Panetta opens combat roles to women

pete98146 · Post by **pete98146** » January 25th, 2013, 4:19 pm

Actually it might not be a bad tactic at all. We can send in 50,000 American women into a given hostile environment. A demand letter would be sent to their leader saying, "unless you surrender, the AW women will stay."

You'd see the white flag waiving up in the air before you know it.....

fuzzy_corleone · Post by **fuzzy_corleone** » January 25th, 2013, 10:25 pm

What kind of society sends their women into battle? This is beyond f***ed up.

jamesbond · Post by **jamesbond** » January 25th, 2013, 11:34 pm

fuzzy_corleone wrote:What kind of society sends their women into battle? This is beyond f***ed up.

Women in America FOUGHT for this, it was their idea. Well, more specifically feminists wanted this for a long time and now thanks to the Obama administration we have women in combat roles.

Now we will see just how "tough" and "strong" american women really are!

All_That_Is_Man · Post by **All_That_Is_Man** » January 26th, 2013, 8:33 am

Bring our boys back home. Send butch, feminist, tomboy Â¢unts to the front lines instead. The modern-day, western female is completely expendable once she turns 25.

jamesbond · Post by **jamesbond** » January 26th, 2013, 8:42 am

pete98146 wrote:Actually it might not be a bad tactic at all. We can send in 50,000 American women into a given hostile environment. A demand letter would be sent to their leader saying, "unless you surrender, the AW women will stay."

You'd see the white flag waiving up in the air before you know it....

It sounds like it could work! lol

Renata · Post by **Renata** » January 28th, 2013, 2:54 pm

I had an Aussie girl stay with me a few days when I was in a place called Hatay, Antakya, it's 5 hrs from the Syrian border. She's a journalist. She passes through borders & cities covered in a burkha (black robe covering head & body) accompanied by several men. That's how it is in the east; women must be accompanied at all times. At check points they look' at womens' hands, that's how they verifiy that the person in the burkha is female. They also assume she's muslim, little do they know it's a petit aussie girl in a burkha, with a stasch of equipment strapped to her.

Don't underestimate your country yet, just saying.

Teal Lantern · Post by **Teal Lantern** » January 28th, 2013, 5:01 pm

ladislav wrote:The Iranian army is getting ready for a rape fest.

They should also get ready to burn when they go pee.

Post by **Winston** » February 3rd, 2013, 8:33 pm

They should put all the feminists on the front line. That will get rid of them or teach them a lesson. lol

Why are more women serving in the armed forces nowadays? Women hate war the most. They don't even like watching war movies. Have you ever met a woman who was a fan of war movies? I've never met even one. Women are nurturers by instinct, not warriors. They are inclined toward social cohesion, not division. So this is very odd and inexplicable.

abcdavid01 · Post by **abcdavid01** » February 3rd, 2013, 9:02 pm

It just means we've reached a tipping point where there are enough women who act like men.

zboy1 · Post by **zboy1** » February 5th, 2013, 11:14 am

Look at this pathetic attempt by Ana Kasparian of the Young Turks, to lift a skinny male off his feet and onto her back, LOL:

Skip to the 1:11 mark