But evolution definitely stays that life started by chance, which is impossible. So why do you believe it? That's illogical. Their claim is that lightning hit a pool of mud and formed the first bacterial life on Earth. That's impossible and all attempts to replicate it have failed. Lightning hitting is definitely an act of chance. So why do you deny it?Yohan wrote:Evolution does not mean everything is going on by chance or random.Winston wrote:Yohan,
Am i the only truth seeker here? You are supposed to analyze the evidence on both sides without bias. And take into account all the data. A freethinker does not take the establishment view on faith without critical thinking.
There is plenty of evidence of design or a creator/creators. There is no evidence of evolution or that everything is due to randomness and chance.
If you want to analyze evidence about evolution you need some knowledge and do some research about it.
If you believe in a creator, you need not to use your brain, you just believe what is in the Bible written or somewhere else in other so-called Holy Books without questioning them which are claiming Jesus was born 200 years ago or visiting later on Utah in USA to support self-appointed prophets.
Very much which was said it could be done only by a 'god' was dismantled as untrue by researchers, who were often threatened by Christians, who know their faith is merely a product of fantasy.
About evidence of evolution there are some few places for reliable research.
What you cannot understand you have to measure, if you cannot measure it you have to do something about how to make it measurable - this is of course much more complicated than just to lie down and claim, it's all done by a 'creator'.
I know best about
Here you can seriously study about evolution of the universe.
If I see a watch or computer and I conclude that it had a designer or designers, that doesn't mean I'm lazy to figure out how evolution could have formed the computer by chance or natural selection over millions of years. I would just be stating the logical conclusion that's self-evident.
Evolutionists claim that the fact that bacteria develops resistance to antibiotics is "proof" of evolution. But all that proves is that they adapt. It doesn't prove that bacteria can develop into animals and people. It doesn't prove macroevolution.
The fact is, there are no transitional fossils between alleged species of evolution. There are no transitional fossils between primates/hominids and human beings for example, nor between reptiles and birds. And all alleged transitional fossils found were revealed to be either hoaxes or mistaken extinct species. The fact is, if macroevolution were true, then primates cannot become human in one day. It would take millions of years. And thus there would be lots and lots of transitional fossils. Yet there are NONE. Darwin even admitted himself in his book that if his theory were true, there would be transitional fossils found to support it, but there have been NONE, so by his own admission, his own theory is debunked. So you evolutionists are clinging to a debunked and outdated theory, which is foolish.
Furthermore, the discover of DNA in the early 1900's ruled out evolution, because DNA is so complicated, more complex and organized than a supercomputer even, that there is NO WAY that chance, evolution or natural selection could have evolved it. One of the discoverers of DNA, Francis Kricke, said that. So why do you evolutionists ignore it? Why do you cling to your atheistic religion against all reason and evidence?
I've explained all this before. Next time I will just copy and paste it.
Btw, it was dishonest of you to act like you saw this film when you didn't. It turns out that most angry reviewers of this film never even saw it. Go figure. The emotional outrage against it is irrational and knee-jerkish. lol
Btw, the makers of this film do not claim that Earth is flat. They believe in a globe Earth, but one that the universe, stars, planets and our sun revolves around.