ethan_sg wrote:The only person who believes what Peter is saying is Peter himself, what amazes me is that he doesn't find a more willing crowd to preach to, but is the 'overzealous fanatical pastor' who keeps futilely preaching to the 'atheists'. Or maybe there is no crowd that will listen to him, and one clutches at whatever straws one can get.
I will be the first to point out that Singaporean girls are among the most materialistic in the world, due to the fact that they are very much engulfed in the culture of materialism brought about by being the most westernized country in Asia. And so like girls in the anglosphere, I wouldn't recommend anyone here to choose a girl from Singapore.
But I do not for a moment believe that ALL women in this world are like that, especially outside the anglosphere and hyper-developed countries like Japan. Because I have seen with my own eyes many obvious cases of women truly loving men for who they are. The more you stay out of the anglo-sphere, the more often you will see this.
Just the other day I read an article about this beautiful girl, daughter of some rich tycoon, who got married to an average looking guy who takes orders at McDonald's. I'm sure Peter will think of another warped way to justify that, but I'm not buying it.
Would one then also say that Mother Theresa was, as he claims, like every woman out there, only out to find and use a rich man, and was incapable of any genuine love towards another human being, simply by the fact of being a woman?
If women were all devils from the start of humankind, then none of us have any reason to have any beef with feminism in the first place, because it would mean that women were devils right from the start and didn't need feminism to corrupt them - one can't corrupt what was already impure. But of course only Peter believes that women have been innately evil since the dawn of humankind. Perhaps even while our ancestors were australopithecines, the female gender of our early ancestors' species were already innately evil. Perhaps the female gender of all species on earth is innately evil, if you take Peter's theories to its logical extreme.
Ethan,
I have put this information in front of more than 10,000 men...perhaps MANY more.
That those men choose to be stupid and ignorant and arrogant about their stupidity and ignorance is not a reflection on me. It is a reflection on THEM.
The message that the guvment is a criminal cartel is unpopular enough. No man with a brain can call the events of this week in the US LAWFUL. This week along Obama declared a national emergency and the supreme court ratified Obamacare.
BOTH are HIGHLY UNLAWFUL acts...and the sheeple are busy watching sports and drinking beer....LOL!!!
The message that women are the WILLING ACCOMPLICES of the criminals in guvment is even less popular. Not even MRA-MRMS are willing to accept that women WILLINGLY commit perjury to rob the men of their children.
Four years ago a man I know told me that men are stupid dumb ignorant animals to be exploited and used because they are too stupid to even realise that is what is going on. He told me I was wasting my time attempting to "save men" and that I should, instead, exploit their stupidity and ignorance. He advised me that I would be far better off letting the Illuminati kill them as that would leave better world for me to live in afterwards.
Now. FOUR YEARS down the track I see he was correct.
So those men who do not join CAF or MBA? I am now willing to openly say what this man said privately. That those men do not deserve any protection of their rights. These men deserve to be exploited by those more intelligent than they are because those men are such pussies they will not do anything about that exploitation.
Look in the west. Men will allow their wives to steal their children, their house, destroy their business, impoverish them, just as happened to me, and then do NOTHING about it. Even when a man like Thomas Ball sets himself on fire and burns himself to death the collective YAWN from the stupid and ignorant men in the MRM-MRA area could be heard around the world.
So no....there is not an "enthusiastic audience" for what I am talking about because 99.7%+ of men who HAVE BEEN ABUSED are pussies who will do nothing about that abuse.
I have appealed to the "masses of moderates" and those masses of moderates have made it clear they are stupid, ignorant arrogant pussies. No two ways about it.
But I have three names for you.
Anders Breivik.
George Sodini.
Marc Lepine.
These men were not pussies. These men refused to bend over and take it up the arse. These men have shown men what needs to be done if men are to have the rule of law in their land again.
"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable" JFK.
So you see Ethan. Your arrogant commitment to your stupidity and ignorance dressed up as "the only person who believes what Peter is saying is Peter himself" will be read by the next Breivik, Sodini, Lepine and they will know that men in the west are weak pussies who will take any amount of abuse and then try and justify their cowardice by being "in the majority".
But here is the rub. The "majority" never made a change in a society....EVER...the ONLY thing that has EVER changed a society is a small number of dedicated men. And that means you are excluded from ever being involved in the transformation of a society. You are too weak. You are too much of a p***y.
I, on the other hand, was selected to author the book that will usher in the new way of living in freedom for all men who choose to use it.
I feel very privileged to have been selected to do that. I wonder why I was selected but does it matter? That selection was made many many years ago...it is not like I did anything to deserve that selection....and my entire life has been leading up to this point.
The purpose of my life is to transform the quality of life of the human race...those who live through the cull.
What is the purpose of your life Ethan?
Do you actually have one?
. Nah but really, she is definitely very conservatively natured in comparison to what would usually be the norm in this country, which for me is great. Usually here a couple would have sex on the first, second or third time of meeting, in my opinion this just kills the excitement of the relationship. With her, it would definitely have to wait at least a few months. In fact, she says she goes to church every Sunday even while in Ireland, so there's a good chance she's a virgin saving herself for marriage. If this is the case, of course I will be slightly disappointed, but I am not seeing her to gain the experience of sex, but to gain the experience of romantic love.