How marriage/society works

[Outcast9428]

What you are describing is not a social contract and no, I’ve never heard that before and it sounds like bullshit to me. That’s like saying “yeah if I jerk off 6 times before having sex with my wife that’s just gonna make me hornier for her.” In what universe does that make sense?

It is a historical fact backed by logic that what I am describing is THE social contract. The idea that the more you get (with different females) the more you want is pretty well known. It also makes the husband more desirable. It is often said that "women want fried ice". A woman will want to completely sexually capture a sexually desirable man, but if she succeeds she will then regard him as a loser and won't want him any more. The solution is the man f***ing whores, which will stimulate the wife's competitive instincts to the betterment of all. This should be very apparent if you can get past your feminist brainwashing.

It is not well known given that this is the first time I’ve heard anything of this rubbish. And you’re not going to convince me by accusing me of being a feminist given that I got banned from a fairly centrist to center-left forum for being too far to the right. I literally was cited as the reason for why numerous SJWs and feminists left the forum was because they couldn’t stand the fact that I was allowed to wreck every argument they put forth without holding back.

The final reason I got banned in fact was for making a thread saying adultery should be criminalized and offenders ought to be deprived of half their financial assets. The people who were super angry with me were all leftists. So congrats Cornfed, you share something in common with them. You both support adultery and bdsm.

Your argument makes no sense whatsoever and if the woman needs her man to cheat on her in order to feel attracted to him then she is a sick masochistic female cuckold and a whore who is unsuitable for marriage.

[Cornfed]

It is not well known given that this is the first time I’ve heard anything of this rubbish. And you’re not going to convince me by accusing me of being a feminist given that I got banned from a fairly centrist to center-left forum for being too far to the right. I literally was cited as the reason for why numerous SJWs and feminists left the forum was because they couldn’t stand the fact that I was allowed to wreck every argument they put forth without holding back.

The final reason I got banned in fact was for making a thread saying adultery should be criminalized and offenders ought to be deprived of half their financial assets. The people who were super angry with me were all leftists. So congrats Cornfed, you share something in common with them. You both support adultery and bdsm.

Your argument makes no sense whatsoever and if the woman needs her man to cheat on her in order to feel attracted to him then she is a sick masochistic female cuckold and a whore who is unsuitable for marriage.

It shows how deeply ingrained the cancer of feminism is in society that feminists like you don't even know they are feminists. The idea that men and women are somehow parallel is particularly silly. You don't get this thinking in other exchanges such as employment. Feminism is a disease. You have to actively fight it. Any research you do will confirm that the social contract in any major culture is as I've stated, as it would have to be in order to be effective.

[Outcast9428]

It is not well known given that this is the first time I’ve heard anything of this rubbish. And you’re not going to convince me by accusing me of being a feminist given that I got banned from a fairly centrist to center-left forum for being too far to the right. I literally was cited as the reason for why numerous SJWs and feminists left the forum was because they couldn’t stand the fact that I was allowed to wreck every argument they put forth without holding back.

The final reason I got banned in fact was for making a thread saying adultery should be criminalized and offenders ought to be deprived of half their financial assets. The people who were super angry with me were all leftists. So congrats Cornfed, you share something in common with them. You both support adultery and bdsm.

Your argument makes no sense whatsoever and if the woman needs her man to cheat on her in order to feel attracted to him then she is a sick masochistic female cuckold and a whore who is unsuitable for marriage.

It shows how deeply ingrained the cancer of feminism is in society that feminists like you don't even know they are feminists. The idea that men and women are somehow parallel is particularly silly. You don't get this thinking in other exchanges such as employment. Feminism is a disease. You have to actively fight it. Any research you do will confirm that the social contract in any major culture is as I've stated, as it would have to be in order to be effective.

I agree with the rest of it, I don’t agree with that “men can cheat all they want” bullshit.

You know what disease runs alongside feminism just as fast? Liberalism! And you reek of it. Talk about needing to actively fight a cancer. You justify both rough sex and adultery and won’t even call women whores if they have sick fetishes and basically act like it’s men’s job to satisfy their sick fetishes. This is right leaning liberal bullshit.

[Cornfed]

You know what disease runs alongside feminism just as fast? Liberalism! And you reek of it.

Eh, I'm advocating authentic traditional values human society is necessarily based on that you can research. You are just making stuff up to suit your feminist sensibilities. Deliberate adultery should be severely punished, adultery of course being sex between a married female and someone other than her husband.

[Outcast9428]

You know what disease runs alongside feminism just as fast? Liberalism! And you reek of it.

Eh, I'm advocating authentic traditional values human society is necessarily based on that you can research. You are just making stuff up to suit your feminist sensibilities. Deliberate adultery should be severely punished, adultery of course being sex between a married female and someone other than her husband.

If you had told anybody in Medieval Times that it’s okay to choke women during sex because you’re her master and that it’s okay to cheat on your wife I guarantee you that no parent in the village would want you marrying their daughter. I would stand a much better chance of getting picked to be a girl’s husband. There’s your answer right there and deep down you know this is true.

[Cornfed]

If you had told anybody in Medieval Times that it’s okay to choke women during sex because you’re her master and that it’s okay to cheat on your wife I guarantee you that no parent in the village would want you marrying their daughter. I would stand a much better chance of getting picked to be a girl’s husband. There’s your answer right there and deep down you know this is true.

They wouldn't have regarded what a husband and wife got up to as anyone else's business and it was normal for married men to have sex with whores, as any research would show. In fact, in an old thread I posted a court record about whores being hired to test a husband's ability to get an erection. Get over your feminist silliness and do some research.

[Outcast9428]

If you had told anybody in Medieval Times that it’s okay to choke women during sex because you’re her master and that it’s okay to cheat on your wife I guarantee you that no parent in the village would want you marrying their daughter. I would stand a much better chance of getting picked to be a girl’s husband. There’s your answer right there and deep down you know this is true.

They wouldn't have regarded what a husband and wife got up to as anyone else's business and it was normal for married men to have sex with whores, as any research would show. In fact, in an old thread I posted a court record about whores being hired to test a husband's ability to get an erection. Get over your feminist silliness and do some research.

Oh my lord. You realize the church taught people back then that all anal sex was a mortal sin? Doesn’t matter if it was with a girl it was considered disguised homosexuality. If you asked a prostitute for anal sex back then you would’ve been permanently banned from the brothel. The church even told people what positions they should be having sex in. People may not have strictly followed the required positions thing but given the way people were towards sex in general. Yes people absolutely did think your sex life was their business. Most people would not have even known choking during sex was a thing and if you mentioned it to someone they would think you were extremely perverse and degenerate.

I’m assuming this was a court decision regarding the man’s impotence and deciding whether this justified marital annulment right? Simply testing the man’s erection for the sake of a trial is different from married dudes cheating on their wife.

[Outcast9428]

Case in point, the guy who invented the bdsm shit was a man named Marquis De Sade. He was a libertine in the 18th century. He horrified everyone so much that he was thrown in various dungeons and insane asylums for years for talking about this kind of shit. I think people in Medieval times would have been more harsh then people in the 18th century were given that libertinism and classical liberalism actually did have a decent number of supporters then whereas anybody advocating that sort of thing in Medieval Times would have probably had their life ruined somehow.

Are you now going to claim it was institutional feminism that put him in jail?

[Cornfed]

Oh my lord. You realize the church taught people back then that all anal sex was a mortal sin? Doesn’t matter if it was with a girl it was considered disguised homosexuality. If you asked a prostitute for anal sex back then you would’ve been permanently banned from the brothel.

Who said anything about anal sex?

Generally these sexual kinks are an irrelevant distraction from the main focus, which is the marriage arrangement as stated.

[Outcast9428]

Oh my lord. You realize the church taught people back then that all anal sex was a mortal sin? Doesn’t matter if it was with a girl it was considered disguised homosexuality. If you asked a prostitute for anal sex back then you would’ve been permanently banned from the brothel.

Who said anything about anal sex?

Generally these sexual kinks are an irrelevant distraction from the main focus, which is the marriage arrangement as stated.

You think that people who thought anal sex was a mortal sin and that even things like oral sex and having sex in non-traditional positions is “pushing the envelope,” not prohibited per se but I do think it was a tiny taboo in the same way that underage drinking is a tiny taboo. Anal sex was clearly extremely taboo though. The point is, you really think that people who thought having sex in certain positions or having oral sex might be a little degenerate are going to suddenly be open minded to your sadism kink?

And like I pointed out with Marquis De Sade. People were clearly not open minded towards him at all. It took radical liberal/socialists in the French Revolution to free him from prison. He spent almost half of his entire lifetime in prison.

[Cornfed]

Oh my lord. You realize the church taught people back then that all anal sex was a mortal sin? Doesn’t matter if it was with a girl it was considered disguised homosexuality. If you asked a prostitute for anal sex back then you would’ve been permanently banned from the brothel.

Who said anything about anal sex?

Generally these sexual kinks are an irrelevant distraction from the main focus, which is the marriage arrangement as stated.

You think that people who thought anal sex was a mortal sin and that even things like oral sex and having sex in non-traditional positions is “pushing the envelope,” not prohibited per se but I do think it was a tiny taboo in the same way that underage drinking is a tiny taboo. Anal sex was clearly extremely taboo though. The point is, you really think that people who thought having sex in certain positions or having oral sex might be a little degenerate are going to suddenly be open minded to your sadism kink?

And like I pointed out with Marquis De Sade. People were clearly not open minded towards him at all. It took radical liberal/socialists in the French Revolution to free him from prison. He spent almost half of his entire lifetime in prison.

Whatever. None of this is particularly important.

[Outcast9428]

Oh my lord. You realize the church taught people back then that all anal sex was a mortal sin? Doesn’t matter if it was with a girl it was considered disguised homosexuality. If you asked a prostitute for anal sex back then you would’ve been permanently banned from the brothel.

Who said anything about anal sex?

Generally these sexual kinks are an irrelevant distraction from the main focus, which is the marriage arrangement as stated.

You think that people who thought anal sex was a mortal sin and that even things like oral sex and having sex in non-traditional positions is “pushing the envelope,” not prohibited per se but I do think it was a tiny taboo in the same way that underage drinking is a tiny taboo. Anal sex was clearly extremely taboo though. The point is, you really think that people who thought having sex in certain positions or having oral sex might be a little degenerate are going to suddenly be open minded to your sadism kink?

And like I pointed out with Marquis De Sade. People were clearly not open minded towards him at all. It took radical liberal/socialists in the French Revolution to free him from prison. He spent almost half of his entire lifetime in prison.

Whatever. None of this is particularly important.

Yes it is because you are empowering degeneracy and evil while claiming to be part of a movement that’s against it. In the process you are damaging the authenticity and moral high ground of our movement by normalizing beliefs that undermine everything we advocate for.

This isn’t even a matter of you “not being extreme enough” this is you pushing our enemy’s beliefs and masquerading them as ours and then hoping nobody will criticize you for it because you have controversial beliefs that are authentically traditional that we do want to normalize.

[ArchibaultNew]

The REAL problem is Radical Left wingers who want to "reimagine society" and not promiscuous people.

People in Conservative society are promiscuous and they keep it to themselves. The Real problem which rarely gets addressed are Radical Left Wingers who promote the "LGBT" agenda by force and want traditional families to stop existing. They demonize men, make women resentful and want children to be gay. As a single man if you don't want to hook up with transgenders you are "transphobic,"

[Outcast9428]

The REAL problem is Radical Left wingers who want to "reimagine society" and not promiscuous people.

People in Conservative society are promiscuous and they keep it to themselves.

No they aren’t. We don’t want people to just “keep it to themselves” we want them to stop being degenerates. Promiscuous people are a big part of the problem. Just because the radical left is even worse doesn’t mean they are guilt free.

A lot of right-leaning liberals and even some mainstream conservatives ask me why I focus so much on criticizing the liberals instead of the radical left. The reason is simple... The radical left has not actually won. In-fact, they are not even close to winning. They are widely despised by the population and retreating on all fronts. They're losing control over Twitter and even companies like Netflix, CNN, and Saturday Night Live are purging radical leftists from their staff and abandoning woke projects. I see less gay shit on TV now compared to in the 2017-2020 era. In the midterm election, the radical left very well could end up losing control over half the US government.

I do think a lot of the Republican Party's victories can be attributed to the absolute insanity of the modern day Democratic Party. If we were facing off against the 1990s Democratic party on the other hand, we would be hosed. The Democrats are right about one thing. America is a broadly liberal country, especially certain areas of it. The radical left has not won but liberalism has. The majority of the country is not even remotely conservative and most of the people who are conservative are half assed conservatives who incorporate a lot of liberal values into their conservatism.

So I feel a lot more compelled to attack liberalism then to attack the radical left because everybody is attacking the radical left. Everybody hates them. Even Bill Maher hates the radical left and he's a self-described socialist. I almost never actually meet crazy SJW type people in real life. This is a problem that is going to correct itself because the wokes are not only deeply unpopular but are also really stupid and incompetent. Their ideas appeal to basically no one who isn't mentally ill.

Liberalism on the other hand, is taken for granted in America. In 2016-2021 I honestly believed that the conservatives had given up on the battle against liberalism and just accepted it as inevitable. The overturning of Roe V. Wade has really breathed life into the conservative movement, giving true social conservatism an actual victory to celebrate. The first time we've taken back ground from the left since the 1950s. It has proven to us that the battle against liberalism is not over and we can still win. I am much much more concerned about liberalism permanently destroying conservative values then I am about the radical left ever getting its way in America.

If you live in a country like Canada or the UK, on the other hand, I can understand mostly focusing on the radical left. Trying to defeat liberalism in those countries is a lost cause.

[ArchibaultNew]

The REAL problem is Radical Left wingers who want to "reimagine society" and not promiscuous people.

People in Conservative society are promiscuous and they keep it to themselves.

No they aren’t. We don’t want people to just “keep it to themselves” we want them to stop being degenerates. Promiscuous people are a big part of the problem. Just because the radical left is even worse doesn’t mean they are guilt free.

A lot of right-leaning liberals and even some mainstream conservatives ask me why I focus so much on criticizing the liberals instead of the radical left. The reason is simple... The radical left has not actually won. In-fact, they are not even close to winning. They are widely despised by the population and retreating on all fronts. They're losing control over Twitter and even companies like Netflix, CNN, and Saturday Night Live are purging radical leftists from their staff and abandoning woke projects. I see less gay shit on TV now compared to in the 2017-2020 era. In the midterm election, the radical left very well could end up losing control over half the US government.

I do think a lot of the Republican Party's victories can be attributed to the absolute insanity of the modern day Democratic Party. If we were facing off against the 1990s Democratic party on the other hand, we would be hosed. The Democrats are right about one thing. America is a broadly liberal country, especially certain areas of it. The radical left has not won but liberalism has. The majority of the country is not even remotely conservative and most of the people who are conservative are half assed conservatives who incorporate a lot of liberal values into their conservatism.

So I feel a lot more compelled to attack liberalism then to attack the radical left because everybody is attacking the radical left. Everybody hates them. Even Bill Maher hates the radical left and he's a self-described socialist. I almost never actually meet crazy SJW type people in real life. This is a problem that is going to correct itself because the wokes are not only deeply unpopular but are also really stupid and incompetent. Their ideas appeal to basically no one who isn't mentally ill.

Liberalism on the other hand, is taken for granted in America. In 2016-2021 I honestly believed that the conservatives had given up on the battle against liberalism and just accepted it as inevitable. The overturning of Roe V. Wade has really breathed life into the conservative movement, giving true social conservatism an actual victory to celebrate. The first time we've taken back ground from the left since the 1950s. It has proven to us that the battle against liberalism is not over and we can still win. I am much much more concerned about liberalism permanently destroying conservative values then I am about the radical left ever getting its way in America.

If you live in a country like Canada or the UK, on the other hand, I can understand mostly focusing on the radical left. Trying to defeat liberalism in those countries is a lost cause.

You can't "patrol" people nor control what they do in their private lives. I think Promiscuity should be accepted in society as long as it kept under wraps. What you can do is to remove all that and put in the "Private Sphere" as opposed to the Public sphere like on TV. For instance, I did not like in the Amber Heard trial she talks about her defecating on johnny's bed. I think all that should NEVER be made public and shared with the masses. It lowers the culture level of societies.