@MarcosZeitola Oh yeah I'm sure the dude you posted would do fine. I wasn't really remarking on the "facial hair" part. I was referring to the fact that you guys keep trying to say that Asian girls don't have a strong preference for guys who have clean cut lifestyles. But when do you ever see Asian girls dating guys like this...
When you said a guy can look like a bad boy. Personally I've never seen that. I've never seen an Asian girl going out with a guy who had tattoos. I suppose because I am not living in an Asian country, I have a smaller sample size to choose from. But I've seen plenty of Asian girls walking around with their boyfriends and I tend to notice its a guy who looks nerdy, boy next door-like, or is significantly older then her... I've also seen what kind of guys the Asian girls I have known all my life were into and the vast majority of the time they seem to be guys with a really gentle and wholesome demeanor to them of some kind.
You seem to be very fixated on each group's hobbies as a way to define them. Nerds like video games, anime, and DnD, jocks like football, beer and chicks. I'm not really looking at it that way. A nerd can easily be into football. "Nerdy" is more about being super-analytical, obsessed with the specific details of their favorite subjects that they tend to research to a tremendous degree, and yes, its definitely related to being intelligent. There are terms for example, history nerds, political nerds, even gun nerds, and yes, there is such a thing as a sports nerd as well. Being nerdy is associated with video games, DnD, and Magic the Gathering type stuff because these hobbies are not really mainstream and tend to require a lot of analysis.
Being athletic or liking sports doesn't make somebody a frat boy. I don't think a jock is necessarily the same thing as being a frat boy. There is definitely overlap in that a lot of frat boys are jocks, but not all jocks are frat boys. Being a frat boy kind of guy is more of a mentality/lifestyle. And in my experience, frat boys are just rich boy versions of hood thugs. The similarities between their behavior and the behavior of street gangs is remarkable...
- They both are very big about "hazing" rituals.
- They both tend to have rivalries with other gangs/fraternities that escalate to violent situations.
- They both have serious substance abuse problems.
- They both have a huge "snitches get stitches" kind of attitude.
- They both act incredibly cruel towards their own members despite claiming to be in a kind of brotherhood.
- They are both have strong rapist-like tendencies and a lot of their success with women comes from the fact that they tend to sort of force women to have sex with them.
- They are both obsessed with the idea that fighting other men, winning pointless battles with other men, and sleeping with as many women as possible is what validates you as a man.
- They are both lawbreakers.
- They both command a lot of unwarranted respect from their surrounding communities, simply because they are the dispensers of entertainment. On college campuses, fraternities control access to the parties and alcohol. Without them, there are no parties, so they get away with an incredible amount of immoral conduct because if the frats get shut down, all the parties get shutdown too. The same thing kind of applies to drug gangs.
The only real difference is that frat boys are not as extreme about all these tendencies as hood thugs are. Frat boys will punch each other, but they won't gun each other down in the streets. They may grind on a random girl at a party without asking, but they won't grab a girl, take her into an alleyway and rape her.
@Lucas88
What you are describing is more the result of the fact that the adult world, the work world, doesn't really tolerate the behavior of frat boy type guys nearly as much as the school environment does. In the work world, you gain respect through your ability to get shit done. The work world values people who show up to work every day, show up on time, get shit done when they are at work, and don't cause any problems. Nerds tend to be very good at this. Frat boys really struggle with this. So the work world doesn't value them nearly as much. The school environment, on the other hand, doesn't care about merit. Its all about popularity and "being cool" essentially. Basically, who can provide the most entertainment and excitement. Frat boys tend to be very good at this because they don't care about the consequences of their actions.
This is why a lot of people say that nerds tend to do better with women as they get older because, after college, they enter a world that values their skills and contributions a lot more so they gain more respect from everybody. The school environment, ironically, doesn't really respect them at all because kids in modern schools absolutely hate school and view it, in many ways, as an oppressive prison they are forced to go to every day. So people who are smart and do well in school are disliked by their peers. Nerds end up also viewing school as a prison world, but mainly because they hate the people they go to school with, not because the work is hard.
And yet I hear all the time from PUAs complaining about how their tactics don't work in Asian countries. Look at Winston's complaints about Taiwan... I've heard countless PUAs go on similar rants about Asian countries. That's because what PUAs refer to as "beta male" behaviors do work really well on Asian girls. Being really sweet and romantic towards them actually does make them like you more. Some girls of other races are like that too, but with Asian girls, it is overwhelmingly true whereas with other girls it does seem to be a more specific minority of them.
My girlfriend specifically told me that the reason she's so attracted to me is because of how sweet and caring I was towards her. I actually don't think my looks initially attracted her. But my behavior was so attractive to her that my looks became attractive. Mercer thinks she has White boy fever but I don't get that impression at all. My ex-girlfriend definitely had White boy fever, but this girl, I really doubt it.
So you have to use examples from 1,000 years ago to show that Asians are just as aggressive as everybody else is? You might as well use the Vikings to make the case for Swedish people being super-aggressive warrior-like people. I mean, from about 1660 to 1860, Japan was not involved in a single military conflict, foreign or domestic. I struggle to think of any other country that can say the same thing. This era of Japanese history is truly incredible and speaks to the Asian spirit because basically nothing changed. From 1660 to 1860, nothing changed in Japan at all. That's why I keep saying that conservatism is deeply rooted in the Asian psyche.