Happier Abroad Forum Community

zacb wrote:http://abcnews.go.com/Lifestyle/michiga ... d=50169471

I don't think they should give the kid 8 shots in 4 days, but that is probably the case because she waited so long.

I am in favor of parents getting to choose whether or not to vaccinate their children, but I think the if there is a dispute like this, the father has the moral right to make the decision and that he should also have the legal rights.

Proof positive that there should be an IQ test before parents are allowed to claim their kids as tax deductions.

The stupid twat should get her kid immunized.

MrMan wrote: ↑

September 29th, 2017, 11:28 pm

zacb wrote:http://abcnews.go.com/Lifestyle/michiga ... d=50169471

I don't think they should give the kid 8 shots in 4 days, but that is probably the case because she waited so long.

I am in favor of parents getting to choose whether or not to vaccinate their children, but I think the if there is a dispute like this, the father has the moral right to make the decision and that he should also have the legal rights.

Usually I would agree that the father should take the leadership role. However, in this case the mom is right. Vaccines are dangerous and it is proven that they cause autism and there is a government cover up of it which the media is in on too. Child safety is far more important than a court order or the father's wishes. Fathers are not infallible. They can be stupid and wrong too, as in this case. So I support the mom in this case. Plus she is hot too and very attractive. I don't understand why her ex-husband would divorce her.

See the new documentary Vaxxed, which proves vaccines are harmful and there is a conspiracy to cover it up. I posted info on it here:

viewtopic.php?f=27&t=7407