Is Our Earth FLAT and Motionless, Not a Spinning Globe?

[Winston]

Some great flat earth documentaries on Bitchute that are fun and entertaining to watch that make good points and might be true. lol

What a great pun. lol. The "global lie". lol

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ysHYWi85m3WK



https://www.bitchute.com/video/BpWrxZfEujCB



https://www.bitchute.com/video/XE0VRZeZAdoI



https://www.bitchute.com/video/Rxilvds3olhb

[Winston]

@Pixel--Dude and @Lucas88:

Wow check out how the Jewish gematria of 666 is in everything around us. This cannot be coincidence!

https://odysee.com/@Christendumb2:0/Cur ... mber-666:1

Earth’s curvature is 0,666 ft - squared mile

The Earth’s Axis, it’s Orbital Inclination around the Sun is 23,4 Degrees, total is 90 Degrees = 66.6 Degrees

The Earth Orbits the Sun at 66,600 Miles Per Hour

The Earth’s Circumference is 6 x 6 x 6 x 100 Nautical Miles

The Curvature of A Square Mile is .666 Feet... in 10 Miles: 66.6 Ft... in 20 Miles: 266.6 Ft... 40M: 1,066.6 Ft... 50M: 1,666 Ft… 70M: 3,266.6 Ft… 80M: 4,266.6 Ft… 100M: 6,666.6Ft… The Heliocentric Curvature Math is Based on 666

The Arctic & Antarctic Circles are at exactly 66.6°

Astro-Not Peggy Whitson Spent 666 Days in Space

The Diameter of the Moon is 6 x 6 x 6 x 10 Miles

Sunset is Divided by 3 Degrees (6° + 6° + 6°) aka: “Civil, Nautical, and Astronomical Twilight”

From Mercury, the Sun is 666 Times Brighter, Using the Inverse Square Law

Venus is 464° Celsius or 867° Fahrenheit (The Median of These Two Numbers: 666)

Mars is at 1.666 AU (Astronomical Units) from the sun at Aphelion

Ceres (Classified as a Dwarf Planet in the Asteroid Belt) Has a 466.6 Day Synodic Period

The Comet Shoemaker Levy Collided with Jupiter, Traveling at 6 x 6 x 6 x 1000 Kilometers Per Hour

Saturn’s Orbital Distance is 1,426,666,422 Kilometers or 9.54 AU

The Surface Temperature of Uranus is: -6x6x6°

The Surface Temperature of Neptune is: -6x6x6°

Pluto’s Orbital Velocity is 4.666 Kilometers Per Second

[Yohan]

.....we have never dug deeper than the earth's crust. But when you see an image of the earth it shows all these layers and talks about liquud iron and nickel. How can we possibly know what is at the Earth's core when we haven't even drilled far enough to determine that for a fact?

Isn't this based on more assumptions and guesswork?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_inner_core

A summary to answer this question can be found here. Link above.

There is still no direct evidence about the composition of the inner core. However, based on the relative prevalence of various chemical elements in the Solar System, the theory of planetary formation, and constraints imposed or implied by the chemistry of the rest of the Earth's volume, the inner core is believed to consist primarily of an iron–nickel alloy.

Nobody really knows, there is no clear evidence about the earth's core.

It's complicated, but using many data like earthquakes (Japan is very good with that) or data from other sources like temperature, magnetic field, multiple layers etc. it could or should be like that....

No need really to drill -

for example
you can measure the height of a mountain, but you need not to climb up to this mountain...
you can measure various data of the earth and conclude, the earth must be round, must have a certain size/volume etc. without travelling around the earth...
you are able to measure the distance earth-moon without travelling to the moon...etc...

[Yohan]

Hey @Winston and @gsjackson what about time zones? They don't seem to make any sense at all on the flat earth model!

Illustration of different phases of the moon, from manuscript of the Kitab al-Tafhim by Al-Biruni (973-1048)

He fully understood correctly more than 1000 years ago, that you can see the shadow of the earth when watching the moon and the light of the moon is coming from the sun.

He wrote under his drawing:

Why the increase and decrease of the light of the moon is settled while other stars don't behave so?
Observing these and not understanding the spirit of these is a misdeed among the people that the light of the stars is of their own

Al-Biruni together with his friends in India were very good in measure of time - they constructed some structures containing many sticks pointing to the sun and recording the data of their shadows taken at the same time but far away different places over years and after comparing them they found that the earth must be round and not flat.

They were able to predict exactly sunrise and sunset, and the time when the moon will show up and in which form.

Gravity was also a topic und studied by Al-Biruni. Watching the moon and the sea, he noticed that low tide and high tide is related with the position of the moon and understood that it is not only the earth, but the moon also has some power of gravity moving the water of the sea towards the direction of the moon.

-------------------------

There were others, long time before Al-Biruni, who suspected that the earth must be a globe,

Pythagoras around 500 B.C.
Aristotle (384-322 BC)
Eratosthenes (276-194 BC)

Nowadays it is much easier, but costly to travel around the round world by airplane or ship and you will come back ALWAYS to the same place you left despite travelling always forward to the same direction regardless which direction - north east south west - you choose - but even Magellan in 1519 made already a proven trip around the world to confirm the earth is round and there is plenty of documentation about this trip in every detail available.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferdinand_Magellan

[Yohan]

@Winston
@gsjackson

If the Earth is a flat plane then why is it if you're in the northern hemisphere and you watch the North star you see the stars moving counterclockwise and in the southern hemisphere stars rotate clockwise instead? This makes sense on a globe earth, but is impossible on a Flat Earth.

Why can you only see Polaris in the northern hemisphere and the southern cross in the southern hemisphere?

https://wonderdome.co.uk/northern-vs-so ... phere-sky/

The North Star, the one that marks the position of the North Celestial Pole, is only visible to the Northern Hemisphere observers. Moreover, the constellations that are close to the North Star – we call them circumpolar constellations [as they circle around the North Star and stay up in the sky all the time, all year round] can also be only seen from the Northern Hemisphere. The Northern Hemisphere’s circumpolar constellation include Ursa Major, Ursa Minor, Cepheus and Cassiopeia.
-----
The Southern Hemisphere, on the other hand, does not have its own ‘Southern Star’. But it does have a number of circumpolar constellations that are unique to that part of the world. They include Carina, Crux and Centaurus, the constellations many Northern Hemisphere stargazers have never even heard of!

[Winston]

Check out this satire video by Eric Dubay about someone questioning the globe god about why all the NASA photos of Earth are vastly different and super fake and all the official excuses for it. It's hilarious and makes NASA dupes look so stupid. lol

[MrMan]

Hey @Winston and @gsjackson what about time zones? They don't seem to make any sense at all on the flat earth model!

Illustration of different phases of the moon, from manuscript of the Kitab al-Tafhim by Al-Biruni (973-1048)

He fully understood correctly more than 1000 years ago, that you can see the shadow of the earth when watching the moon and the light of the moon is coming from the sun.

He wrote under his drawing:

Why the increase and decrease of the light of the moon is settled while other stars don't behave so?
Observing these and not understanding the spirit of these is a misdeed among the people that the light of the stars is of their own

Al-Biruni together with his friends in India were very good in measure of time - they constructed some structures containing many sticks pointing to the sun and recording the data of their shadows taken at the same time but far away different places over years and after comparing them they found that the earth must be round and not flat.

They were able to predict exactly sunrise and sunset, and the time when the moon will show up and in which form.

Gravity was also a topic und studied by Al-Biruni. Watching the moon and the sea, he noticed that low tide and high tide is related with the position of the moon and understood that it is not only the earth, but the moon also has some power of gravity moving the water of the sea towards the direction of the moon.

-------------------------

There were others, long time before Al-Biruni, who suspected that the earth must be a globe,

Pythagoras around 500 B.C.
Aristotle (384-322 BC)
Eratosthenes (276-194 BC)

Nowadays it is much easier, but costly to travel around the round world by airplane or ship and you will come back ALWAYS to the same place you left despite travelling always forward to the same direction regardless which direction - north east south west - you choose - but even Magellan in 1519 made already a proven trip around the world to confirm the earth is round and there is plenty of documentation about this trip in every detail available.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferdinand_Magellan

I suppose the another explanation is that the edge of the map is like the edge of the screen on the old games 'Asteroids' or Pac Man, where if you ship or character goes to the edge of one side of the screen it comes out on the other side.

[Winston]

Yes MrMan. I was thinking that too.

One way to reconcile flat earth and globe earth and have them both be true at the same time is this: In higher mathematics, there's no straight line, everything is curved. So we may be in a reality bubble that is enclosed and curves around itself. So while technically the Earth is flat and looks flat, it is SPACE-TIME that is CURVING around in this reality bubble. Not the ground itself. Hence when you go forward you eventually go back around to square one, because the curve of space-time wraps around itself eventually. Kind of like in a video game.

Interesting video about a new theory that our flat plane is a hologram being projected from the North Pole. Very mind blowing and fascinating. There's a YouTuber named Devin Madgy that has a similar theory to this. He says that our reality is a holographic projection emanating from the North Pole too on a flat plane with a toroidal shaped structure around it. His channel is at Flat Earth Paradise if you want to look him up. He's very out there but mind blowing and looks like Jesus. lol

https://odysee.com/@chrisfolgersdehaan: ... m-theory:6

[Winston]

Interesting 3 part investigation series by a Hispanic guy who says he researched flat earth and tried to debunk it, but ended up proving it to be true instead! lol. He is funny and explains all his investigation and evidence and findings in a clear easy to understand manner that any average Joe can understand. If you are new to this topic or want a layman's explanation, this video is for you. All 3 parts below.

[Winston]

Wow check out this Freemason explain the true shape of the earth and how the Black Sun makes the matrix function and its connection to the Sun and Moon. This is very mind blowing and only 10 min. A must see!

https://odysee.com/@FEIsTheKey:a/Black- ... xplained:d

[Winston]

Here's a few big questions that will make you all scratch your head:

1) If earth is moving in space at 67,000 mph and the solar system is moving around the galaxy at 500,000 mph, then why are the stars the same every night and the north star Polaris is fixed and stationary? Shouldn't the stars be moving by sideways like if you were on the Starship Enterprise? Science has never explained that.

2) How come the surface of the moon is always 100 percent the same? That defies the fundamental universal law that "everything changes". If you look at the moon with a telescope for 100 years you will NEVER see any rock or debris ever hit the moon's surface, or dust kicking up from the moon. Ever. And no one has ever seen a craft or probe or LEM land on the moon with a telescope. Ever. No one has seen a rocket approach the moon either with a telescope or the naked eye. It's all on TV only. Did you know that? That should make you question everything. Obviously the moon is a construct and not some ball of rock floating in outer space.

3) How come NASA or anyone can't put a probe on the moon and stream back HD video to us, like it did with Mars? They should be able to easily do that if they are indeed landing probes on the moon. Every time an unmanned probe lands on the moon (allegedly) they give some excuse why the camera malfunctioned. How many excuses do they have to give before you realize they are lying? Anything that can be filmed will be filmed. 4) How come 100 percent of rockets sent to space never go straight up into space? They always go sideways over the ocean and vanish. This means that nothing seems to be able to leave low earth orbit. That implies a dome or barrier above us. Just because you see black in the sky doesn't mean outer space exists. Think about it.

You see what I mean? There are hundreds of questions like these that science can't answer. This means that space and astronomy are most likely hoaxes and not what we've been told. Think about it.

[Yohan]

Here's a few big questions that will make you all scratch your head:

1) If earth is moving in space at 67,000 mph and the solar system is moving around the galaxy at 500,000 mph, then why are the stars the same every night and the north star Polaris is fixed and stationary?

These are easy questions.

1)
Polaris is not fixed, not stationary. It is also moving, but as it is in the center and far away, its movement is small, very difficult to measure, only some observatories are able to to it.
You might compare this with a large rotating wheel, the center of the wheel appears to be not moving.

2) The moon is too far away you cannot see a rocket or debris hitting the moon's surface with your eyes and even not with a very large telescope.
You also can see only one side of the moon. You might also say, earth did not change during the few years you are alive.

3) There are very serious issues about producing electricity and about low temperature, solar power is not even available all the time.
Receiving data and broadcasting data are not the same. To broadcast you need a lot of power.

If you have a good radio amateur equipment/and the required permits and place for antennas and a good location, you can send with high power signals straight to the moon if it is near/over your location and listen to the echo coming back, called EME (earth-moon-earth). Depends on the position you can also talk to other people living on other places in the world.





4) Of course rockets will never go straight up into space, they first circle the earth a few times, getting higher and higher and faster and after reaching a certain position they will leave the earth and move on into outer space.

---------------------------------------------------

2) How come the surface of the moon is always 100 percent the same? That defies the fundamental universal law that "everything changes". If you look at the moon with a telescope for 100 years you will NEVER see any rock or debris ever hit the moon's surface, or dust kicking up from the moon. Ever. And no one has ever seen a craft or probe or LEM land on the moon with a telescope. Ever. No one has seen a rocket approach the moon either with a telescope or the naked eye. It's all on TV only. Did you know that? That should make you question everything. Obviously the moon is a construct and not some ball of rock floating in outer space.

3) How come NASA or anyone can't put a probe on the moon and stream back HD video to us, like it did with Mars? They should be able to easily do that if they are indeed landing probes on the moon. Every time an unmanned probe lands on the moon (allegedly) they give some excuse why the camera malfunctioned. How many excuses do they have to give before you realize they are lying? Anything that can be filmed will be filmed.

4) How come 100 percent of rockets sent to space never go straight up into space? They always go sideways over the ocean and vanish. This means that nothing seems to be able to leave low earth orbit. That implies a dome or barrier above us. Just because you see black in the sky doesn't mean outer space exists. Think about it.

You see what I mean? There are hundreds of questions like these that science can't answer. This means that space and astronomy are most likely hoaxes and not what we've been told. Think about it.