andrewfitzpatrick wrote: ↑
January 17th, 2020, 5:59 pm
Winston wrote: ↑
January 17th, 2020, 3:06 am
Is there any proof or evidence that Dan is a pedofile? Just because he films young girls doesn't make him a pedofile. The mainstream media films young girls and focuses on them all the time. They get a lot of attention.
He talks openly on youtube about his attraction to girls 12-14. How he reads statutory rape laws, knows age of consent laws throughout the world, and wants to marry a child. His entire defense in court when he was arrested wasn't that he didn't break any laws. It was that his attraction to children is natural. He spent months leading up to his trial admitting that he was attracted to underage girls but it was the law that was the problem. They had to prove that his comments towards that 15 year old were motivated by an unnatural attraction to children. He made their case for them by acting like it was the law on trial not him. He came up with ridiculous excuses like girls today are more developed at a younger age due to their diet. He literally has no idea what girls looked like at that age 100 years ago. He was just pretending to in order to rationalize his perversions. i was wrong Winston to say that people could associate this site with those pedo expats in Thailand by having Dan around. Since based on replies to him the people here for the most part recognize how mentally ill Dan is and that is without seeing him at his worst on youtube. Most of the time he just talks about food allergies that he doesn't actually have they are just somatic delusions from the the schizophrenia. It is just occasionally he goes off the deep end with the child sex talk, or wanting to have sex with his sisters, or wanting to eat feces for probiotics.
The thing is he knows it is wrong. He made this comment in an old blog post https://dancilley.blogspot.com/
"There was a girl in there who was filling out an application who I wanted to talk to, but I felt like I was a perverted, dirty old man that wanted to take advantage of a young defenseless, immature girl. She was at least 18, guaranteed though."
Ok I get that he likes underaged girls and has said so. But isn't a pedofile someone who likes little girls who are like under 10? A teenage girl that is 16 or 17 looks almost like an adult. So that isn't the same as being attracted to a child right? A 17 year old is just a minor.
What if a 17 year old girl has an 18 year old boyfriend? Are they allowed to have sex? Or what if a teenage couple meet when the boy is 17 and the girl is 16, and then the following year, the boy is 18 and the girl is 17? Does that make him a pedofile or rapist just because he is now 18 and his girlfriend is still 17? I'm confused. Surely the law can't be that dumb right?
Also, what's the definition of a sex offender under CA state law? Don't you have to have sex with a minor to be a sex offender? Or rape one? Just filming one shouldn't count as an offender. That makes no sense. Is CA state law the same as other states on this matter?
Didn't the CA court appoint a free defense lawyer to Dan? If so what did that lawyer advise him to do or plea?
So basically Dan got convicted as a "sex offender" just for filming a minor, and then later in court admitting that he's attracted to underaged girls? Does that mean anyone who admits to being attracted to underaged girls is automatically arrested as as sex offender? I don't get it. Surely the law can't be that trivial otherwise tons of pedofiles online would be getting arrested. What if the NSA catches you admitting that you like underaged girls on private social media, like Messenger or Viber or WhatsApp? They could arrest you for that?
A sexy 16 or 17 year old girl is obviously going to be lusted after. I think when Britney Spears first started out and became a pop star, she was only 17 too. So it cannot be illegal to get aroused or feel horny by a sexy 16 year old or 17 year old girl right?
I don't get it. Is the law arbitrary and only enforced when they feel like it or don't like you? That's what it seems like. Same with speeding tickets. If the officer likes you he will let you off. If not, he will give you a ticket.