Is Our Earth FLAT and Motionless, Not a Spinning Globe?

[galii]

Finally the first Physics PhD is admitting Flat Earth is true. I guess he is tired of lying



btw regarding Gravity:
"Why do you want to believe in something like gravity that literally just holds you back"

[gsjackson]

Why is this Galii troll unusually annoying? He's just a silly little twit who proclaims himself an emissary of science and reason yet never makes anything like a substantive argument. He got under Winston's skin too. He must be an advanced student of trolling.

[galii]

Why is this Galii troll unusually annoying? He's just a silly little twit who proclaims himself an emissary of science and reason yet never makes anything like a substantive argument. He got under Winston's skin too. He must be an advanced student of trolling.

Flat Earthers who are allergic against science, but who are entitled to use technology, created by science, telling science advocates who use science, as trolling. That is extra funny.

[Lucas88]

Why is this Galii troll unusually annoying? He's just a silly little twit who proclaims himself an emissary of science and reason yet never makes anything like a substantive argument. He got under Winston's skin too. He must be an advanced student of trolling.

galii/gali, or Señor Galimatías as I like to call him, is just a silly lowlife troll who has nothing better in his miserable life other than to disrupt other people's threads with unrelated nonsense and post his irrelevant low-effort shitposts. He's only here to disrupt the forum with his bullshit and wind people up. He really is just a sad little loser with nothing better to do.

I knew who that dipshit was as soon as he reappeared and I suspect that he's the same troll behind that Galileo who was shitposting about beheading women not too long ago.

Unfortunately Winston allows disruptive lowlife trolls to run amok on his own forum. There's absolutely no quality control here.

[galii]

Why is this Galii troll unusually annoying? He's just a silly little twit who proclaims himself an emissary of science and reason yet never makes anything like a substantive argument. He got under Winston's skin too. He must be an advanced student of trolling.

galii/gali, or Señor Galimatías as I like to call him, is just a silly lowlife troll who has nothing better in his miserable life other than to disrupt other people's threads with unrelated nonsense and post his irrelevant low-effort shitposts. He's only here to disrupt the forum with his bullshit and wind people up. He really is just a sad little loser with nothing better to do.

I knew who that dipshit was as soon as he reappeared and I suspect that he's the same troll behind that Galileo who was shitposting about beheading women not too long ago.

Unfortunately Winston allows disruptive lowlife trolls to run amok on his own forum. There's absolutely no quality control here.

Well I had high hopes for you. You were a good high IQ poster but you turned thanks to the terraplanistas to a partial idiot.

[galii]

Why is this Galii troll unusually annoying? He's just a silly little twit who proclaims himself an emissary of science and reason yet never makes anything like a substantive argument. He got under Winston's skin too. He must be an advanced student of trolling.

galii/gali, or Señor Galimatías as I like to call him, is just a silly lowlife troll who has nothing better in his miserable life other than to disrupt other people's threads with unrelated nonsense and post his irrelevant low-effort shitposts. He's only here to disrupt the forum with his bullshit and wind people up. He really is just a sad little loser with nothing better to do.

I knew who that dipshit was as soon as he reappeared and I suspect that he's the same troll behind that Galileo who was shitposting about beheading women not too long ago.

Unfortunately Winston allows disruptive lowlife trolls to run amok on his own forum. There's absolutely no quality control here.

Well I had high hopes for you. You were a good high IQ poster but you turned thanks to the terraplanistas to a partial idiot.

Well, nobody thinks any less of you, Señor Galimatías. We didn't think that much of you to begin with and the Earth could well be flat. Deal with it and get off Newton's dick, brah!

I am a big fan of your Flat Earth club. Even gravity can not pull you down.

[galii]

This is cool

[galii]

The Flat Earth in the Quran

The quran proves the Flat Earth Model? Check it out yourself

[Moretorque]

The Flat Earth in the Quran

The quran proves the Flat Earth Model? Check it out yourself

Just a bunch of idiots is all, go research Line of Sight Radar and Over the Horizon Radar or OTH..

[galii]

The Flat Earth in the Quran

The quran proves the Flat Earth Model? Check it out yourself

Just a bunch of idiots is all, go research Line of Sight Radar and Over the Horizon Radar or OTH..

Flat Earthers are not a bunch of idiots. Lies from government and their institutions cause free thinkers to question everything they are told as "fact" by these institutions! People are disillusioned by all the lies and become curious about alternate sources of information. Curiosity is a trait of intelligence, not stupidity. On the contrary @Moretorque, those who blindly believe the narrative of the mainstream with no curiosity or ability of free thought are the true idiots.

I respect Flat Earthers who put in the work but most want to feel special and different and like getting validation without having special value to offer.

'Hey something I can finally answer! Not me but my good friend and room mate fell into the flat earth black hole while in university. Started out as a joke but then he just fell into it more and more.

Eventually I challenged him to do an experiment to figure it out ourselves. We went to opposite ends of a big inlet - bay. He had calculated the supposed curvature of the earth and figured out that from the distance between us me at one end and him at the other we should have a few metres of water between us. We both took some powerful green lasers that he had smuggled back from China in years past. While on the phone I would shine my laser somewhat into the air, watching to avoid plains and helicopters, then now that he could see me he would shine his laser up into the sky and slowly lower it until it disappears or just me. If it hit me, the earth was possibly flat. Well it disappeared 3 or so metres above my head every time. He accepted it and we moved on besides a brief time where he thought it was refracted from the water'

https://www.boredpanda.com/former-flat- ... gn=organic

'Was never a "flat earther" but I humored the theories and felt like some of them had some strong points that made me think they could be right. However, I realized it took away all the hard work and dedication from amazing scientists who spent their lives trying to educate and expand our knowledge and understanding of our world and space.

Also The fact that you can see Jupiter rotate with a personal telescope was a huge turning point for me. Flat earth theories make it seem like NASA is lying about everything but fail to mention you can see SO much from your backyard. You can also use a star tracking mount and watch the earth tilt through the sky

TLDR , I thought it was possible for everything to be doctored without realizing that everyday people can see so much.'

[Cornfed]

Just a bunch of idiots is all, go research Line of Sight Radar and Over the Horizon Radar or OTH..

Bouncing the radar signal off the ionosphere makes perfect sense on a flat earth. You avoid thicker atmosphere and obstructions at ground level.

[gsjackson]

Pixel--Dude, you said you were going to take a look at this little piece of evidence that Moretorque tells us over and over again is dispositive of the question -- over-the-horizon radar. Did you get a chance to?

I looked it up, and it just struck me as one more thing (((the government))) (aka liars) say they can do, and not especially relevant to the shape of the earth question. I suppose Moretorque thinks it proves curvature, but that's one part of the debate that I've been able to examine with my own eyes. When you fly on a clear day the horizon does continuously rise to eye level, as flat earthers say. And also, from an overlook in the Sierra Nevada Mountains I could see Mount Lassen and Mount Shasta, and everything in between. That's a distance of 120+ miles and there should be almost two miles of curvature over that distance. None was visible. Online, of course, you can see pictures of visible landmarks twice that distance away, which should be buried well under the curvature and invisible.

[galii]

Pixel--Dude, you said you were going to take a look at this little piece of evidence that Moretorque tells us over and over again is dispositive of the question -- over-the-horizon radar. Did you get a chance to?

I looked it up, and it just struck me as one more thing (((the government))) (aka liars) say they can do, and not especially relevant to the shape of the earth question. I suppose Moretorque thinks it proves curvature, but that's one part of the debate that I've been able to examine with my own eyes. When you fly on a clear day the horizon does continuously rise to eye level, as flat earthers say. And also, from an overlook in the Sierra Nevada Mountains I could see Mount Lassen and Mount Shasta, and everything in between. That's a distance of 120+ miles and there should be almost two miles of curvature over that distance. None was visible. Online, of course, you can see pictures of visible landmarks twice that distance away, which should be buried well under the curvature and invisible.

100 mile distance makes 1.3 miles curvature
Mount Shasta is 2.6 miles high
So you would get to see 1.3 miles of the mountain from 100 miles distance.
200 miles away is where that mountain would vanish completely

[gsjackson]

Pixel--Dude, you said you were going to take a look at this little piece of evidence that Moretorque tells us over and over again is dispositive of the question -- over-the-horizon radar. Did you get a chance to?

I looked it up, and it just struck me as one more thing (((the government))) (aka liars) say they can do, and not especially relevant to the shape of the earth question. I suppose Moretorque thinks it proves curvature, but that's one part of the debate that I've been able to examine with my own eyes. When you fly on a clear day the horizon does continuously rise to eye level, as flat earthers say. And also, from an overlook in the Sierra Nevada Mountains I could see Mount Lassen and Mount Shasta, and everything in between. That's a distance of 120+ miles and there should be almost two miles of curvature over that distance. None was visible. Online, of course, you can see pictures of visible landmarks twice that distance away, which should be buried well under the curvature and invisible.

100 mile distance makes 1.3 miles curvature
Mount Shasta is 2.6 miles high
So you would get to see 1.3 miles of the mountain from 100 miles distance.
200 miles away is where that mountain would vanish completely

What I said was that looking at both mountains from an overlook to the east you could not see any curvature of the earth between them.

[galii]

Pixel--Dude, you said you were going to take a look at this little piece of evidence that Moretorque tells us over and over again is dispositive of the question -- over-the-horizon radar. Did you get a chance to?

I looked it up, and it just struck me as one more thing (((the government))) (aka liars) say they can do, and not especially relevant to the shape of the earth question. I suppose Moretorque thinks it proves curvature, but that's one part of the debate that I've been able to examine with my own eyes. When you fly on a clear day the horizon does continuously rise to eye level, as flat earthers say. And also, from an overlook in the Sierra Nevada Mountains I could see Mount Lassen and Mount Shasta, and everything in between. That's a distance of 120+ miles and there should be almost two miles of curvature over that distance. None was visible. Online, of course, you can see pictures of visible landmarks twice that distance away, which should be buried well under the curvature and invisible.

100 mile distance makes 1.3 miles curvature
Mount Shasta is 2.6 miles high
So you would get to see 1.3 miles of the mountain from 100 miles distance.
200 miles away is where that mountain would vanish completely

What I said was that looking at both mountains from an overlook to the east you could not see any curvature of the earth between them.

The curvature is 1,3%. It is too small to see the differnce. As an anology imagine one mountain is 5000m high and another one 5500m high. Would you see the diffence from 100 miles? Probably not. That is why using laser is a better way to figure stuff like this out.