Happier Abroad Forum Community

Obviously the vast majority of abortions could be avoided if the female just declined to have sex. The advocates of abortion would say that is an unreasonable requirement. It follows that they think people are so entitled to consequence-free sex that it is OK for females to butcher their own developing babies - something that would otherwise be seen as a horrendous crime - in order to get sex. Well, if sex is really so important and we are so entitled to it, why shouldn’t rape be legal? Maybe the rapist can’t find a willing partner. If getting sex is so important that baby killing is justified then using force to get sex is hardly worth mentioning. Even murdering some stranger pales in comparison to killing your own baby. In fact, since men on average have a higher sex drive and diminished ability to obtain sex, shouldn’t abortion supporters be calling on the government to force females to have sex with men in various circumstances? It only makes logical sense.

Cornfed wrote:Obviously the vast majority of abortions could be avoided if the female just declined to have sex. The advocates of abortion would say that is an unreasonable requirement. It follows that they think people are so entitled to consequence-free sex that it is OK for females to butcher their own developing babies - something that would otherwise be seen as a horrendous crime - in order to get sex. Well, if sex is really so important and we are so entitled to it, why shouldn’t rape be legal? Maybe the rapist can’t find a willing partner. If getting sex is so important that baby killing is justified then using force to get sex is hardly worth mentioning. Even murdering some stranger pales in comparison to killing your own baby. In fact, since men on average have a higher sex drive and diminished ability to obtain sex, shouldn’t abortion supporters be calling on the government to force females to have sex with men in various circumstances? It only makes logical sense.

You're asking an American "liberal" to grasp irony? Not in their tool kit.

Pro-baby killing liberal feminists value a woman being able to choose what happens to their own bodies to an extreme amount, valuing it over the life of their own children, at least on an ideological level. Killing her baby so she doesn't give birth is an issue of control over her own body. But so is choosing not to be raped or even having a sense of sexual duty to her husband if she gets married.

These are all reasons to avoid such women for relationships.

Raping sluts may cause their genes to be passed on. Abortion for sluts prevents their genes from being passed on. So abortion is the clear winner.

fschmidt wrote:Raping sluts may cause their genes to be passed on. Abortion for sluts prevents their genes from being passed on. So abortion is the clear winner.

The execution of sluts would be even more effective in preventing genetic contamination, so executing murderous sluts would be the clear winner. However, problems are that many sluts these days are made rather than born and there aren’t enough non-sluts to spread the genetic legacy of quality white men.

When you think about it, females who support abortion are the ultimate sexual predators.

HEY CORNY

ROOSH V IS WITH YOU! HE SUPPORTS RAPE
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... -post.html