Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Discuss and talk about any general topic.

Moderators: jamesbond, fschmidt

Should Cornfed be banned?

Yes. He should be permanently banned. His extreme racism is irreconcilable with basic civility, which has been demonstrated repeatedly.
34
48%
Neither. He should continue to be given warnings and temporary bans, until he learns to change his behavior.
10
14%
No. Cornfed is a good poster and should be allowed to say anything he wants under free speech.
27
38%
 
Total votes: 71
User avatar
Winston
Site Admin
Posts: 31297
Joined: August 18th, 2007, 6:16 am
Contact:

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by Winston »

Well it looks like according to the poll, most people prefer Cornfed to stay and not be banned.

Anyhow, I've changed the poll to allow revoting. So if you already voted and wish to change your mind about Cornfed, you may do so by casting a different vote above.
Check out my FUN video clips in Russia and Female Encounters of the Foreign Kind video series and Full Russia Trip Videos!

Join my Ukrainian/Russian Women Dating Site to meet thousands of legit foreign girls at low cost!

"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne


Special Offer! FREE 6 Month Membership on ForeignWomen.com! Sign up here.

Meet Foreign Women Now! Post your FREE profile on Happier Abroad Personals and start receiving messages from gorgeous Foreign Women today!

User avatar
Shemp
Experienced Poster
Posts: 1158
Joined: November 22nd, 2014, 7:45 pm

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by Shemp »

Also posted in the banning announcement thread:
Cornfed wrote:
May 7th, 2020, 2:18 pm
Faithful old CE, always backing up his Massa, just like his house negro ancestors no-doubt looked down on white yeomen going about their business. I wonder if the dogs of rich men have that outlook. The cats surely do, but that is cats being cats, just like CE is a bred slave being a slave.
In case Cornfed is reading this thread, the problem is not the above paragraph per se, since CE is indeed something of an Uncle Tom, finally rewarded with a nice pension after 30 long years of faithful servitude doing the bidding of his masters. Rather, it's that Cornfed doesn't acknowledge that for every 1 black "house nigga", there's 10 whites who are even worse ass kissers, suck-ups, toadies, sycophants, bootlickers, lickspittles, etc. The very richness of the English language to describe these time-serving pension grubbers is testimony to their pervasiveness.

In other words, stop focusing on skin color, which is a trivial superficial bodily characteristic at the level of eye color, or height, or head shape, etc, and focus on character, culture, etc. And stop harping exclusively on inner city Ebonics culture, since this is surely but one of many lower class cultures that you find disgusting.
Moretorque
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 5518
Joined: April 28th, 2013, 7:00 am

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by Moretorque »

Winston you claim this site is about free speech.... He used to be much more racist actually....
Time to Hide!
StanfordGuy
Freshman Poster
Posts: 235
Joined: March 22nd, 2020, 11:37 am

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by StanfordGuy »

Lol, he should have been corrected a long time ago. But it's kinda too late now... your forum has been pretty much delisted from Google :/
User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 8425
Joined: August 16th, 2012, 9:22 pm

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by Cornfed »

Shemp wrote:
May 11th, 2020, 3:43 am
In case Cornfed is reading this thread, the problem is not the above paragraph per se, since CE is indeed something of an Uncle Tom, finally rewarded with a nice pension after 30 long years of faithful servitude doing the bidding of his masters. Rather, it's that Cornfed doesn't acknowledge that for every 1 black "house nigga", there's 10 whites who are even worse ass kissers, suck-ups, toadies, sycophants, bootlickers, lickspittles, etc. The very richness of the English language to describe these time-serving pension grubbers is testimony to their pervasiveness.
Right, and at no point does the post say blacks have an exclusive franchise on being simpering lickspittles like CE. It is not even particularly critical of CE given that licking boot seems to have been a viable life strategy for him and given his mode of cognition it is not like he could have a viable independent philosophical yardstick to measure achievement. Winston is just being a dick.
In other words, stop focusing on skin color, which is a trivial superficial bodily characteristic at the level of eye color, or height, or head shape, etc
I don't know why you insist on making insane leftist statements that you surely must know are untrue. The issue has been studied to death and we all know that blacks in the aggregate have low intelligence, low impulse control, high time preference, limited abstraction ability, different hormone levels etc. all of which makes perfect sense given the particular environmental niche they evolved to fill. Your statement is arguably hateful to blacks given that it implies they are pathologically underperforming in various areas whereas they are just being who they are and doing their best. Such nonsense will get people killed and prevent society from solving the problems caused by blacks and whites living under the same system.
User avatar
Shemp
Experienced Poster
Posts: 1158
Joined: November 22nd, 2014, 7:45 pm

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by Shemp »

Cornfed wrote:
May 15th, 2020, 11:03 am
Shemp wrote:
May 11th, 2020, 3:43 am
In other words, stop focusing on skin color, which is a trivial superficial bodily characteristic at the level of eye color, or height, or head shape, etc
I don't know why you insist on making insane leftist statements that you surely must know are untrue. The issue has been studied to death and we all know that blacks in the aggregate
In other words, you are saying the bell curve for blacks is shifted relative to whites. If that is true, then the answer is to cut off the undesirable parts of the curve for all races, possibly meaning a bigger chunk of the black bell curve gets deleted. Of course, there's still the issue of defining white and black, given that most American blacks have some percentage of European ancestry. Ex-President Obama, for example, was half European ancestry, half East African (not west African like most American blacks).
User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 8425
Joined: August 16th, 2012, 9:22 pm

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by Cornfed »

Shemp wrote:
May 15th, 2020, 12:41 pm
In other words, you are saying the bell curve for blacks is shifted relative to whites. If that is true, then the answer is to cut off the undesirable parts of the curve for all races, possibly meaning a bigger chunk of the black bell curve gets deleted. Of course, there's still the issue of defining white and black, given that most American blacks have some percentage of European ancestry. Ex-President Obama, for example, was half European ancestry, half East African (not west African like most American blacks).
Not really. Each race has its own spectrum forming a social dynamic that suits a particular environment. The stupid and uncivilised members of the race may be equally valuable to the smart ones in that environment. The trouble is when incompatible races have to share the same environment. As to defining races, the regime has no such problem when it comes to handing out affirmative action gibs.
User avatar
Shemp
Experienced Poster
Posts: 1158
Joined: November 22nd, 2014, 7:45 pm

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by Shemp »

Cornfed wrote:
May 15th, 2020, 12:46 pm
As to defining races, the regime has no such problem when it comes to handing out affirmative action gibs.
Actually, they do have a problem in the USA, since more and more people with just a tiny amount of African ancestry are declaring themselves as black in order to qualify for preferential treatment. I'm not sure if a person with 100% European ancestry can call themselves black because they identify as such, the way men can call themselves women because they identify as the latter, but it's the next step.

Why do the masters allow such foolishness? Because ot keeps the peons fighting amongst themselves. Affirmative action was a Republican idea (President Nixon) precisely because the rich knew it would unite the poor whites under Republican leadership, and thus give the rich an opportunity to vote themselves tax breaks. By mutual tacit agreement, both political parties are now allowing affirmative action to be turned into circus so as distract the masses while the rich are busy robbing the Treasury.
User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 8425
Joined: August 16th, 2012, 9:22 pm

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by Cornfed »

Shemp wrote:
May 15th, 2020, 1:22 pm
Cornfed wrote:
May 15th, 2020, 12:46 pm
As to defining races, the regime has no such problem when it comes to handing out affirmative action gibs.
Actually, they do have a problem in the USA, since more and more people with just a tiny amount of African ancestry are declaring themselves as black in order to qualify for preferential treatment.
Yeah but most of the time the classification is fairly simple and intuitive. Maybe it is hard to define exactly where bulldogs end and bull terriers begin, but to say that makes those invalid categories would be insane.
By mutual tacit agreement, both political parties are now allowing affirmative action to be turned into circus so as distract the masses while the rich are busy robbing the Treasury.
Also it uses low agency types as a barrier to protect the rich from usurpation by the talented poor. But even were that not the case, the presence of blacks would still be causing a problem.
StanfordGuy
Freshman Poster
Posts: 235
Joined: March 22nd, 2020, 11:37 am

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by StanfordGuy »

Cornfed wrote:
May 15th, 2020, 11:03 am
I don't know why you insist on making insane leftist statements that you surely must know are untrue. The issue has been studied to death and we all know that blacks in the aggregate have low intelligence, low impulse control, high time preference, limited abstraction ability, different hormone levels etc. all of which makes perfect sense given the particular environmental niche they evolved to fill. Your statement is arguably hateful to blacks given that it implies they are pathologically underperforming in various areas whereas they are just being who they are and doing their best. Such nonsense will get people killed and prevent society from solving the problems caused by blacks and whites living under the same system.
Idiocy.

Everything you said has been debunked and why Google has dropped this site from search :lol:

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/who ... sh-problem

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/hum ... telligence

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/wha ... eally-mean

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/heritability-iq

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/ext ... ted-autism

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/rk- ... man-beings
User avatar
Cornfed
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 8425
Joined: August 16th, 2012, 9:22 pm

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by Cornfed »

StanfordGuy wrote:
May 15th, 2020, 2:39 pm
Cornfed wrote:
May 15th, 2020, 11:03 am
I don't know why you insist on making insane leftist statements that you surely must know are untrue. The issue has been studied to death and we all know that blacks in the aggregate have low intelligence, low impulse control, high time preference, limited abstraction ability, different hormone levels etc. all of which makes perfect sense given the particular environmental niche they evolved to fill. Your statement is arguably hateful to blacks given that it implies they are pathologically underperforming in various areas whereas they are just being who they are and doing their best. Such nonsense will get people killed and prevent society from solving the problems caused by blacks and whites living under the same system.
Idiocy.

Everything you said has been debunked and why Google has dropped this site from search :lol:

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/who ... sh-problem

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/hum ... telligence

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/wha ... eally-mean

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/heritability-iq

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/ext ... ted-autism

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/rk- ... man-beings
The supposed debunking linked to is various forms of obfuscation and strategic nihilism to avoid the impossibility of debating well-established empirical facts. Google would have dropped the site for any number of reasons.
StanfordGuy
Freshman Poster
Posts: 235
Joined: March 22nd, 2020, 11:37 am

Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

Post by StanfordGuy »

Like most people, you rely on a simplification of the truth that will make it understandable to you. Your knowledge, then, is essentially a refinement of ignorance --- that you have elevated to established fact. Google agrees with me.
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “General Discussions”