Are Dinosaurs a Hoax? Did they ever exist? Shocking facts!

[Winston]

Are Dinosaurs and their 160 million year domination over the Earth all a hoax? Did they ever even exist? Or is it all Hollywood fantasy and fraud? Consider the following suspicious points and facts mentioned in the article below and you will start to seriously consider it.

1. The only people who find dinosaur bones are those PAID to find them or sent out on quests to find them by museums and paleontology institutions. No one seems to find them by accident. How odd. That means those who found dinosaur bones had a VESTED interest in finding them. That makes them highly suspect. Not objective.
2. If gigantic dinosaurs really roamed the Earth for 160 million years, as paleontologists claim, then their bones would be everywhere. People digging in their backyards would be tripping over them. But they don't. Only those looking for them or paid to find them, find them.
3. Before the 1840's, no one ever heard of dinosaurs. No primitive tribes or ancient cultures ever mentioned them. Sure the Chinese and Medieval Europeans had tales of dragons, but they never mentioned an entire giant dinosaur kingdom.
4. The existence of dinosaurs was announced in the 1840's a decade BEFORE any dinosaur bones were allegedly found in the 1850's. How can that be? It looks like there was an AGENDA to create them, since the theory of dinosaurs came BEFORE they were allegedly found.
5. The announcement of dinosaurs came at the SAME time that the theories of Darwinian Evolution began to be promoted by the scientific establishment. What a coincidence huh? This makes it likely that the theory of dinosaurs was created to back up and support the Darwinian Evolution theory that was being promoted at the time.
6. All the dinosaur skeletons you see in museums are reconstructions made of plaster, which the museums openly admit. None of the dinosaur skeletons on display are original dinosaur bones. All the alleged original dinosaur bones, of which there are only 2100 of, are kept in a tight security vault that only a small select number of paleontologists are allowed to see. Independent researchers are NEVER given access to examine them or run tests on them. Just as in the incident of the Piltdown Man used to try to prove Evolution, which turned out to be a hoax upon testing, these dinosaur bones could all turn out to be a hoax as well, without independent testing. If these dinosaur bones are real, then why would they fear independent examination and testing? Truth does not fear investigation, only lies do. So this is highly suspicious.
7. Furthermore, if dinosaurs roamed the earth for millions of years, they should have found millions of bones, not just 2100. That's basic logic. So it doesn't add up. And even if some of these alleged dinosaur bones were real, it doesn't automatically follow that they dominated the Earth for 160 million years.
8. Some paleontologists have quit their careers when they found out that the dinosaur industry was a hoax.
See the full articles that elaborate on these points here:

What do you think? Doesn't that all make the dinosaur theory and history highly suspect? Don't you find it all highly suspicious? There are too many red flags here. See the articles below that expound upon these points.

Dinosaur Hoax - Dinosaurs Never Existed
http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2015 ... isted.html

Dinosaurs: Science or Science Fiction?
http://www.ocii.com/~dpwozney/dinosaurs.htm

Intro to the first link above:

The class “Dinosauria” was originally defined by “Sir” Richard Owen of the Royal Society, and Superintendent of the British Museum Natural History Department in 1842. In other words, the existence of dinosaurs was first speculatively hypothesized by a knighted museum-head “coincidentally” in the mid-19th century, during the heyday of evolutionism, before a single dinosaur fossil had ever been found. The Masonic media and mainstream press worldwide got to work hyping stories of these supposed long-lost animals, and then lo and behold, 12 years later in 1854, Ferdinand Vandiveer Hayden during his exploration of the upper Missouri River, found “proof” of Owen’s theory! A few unidentified teeth he mailed to leading paleontologist Joseph Leidy, who several years later declared them to be from an ancient extinct “Trachodon,” dinosaur (which beyond ironically means “rough tooth”).

Firstly, it should be needless to say that it is impossible to reconstruct an entire hypothetical ancient animal based on a few teeth! But even more importantly, it is dubious that a myriad of ancient reptile/bird and reptile/mammal transitional forms necessary for the blossoming theory of evolution, would be hypothesized and then conveniently “discovered” by teams of evolutionist archeologists purposely out looking to find such fossils! And it is even more dubious that such fossils have supposedly existed for millions of years but were never found by or known to any civilization in the history of humanity until evolutionism’s Masonic renaissance in the mid-19th century! Read all about the 150+ year Dinosaur Hoax deception in the following article:The class “Dinosauria” was originally defined by “Sir” Richard Owen of the Royal Society, and Superintendent of the British Museum Natural History Department in 1842.

In other words, the existence of dinosaurs was first speculatively hypothesized by a knighted museum-head “coincidentally” in the mid-19th century, during the heyday of evolutionism, before a single dinosaur fossil had ever been found. The Masonic media and mainstream press worldwide got to work hyping stories of these supposed long-lost animals, and then lo and behold, 12 years later in 1854, Ferdinand Vandiveer Hayden during his exploration of the upper Missouri River, found “proof” of Owen’s theory! A few unidentified teeth he mailed to leading paleontologist Joseph Leidy, who several years later declared them to be from an ancient extinct “Trachodon,” dinosaur (which beyond ironically means “rough tooth”).

Firstly, it should be needless to say that it is impossible to reconstruct an entire hypothetical ancient animal based on a few teeth! But even more importantly, it is dubious that a myriad of ancient reptile/bird and reptile/mammal transitional forms necessary for the blossoming theory of evolution, would be hypothesized and then conveniently “discovered” by teams of evolutionist archeologists purposely out looking to find such fossils! And it is even more dubious that such fossils have supposedly existed for millions of years but were never found by or known to any civilization in the history of humanity until evolutionism’s Masonic renaissance in the mid-19th century!

Video talk by the author of the article above.



More videos about the dinosaur hoax.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_ ... er+existed
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_ ... osaur+hoax

[droid]

2. If gigantic dinosaurs really roamed the Earth for 160 million years, as paleontologists claim, then their bones would be everywhere. People digging in their backyards would be tripping over them. But they don't. Only those looking for them or paid to find them, find them.

6. All the dinosaur skeletons you see in museums are reconstructions made of plaster, which the museums openly admit. None of the dinosaur skeletons on display are original dinosaur bones. All the alleged original dinosaur bones

7. Furthermore, if dinosaurs roamed the earth for millions of years, they should have found millions of bones, not just 2100. That's basic logic. So it doesn't add up. And even if some of these alleged dinosaur bones were real, it doesn't automatically follow that they dominated the Earth for 160 million years.

Interesting subject.
From what i understand though, 65M years is a very, very, very long time, and not even bones can withstand decay.
Think about the -supposedly- huge timescale, the Egyptians lived what, 4,000 years ago?, now multiply that by x15,000

What happens is that those found are not actually bones but fossils, that is, mineral material migrated and replaced the bones over time within their sediment encasing.
And i think it happens under exceptional circumstances, so most bones are actually gone. Well this is the theory.

You also have geological changes over this period. Places that used to be at the bottom of the sea are now high mountains and vice versa, so I would think a great percentage of dinosaur fossils are just too inaccessible.
For example in Colombia there's a town that's like 7000 feet in elevation but there are sea life fossils. It's perplexing.
https://lunaeikar.files.wordpress.com/2 ... .jpg?w=810

Oh, i just ran into a nice specimen from the area
http://lapaleontologiaencolombia.blogsp ... rinos.html

[droid]

Not to hijack the thread, but I just want to add a side note here,
If those insanely huge timescales are real, I think it is very possible there have been some -if not many- other civilizations waaayy before ours, probably not even in human form as we know it.
Have you explored this subject winston? Are there any evidences of this? What about that undersea pyramid in japan?

[MarcosZeitola]

You are a compulsory conspiracy theorist lol.

[Cornfed]

I wouldn't have the faintest clue any more, but perhaps the evidence the average person can check is consistent with the idea that life on this planet was terraformed over the last 10k years or so. If dinosaurs existed, they may have existed during this time. There really seems no way to know.

[Ghost]

.

[Adama]

Some of the dinosaurs are not real. Namely the ones in museums that you see. They find one tiny fragment of a bone, and then they extrapolate (guesswork) what they think the rest of the dinosaur must have looked like. All that from a tiny bone smaller than a human bone many times. Most of the displays you see of dinosaurs are similar to that, in that they are reconstructions of the imagination from tiny fragments of bone.

The same is true of Lucy, one of our supposed human ancestors. They have no idea what the monkey even looked like, but they have the nerve to say it is a human ancestor from a few fragmented bones strewn across the countryside in Africa. Some of the bones even come from different sites, and key features are missing, but they feel free to take the artistic license, in the name of science (evolutionary biology) of course, to recreate what they feel Lucy must have looked like, complete with flesh, skin, hair and everything.

[Adama]

That's why the Bible calls much of this "Science Falsely So called". Meaning that although it claims the name science, it is not science. They are composed of lies. Anyone whose mind is receptive to the truth can see this.

I used to believe ALL the lies of science. Every last one of them. Now that I am saved (a believer in Christ through faith alone), I can see, these so called scientists are lying about everything, from the shape of the earth, the nature of the "universe" (there isnt one), evolution, HIV/AIDS, the space program, the Boston Bombing, 9/11, reasons for war in Iraq, feminism. THE LIST IS ENDLESS. They are all lies.

[Adama]

Archaeology especially is bunk. So is carbon dating and the rest. Look into it yourself if you do not believe me. They date the archaeological columns from the contents thereof. But then they use the columns to also date the contents. There is no way to date anything in the ground, except they tell us. There is no scientific basis for dating these fossils at all.

[Adama]

Are Dinosaurs and their 160 million year domination over the Earth all a hoax? Did they ever even exist? Or is it all Hollywood fantasy and fraud? Consider the following points mentioned in the article below and you will start to seriously consider it, because they all make the dinosaur industry highly suspicious.

1. The only people who find dinosaur bones are those PAID to find them or sent out on quests to find them by museums and paleontology institutions. No one seems to find them by accident. How odd. That means those who found dinosaur bones had a VESTED interest in finding them. That makes them highly suspect. Not objective.
2. If gigantic dinosaurs really roamed the Earth for 160 million years, as paleontologists claim, then their bones would be everywhere. People digging in their backyards would be tripping over them. But they don't. Only those looking for them or paid to find them, find them.
3. Before the 1840's, no one ever heard of dinosaurs. No primitive tribes or ancient cultures ever mentioned them. Sure the Chinese and Medieval Europeans had tales of dragons, but they never mentioned an entire giant dinosaur kingdom.
4. The existence of dinosaurs was announced in the 1840's a decade BEFORE any dinosaur bones were allegedly found in the 1850's. How can that be? It looks like there was an AGENDA to create them, since the theory of dinosaurs came BEFORE they were allegedly found.
5. The announcement of dinosaurs came at the SAME time that the theories of Darwinian Evolution began to be promoted by the scientific establishment. What a coincidence huh? This makes it likely that the theory of dinosaurs was created to back up and support the Darwinian Evolution theory that was being promoted at the time.
6. All the dinosaur skeletons you see in museums are reconstructions made of plaster, which the museums openly admit. None of the dinosaur skeletons on display are original dinosaur bones. All the alleged original dinosaur bones, of which there are only 2100 of, are kept in a tight security vault that only a small select number of paleontologists are allowed to see. Independent researchers are NEVER given access to examine them or run tests on them. Just as in the incident of the Piltdown Man used to try to prove Evolution, which turned out to be a hoax upon testing, these dinosaur bones could all turn out to be a hoax as well, without independent testing. If these dinosaur bones are real, then why would they fear independent examination and testing? Truth does not fear investigation, only lies do. So this is highly suspicious.
7. Furthermore, if dinosaurs roamed the earth for millions of years, they should have found millions of bones, not just 2100. That's basic logic. So it doesn't add up. And even if some of these alleged dinosaur bones were real, it doesn't automatically follow that they dominated the Earth for 160 million years.
8. Some paleontologists have quit their careers when they found out that the dinosaur industry was a hoax.
See the full articles that elaborate on these points here:

What do you think? Doesn't that all make the dinosaur theory and history highly suspect? Don't you find it all highly suspicious? There are too many red flags here. See the articles below that expand upon these points.

Dinosaur Hoax - Dinosaurs Never Existed
http://www.atlanteanconspiracy.com/2015 ... isted.html

Dinosaurs: Science or Science Fiction?
http://www.ocii.com/~dpwozney/dinosaurs.htm

Intro to the first link above:

The class “Dinosauria” was originally defined by “Sir” Richard Owen of the Royal Society, and Superintendent of the British Museum Natural History Department in 1842. In other words, the existence of dinosaurs was first speculatively hypothesized by a knighted museum-head “coincidentally” in the mid-19th century, during the heyday of evolutionism, before a single dinosaur fossil had ever been found. The Masonic media and mainstream press worldwide got to work hyping stories of these supposed long-lost animals, and then lo and behold, 12 years later in 1854, Ferdinand Vandiveer Hayden during his exploration of the upper Missouri River, found “proof” of Owen’s theory! A few unidentified teeth he mailed to leading paleontologist Joseph Leidy, who several years later declared them to be from an ancient extinct “Trachodon,” dinosaur (which beyond ironically means “rough tooth”).

Firstly, it should be needless to say that it is impossible to reconstruct an entire hypothetical ancient animal based on a few teeth! But even more importantly, it is dubious that a myriad of ancient reptile/bird and reptile/mammal transitional forms necessary for the blossoming theory of evolution, would be hypothesized and then conveniently “discovered” by teams of evolutionist archeologists purposely out looking to find such fossils! And it is even more dubious that such fossils have supposedly existed for millions of years but were never found by or known to any civilization in the history of humanity until evolutionism’s Masonic renaissance in the mid-19th century! Read all about the 150+ year Dinosaur Hoax deception in the following article:The class “Dinosauria” was originally defined by “Sir” Richard Owen of the Royal Society, and Superintendent of the British Museum Natural History Department in 1842.

In other words, the existence of dinosaurs was first speculatively hypothesized by a knighted museum-head “coincidentally” in the mid-19th century, during the heyday of evolutionism, before a single dinosaur fossil had ever been found. The Masonic media and mainstream press worldwide got to work hyping stories of these supposed long-lost animals, and then lo and behold, 12 years later in 1854, Ferdinand Vandiveer Hayden during his exploration of the upper Missouri River, found “proof” of Owen’s theory! A few unidentified teeth he mailed to leading paleontologist Joseph Leidy, who several years later declared them to be from an ancient extinct “Trachodon,” dinosaur (which beyond ironically means “rough tooth”).

Firstly, it should be needless to say that it is impossible to reconstruct an entire hypothetical ancient animal based on a few teeth! But even more importantly, it is dubious that a myriad of ancient reptile/bird and reptile/mammal transitional forms necessary for the blossoming theory of evolution, would be hypothesized and then conveniently “discovered” by teams of evolutionist archeologists purposely out looking to find such fossils! And it is even more dubious that such fossils have supposedly existed for millions of years but were never found by or known to any civilization in the history of humanity until evolutionism’s Masonic renaissance in the mid-19th century!

Video talk by the author of the article above.



More videos about the dinosaur hoax.
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_ ... er+existed
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_ ... osaur+hoax

I don't disagree with any of that. The Piltdown hoax especially is proof of the integrity of these so called scientists. Most of this will be lost on the bumble heads who believe everything they're told because they're unsaved. There is no use even bothering to discuss these things with most of the individuals here.

Those royal societies are masonic. That is also another fact which will be lost on bumble heads who believe everything the establishment tells them. The Masons are conspiring, along with the Vatican, Royalty, politicians and the false lost tribes of the chosen to control the world. It is an anti-God, anti-human organization which worships Satan. Oh you can mention that they worship Satan, but oh, no one wants to believe that either. Believe what you want though.

[Adama]

2. If gigantic dinosaurs really roamed the Earth for 160 million years, as paleontologists claim, then their bones would be everywhere. People digging in their backyards would be tripping over them. But they don't. Only those looking for them or paid to find them, find them.

6. All the dinosaur skeletons you see in museums are reconstructions made of plaster, which the museums openly admit. None of the dinosaur skeletons on display are original dinosaur bones. All the alleged original dinosaur bones

7. Furthermore, if dinosaurs roamed the earth for millions of years, they should have found millions of bones, not just 2100. That's basic logic. So it doesn't add up. And even if some of these alleged dinosaur bones were real, it doesn't automatically follow that they dominated the Earth for 160 million years.

Interesting subject.
From what i understand though, 65M years is a very, very, very long time, and not even bones can withstand decay.
Think about the -supposedly- huge timescale, the Egyptians lived what, 4,000 years ago?, now multiply that by x15,000

What happens is that those found are not actually bones but fossils, that is, mineral material migrated and replaced the bones over time within their sediment encasing.
And i think it happens under exceptional circumstances, so most bones are actually gone. Well this is the theory.

You also have geological changes over this period. Places that used to be at the bottom of the sea are now high mountains and vice versa, so I would think a great percentage of dinosaur fossils are just too inaccessible.
For example in Colombia there's a town that's like 7000 feet in elevation but there are sea life fossils. It's perplexing.
https://lunaeikar.files.wordpress.com/2 ... .jpg?w=810

Oh, i just ran into a nice specimen from the area
http://lapaleontologiaencolombia.blogsp ... rinos.html

Bones are found at elevation because there was a flood which destroyed all the life on this earth during the days of Noah.

[Adama]

Winston, BTW, have you checked into Dubay's theory of the nuclear hoax? Especially the old footage of the houses blowing up while the camera is unaffected? Like the space program, the footage of the destruction of nuclear weapons they showed the world is fake. It is also said that the two Japanese cities were leveled by regular bombs instead of by a nuclear bomb, similar to the way they killed the people of Dresden and Berlin Germany.

[fschmidt]

Is reality a hoax? Did it ever exist? Or is the secret all-powerful conspiracy just manipulating your mind, making it see a reality that isn't there?

[droid]

Bones are found at elevation because there was a flood which destroyed all the life on this earth during the days of Noah.

Let me stress again, they're not bones, they're mineral imprints.
Are you saying the flood took live sea creatures and/or their remains 1,000 miles inland and to an elevation of 7,000 feet?
How did water-borne life "die" in the flood?

Also, excuse my ignorance, but where did all the water come from to cover over the mountains up to 20,000+ feet? Where did it go afterwards? Dit it fall off the edge of the earth?(lol sorry, I couldn't help it)
Come to think of it, how would the edge of the flat earth contain 20,000+ feet of water, is there a giant wall around the edge? wouldn't the inhabitants of Chile or Australia be able to see it?

[Winston]

Check this out. Even kids can make their own dinosaurs now with chicken bones. Here's a guide on how to do so.



Another thing you should all keep in mind is that dinosaurs like the T-Rex are anatomically impossible. It's head and abdomen are far larger than its tail to be balanced on only two small hind legs. A creature cannot walk like that, it'd be too off-balanced by a lopsided weight.




“This idea of slow moving animals does not agree with the bio-mechanical analysis of dinosaurs, which indicate that the Dinosaurs were agile, active creatures. This is the paradox between the Dinosaurs size and lifestyle. Many displays and drawings of dinosaurs appear to be an absurdity, showing a two-legged animal that would be totally off-balance, with the weight of head and abdomen much greater than weight of tail, which is supposed to act as a counter-balance. Is the dinosaur industry a case of science trying to meet public desires or expectations? The movie Jurassic Park is an example of showing dinosaurs much larger than any current displays in museums. After the movie came out, it is interesting to note that many articles were written asking ‘Is this possible?’ I can recall a report of dinosaur DNA being discovered preserved in amber, which later turned out to be false.” - David Wozney, “Dinosaurs: Science or Science Fiction”