How many of you have daughters?

Discuss what's wrong with American women. Share problems, experiences and stories about them and why they suck so bad that you've had to resort to dating abroad and foreign women.
OutWest
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2429
Joined: March 19th, 2011, 12:09 am
Location: Asia/USA

Re: How many of you have daughters?

Post by OutWest »

argaluza wrote:
OutWest wrote: Well things are looking up. And as a descendent of a Scot who was banished from his own lands in the Clearances, I know that most Brits are beyond taking insult at rude comments on my part about
their former empire and the Prussian imposters known as the Royal Family.
As a fellow Celt whose ancestors shared the island with your ancestors, I just have to say, the royals are awful aren't they?
So, I will give that some thought...refresh my instincts and hell, I would buy you the beer
so we could work on insulting each other at close range. You do sound like a cheap date anyway,
and those Facebook pics of you in that soiled state would look great on your resume, no?
Man - you sound like my mum is disguise? She is the only one who has seen me in a soiled state whilst dishing out insults.
But...I think we are at some distance, and I doubt a pint bought via Paypal would really count, would it?
A virtual pint has been drunk by us both - cheers! :D

The Royals? Well, the House of Spencer lived to regret letting one of their own consort with such degenerates. No, not your mum in disguise...but she DID contact me and warn me about you...


Meet Loads of Foreign Women in Person! Join Our Happier Abroad ROMANCE TOURS to Many Overseas Countries!

Meet Foreign Women Now! Post your FREE profile on Happier Abroad Personals and start receiving messages from gorgeous Foreign Women today!

User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 12543
Joined: August 16th, 2012, 9:22 pm

Re: How many of you have daughters?

Post by Cornfed »

argaluza wrote: I don't see what that has to do with the evils of feminism. What it seems to me is that folks want to blame bad behaviour on 'feminism' when it is just bad behaviour.
Feminism is the idea that women are the property of ruling class men to be administered by the state/corporate system. Therefore, under feminism women are encouraged to behave badly in order to separate them from ordinary, decent men.
argaluza
Freshman Poster
Posts: 120
Joined: April 19th, 2014, 2:37 am

Re: How many of you have daughters?

Post by argaluza »

OutWest wrote: No, not your mum in disguise...but she DID contact me and warn me about you...
Ha! Thats her, cant say owt good about her first born. :evil:
argaluza
Freshman Poster
Posts: 120
Joined: April 19th, 2014, 2:37 am

Re: How many of you have daughters?

Post by argaluza »

Cornfed wrote:
argaluza wrote: I don't see what that has to do with the evils of feminism. What it seems to me is that folks want to blame bad behaviour on 'feminism' when it is just bad behaviour.
Feminism is the idea that women are the property of ruling class men to be administered by the state/corporate system. Therefore, under feminism women are encouraged to behave badly in order to separate them from ordinary, decent men.
We are going to have to differ on that one because my take on feminism is the one via the definition in the dictionary.

Bad behaviour from women (it does exist, I agree with you on that and it is more common than before) is down to (for me personally) the absence of consequences in their lives, now could this be down to the state implementing punishment in regards the of disciplining ones own children? Yes, is it part of a sinister plot to upend society and civilisation in some kind of 'divide and conquer' tactic. I am for that. I just don't see why the state would deny 'ordinary decent men' a lovelife when the elites realise that they still need 'ordinary decent men' to police and protect them. In fact 'ordinary decent men' are the most value human commodity to the elites.

The way women behave is just a byproduct of awful parenting - we don't notice the same as much with their male peers because we are not trying to bed them.
argaluza
Freshman Poster
Posts: 120
Joined: April 19th, 2014, 2:37 am

Post by argaluza »

I'll go one further, wherever there are well behaved, respectful women - like the Philippines, China, Japan and wherever - there is discipline in schools and corporal punishment isn't banned. There are consequences to bad behaviour for children in those countries.
Last edited by argaluza on April 19th, 2014, 2:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
OutWest
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2429
Joined: March 19th, 2011, 12:09 am
Location: Asia/USA

Re: How many of you have daughters?

Post by OutWest »

argaluza wrote:
OutWest wrote: No, not your mum in disguise...but she DID contact me and warn me about you...
Ha! Thats her, cant say owt good about her first born. :evil:
She just called again, something about it being way past your bedtime...and how you were always that way. It's a Brit mum thing. Any wonder so many of us left?
argaluza
Freshman Poster
Posts: 120
Joined: April 19th, 2014, 2:37 am

Re: How many of you have daughters?

Post by argaluza »

OutWest wrote:
argaluza wrote:
OutWest wrote: No, not your mum in disguise...but she DID contact me and warn me about you...
Ha! Thats her, cant say owt good about her first born. :evil:
She just called again, something about it being way past your bedtime...and how you were always that way. It's a Brit mum thing. Any wonder so many of us left?
See, your ancestors were 'happier abroad' :lol:
User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 12543
Joined: August 16th, 2012, 9:22 pm

Re: How many of you have daughters?

Post by Cornfed »

argaluza wrote:
Cornfed wrote:
argaluza wrote: I don't see what that has to do with the evils of feminism. What it seems to me is that folks want to blame bad behaviour on 'feminism' when it is just bad behaviour.
Feminism is the idea that women are the property of ruling class men to be administered by the state/corporate system. Therefore, under feminism women are encouraged to behave badly in order to separate them from ordinary, decent men.
We are going to have to differ on that one because my take on feminism is the one via the definition in the dictionary.
People can write down whatever they want in dictionaries. You would make some progress if you observed what is actually happening.
Bad behaviour from women (it does exist, I agree with you on that and it is more common than before) is down to (for me personally) the absence of consequences in their lives, now could this be down to the state implementing punishment in regards the of disciplining ones own children?
Yes and also giving females a free pass for crimes like perjury and false criminal allegations, funding lousy female behavior with child support, welfare etc.
I just don't see why the state would deny 'ordinary decent men' a lovelife when the elites realise that they still need 'ordinary decent men' to police and protect them. In fact 'ordinary decent men' are the most value human commodity to the elites.
The stated reason is to reduce overpopulation, but whatever the reason is, that is their policy. I agree that it seems a little short sighted, but I'm sure the elite know what they're doing.
argaluza
Freshman Poster
Posts: 120
Joined: April 19th, 2014, 2:37 am

Re: How many of you have daughters?

Post by argaluza »

Cornfed wrote: People can write down whatever they want in dictionaries. You would make some progress if you observed what is actually happening.
I am sorry, I don't see it your way. I do believe that young women behave a lot worse than their mothers and grandmothers but to keep blaming it on 'feminism' is not going to solve it. Badly behaved females are not so because of feminism.

Yes and also giving females a free pass for crimes like perjury and false criminal allegations, funding lousy female behavior with child support, welfare etc.
Yes, but a decent percentage of young males partake in lousy behaviour such as impregnating women and letting the state feed them, violence, idleness, destructive behaviour regards drugs and alcohol (yes, women do this too, bad behaviour is not gender specific). As many men are on welfare as women.

The stated reason is to reduce overpopulation, but whatever the reason is, that is their policy. I agree that it seems a little short sighted, but I'm sure the elite know what they're doing.
After the Jimmy Savile nonsense in my country and the amount of famous people who have been 'named and shamed' of the evil crime of being a nonce being protected by the law, I do now believe an elite controls what we read and to an extent our inner beliefs. Feminism has reached the pinnacle moreso in socialist countries such as Cuba, China and the Soviet Union than in the west but still has more 'feminine' women. I just think blaming bad behaviour on 'feminism' is looking at the real issue from the wrong angle.
Wolfeye
Experienced Poster
Posts: 1439
Joined: December 28th, 2013, 10:18 pm

Post by Wolfeye »

argaluza- You're not wrong at all on that. Personally, I think feminism (at least in this country) is NOT a supportive, self-sufficient, "Your body, your rules & You shouldn't have to rely on being lucky enough to have someone provide things for you" type of thing. Those ARE good things, but I think (and I've heard quite a few women say this too) it's more of a "dictatorial conduct by other women" type of thing.

They don't have anything to say when doctors get pushy with women, but let a guy so much as call his wife an idiot & thy're all over it. She's a joke if she's not a workplace implement, instead of a wife & mother that runs the house (that, oddly enough, is seen as being a "human resource"). They also seem to think it's an abdication to have a good relationship with a man or even to look pretty. It's very much a "do what I say as an act of liberation" type of things.

She shouldn't be treated like shit just because she's female or handicap herself because of that.
User avatar
Yohan
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 6431
Joined: April 2nd, 2014, 10:05 pm
Location: JAPAN

Post by Yohan »

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... other.html

This is a good example, how a daughter will develope in a Western feminist country.
User avatar
Yohan
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 6431
Joined: April 2nd, 2014, 10:05 pm
Location: JAPAN

Post by Yohan »

Winston wrote:It depends on how you define feminism...
I define so-called 'nowadays feminism' out of my personal observation and experiences as a hateful and highly aggressive movement in Westernized countries against everything which is 'male'.

Feminists are acting verbally strong and very oppressive, blaming everybody who disagrees with them as 'women-hating'. Feminists are against free speech and are demanding censorship of the Men's Rights Movement. Deleting and banning is the usual way feminist websites are moderated, any civilized discussion with feminists is not possible.

Nowadays feminism for sure has nothing to do with equality anymore - it's not about equality, which should mean to expect same rights but also to accept same obligations and responsibility. - Feminism is about 'equality but only if it fits me', me and me.

Feminism is a parasite movement, non-productive and needs money all the time to survive. This money might be extorted from individual men, especially those who are divorced and have children, it might be extorted from rich companies claiming sexual discrimination and harassment at the work place, it might also be collected by demanding money from public funds for financing women rights organizations.

Plainly said, feminism is about take as much as you can and give as little as possible, it's all about advantages and privileges solely justified because of your 'right' (=female) gender.

---

As a response against feminism, we see Western men going their own way, refusing marriage and even any private contact with a Western female - some men might stay single, some men are looking for a foreign wife, others consider to leave USA for always, even changing citizenship.

If somebody with this forum disagrees with my definition of 'nowadays-feminism', please let me know why.
argaluza
Freshman Poster
Posts: 120
Joined: April 19th, 2014, 2:37 am

Post by argaluza »

Yohan wrote: I define so-called 'nowadays feminism' out of my personal observation and experiences as a hateful and highly aggressive movement in Westernized countries against everything which is 'male'.
'Nowadays feminism' never heard of it, is that something you have made up?
Feminists are acting verbally strong and very oppressive, blaming everybody who disagrees with them as 'women-hating'. Feminists are against free speech and are demanding censorship of the Men's Rights Movement. Deleting and banning is the usual way feminist websites are moderated, any civilized discussion with feminists is not possible.
Show me any feminist movement who are against 'free speech' and are for curtailing men's rights? It is in your head, I promise you.
Nowadays feminism for sure has nothing to do with equality anymore - it's not about equality, which should mean to expect same rights but also to accept same obligations and responsibility. - Feminism is about 'equality but only if it fits me', me and me.
Some women are badly behaved and rude.

Some men think 'masculinity' and being an 'alpah male' is about domineering other men, being rude and using their fists or superior strength and size to get their own way, it is not my view of 'masculinity' at all but some men think it is.
Feminism is a parasite movement, non-productive and needs money all the time to survive. This money might be extorted from individual men, especially those who are divorced and have children, it might be extorted from rich companies claiming sexual discrimination and harassment at the work place, it might also be collected by demanding money from public funds for financing women rights organizations.
Again, that description of feminism isn't to be found anywhere except in your angry little mind. Find me that definition of 'feminism'.
Plainly said, feminism is about take as much as you can and give as little as possible, it's all about advantages and privileges solely justified because of your 'right' (=female) gender.
It is not, it is about women having the same freedoms and opportunities as men, that is all.

---
As a response against feminism, we see Western men going their own way, refusing marriage and even any private contact with a Western female - some men might stay single, some men are looking for a foreign wife, others consider to leave USA for always, even changing citizenship.
If a man wants a homemaker as a wife (and there is nothing wrong with that at all) who will do as she is told (again, nothing wrong with that) then there are millions of women in lots of countries where he will find what he is looking for.
If somebody with this forum disagrees with my definition of 'nowadays-feminism', please let me know why.
I do, because it is doesn't exist.
argaluza
Freshman Poster
Posts: 120
Joined: April 19th, 2014, 2:37 am

Post by argaluza »

Yohan wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... other.html

This is a good example, how a daughter will develope in a Western feminist country.
http://www.womeninscience.co.uk/emily-jones.php

A good example of how a daughter will develop in a western feminist country.
User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 12543
Joined: August 16th, 2012, 9:22 pm

Post by Cornfed »

argaluza wrote:http://www.womeninscience.co.uk/emily-jones.php

A good example of how a daughter will develop in a western feminist country.
Yeah, you can tell she is a horrible slut just by looking at her. In this case she would also appear to be having lots of money thrown at her just for having a vagina - money that could have been going to men discovering stuff that would revolutionize human life.
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Anti-American Women Rants”