Is Global Population reduction the End Goal of the Elites?

[ArchibaultNew]

Hey guys,

Not to get conspiratorial but it seems that if we take "Population reduction"as the ultimate goal everything starts to make sense. Roosh and others did have a point with this idea.

Feminism: Lowers the population.
Homosexuality/LGBT: Lowers the population.
Abortion: Lowers the population
Euthanasia: Lowers the population.

[jamesbond]

Feminism has caused MGTOW and 'men who are going their own way' want nothing to do with women and this further lowers the population. The latest census data from 2020 has shown that the population in America rose the smallest amount in history from 2010 to 2020. I think there maybe something to this idea of population control from the elite.

[WilliamSmith]

I think there's more to why they finance and push those things with an agenda, yet that's certainly true.

But if anyone tells you you're being conspiratorial for thinking that "globalist" elites want depopulation, let's take a quick look at this list of quotes here:

This article hyperlinks to each original source as well as providing a good overview of the topic:
https://www.unz.com/article/depopulation-for-dummies/

To make an argument in a court of law, motive usually needs to be established. Motive is defined as, “the cause that moves people to induce a certain action.” If the earth is in an existential crisis, is there motive to institute population control measures?

Let’s ask a few elites what they think:

Stephan Hawking: “In the last 200 years the population of our planet has grown exponentially, at a rate of 1.9% per year. If it continued at this rate, with the population doubling every 40 years, by 2600 we would all be standing literally shoulder to shoulder.”
Albert Einstein: “Overpopulation in various countries has become a serious threat to the health of people and a grave obstacle to any attempt to organise peace on this planet.”
Michail Gorbachev: “We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.”
Isaac Asimov: “Democracy cannot survive overpopulation.”
Prince Philip: “In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.”
Bill Maher: “Shouldn’t we be against procreation at this point in time? With overpopulation and the strain on the resources on this planet? Shouldn’t we reward people who don’t spawn?”
Bill Gates: “The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent.”
Doug Stanhope: “When you consider the overpopulation in this world … homosexuality is completely underrated in this society.”
Ted Turner:“A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.”
Richard Branson: “The truth is this: the Earth cannot provide enough food and fresh water for 10 billion people, never mind homes, never mind roads, hospitals, and schools.”
Margaret Sanger: “All of our problems are the result of overbreeding among the working class.”
Paul Erlich: “Basically, then, there are only two kinds of solutions to the population problem. One is a ‘birth rate solution,’ in which we find ways to lower the birth rate. The other is a ‘death rate solution,’ in which ways to raise the death rate — war, famine, pestilence — find us.
Jacques Cousteau: “In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it.”
Pentti Linkola: “If there were a button I could press, I would sacrifice myself without hesitating if it meant millions of people would die.”
Dan Brown: “Overpopulation is an issue so profound that all of us need to ask what should be done.”

[Lucas88]

While all those fads currently being promoted do inevitably lead to population reduction, I don't really think a smaller population serves the interests of "the elites". They need a booming economy, and a booming economy needs fresh blood to sustain itself.

While your last point would make sense in the kind of societies that have existed up until now, the global elites now seem to want to automate most if not all forms of menial labor and indeed all industry and agriculture is expected to be automated by 2050 provided that technology continues to evolve at its present rate. The global elites no longer need a large population of slave drones to do their society's grunt work. Only experts with technical knowledge will be needed. So the global elites most likely see the majority of people as nothing more than useless eaters and would love to reduce our numbers. That might be why their social engineers are promoting the trends which others have described. Indeed one of the talking points of the WEF's envisioned Great Reset is "sustainability".

I personally don't see population reduction as a bad thing per se given the present condition of the planet but what concerns me is that population decline is occurring primarily in certain Western countries while thirdworld immigration to those same countries is being actively promoted. The obvious result of this will be population replacement. I'm not even an ethno-nationalist of any kind but it is obvious to me what is happening.

[CaptainSkelebob]

While all those fads currently being promoted do inevitably lead to population reduction, I don't really think a smaller population serves the interests of "the elites". They need a booming economy, and a booming economy needs fresh blood to sustain itself.

While your last point would make sense in the kind of societies that have existed up until now, the global elites now seem to want to automate most if not all forms of menial labor and indeed all industry and agriculture is expected to be automated by 2050 provided that technology continues to evolve at its present rate. The global elites no longer need a large population of slave drones to do their society's grunt work. Only experts with technical knowledge will be needed. So the global elites most likely see the majority of people as nothing more than useless eaters and would love to reduce our numbers. That might be why their social engineers are promoting the trends which others have described. Indeed one of the talking points of the WEF's envisioned Great Reset is "sustainability".

I personally don't see population reduction as a bad thing per se given the present condition of the planet but what concerns me is that population decline is occurring primarily in certain Western countries while thirdworld immigration to those same countries is being actively promoted. The obvious result of this will be population replacement. I'm not even an ethno-nationalist of any kind but it is obvious to me what is happening.

Most likely the work of the far left and Marxists who are flooding European countrys with immigrants to destroy the culture of the west!!!
I said in one of my threads that a lot of ppl are lazy and we should not make it our moral obligation to keep them alive. Im talking about these who dont want to work and who are happy to take hand outs from the rest of us
So you are right..... The weak should be removed to leave more for the strong
The weak are meat and the strong must eat!
Im not afraid anyway
I have all the resources I need to survive any outcome and my genes have been well secured by now