The Cult of Modern Science

[fschmidt]

Science before humanity became retarded around 2000 was generally sound. Of course moronic modern scum are too stupid to understand science, so they reject it. That includes the big bang theory and the theory of evolution.

[fschmidt]

These "theories" are mostly based on guesswork and connecting dots erroneously to make the theories of their model fit. It isn't a moron who questions what the mainstream narrative is, it's a moron who blindly accepts what he's told without a shred of critical thinking. That's why these bullshit theories are presented as facts, so that the sheeple of today don't have to ask important questions about cosmology or ontology.

The answers to the questions regarding ontology and cosmology are provided for us by the mainstream so we don't need to ask them. That's why these flimsy theories are given to people to eliminate critical thinking.

It's unthinkable that anyone who considers themselves intelligent would buy into this bullshit without considering alternative possibilities. Curiosity and an open mind are indicative of intelligence. Not blind acceptance of whatever you're told

I am not going to consider alternative theories to 1+1=2. If you argue that 1+1=3, I am not going to waste my time arguing. People today are retarded so they believe in all kinds of bullshit.

[gsjackson]

Amen, Pixel-Dude. It's almost like somebody decided to see just how outlandish a "theory" people can be made to believe just by calling it "science." One that's completely obvious to me is the heliocentric model. Take a look at the sun (not too long). How far away does common sense tell you it is? Fifty miles, 100, 200? And yet we're told that, traveling 67,000 mph, it takes the earth a year to go around it. It's patently absurd.

[fschmidt]

Dear God, please exterminate these idiots.

[Seeker]

I agree with fschmidt in this case. If this kind of thinking were to become mainstream it would lead to the end of civilization. I've got low ability Grade 10 students who could argue about science better than most of the retards on this forum.

[gsjackson]

Spot on analysis, P-D. It's really quite a remarkable phenomenon, which I've observed continuously for seven years following the flat earth/spinning ball debate on Youtube. I guess what's fundamentally going on is that, having acquired an "education," they have taken on that acquisition as an essential part of their personas, and any challenge to their indoctrination is seen as an attack on that persona.

I made the perfectly unremarkable point that the sun seems much closer than the 93 million miles away we're told it is, and it seems absurd that it would take the earth a year to go around it traveling 67,000 mph. Anyone who disputes that common-sense perception (which doesn't mean it's true, only that it's what common sense tells you) is either a liar, a complete moron or blind. Yet I get called an idiot worthy of extermination and a retard, by what are presumably adults, not seven-year-old children. If you ever get anything close to a substantive argument from these sorts of characters, you've got a scoop.