getting women is a number's game,hence travel to places where approaching is welcomed not shunned

[88jose88]

That means places like colombia,latin cultures,Poland etc

and avoid places like Japan unless you want to be limited to dating apps.I know for a fact I'd approach if it were not seen as something bad,but rather something men are expected to do.

I remember in miami,this hot latina got angry because I didn't check her out and approach her.this is a good thing.a woman should expect to get approached if she is attractive.Some women want men to approach just to get the ego boost and let them down harshly though,like dutch women back in 2012 when I went out alot to nightclubs.

Hyper-feminist cultures,where approaching is seen as harrassment,and hyperconservative cultures where approaching a woman you like cold is taboo,and you're supposed to wait to meet her thru social circle and ask her out after a long acquintance phase are both stifling for men.

[Lucas88]

That means places like colombia,latin cultures,Poland etc

and avoid places like Japan unless you want to be limited to dating apps.I know for a fact I'd approach if it were not seen as something bad,but rather something men are expected to do.

I remember in miami,this hot latina got angry because I didn't check her out and approach her.this is a good thing.a woman should expect to get approached if she is attractive.Some women want men to approach just to get the ego boost and let them down harshly though,like dutch women back in 2012 when I went out alot to nightclubs.

Hyper-feminist cultures,where approaching is seen as harrassment,and hyperconservative cultures where approaching a woman you like cold is taboo,and you're supposed to wait to meet her thru social circle and ask her out after a long acquintance phase are both stifling for men.

Modern Anglo societies stifle male sexuality by making direct approach and expressions of sexual interest a social taboo. This is due to a persistent remnant of the old puritanical streak in the Anglo psyche, which condemned all forms of sexual freedom, in conjunction with more recent feminist sensitivities which consider the "sexual objectification" of women on the part of men a grave offense. The observable result of this unholy marriage of Anglo puritanism and modern feminism (which is really just thinly veiled misandry) is the kind of sterile society that we see in the US today.

Let's get one thing straight. Men are supposed to be sexually interested in women and express that interest explicitly. That's just nature. But the (((social engineers))) don't want a natural world. They want to destroy all connection between men and women and turn Gentile societies into sterile wastelands with feminist ideology, condemnation of male sexuality, sissification of men, LGBT nonsense, the promotion of ugliness and anti-aesthetics, and now the isolated Gen Z screen lifestyle. The end goal is the extinction of our bloodlines.

But some societies still haven't fallen for their sick and unnatural agenda. In normal societies such as Latin America and parts of Southern Europe, it's normal for men to approach women, verbally express their sexual attraction to them, "objectify" female beauty, and f**k women in accordance with their own natural instincts. It used to be like that in the Anglo countries too in the late 20th century and early 2000s as the old puritanism was on its way out and people had a more or less healthy view of sexuality (I love movies, music videos and videogames from that time which depict stereotypically sexy female characters and even glorify heterosexual attraction) but then the "taboo" of male sexual interest was ramped up again with the aggressive promotion of feminism and now society is sterile as hell.

[vlkmo]

I have to say, if you want to make a society puritan, at least acknowledge that women's sexuality should be condemned too. You shouldn't expressly condemn one but not the other. I don't hear either the feminists or religious pulpit today condemning female sexuality as strongly if they ever do.