The Truth Behind Islam

Discuss religion and spirituality topics.
Jonny Law
Experienced Poster
Posts: 1186
Joined: May 13th, 2014, 1:14 pm

Re: The Truth Behind Islam

Post by Jonny Law »

MrPeabody wrote:It's interesting the Nietzsche seem to believe that Islam was more life-affirming than Christianity.

Nietzsche on Islam

"If Islam despises Christianity, it has a thousandfold right to do so: Islam at least assumes that it is dealing with men…"

"Christianity destroyed for us the whole harvest of ancient civilization, and later it also destroyed for us the whole harvest of Mohammedan civilization. The wonderful culture of the Moors in Spain, which was fundamentally nearer to us and appealed more to our senses and tastes than that of Rome and Greece, was trampled down (—I do not say by what sort of feet—) Why? Because it had to thank noble and manly instincts for its origin—because it said yes to life, even to the rare and refined luxuriousness of Moorish life!… "

http://www.bogvaerker.dk/wordpress/?p=512
:twisted: The Great Amazing Nietzsche
1. Son of a Whore
2. Faggot
3. Mentally Ill
Great example of moral and ethical behavior! Good job MrPeabody showing us what a Straw-Man Argument looks like :twisted:
User avatar
MrPeabody
Experienced Poster
Posts: 1802
Joined: April 13th, 2008, 11:53 am

Re: The Truth Behind Islam

Post by MrPeabody »

"Why did Christianity trample down the culture of Islam? "...ecause Islam was noble, because it owed its origin to manly instincts, because it said Yes to life even in the rare and exquisite treasures of Moorish life!""


-- The AntiChrist, Nietzsche
Misko_Varesanovic
Freshman Poster
Posts: 142
Joined: March 13th, 2016, 11:24 am

Re: The Truth Behind Islam

Post by Misko_Varesanovic »

OutWest wrote:
MrPeabody wrote:It's interesting that throughout the Middle Ages, ancient religions like the Kalash still survived under Islam. Under Christianity, paganism was basically 100% eliminated in Europe under a brutal and violent extermination conducted by the Church. Even heresies within Christianity were crushed with millions of deaths. This proves that Islam has been a more tolerant religion than Christianity.
When the Catholic Church was essentially a political force, great repression was the norm. In the past, much of the Muslim world was relatively live and let live. What happened? The Islamic world is certainly not a bastion of tolerance. Is there any place in the so called Christian world today where Islam and mosques are simply not permitted, the say Churches and Christianity are not permitted in much of the Arab world. Shall we meet at a church in Saudi Arabia or the UAR? LOL There are none. They are not permitted.

In a more moderate country like Malaysia, significant non Muslim minorities are accepted, with such minorities being Buddhist, Christian and Hindu primarily. The fact that these groups have significant numbers also connects to the reality that the country's economy would collapse without these groups who account for possibly majority of business activity within the country.

In any case, when the religion IS the state, disaster follows. This condition afflicts numerous Muslim countries around the world TODAY. The reality we deal with is today. The tolerance of 500 years ago will hardly help the oppressed today and the repression of 500 years ago will hardly bother people today. In general around the world, I find Buddhists far more tolerant than Muslims. There is no comparison. As long as you do not stick your finger in their eye, Buddhists are pretty much live and let live. Even in a more moderate Muslim country such as Malaysia, the state religious apparatus wants to control your life. If you are Muslim, it is a crime to drink beer or wine. When they ask for ID related to alcohol, it is your religious status that concerns them.

In Muslim countries, religious authorities have the power of armed force to impose their dictates. Help yourself if that is what you want. Convert. Enjoy.
Firstly, you've got it the wrong way round: Saudi Arabia is not the rule - it is the exception when it comes to the practice of Christianity in the Arab world, let alone the Muslim world.

Even in Muslim-majority countries which do not have a significant Christian minority, such as Algeria, there exist notable churches, many of which are frequented by Muslims. For example, at Notre Dame du Salut de Santa Cruz in Oran (a city in Algeria made famous in the West by Albert Camus' novel La Pestilence), the local women (who are almost all Muslim) 'still climb up to the church the [French] settlers built...in 1959, at Santa Cruz, to light candles to lalla Maryam, the Virgin whose statue still looks benignly over their city from the mountaintop.'

http://www.thearabweekly.com/Culture/91 ... -resilient

Secondly, the idea that in Muslim-majority countries, the religious authorities can impose their will by armed force...with the greatest of respect, you cannot be familiar with how religious authorities work in the Islamic world. There is no equivalent of the church in Sunni Islam: the idea that the state could fuse exclusively with one religious denomination, as happened in most of Europe with awful consequences, is conceptually alien to almost everywhere in the OIC. In fact, religious authorities in most Muslim-majority countries were historically incredibly weak, and this is still largely true, even today.
Jonny Law
Experienced Poster
Posts: 1186
Joined: May 13th, 2014, 1:14 pm

Re: The Truth Behind Islam

Post by Jonny Law »

MrPeabody wrote:"Why did Christianity trample down the culture of Islam? "...ecause Islam was noble, because it owed its origin to manly instincts, because it said Yes to life even in the rare and exquisite treasures of Moorish life!""


-- The AntiChrist, Nietzsche


Nietzsche was a piece shit!

He should have joined the Taliban! Unfortunately he was a son of a whore, faggot and full of syphilis they would have never accepted him!
User avatar
Mr S
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2409
Joined: September 1st, 2007, 3:57 am
Location: Physical Earth, 3rd Dimensional Plane

Re: The Truth Behind Islam

Post by Mr S »

For all you infidels and kafirs* to better prepare oneself for the potential future of life in Occidental Western countries:

* Christians and Jews are infidels, but infidels are kafirs, too. Polytheists are Hindus, but they are also kafirs. The terms infidel and polytheist are religious words. Only the word “kafir” shows the common political treatment of Christian, Jew, Hindu, Buddhist, animist, atheist and humanist.

[youtube]www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsN5lvu1SZk[/youtube]

Islam for kids, age 8 and up. For anyone who isn’t sure: what are the 3 core parts of Islam? For example, what is al Walaa wal Baraa? Short video - fun, simple, clear. Kids understand Islam in just 9 fun minutes. Adults too. Also great for teachers and parents, to explain Islam to kids. The 3 core parts of Islam: who, what, and how. Plus the outcome, according to Islam. Plus, some of the rules of Islam, which can’t be changed, according to Islam. All in just 9 fun minutes. Very easy. Very simple and clear.

For more, come to Live Freedom: http://LiveFreedom.net. Great membership site. FREEDOM FOR US. FREEDOM FOR ALL.
"The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." Marcus Aurelius, Roman Emperor and stoic philosopher, 121-180 A.D.
User avatar
Mr S
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2409
Joined: September 1st, 2007, 3:57 am
Location: Physical Earth, 3rd Dimensional Plane

Re: The Truth Behind Islam

Post by Mr S »

Duplicate
Last edited by Mr S on October 21st, 2017, 9:50 am, edited 1 time in total.
"The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." Marcus Aurelius, Roman Emperor and stoic philosopher, 121-180 A.D.
User avatar
Mr S
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2409
Joined: September 1st, 2007, 3:57 am
Location: Physical Earth, 3rd Dimensional Plane

Re: The Truth Behind Islam

Post by Mr S »

Yohan wrote:I can only say from all Muslim countries I have seen so far, my best impression was surprisingly about IRAN.

I have not seen so much, as I made it only up to Tabriz, and this is a long time ago. It was wintertime and it was pretty cold.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tabriz

These people are not Arabs and not Turks and not Pakistani...

In Iran everybody shows their face, and despite it is an Islamic Republic and people are not really so rich there, the scenery is quite impressive and compared to other countries I never had a feeling it's dangerous for a foreigner.

Shia Islam is 'somewhat' a bit 'open'.

I also know some co-workers who made that trip to Iran, and some of them also had to stay for business up to 4 years in Tehran.

This movie is quite informative and quality is good.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYoa9hI3CXg[/youtube]
Most Iranians are actually Aryans and related to Europeans. I've had to interview a number of them and they all seemed very relatable and I felt an instant connection with them in comparison to other ethnic races I've interviewed. There are a bunch that live in PI going to dental school or nursing, usually cause it's cheaper and they can use it to immigrate or work in other countries. It's too bad about the politics involved regarding international relations with America. I'd be interested in visiting for the historical aspects but high probability that may never come to fruition in my lifetime.

I suggest listening to this interview, he clears up a lot regarding Iranian heritage and what Shia is all about. Islam really F'ed up the world, I wonder what would have become of Iran if Islam hadn't occupied the country and practically destroyed Zoroastrianism in it's native country of origin. The largest population of followers actually resides in India now rather than Iran.

https://redice.tv/red-ice-radio/the-ira ... n-imperium

Jason Reza Jorjani, PhD is a native New Yorker and Iranian-American of Persian and Northern European descent. After receiving his BA and MA at New York University, he completed his doctorate in Philosophy at the State University of New York at Stony Brook. Jorjani currently teaches Science, Technology, and Society (STS) at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. He is the author of Prometheus and Atlas (Arktos, 2016). Dr. Jorjani is also a member of the Iranian Renaissance movement.

Jason returns to Red Ice for another fascinating show, this time on the subject of Iran. To begin, Jason tells us about the Iranian Renaissance Movement, including its history and goals. Jason clears up some misconceptions about the movement, and assures us that its success would only benefit Europeans. We then dive into the history of Iran, starting with the Aryans. We discussing the origins of the very term “Aryan”, and clarify that the Aryans were, in fact, White. Jason sheds light on the relationship between ancient Iran and classical Greece, explaining that the Iranian spirit had far more in common with Sparta than Athens. The first half of our show also deals with a variety of historical figures in Iranian history, including Zarathustra, Cyrus, and Ferdowsi, in addition to touching on many other aspects of Iranian history.

In the members’ segment, we continue our conversation on the history of Iran. We begin by discussing the Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the visionary ruler who modernized Iran but was later forced into exile after a Western-backed coup. Jason tells us about the the Islamist takeover in 1979, and we ponder why Western elites would want Iran to become an Islamic theocracy. We discuss Barack Obama’s betrayal of Iranians, the Arab Spring, and the rise of Isis. Jason explains how to Make Iran Great Again, and outlines his hopes for Trump’s Iran policy. The members’ segment also explores Iran’s place in the wider Indo-European world, and the possibility of an Indo-European World Order.

Other interviews:

https://redice.tv/red-ice-radio/prometheus-and-atlas

Jason Reza Jorjani, PhD is a native New Yorker and Iranian-American of Persian and Northern European descent. After receiving his BA and MA at New York University, he completed his doctorate in Philosophy at the State University of New York at Stony Brook. Jorjani currently teaches Science, Technology, and Society (STS) at the New Jersey Institute of Technology. He is the author of Prometheus and Atlas (Arktos, 2016). Dr. Jorjani is also a member of the Iranian Renaissance movement.

Dr. Jorjani joins us for an enlightening overview of Prometheus and Atlas, a book essentially describing a coming scientific revolution that would move civilization past the current Cartesian paradigm through a reordering of society and politics. Jason brings forth his idea of a ‘spectral revolution,’ which calls for a conscious recognition of the often suppressed and marginalized research on psychical phenomena such as clairvoyance and telekinesis. We discuss CIA funded parapsychology (psi) studies at Stanford Research Institute on remote viewing and the destabilizing effects on society that could result from mainstream recognition of this human ability to transcend time and space. Jason underscores how the existence of psychic capabilities in the animal kingdom and in primitive tribes proves that human ESP is not just a supernatural phenomenon, but an atrophied human ability, as evidenced by the sophistication of ancient civilizations. Then, Jason illuminates the Greek archetype of Prometheus, the creator god of the Aryans who steals fire from Olympus to bring the light of knowledge to the human race and whose abilities of anticipatory projection are embodied in the European spirit of exploration and discovery. We trace through the tale of Atlas, brother of Prometheus and bearer of the celestial sphere, whose mythic burden is connected to the aesthetic idea of atlases, models, charts and maps of all kinds. Jason also details the rise and fall of Atlantis and its hybridized demigods who acted as stewards over the cosmopolitan knowledge they seeded across the ancient world, and we frame these primeval myths within the context of modern colonialism and technological advancement.

In the member segment, we delve into the suppression of the spectral and the ordering of binary oppositions. Jason defines the nature of ordering chaos in terms of craftsmanship and fine art, illustrating how the tone and mode of societies is set by poets, artists and architects. We look at the need for a global regulatory mechanism that can be applied across the powers of technology, governing an order that avoids negative diversity while revering genuine human psi capabilities and using a biomechanical approach. Jason summarizes “Worlds at War Over Earth,” a chapter in Prometheus and Atlas that addresses the question of religion, the materialistic nature of humans, and the soulless sciences that have been aided in propagation by the church. We discuss the state of the folk as a total work of art, in that the cultivation of an animalistic relationship to the truth is reflected in art, thus setting the cultural tone. Then, Jason delineates the fundamental reasons why Islam has no place in a world governed by Atlas and consciously embracing the Promethean spirit, and he talks about the stage of decadence, decline and disintegration that has been set by liberal values and capitalism. Further, we get into Nietzsche’s criticisms of liberalism and his idea of three modes of history – antiquarian, monumental, and critical. Jason also explains the concepts of archeofuturism and Mercurial hermeneutics, and we consider the vast body of ancient wisdom manipulated and destroyed during the rise of Abrahamic religions. At the end, we discuss possibilities of advanced, otherworldly intelligence manipulating the human race and some bizarre close encounters that suggest we’re dealing with a cosmic trickster using black humor to help us realize the potential of a full spectral revolution.

https://redice.tv/news/rumiwaswhite

Image

#RumiWasWhite

23Jun 10, 2016 By Jason Jorjani | redice.tv

David Franzoni, the writer of Gladiator, announced that he wants to cast Leonardo DiCaprio in the role of Rumi in an upcoming bio-pic about the medieval Persian poet. Franzoni has also suggested casting Robert Downey Jr. in the role of Rumi’s mentor and dear friend, Shams of Tabriz. White liberals, ‘people of color’ and others partial to de-colonial theory are at it again claiming that white people have misappropriated something – or in this case, someone – of their own. Hurling accusations of “whitewashing” at Franzoni and Hollywood, they are trending the hashtag #RumiWasntWhite.

In fact, Rumi was white. He was an ethnic Persian who wrote the vast majority of his world-renowned poetry in his native language. The Persians are the cultural-historically dominant subgroup of the ethnic and linguistic grouping of Iranian peoples, which also includes the native peoples of the Caucasus region (especially in Azerbaijan and Ossetia), the Kurds, Pashtuns, and Balochis among others. The so-called ‘Tajiks’ of Central Asia (present-day northern Afghanistan, Tajikistan, and part of Uzbekistan) are simply Persians who have been given another name by 19th century British and Russian colonialists who schemed to colonize this area of Iran.

It is not just any area either. Known as “Khorasan” or sunrise land in Persian, this is where the majority of native Persian scientists and poets of the so-called ‘Islamic Golden Age’ hailed from. It is also Rumi’s birthplace. Stan means province in Persian. Afghanistan and the rest of the stans in that region are totally artificial nation-states, which is partly why they are so dysfunctional. The Persian spoken in the stans is referred to as “Dari” (Parsie Darbari or “Tajiki”) because it was the courtly (Darbari) language of the Crown (Taj).

The Persians and other Iranians never called their realm “the Persian Empire” or referred to their country as “Persia.” This was an ancient Greek designation that caught on in the West. When, in 1935, Reza Shah Pahlavi asked Westerners to refer to his country by its proper name he meant to remind the West that “Iran” is shorthand for Iran Shahr, a middle Persian form of the ancient Persian Aryana Khashatra or “Aryan Imperium.” To this day, many natives of the part of Khorasan that Rumi hails from refer to their land as Aryana. The first recorded usage of the term “Aryan” is in the rock carved inscriptions of ancient Persian Emperors such as Darius and Xerxes, who used to sign their decrees: “I am a Persian, son of a Persian… an Aryan of Aryan lineage.”

These men were white and they established the most tolerant, humanitarian, and constructive form of government in pre-modern times, which at its zenith counted nearly 1 out of every 2 people on Earth among its subjects. I am not even counting the realms governed by Scythians and Sarmatians, northern Iranian tribes who refused the Empire, and rode freely in an area from the Ukraine to the Gobi. Their warrior women became the basis for Greek legends about the Amazons. The Persians and their northern cousins were phenotypically identical to modern Europeans, having all descended – ethnically and linguistically – from the same Indo-European or Caucasian community of prehistory.

It is only beginning with the catastrophic Arab invasion of Iran Shahr in the 7th century AD that Iran’s ethnic composition began to be forcibly altered. (The Hellenistic colonization of the Persian Empire did not have this effect, since the Greeks were fellow Aryans.) Consistent with their messenger’s mandate in the Quran, after burning libraries, mutilating art, and massacring urban populations, these half-savage desert tribesmen took to enslaving and selling Persian women at public markets. Two centuries of Persian insurgency, especially in the Azerbaijan and Mazandaran regions, ended in defeat. The Zoroastrian mystics who led this Khorramdinan (“those of the Joyous Religion”) insurgency – a continuation of ancient Persia’s Mazdakite sect – donned the cloak of Islam in order to survive. They were badly persecuted nonetheless, since the idea of esoteric (Bateni) interpretation (Zand) is declared heresy by the Quran itself – which insists that its legal injunctions are clear, perfect, and unalterable. These Batenis or Zandiqs were the nucleus of the Sufi movement whose epitomizing voice Rumi eventually becomes.

When he was born in 1207, Khorasan was still ethnically white. Some of the region’s illustrious scientists were forced to pen their treatises in Arabic, rather than in their native Persian, because their research was being commissioned by Arabs (who at first just tried to wipe out Persian science). However, Persian remained the language of poetry and the Persian poets of Khorasan, especially Ferdowsi, actually saved the Iranian national identity by maintaining the linguistic structure that enfolded an Aryan modality of thought within itself, and by fostering the kind of living tradition of ancient Indo-European lore that we see in the Shahnameh. The poets, and even the Iranian scientists forced to write in Arabic, effected a Persian Renaissance of sorts that both inspired and reinforced regional revolts that came to the brink of liberating large parts of Iran from the Arab Caliphate by the 11th century AD.

Then the Turks and Mongols poured in from Asia in the 12th and 13th centuries, respectively. During Rumi’s adolescence, the Mongol hordes rushed into Khorasan forcing his family to flee from Balkh in 1219 and head westwards across Iran, moving each time the Mongols advanced further. Entire cities were razed. Ultimately the Mongols would be responsible for a genocide of half – yes, half – of the Iranian population. The half that survived was subjected to plunder, rape, and forced miscegenation. Rumi ultimately wound up in Anatolia, which is where Mowlana Jalaluddin Balkhi picked up his nickname. Rum (pronounced Roum) is the Persian name for “Rome”, including the Eastern Roman Empire or Byzantium – so Rumi means “the Roman”. Konya, where Rumi settled, was hardly Turkish when he arrived there.

Easternmost Anatolia, the home of the Kurds, has always been ethnically and linguistically Iranian. This region, and the more central part of Anatolia in which Rumi’s family settled, had only been conquered by the Seljuq Turks (which the Ottomans broke off of later on) for a little over a century. It was a conquest as bloodthirsty as the Mongol one (in fact, the Turks and Mongols are ethnically related), the most catastrophic consequence of which was the miscegenation of the population of Azerbaijan – itself a Turkicized appellation for Azar Padegan or “Fire Stronghold”, that province of Iran in the Caucasus mountains that was thought to be the birthplace of Zarathustra (one reason why the insurgency against the Arab-Muslims was based there). From Baku to Tabriz, Azerbaijan was demographically white and it took centuries of Seljuq Turkish occupation to change this before Iranians re-conquered the area. So there is no reason whatsoever to think that Shams, the mentor from Tabriz that Rumi met in 1244, was other than a white man. He was certainly a native Persian speaker, and a newly arrived Seljuq Turk in Azerbaijan in those days would have spoken Turkish.

The worst thing about the Turkish and Mongol invasions was not that they represented a second wave of miscegenation in a white nation already under Arab occupation, it is that both of these Asian conquerors adopted an orthodox form of Islam. Largely nomadic and illiterate tribes, unlike the highly-civilized Persians, the Mongols and Mongoloid Turks felt at home in the worldview of the Quran. One wonders how Rumi’s mystical philosophy would have taken shape had he grown up in an Iran where the Persian Renaissance of the generation before him were to have continued. Iranians say, Masnavié Mowlavi ast Qorân be zabâné Pahlavi, meaning “the Mathnawi of Rumi is the Quran in Pahlavi.” The term Pahlavi refers to the middle Persian language of Pre-Islamic Iran, so that the saying suggests Rumi made out of Islam something tolerable to the Persian ethos. Of course, as I suggested above, Rumi only represents the culmination of this process, which I would describe as a kind of Sufi Stockholm Syndrome. A brutally colonized and terrorized population of ‘very understanding’ white folks come to identify with their hostage taker and begin to make excuses for him that are so good that he would never have been able to dream them up himself. So if there is any whitewashing going on, it is Rumi who whitewashed Islam.

Some of the less vile people who have jumped on the #rumiwasntwhite bandwagon have tried to say that his ethnicity really does not matter, since his message is for all mankind. The fact is that a “message for all mankind” (women included) is an Aryan idea in the first place, and a specifically Persian one at that. Ancient Greek writers and thinkers, like Herodotus and Xenophon, who lived under the Persian Empire knew that the opposition to slavery, religious tolerance, a humanitarian concern for the welfare of all peoples, and a Cosmopolitan openness to learning from other cultures were Persian ideals. They were grounded in the worship of Wisdom preached by Zarathustra and became state policy under Cyrus and Darius. This tradition survived the vicissitudes of centuries of history, influencing Roman Europe through Mithraism and guiding the statecraft of Khosrow Anoushiravan – one of the late great Persian Emperors in the century before the Arab-Muslim Conquest of Iran. There is an agenda to erasing this heritage: it allows de-colonial theorists to claim that only non-white people can be colonized, and to demonize white colonialism by excluding the benevolent Persian Empire from the history of the white world. Iran’s glorious history – that of Rumi’s folk – puts the lie to their claim that Caucasian superiority in science, technology, and the arts always came at the expense of exploited non-white peoples.

Despite Rumi’s best efforts to whitewash Islam, anyone who has seriously studied Islamic scripture and law knows – as he should have – that this is apostasy: “Love’s creed is separate from all religions: the creed and denomination of Lovers is God.” “Love’s valley is beyond all religions and cults… here there is no room for religions or cults.” What these verses sound like are the teachings of the Nizari Ismailis, better known as the Order of the Assassins, who actually did and still do claim that Rumi was secretly a preserver of their movement. The Nizaris adopted Persian as their liturgical language. They were the Sufis who remained truest to the Khorramdin teachings after the failed insurgency against the Arab invasion. In fact, they renewed the insurgency by waging a winning war against the Caliphate – until the Turks and Mongols descended on Iran.

#RumiWasWhite and so were all Persians and other Iranians before being colonized, genocided, raped, and plundered by Semitic Arabs and Asiatic Mongols and Turks – half-savage peoples who parasitically appropriated the greatness of Iranian (i.e. Aryan) Civilization in the name of Islam.



Jason Reza Jorjani speaks at the Identitarian Ideas gathering in Stockholm, Sweden.
"The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." Marcus Aurelius, Roman Emperor and stoic philosopher, 121-180 A.D.
User avatar
Mr S
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2409
Joined: September 1st, 2007, 3:57 am
Location: Physical Earth, 3rd Dimensional Plane

Re: The Truth Behind Islam

Post by Mr S »

Great video to watch regarding research related to the fallacies of Islam, you don't have to be a Christian either to watch and relate.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ySbW-btfK8[/youtube]

Allah & Muhammad had nothing to do with the Quran or Islam - Islam is founded on Lies & Deception

Jesus Christ is God manifested in the flesh - Jesus says “You call me ‘Teacher’ and ‘Lord,’ and rightly so, for that is what I am", (John 13:13). ‘Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father [God]” (John 14:9). “I and the Father [God] are one” (John 10:30).
Jesus is far more than God’s mere messenger. Jesus Christ is God’s one and only Son (John 3:16-18). Further, He is the Second Person of the Trinity, God incarnate—God Himself (John 1:1,14; 5:18). Jesus claimed to be both “the Lord” and “God”’
No one can deny that Muslims reject the biblical Jesus. Yet it was Jesus Himself who warned all men, “If you do not believe that I am the one I claim to be, you will indeed die in your sins” (John 8:24).

Jay Smith points out many interesting points that Muslims never told us.
Allah & Muhammad had nothing to do with the Quran or Islam.
The Quran and Islam were created by Abdul Malik in the 8th century who was a caliph from 685-705 - the great Arab reformer.
Abdul Malik takes and creates an Identity for Arabs.
Abdul Malik names who the prophet will be.
Abdul Malik creates the first Quran in the 8th century.
Abdul Malik Introduces the name Muslim.
Abdul Malik Introduces the name Islam.
It all begins with Abdul Malik in the 8th century.
200 to 300 years after Muhammad's death, the Quran was made.
We have the biography of Muhammad at the 9th century.
There is no complete manuscript at all from the 7th century, they only appear in the 8th century.
70% of the Quran is borrowed writings from Jewish writings and Christian sectarians and is all agreed with western scholars.
There are no peaceful verses in the Quran.
Muhammad was never about peace. He killed, raped and robbed everywhere he went.
20% of Muslim scholars don't even understand the Quran.
The Quran has no complete stories, only in Sura 12, about Joseph, stories dont begin, stories don't end. No transitional phrase from story to story. It's confusing. The Bible makes total sense.
Muhammad is the model in Islam.
Allah wants everybody to be like Muhammad.
Jesus Christ is the model in Christianity.
God wants Christians to follow Jesus Christ, His Only begotten Son for eternal life.
The Quran is not a book to understand, it is a book to get salvation and blessings.
75% of Christians that converted from Islam all had dreams at night saying that Jesus Christ appeared to them dressed in white and declares his name to be Jesus Christ, The Son of God, not Isa.
Muslims call their Muslim jesus Isa. Muslims got the wrong jesus.
The Bible passes every test unlike the Quran.

Christians & Jews worship Yahweh, The God of Israel - The God of Abraham Jacob and Isaac. God Never Mentioned Ismael because Ismael's god is called Allah - the god of the Quran.

Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life - 1 John 5:12

Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life, but whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for God's wrath remains on them - John 3:36.

Accept the Biblical Jesus Christ - The Son of God into your hearts for redemption of your sins and be saved and have eternal life.
"The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." Marcus Aurelius, Roman Emperor and stoic philosopher, 121-180 A.D.
Misko_Varesanovic
Freshman Poster
Posts: 142
Joined: March 13th, 2016, 11:24 am

Re: The Truth Behind Islam

Post by Misko_Varesanovic »

Mr S wrote:Great video to watch regarding research related to the fallacies of Islam, you don't have to be a Christian either to watch and relate.

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ySbW-btfK8[/youtube]

Allah & Muhammad had nothing to do with the Quran or Islam - Islam is founded on Lies & Deception

Jesus Christ is God manifested in the flesh - Jesus says “You call me ‘Teacher’ and ‘Lord,’ and rightly so, for that is what I am", (John 13:13). ‘Anyone who has seen me has seen the Father [God]” (John 14:9). “I and the Father [God] are one” (John 10:30).
Jesus is far more than God’s mere messenger. Jesus Christ is God’s one and only Son (John 3:16-18). Further, He is the Second Person of the Trinity, God incarnate—God Himself (John 1:1,14; 5:18). Jesus claimed to be both “the Lord” and “God”’
No one can deny that Muslims reject the biblical Jesus. Yet it was Jesus Himself who warned all men, “If you do not believe that I am the one I claim to be, you will indeed die in your sins” (John 8:24).

Jay Smith points out many interesting points that Muslims never told us.
Allah & Muhammad had nothing to do with the Quran or Islam.
The Quran and Islam were created by Abdul Malik in the 8th century who was a caliph from 685-705 - the great Arab reformer.
Abdul Malik takes and creates an Identity for Arabs.
Abdul Malik names who the prophet will be.
Abdul Malik creates the first Quran in the 8th century.
Abdul Malik Introduces the name Muslim.
Abdul Malik Introduces the name Islam.
It all begins with Abdul Malik in the 8th century.
200 to 300 years after Muhammad's death, the Quran was made.
We have the biography of Muhammad at the 9th century.
There is no complete manuscript at all from the 7th century, they only appear in the 8th century.
70% of the Quran is borrowed writings from Jewish writings and Christian sectarians and is all agreed with western scholars.
There are no peaceful verses in the Quran.
Muhammad was never about peace. He killed, raped and robbed everywhere he went.
20% of Muslim scholars don't even understand the Quran.
The Quran has no complete stories, only in Sura 12, about Joseph, stories dont begin, stories don't end. No transitional phrase from story to story. It's confusing. The Bible makes total sense.
Muhammad is the model in Islam.
Allah wants everybody to be like Muhammad.
Jesus Christ is the model in Christianity.
God wants Christians to follow Jesus Christ, His Only begotten Son for eternal life.
The Quran is not a book to understand, it is a book to get salvation and blessings.
75% of Christians that converted from Islam all had dreams at night saying that Jesus Christ appeared to them dressed in white and declares his name to be Jesus Christ, The Son of God, not Isa.
Muslims call their Muslim jesus Isa. Muslims got the wrong jesus.
The Bible passes every test unlike the Quran.

Christians & Jews worship Yahweh, The God of Israel - The God of Abraham Jacob and Isaac. God Never Mentioned Ismael because Ismael's god is called Allah - the god of the Quran.


Whoever has the Son has life; whoever does not have the Son of God does not have life - 1 John 5:12

Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life, but whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for God's wrath remains on them - John 3:36.

Accept the Biblical Jesus Christ - The Son of God into your hearts for redemption of your sins and be saved and have eternal life.
You don't seem to be aware that Arabic-speaking Christians and Jews use the name 'Allah' for God:

'The Aramaic word for "God" in the language of Assyrian Christians is ʼĔlāhā, or Alaha. Arabic-speakers of all Abrahamic faiths, including Christians and Jews, use the word "Allah" to mean "God".[10] The Christian Arabs of today have no other word for "God" than "Allah".[29] (Even the Arabic-descended Maltese language of Malta, whose population is almost entirely Roman Catholic, uses Alla for "God".) Arab Christians, for example, use the terms Allāh al-ab (الله الأب) for God the Father, Allāh al-ibn (الله الابن) for God the Son, and Allāh al-rūḥ al-quds (الله الروح القدس) for God the Holy Spirit. (See God in Christianity for the Christian concept of God.)

'Arab Christians have used two forms of invocations that were affixed to the beginning of their written works. They adopted the Muslim bismillāh, and also created their own Trinitized bismillāh as early as the 8th century.[30] The Muslim bismillāh reads: "In the name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful." The Trinitized bismillāh reads: "In the name of Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, One God." The Syriac, Latin and Greek invocations do not have the words "One God" at the end. This addition was made to emphasize the monotheistic aspect of Trinitarian belief and also to make it more palatable to Muslims.[30]

'According to Marshall Hodgson, it seems that in the pre-Islamic times, some Arab Christians made pilgrimage to the Kaaba, a pagan temple at that time, honoring Allah there as God the Creator.[31]'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allah#Christianity
User avatar
Yohan
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 6435
Joined: April 2nd, 2014, 10:05 pm
Location: JAPAN

Re: The Truth Behind Islam

Post by Yohan »

Misko_Varesanovic wrote: You don't seem to be aware that Arabic-speaking Christians and Jews use the name 'Allah' for God:
And you seem not to be aware that the use of the word 'Allah' is outlawed to be used by Christians and Jews, even in such a 'moderate' Islamic country like Malaysia.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/wor ... /11256503/
KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia (AP) — Malaysia's top court ruled Monday that non-Muslims cannot use the word "Allah" to refer to God, delivering the final word on a contentious debate that has reinforced complaints that religious minorities are treated unfairly in the Muslim-majority country.

In a 4-3 judgment, the Federal Court rejected a challenge by the Roman Catholic Church and upheld a government ban on the use of the word. Most Christians in Malaysia worship in English, Tamil or various Chinese dialects, and refer to God in those languages but some Malay-speaking people on the island of Borneo have no other word for God but "Allah," a Malay word derived from Arabic.
.....
The ban appears to apply mostly to published materials, not spoken words, and newspapers using the term would lose their license. Imported Malay-language Bibles containing the term Allah, typically from Indonesia, already have been blocked.
Misko_Varesanovic
Freshman Poster
Posts: 142
Joined: March 13th, 2016, 11:24 am

Re: The Truth Behind Islam

Post by Misko_Varesanovic »

MrPeabody wrote:"Why did Christianity trample down the culture of Islam? "...ecause Islam was noble, because it owed its origin to manly instincts, because it said Yes to life even in the rare and exquisite treasures of Moorish life!""


-- The AntiChrist, Nietzsche


Interestingly enough, Nietzsche wasn't the only notable Western philosopher and/or cultural commentator to make this point. Particularly contrasted against what was perceived as the suffocating asceticism of Protestantism, the Islamic world was seen by some as a domain of sensuality, hence the popular imagery of the harem, polygyny, belly-dancing, Turkish baths etc. In fact, right up until 1979, the 'Orient' was generally viewed as 'louche' and 'libertine' when compared to the 'morally upstanding' and 'sober' West.
Misko_Varesanovic
Freshman Poster
Posts: 142
Joined: March 13th, 2016, 11:24 am

Re: The Truth Behind Islam

Post by Misko_Varesanovic »

Yohan wrote:
Misko_Varesanovic wrote: You don't seem to be aware that Arabic-speaking Christians and Jews use the name 'Allah' for God:
And you seem not to be aware that the use of the word 'Allah' is outlawed to be used by Christians and Jews, even in such a 'moderate' Islamic country like Malaysia.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/wor ... /11256503/
KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia (AP) — Malaysia's top court ruled Monday that non-Muslims cannot use the word "Allah" to refer to God, delivering the final word on a contentious debate that has reinforced complaints that religious minorities are treated unfairly in the Muslim-majority country.

In a 4-3 judgment, the Federal Court rejected a challenge by the Roman Catholic Church and upheld a government ban on the use of the word. Most Christians in Malaysia worship in English, Tamil or various Chinese dialects, and refer to God in those languages but some Malay-speaking people on the island of Borneo have no other word for God but "Allah," a Malay word derived from Arabic.
.....
The ban appears to apply mostly to published materials, not spoken words, and newspapers using the term would lose their license. Imported Malay-language Bibles containing the term Allah, typically from Indonesia, already have been blocked.
That is completely irrelevant to the point being discussed. A court case in the jurisdiction of Malaysia (which is in South-East Asia) doesn't change the fact that Christians and Jews in the Arabic-speaking world refer to 'God' as 'Allah', not 'Yaweh'.
User avatar
Yohan
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 6435
Joined: April 2nd, 2014, 10:05 pm
Location: JAPAN

Re: The Truth Behind Islam

Post by Yohan »

Misko_Varesanovic wrote: Saudi Arabia is not the rule - it is the exception when it comes to the practice of Christianity in the Arab world, let alone the Muslim world.
I wonder if this is a troll posting. Ridiculous comment.

If Saudi Arabia is not the highest respected and responsible party to act as the guardian of Islam and protector of its Holiest Place in Mecca, I wonder which other country could it be...

I really wonder if this comment is coming from a Muslim. It's about the same if a Catholic claims, the Vatican and the Pope has nothing to say about the Catholic Church.

Every Muslim 5 times a day is praying and looking to Mecca, and this poster is telling me Saudi Arabia is the exception regarding how Muslims should act with Christianity and 'let alone with the Muslim world'.... LOL
User avatar
Yohan
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 6435
Joined: April 2nd, 2014, 10:05 pm
Location: JAPAN

Re: The Truth Behind Islam

Post by Yohan »

Misko_Varesanovic wrote:
That is completely irrelevant to the point being discussed. A court case in the jurisdiction of Malaysia (which is in South-East Asia) doesn't change the fact that Christians and Jews in the Arabic-speaking world refer to 'God' as 'Allah', not 'Yaweh'.
It is not 'completely irrelevant', as to ban the use of a Bible in Malay language (the national language) clearly shows the intolerance of Islam against any other religion.

About the Arabic-speaking world, it is strongly advised by Islamic teachers that intelligent and faithful Muslims are studying the Quran and learn how to use Arabic, regardless their native language. Prayers are in Arabic. Arabic is the original language of the Quran.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-malay ... 5C20140119
KUALA LUMPUR (Reuters) - Malaysia’s king gave his backing on Sunday to a court ruling barring non-Muslims from using the word Allah to refer to God, weighing in for the first time on an issue that has fanned religious tensions in the multi-cultural country.
.....
Sultan Abdul Halim is one of the nine sultans who take turns every five years to serve as head of state.
While the king has limited powers, he is regarded as a defender of the Islamic faith and is deeply respected by the Malay Muslims who make up 60 percent of the population.
.....
Earlier this month religious authorities in Selangor state seized over 300 Malay Bibles from a Christian group, saying they acted on a decree by the sultan of that state forbidding non-Muslims from using Allah.
What would you say, for example, if USA is banning the Quran in English?
\would you also consider it as ' completely irrelevant'?
Misko_Varesanovic
Freshman Poster
Posts: 142
Joined: March 13th, 2016, 11:24 am

Re: The Truth Behind Islam

Post by Misko_Varesanovic »

Yohan wrote:
Misko_Varesanovic wrote: Saudi Arabia is not the rule - it is the exception when it comes to the practice of Christianity in the Arab world, let alone the Muslim world.
I wonder if this is a troll posting. Ridiculous comment.

If Saudi Arabia is not the highest respected and responsible party to act as the guardian of Islam and protector of its Holiest Place in Mecca, I wonder which other country could it be...

I really wonder if this comment is coming from a Muslim. It's about the same if a Catholic claims, the Vatican and the Pope has nothing to say about the Catholic Church.

Every Muslim 5 times a day is praying and looking to Mecca, and this poster is telling me Saudi Arabia is the exception regarding how Muslims should act with Christianity and 'let alone with the Muslim world'.... LOL
Firstly, Saudi Arabia did not even exist until 1932. It therefore had no role up to that point in determining anything much, let alone how Muslims interact with Christians. In any case, it has no tradition of high-level scholarship. The traditional seats of Islamic scholarship have been places such as Al Azhar in Cairo, the city of Qom in Iran, and Istanbul and Konya in Turkey.

Secondly, Islam does not have a church. Drawing parallels between the Catholic Church and Saudi Arabia in this context could only be done by someone who knows next to nothing about either.

Thirdly, the Wahabbism mandated in Saudi Arabia is a minority sect which did not even exist until the 18th century. Even today, it has little resonance outside the Gulf.
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Religion and Spirituality”