Is a man who has intercourse with a ladyboy homosexual or bisexual or can he still claim he's "straight"?

[CaptainSkelebob]

To be honest, I don’t really care… I’d rather Skelebob have sex with ladyboys anyway.

Thats the nicest thing youve ever said about me

LOL!!! I haven't seen "Adventures in Babysitting" since I was a boy in the late 1980s, but I still recall a scene where the guy with orange hair gives a hot chick a compliment in a bar, and she says "That's the sweetest thing anyone's ever said to me! Wanna go to bed?"
Appropriate inclusion for a thread full of a bunch of homos talking about balling ladyboys and then claiming they're still "straight."

P.S. I bet you guys can guess how I voted.

@CaptainSkelebob I kinda figured from the start you were a jewish troll all along, but I still give you the grand prize for best comedian.
And that's from a virulently antisemitic and homophobic Gentile white man like me, so the jews on HA didn't even have to make up their own bullshit ceremony like the Oscars in order to give themselves awards that no one else would have given them otherwise.

Holy f**k balls fella!!
Ur back!!!
Im glad ur back
Ur someone I respect here so plz dont accuse me of being a troll or jewish
I explained why it isnt gay to f**k a ladyboy
You said urself in another thread fella that one you posted was f***ing hot
Right???
Eh???
Where the f**k have you been???

[WilliamSmith]

For what it's worth, I have never personally been with a "ladyboy" and they honestly disgust me more than straight-up faggots because a straight-up faggot is at least true to his nature and not trying to lure men into perversion by blinding them. It's a sick game, but it will always have players.

@MarcosZeitola
No worries to you or @publicduende , whose contributions I also highly enjoy here in this distinctive "community," but yes my own personal opinion is clear: Cornholing pinoys, regardless of whether they've dressed themselves up in women's clothing and put on wigs (or even got a gender-change operation), is still an act of horrifying homosexuality, and I want to get myself to a country where this sort of thing is illegal and taboo to the max, so my children have the least risk of being exposed to it.

If I have my own children, I want to be amongst the largest possible # of people who are opposed to the sort of wickedness we're seeing with the globohomo/pedophilia/trans movement, this latest Balenciaga (translated to "Baal is god") scandal with the overt demonic sexualization of toddlers, pictures of BDSM teddy bears, and worse, just proving my point about how if anyone lets jews and homosexuals infest your country, there is literally no lower limit on what horrifying depravity they'll try to get away with normalizing and perpetrating against the children.

I'm glad the Jamaicans are not prone to such perversion but make no mistake; even the manliest and seemingly most wholesome heterosexual of places have no shortage of filthy men "on the down-low", so beware; you can never fully escape this. Still, to be sure, I may have to get my sons out of the Philippines because there seems to be something in the water out there and it's freaking me out.

Ah, well I love Jamaicans but I didn't mean to imply that none of them were "prone to such perversions," since after all they wouldn't torch so many "batty boys" with molotov cocktails or hack them with machetes or shoot them if a problematic number of them weren't there already buggering each other there (and, of course the homosexuals are no doubt trying to bugger innocent children and animals as well, since the homosexuals never merely content themselves with their depraved interest on another man's rear-end).... but the fact remains:
Jamaica, some of the other islands (Antigua and Barbuda, Saint Lucia, Barbados), and Uganda and other black African countries still have the largest # of people who are ardently opposed to homosexual depravity regardless, which means even if the international globohomo lobby pulls out the stops to use any form of corruption of finagling to legalize homosexuality there, there's still the most "entrenched" homophobia there amongst the general population.

I would not discount the Philippines just because there happens to be a certain subset of degenerates attracted to it. I mean there are pedophiles who come there for underaged kids to f**k, which is disgusting, sometimes they go for elementary school age and below... there are also those who seek out ladyboys, trannies and other confused sad creatures. Again, not something I am a fan of, at all. But we should not paint the whole country with one wide brush and dismiss it just because of that. It still has a lot of good, clean, fun to offer. It still has sunshine, affordable lodgings and food and a ton of adventure to be had. Why dismiss all that just because of some faggy stuff? Don't let the rainbow folk and the alphabet people steal your thunder and cheat you out of an amazing travel location, brother.

Oh, I think the Philippines is an awesome place, don't get me wrong. Also there's so many beautiful islands I'd love to sail in, friendly dynamic people. I'd love to travel there and throughout SE and East Asia someday, and show the locals all my most gentlemanly faux-James Bond respects, with no ranting and raving in the streets about they have too many homosexuals... But there are way too many homosexuals there for me to make it my home, personally.
I feel the same about almost all of Asia even though I still aspire to be a poor man's scholar of East Asian languages (mainly Cantonese and Vietnamese, possibly also Japanese), but I feel I've made the right choice to swear off WMAF because that sense of guilt I always had from nailing their chicks disappears when I do + I don't have to be surrounded in effeminate men and gays if I decline to go there....
But if I end up an old wounded ex-"sea dog" hobbling around with no children of my own to protect though, I'd have nothing against the Philippines at all and would count myself lucky to be there if I didn't find another home.
You never know, if my bravado and luck doesn't last, I may end up with a "beggars can't be choosers" scenario and be obliged to go wherever I can afford the rents and beer, and am liked (or at least willingly tolerated) by the locals....

Either way, in spite of lively debate, "the people have spoken" and the results are undeniable...

All 15 or so of us who have voted so far!
But hey, never discount the power of a close-knit community.
After all, the jews are less than 1% of the world's population are responsible for virtually all the worst problems and mass-murders on the planet for a vast span of this unfortunate jew-afflicted world's history (so imagine what a small # of *positive* people could accomplish with similarly small numbers!).

[publicduende]

@WilliamSmith

An erudite critique of many of the more blatant and overt expressions of our degenerate, woke ultra-liberal "rule of the minority", courtesy of the vocal elite. I can't agree more that the Balenciaga campaign is only one of the many attempts to normalise perversion, or at least to announce that the target markets are indeed a perverted bunch. I am sure you follow The Vigilant Citizen, a blog where they denounce one such thing at least once a week.

Yet, I have to say that framing the existence of ladyboys to this kind of degeneration doesn't really capture the complexity of the choice of being a TG or being attracted to TGs.

Ladyboys and transvestites are as old as society itself. Across history and geography, they took different forms and were given different degrees of tolerance, love, respect, or their opposites. Many of civilisations we consider highly, like the ancient Romans and the Japanese, all had a place for boys who showed off their fresh, youthful beauty in a less-than-masculine way. Indeed, homosexuality towards both masculine and feminine looking individuals was standard in ancient times, not only during Roman times but also the "enlightened" Islam, the opulent and culturally rich domain of the Ottomans.

Reducing the phenomenon to just an expression of modern degeneracy doesn't really explain much. Perhaps the obsessive display of the most circus-like qualities of the LGBT+ community, looking for "acceptance by default", is something new and pathetic. Yet, there will always be people who want to cross-dress or behave like girls, like there will always be people who will like these individuals.

For what it's worth, I have never personally been with a "ladyboy" and they honestly disgust me more than straight-up faggots because a straight-up faggot is at least true to his nature and not trying to lure men into perversion by blinding them. It's a sick game, but it will always have players.

@MarcosZeitola
No worries to you or @publicduende , whose contributions I also highly enjoy here in this distinctive "community," but yes my own personal opinion is clear: Cornholing pinoys, regardless of whether they've dressed themselves up in women's clothing and put on wigs (or even got a gender-change operation), is still an act of horrifying homosexuality, and I want to get myself to a country where this sort of thing is illegal and taboo to the max, so my children have the least risk of being exposed to it.

If I have my own children, I want to be amongst the largest possible # of people who are opposed to the sort of wickedness we're seeing with the globohomo/pedophilia/trans movement, this latest Balenciaga (translated to "Baal is god") scandal with the overt demonic sexualization of toddlers, pictures of BDSM teddy bears, and worse, just proving my point about how if anyone lets jews and homosexuals infest your country, there is literally no lower limit on what horrifying depravity they'll try to get away with normalizing and perpetrating against the children.

I'm glad the Jamaicans are not prone to such perversion but make no mistake; even the manliest and seemingly most wholesome heterosexual of places have no shortage of filthy men "on the down-low", so beware; you can never fully escape this. Still, to be sure, I may have to get my sons out of the Philippines because there seems to be something in the water out there and it's freaking me out.

Ah, well I love Jamaicans but I didn't mean to imply that none of them were "prone to such perversions," since after all they wouldn't torch so many "batty boys" with molotov cocktails or hack them with machetes or shoot them if a problematic number of them weren't there already buggering each other there (and, of course the homosexuals are no doubt trying to bugger innocent children and animals as well, since the homosexuals never merely content themselves with their depraved interest on another man's rear-end).... but the fact remains:
Jamaica, some of the other islands (Antigua and Barbuda, Saint Lucia, Barbados), and Uganda and other black African countries still have the largest # of people who are ardently opposed to homosexual depravity regardless, which means even if the international globohomo lobby pulls out the stops to use any form of corruption of finagling to legalize homosexuality there, there's still the most "entrenched" homophobia there amongst the general population.

I would not discount the Philippines just because there happens to be a certain subset of degenerates attracted to it. I mean there are pedophiles who come there for underaged kids to f**k, which is disgusting, sometimes they go for elementary school age and below... there are also those who seek out ladyboys, trannies and other confused sad creatures. Again, not something I am a fan of, at all. But we should not paint the whole country with one wide brush and dismiss it just because of that. It still has a lot of good, clean, fun to offer. It still has sunshine, affordable lodgings and food and a ton of adventure to be had. Why dismiss all that just because of some faggy stuff? Don't let the rainbow folk and the alphabet people steal your thunder and cheat you out of an amazing travel location, brother.

Oh, I think the Philippines is an awesome place, don't get me wrong. Also there's so many beautiful islands I'd love to sail in, friendly dynamic people. I'd love to travel there and throughout SE and East Asia someday, and show the locals all my most gentlemanly faux-James Bond respects, with no ranting and raving in the streets about they have too many homosexuals... But there are way too many homosexuals there for me to make it my home, personally.
I feel the same about almost all of Asia even though I still aspire to be a poor man's scholar of East Asian languages (mainly Cantonese and Vietnamese, possibly also Japanese), but I feel I've made the right choice to swear off WMAF because that sense of guilt I always had from nailing their chicks disappears when I do + I don't have to be surrounded in effeminate men and gays if I decline to go there....
But if I end up an old wounded ex-"sea dog" hobbling around with no children of my own to protect though, I'd have nothing against the Philippines at all and would count myself lucky to be there if I didn't find another home.
You never know, if my bravado and luck doesn't last, I may end up with a "beggars can't be choosers" scenario and be obliged to go wherever I can afford the rents and beer, and am liked (or at least willingly tolerated) by the locals....

Either way, in spite of lively debate, "the people have spoken" and the results are undeniable...

All 15 or so of us who have voted so far!
But hey, never discount the power of a close-knit community.
After all, the jews are less than 1% of the world's population are responsible for virtually all the worst problems and mass-murders on the planet for a vast span of this unfortunate jew-afflicted world's history (so imagine what a small # of *positive* people could accomplish with similarly small numbers!).

[Cornfed]

A less silly question would be - is it gay to find muscular crossfit chicks attractive?

[MrMan]

A less silly question would be - is it gay to find muscular crossfit chicks attractive?
[/img]

Ewwww... Deleted the pick. It's not technically gay. If the woman is biologically female, I'm don't fault the man who dates or marries her on account of that. But definitely not my taste.

I also wouldn't want to be a with a woman who could beat me up or do very serious damage trying.

Of course if you end up with a crazy one, there's always kitchen knives and you got to sleep sometime. So being stronger than her doesn't guarantee anyone. You have to find someone trustworthy.

[publicduende]

While it is true that the Muslims, the Japanese and ancient Romans had their fair share of effeminate men and a certain degree of tolerance for their existence, they never bought into the delusion that men could actually become women. Or even live as women. They didn't play pretend... didn't put on dresses and squeel like girls and act like the other gender, unless it was for the theatre and meant to be comical. These were just soft, feminine looking youthful men with handsome, delicate faces. That's what they were crazy about. But if you had dropped a "bakla" or a legit transgender or crossdresser in ancient Rome, or in the harem of some sultan or shogun, they would have instantly put the creature to the sword without a second thought.

Emperor Hadrian was mad about a boy called Antinous, his lover, who was reconstructed to have looked something like this based on statues, paintings and descriptions of the lad:



Looks like a gay fellow. But doesn't look anything close to a 'bakla'. It's simply a feminine young man, no gender bending madness. Simply didn't happen. Or very, very rarely compared to nowadays. Compare that to this goldfish looking creature in a wig:

That's true. Nobody in ancient times, and even now, would love to see a man acting as a caricature of a woman, beyond, maybe, comedy theatre. Still the attraction to the kind of effeminate, delicate beauty certain young men would offer, might be compared to the attraction to TG individuals of today.

All in all, it's a phenomenon that has existed in history, and will continue to exist. There will always be gay boys who express a feminine quality of beauty, just like there will always be the odd women who are into body building and have nothing feminine, apart from their genitalia, to show for. That's supply side. The demand will never dwindle, either, especially now that men are only a flight away from cultures, like Thailand and the Philippines, where good-looking TGs are abundant and available.

What you and I (and a lot of other people) despise is the f*cking circus built around TG and LGBTQ+ people. The idea that these people have not only the right to be who (or what) they want to be, but also slap it on everybody else's face at any time, consider anybody who doesn't subscribe to every idea and whim of theirs as sexist bigots, and claim rights that usually belong to a majority, not to a minority.

Everybody is entitled to the sexual life and preferences they want. It's the weaponisation of their sexual life and preferences for political, ideological and (unsuccessfully) commercial reasons (usually to disrupt a traditional status quo rooted on biology and common sense), that is the problem.

[Jackfruits]

any man that has sex with another man/ladyboy = gay

[Jackfruits]

Alright, lets settle this once and for all... @CaptainSkelebob has been making the rounds on this forum claiming that it's totally normal for a straight bloke to bone ladyboys. He claims to only fornicate with those who already had their dongs chopped off, opting to only go for blowjobs with those that still possess their dangly bits. As a result, he says, he's still just a 100% heterosexual man.

Others like me, @MrMan and others are of the opinion that a ladyboy is a male no matter what; you cannot fight biology. Even if you chop off a man's nutsack, pump him full of steroids and fashion a neo-vagina out of the tissue of his penis, you'd still be f***ing what is essentially just a male with an open surgical wound in his crotch. Which is absolutely disgusting, but some people are okay with such ridiculous cognitive dissonance. In my view, a man who f***s a ladyboy, either sans penis or with male genitalia remaining, is per definition not 100% straight... he is more likely bisexual, at the very least somewhere "out there" on the Kinsey Scale.

So what do you think, forum? Can you bang ladyboys and still be 100% straight or is that just an illusion made up by down-low men too afraid to admit that some of the shit they're into isn't as "straight" as they'd like to admit?

Oh f**k off MarcosArsehola!!!!
You know as well as I do the 1 time with the ladyboy who had a cock was an accident....
She looked like a girl in the face!!!
She had tits...
I didnt know she had a dong until we already got back to my room!!
Once shes there Im not gunna just tell her to f**k off and f**k about getting another ladyboy!!
A ladyboy with a p***y who looks like a girl and who has tits and a curvy ass is a f***ing woman as far as Im concerned!!!
I dont give a f**k about the what is a woman BS they are arguing about!!!
Im a straight man!!!
I like f***ing p***y and Im not f***ing gay!!!
Next person to call me f***ing gay I swear to god I'll kick my dog!!!
Look at some of these hot ladyboys and tell me you wouldnt f**k them!!
They are totally women and it isnt gay to f**k these!!
I dont care about them being men before!!
They look like hot babes now so why should i care about whether they think theyre real women or ppl dont think theyre women
Nah fellas!!
I like p***y!!!
Which is the complete opposite of gay!!!
Marcos fails with this poll
https://www.jakarta100bars.com/2020/09/ ... a.html?m=1
Try and tell me you wouldnt f**k these and then lie and call urself straight
BWAHAHA
So many faggots around here its unreal

my guess, ofc only a guess.... the many STDs you have collected over the years banging gay men made you insane. Henry VIII was crazy due to many STDs as well so nothing to be ashamed of. I also think you likely are HIV positive as you are so erratic

[CaptainSkelebob]

Alright, lets settle this once and for all... @CaptainSkelebob has been making the rounds on this forum claiming that it's totally normal for a straight bloke to bone ladyboys. He claims to only fornicate with those who already had their dongs chopped off, opting to only go for blowjobs with those that still possess their dangly bits. As a result, he says, he's still just a 100% heterosexual man.

Others like me, @MrMan and others are of the opinion that a ladyboy is a male no matter what; you cannot fight biology. Even if you chop off a man's nutsack, pump him full of steroids and fashion a neo-vagina out of the tissue of his penis, you'd still be f***ing what is essentially just a male with an open surgical wound in his crotch. Which is absolutely disgusting, but some people are okay with such ridiculous cognitive dissonance. In my view, a man who f***s a ladyboy, either sans penis or with male genitalia remaining, is per definition not 100% straight... he is more likely bisexual, at the very least somewhere "out there" on the Kinsey Scale.

So what do you think, forum? Can you bang ladyboys and still be 100% straight or is that just an illusion made up by down-low men too afraid to admit that some of the shit they're into isn't as "straight" as they'd like to admit?

Oh f**k off MarcosArsehola!!!!
You know as well as I do the 1 time with the ladyboy who had a cock was an accident....
She looked like a girl in the face!!!
She had tits...
I didnt know she had a dong until we already got back to my room!!
Once shes there Im not gunna just tell her to f**k off and f**k about getting another ladyboy!!
A ladyboy with a p***y who looks like a girl and who has tits and a curvy ass is a f***ing woman as far as Im concerned!!!
I dont give a f**k about the what is a woman BS they are arguing about!!!
Im a straight man!!!
I like f***ing p***y and Im not f***ing gay!!!
Next person to call me f***ing gay I swear to god I'll kick my dog!!!
Look at some of these hot ladyboys and tell me you wouldnt f**k them!!
They are totally women and it isnt gay to f**k these!!
I dont care about them being men before!!
They look like hot babes now so why should i care about whether they think theyre real women or ppl dont think theyre women
Nah fellas!!
I like p***y!!!
Which is the complete opposite of gay!!!
Marcos fails with this poll
https://www.jakarta100bars.com/2020/09/ ... a.html?m=1
Try and tell me you wouldnt f**k these and then lie and call urself straight
BWAHAHA
So many faggots around here its unreal

my guess, ofc only a guess.... the many STDs you have collected over the years banging gay men made you insane. Henry VIII was crazy due to many STDs as well so nothing to be ashamed of. I also think you likely are HIV positive as you are so erratic

If I got any STDs I caught them from ur mum fella
Sure ive had custard leaking out my japs eye a couple of times fella
But thats coz unlike little fags like you I actually get some f***ing p***y
Jackfruit is that ur name coz you like sucking on plums you f***ing homo cunt

[Jackfruits]

how is this guy not banned?

[Yohan]

Ppl who dont find the ladyboys I posted attractive must be gay. They look like women and they have pussys
Some of them are hot and it cant be denied by a straight man who is attracted to women!!

Not correct, ladyboys do not really look like women...but you will notice it only if you look at them carefully.

If you are a straight man and are solely interested in a straight woman, you will notice the difference soon - not immediately maybe, if the first meeting is in a rather dark area or if you see only pictures which show you only the face and not the entire person from top to toe.

However if you see such a ladyboy without makeup in bright daylight without able hiding his hands by gloves and feet/knees by stocking/shoes, you will notice quickly that they do not have fingers and toes of a woman, but those of a male. There are differences between men and women which a ladyboy cannot change.

Some ladyboys indeed look very similar to a straight female, who is born as a female - but only similar, not the same. Also if you talk to a ladyboy, the way he is talking to you is somehow different, no woman who is 100% a lady will talk to you like that.

I remember a ladyboy crossing my way in a rather dark corner in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia a few years ago.

He: Hey!
I : Do we know each other?
He: It does not matter, you can f**k me if you want
I: Is this really necessary?
He: Yes, it is, if you do not f**k me you will miss the f**k of your life
I: Don't waste my time. Do me a favor and get out of my eyes.

------

Any female who is looking for some money for a night will approach me somehow like:

Hellooooo - You are alone? You have no lady? I want to go with you...I will be nice to you... etc. etc.

How ladyboys and how real hospitality girls try to talk to you in Asia is not the same...

[Jackfruits]

do local filipino men date ladyboys?

[Kalinago]

I was tricked in 2012,into banging a colombian ladyboy,and after that I thought I've already done the worst thing ever,and it felt good,because the ass was tighter than most pussies,so I went on a ladyboy binge and banged Native Dutch,latina,puerto rican,venezuelan,ecuadorian,colombian ladyboys,many of them extremely beautiful only with a penis.

Never been with a Asian or redbone or black(yuck,unless pretty lightskin redbone or something)Ladyboy.

I am ashamed of this behaviour,but maybe I am a fetishist.

I don't intend to do it again,my FWB was a 'white' venezuelan ladyboy,about a 8 in looks,and 'she'was very kind hearted and horny and lustful to me.

Ladyboys are still men in wiring,they rightfully hate being dominated by other men,even the ones like me they begged to bang them,they also are very insecure.

they also have a temper.

I don't care if I'm gonna be judged by this,it has happened and no point in presenting a false image of myself to others,especially online,though only my sister knows what I've done,my family would ostracize me.

[Kalinago]

Ladyboys are very horny sometimes,and also very insecure about not being real women.that's my passing observation after banging many of them .

[CaptainSkelebob]

Ppl who dont find the ladyboys I posted attractive must be gay. They look like women and they have pussys
Some of them are hot and it cant be denied by a straight man who is attracted to women!!

Not correct, ladyboys do not really look like women...but you will notice it only if you look at them carefully.

If you are a straight man and are solely interested in a straight woman, you will notice the difference soon - not immediately maybe, if the first meeting is in a rather dark area or if you see only pictures which show you only the face and not the entire person from top to toe.

However if you see such a ladyboy without makeup in bright daylight without able hiding his hands by gloves and feet/knees by stocking/shoes, you will notice quickly that they do not have fingers and toes of a woman, but those of a male. There are differences between men and women which a ladyboy cannot change.

Some ladyboys indeed look very similar to a straight female, who is born as a female - but only similar, not the same. Also if you talk to a ladyboy, the way he is talking to you is somehow different, no woman who is 100% a lady will talk to you like that.

I remember a ladyboy crossing my way in a rather dark corner in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia a few years ago.

He: Hey!
I : Do we know each other?
He: It does not matter, you can f**k me if you want
I: Is this really necessary?
He: Yes, it is, if you do not f**k me you will miss the f**k of your life
I: Don't waste my time. Do me a favor and get out of my eyes.

------

Any female who is looking for some money for a night will approach me somehow like:

Hellooooo - You are alone? You have no lady? I want to go with you...I will be nice to you... etc. etc.

How ladyboys and how real hospitality girls try to talk to you in Asia is not the same...

Are you kidding me alfred???
Just go to thailand like I did and see some of these hot feminized ladyboys!!!
They are f***ing stunning fella....
Look on some ladyboy escort websites and at ladyboy porn and look how some of these hot babes look way hotter than regular women!!!
They are superior fella!!!
Most socalled real women dont act or look like real women....