the dignity of the judiciary of Obama appointees.

So you're big on predictions, Guhji. Tell us which one will betray his/her country?

So for a Supreme Court justice to rule on existing law such that Trump's path to the presidency is blocked would be to "defect" and "betray his/her country"? I'm pretty sure the Supreme Court does not work this way

Expanding mail-in balloting was a dirty ploy by the Dems, but a legal one. This Texas-led effort of some states to nullify certified results of other states reeks of desperation, like a wild half-court shot at the buzzer. If it succeeds I'll eat my hat.

"Expanding mail-in balloting was a dirty ploy by the Dems, but a legal one." Well, that's what's at issue, isn't it? If the state legislatures established safeguards for mail-in balloting and those safeguards were overridden by non-legislature actors, then arguably the Constitution's explicitly prescribed method of choosing electors has been violated. But of course that has already been decided in the editorial offices of the NYT.

You seem determined to ignore or minimize the evidence of fraud -- in direct contradiction of the lawyers who are working with that evidence. Guhji's premise, to which I was responding, is that even if substantial evidence of fraud exists SCOTUS will not act on it because of some threat or bribe the justices face. Yes, that would be treason, not to mention the end of any pretense that something like democratic government exists in the U.S.