Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

[Winston]

Well it looks like according to the poll, most people prefer Cornfed to stay and not be banned.

Anyhow, I've changed the poll to allow revoting. So if you already voted and wish to change your mind about Cornfed, you may do so by casting a different vote above.

[Shemp]

Also posted in the banning announcement thread:

Faithful old CE, always backing up his Massa, just like his house negro ancestors no-doubt looked down on white yeomen going about their business. I wonder if the dogs of rich men have that outlook. The cats surely do, but that is cats being cats, just like CE is a bred slave being a slave.

In case Cornfed is reading this thread, the problem is not the above paragraph per se, since CE is indeed something of an Uncle Tom, finally rewarded with a nice pension after 30 long years of faithful servitude doing the bidding of his masters. Rather, it's that Cornfed doesn't acknowledge that for every 1 black "house nigga", there's 10 whites who are even worse ass kissers, suck-ups, toadies, sycophants, bootlickers, lickspittles, etc. The very richness of the English language to describe these time-serving pension grubbers is testimony to their pervasiveness.

In other words, stop focusing on skin color, which is a trivial superficial bodily characteristic at the level of eye color, or height, or head shape, etc, and focus on character, culture, etc. And stop harping exclusively on inner city Ebonics culture, since this is surely but one of many lower class cultures that you find disgusting.

[Moretorque]

Winston you claim this site is about free speech.... He used to be much more racist actually....

[StanfordGuy]

Lol, he should have been corrected a long time ago. But it's kinda too late now... your forum has been pretty much delisted from Google :/

[Cornfed]

In case Cornfed is reading this thread, the problem is not the above paragraph per se, since CE is indeed something of an Uncle Tom, finally rewarded with a nice pension after 30 long years of faithful servitude doing the bidding of his masters. Rather, it's that Cornfed doesn't acknowledge that for every 1 black "house nigga", there's 10 whites who are even worse ass kissers, suck-ups, toadies, sycophants, bootlickers, lickspittles, etc. The very richness of the English language to describe these time-serving pension grubbers is testimony to their pervasiveness.

Right, and at no point does the post say blacks have an exclusive franchise on being simpering lickspittles like CE. It is not even particularly critical of CE given that licking boot seems to have been a viable life strategy for him and given his mode of cognition it is not like he could have a viable independent philosophical yardstick to measure achievement. Winston is just being a dick.

In other words, stop focusing on skin color, which is a trivial superficial bodily characteristic at the level of eye color, or height, or head shape, etc

I don't know why you insist on making insane leftist statements that you surely must know are untrue. The issue has been studied to death and we all know that blacks in the aggregate have low intelligence, low impulse control, high time preference, limited abstraction ability, different hormone levels etc. all of which makes perfect sense given the particular environmental niche they evolved to fill. Your statement is arguably hateful to blacks given that it implies they are pathologically underperforming in various areas whereas they are just being who they are and doing their best. Such nonsense will get people killed and prevent society from solving the problems caused by blacks and whites living under the same system.

[Shemp]

In other words, stop focusing on skin color, which is a trivial superficial bodily characteristic at the level of eye color, or height, or head shape, etc

I don't know why you insist on making insane leftist statements that you surely must know are untrue. The issue has been studied to death and we all know that blacks in the aggregate

In other words, you are saying the bell curve for blacks is shifted relative to whites. If that is true, then the answer is to cut off the undesirable parts of the curve for all races, possibly meaning a bigger chunk of the black bell curve gets deleted. Of course, there's still the issue of defining white and black, given that most American blacks have some percentage of European ancestry. Ex-President Obama, for example, was half European ancestry, half East African (not west African like most American blacks).

[Cornfed]

In other words, you are saying the bell curve for blacks is shifted relative to whites. If that is true, then the answer is to cut off the undesirable parts of the curve for all races, possibly meaning a bigger chunk of the black bell curve gets deleted. Of course, there's still the issue of defining white and black, given that most American blacks have some percentage of European ancestry. Ex-President Obama, for example, was half European ancestry, half East African (not west African like most American blacks).

Not really. Each race has its own spectrum forming a social dynamic that suits a particular environment. The stupid and uncivilised members of the race may be equally valuable to the smart ones in that environment. The trouble is when incompatible races have to share the same environment. As to defining races, the regime has no such problem when it comes to handing out affirmative action gibs.

[Shemp]

As to defining races, the regime has no such problem when it comes to handing out affirmative action gibs.

Actually, they do have a problem in the USA, since more and more people with just a tiny amount of African ancestry are declaring themselves as black in order to qualify for preferential treatment. I'm not sure if a person with 100% European ancestry can call themselves black because they identify as such, the way men can call themselves women because they identify as the latter, but it's the next step.

Why do the masters allow such foolishness? Because ot keeps the peons fighting amongst themselves. Affirmative action was a Republican idea (President Nixon) precisely because the rich knew it would unite the poor whites under Republican leadership, and thus give the rich an opportunity to vote themselves tax breaks. By mutual tacit agreement, both political parties are now allowing affirmative action to be turned into circus so as distract the masses while the rich are busy robbing the Treasury.

[Cornfed]

As to defining races, the regime has no such problem when it comes to handing out affirmative action gibs.

Actually, they do have a problem in the USA, since more and more people with just a tiny amount of African ancestry are declaring themselves as black in order to qualify for preferential treatment.

Yeah but most of the time the classification is fairly simple and intuitive. Maybe it is hard to define exactly where bulldogs end and bull terriers begin, but to say that makes those invalid categories would be insane.

By mutual tacit agreement, both political parties are now allowing affirmative action to be turned into circus so as distract the masses while the rich are busy robbing the Treasury.

Also it uses low agency types as a barrier to protect the rich from usurpation by the talented poor. But even were that not the case, the presence of blacks would still be causing a problem.

[StanfordGuy]

I don't know why you insist on making insane leftist statements that you surely must know are untrue. The issue has been studied to death and we all know that blacks in the aggregate have low intelligence, low impulse control, high time preference, limited abstraction ability, different hormone levels etc. all of which makes perfect sense given the particular environmental niche they evolved to fill. Your statement is arguably hateful to blacks given that it implies they are pathologically underperforming in various areas whereas they are just being who they are and doing their best. Such nonsense will get people killed and prevent society from solving the problems caused by blacks and whites living under the same system.

Idiocy.

Everything you said has been debunked and why Google has dropped this site from search

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/who ... sh-problem

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/hum ... telligence

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/wha ... eally-mean

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/heritability-iq

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/ext ... ted-autism

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/rk- ... man-beings

[Cornfed]

I don't know why you insist on making insane leftist statements that you surely must know are untrue. The issue has been studied to death and we all know that blacks in the aggregate have low intelligence, low impulse control, high time preference, limited abstraction ability, different hormone levels etc. all of which makes perfect sense given the particular environmental niche they evolved to fill. Your statement is arguably hateful to blacks given that it implies they are pathologically underperforming in various areas whereas they are just being who they are and doing their best. Such nonsense will get people killed and prevent society from solving the problems caused by blacks and whites living under the same system.

Idiocy.

Everything you said has been debunked and why Google has dropped this site from search

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/who ... sh-problem

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/hum ... telligence

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/wha ... eally-mean

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/heritability-iq

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/ext ... ted-autism

https://culturewhiz.org/forum/topic/rk- ... man-beings

The supposed debunking linked to is various forms of obfuscation and strategic nihilism to avoid the impossibility of debating well-established empirical facts. Google would have dropped the site for any number of reasons.

[StanfordGuy]

Like most people, you rely on a simplification of the truth that will make it understandable to you. Your knowledge, then, is essentially a refinement of ignorance --- that you have elevated to established fact. Google agrees with me.

[Kalinago]

Stay!Cornfed is just expressing his views and this is a free speech forum ,right?


Also what he says is mostly correct and he shouldn't be banned for speaking the truth that makes people uncomfortable or clashes with a leftist or Christian kumbaya worldview!

Also he's really funny too!

[Natural_Born_Cynic]

I like cornfed, his cool. His views are totally hilarious in a good way.

[Pixel--Dude]

@Kalinago
@Natural_Born_Cynic

Tough! Sorry @Cornfed, but I'm going to have to ban you! For the good of the land!

Only f***ing around. Cornfed makes some decent contributions to the forum and deserves to be here.