Posted: July 28th, 2014, 6:55 pm
I say keep his dumb a** around. I need him here to smack around and take out back to the proverbial shed on this forum. Gives me great pleasure to routinely put him in his place......
Our Message: You Can Transform Your Life and Solve Your Problems by Escaping America for a Better Life & Love Overseas! Discover Friendlier People, Social Connection, Saner Cultures, Lower Cost Living, Healthier Food, Greater Freedoms and More!
https://www.happierabroad.com/forum/
https://www.happierabroad.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=23389
Couldn't have said it better myself.Ghost wrote:Why is this still being tossed around? Sanity and free speech will stay on this forum for now. (And I hope from here on out, for good.) People say things you don't like - that's tough, grow up. Unlike in real life, here you have an ignore button. That's where this issue should have been solved. Eleven pages in and some still can't get over the fact that others are (gasp!) allowed to express opposing opinions.
We've been through all this before. Why is this silly nonsense coming up again?Winston wrote: ↑January 5th, 2018, 2:58 amDo you guys think there should be some limitation or restriction on Cornfed's right to call blacks bad names and use denigrating insults against blacks and african americans? Or should that be protected under free speech? Should a line be drawn somewhere? What do you all think?
What about his posts that imply violence against blacks or reducing their population, aka "culling"?
Because some members have complained and said you shouldnt be allowed to call blacks animals. So i wanted to know where everyone stands on this. And what the optimal solution is. Or compromise.Cornfed wrote: ↑January 5th, 2018, 4:28 amWe've been through all this before. Why is this silly nonsense coming up again?Winston wrote: ↑January 5th, 2018, 2:58 amDo you guys think there should be some limitation or restriction on Cornfed's right to call blacks bad names and use denigrating insults against blacks and african americans? Or should that be protected under free speech? Should a line be drawn somewhere? What do you all think?
What about his posts that imply violence against blacks or reducing their population, aka "culling"?
Yes its derogatory. But does that mean he should be censored or banned? Anything can be offensive to somebody. This site is offensive to feminists for instance. Where do you draw the line?Yohan wrote: ↑January 5th, 2018, 8:50 amIt is not only insulting, but it is plainly wrong to consider people of other race who are not white as animals, wildlife, cattle, apes, monkeys...
They are humans, there is nowhere scientifically proven that no-white people are non-humans, primates...
This argument coming from Cornfed is also derogatory against all white people who are in a personal interracial relationship.
To have sex with an animal is 'bestiality'.
This forum is promoting and encouraging international/interracial dating between Western men and foreign women of any kind living anywhere in this world. Racist comments do not fit the purpose of this forum.
That's my opinion, but of course it is up to the admin - Winston - to decide, what to do and what not to do - it is his forum, not my forum.
This is why we love you Winston. No filter, just raw observation.For instance ive seen filipino girls climb trees with no experience or training, as though they have strong monkey genes.
As a result of pretending they are people, blacks have displaced and wiped out much of the indigenous population of Africa, destroyed most African fauna, destroyed white civilisation in Southern Africa and committed countless attacks on humans and generally ruined life in the West. By not wanting this horrendous situation even discussed, you clearly want it to continue and get worse. You are clearly a vile, evil person.