Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?

The_Hero_of_Men · Post by **The_Hero_of_Men** » June 18th, 2014, 3:24 pm

MarcosZeitola wrote:
Chad N. Froyda wrote:All of your rants just prove what is being said about you and those like you: you claim superiority while lacking the wherewithal to do anything productive for yourself.
He doesn't do an awful lot to promote his own idea of white racial superiority, that much is for certain. As a white man myself I am quite uncomfortable having my race represented so vocally by a man so utterly unfit. Maybe if he actually had a bit of success with women I would take Corny a little more seriously. However all I hear him talk about "blacks contaminating the gene pool" by "stealing our white women" and all that jazz.

It makes me wonder if Cornfed saw himself cheated out of contributing to our gene pool when a black 'inferior' dude stole a lady he was interested in? That sure would explain a lot. Maybe she lived nearby and he saw her pushing a stroller with a mocca colored baby in it every day, driving him insane and turning him into a David Duke on steroids type of guy minus the actual charisma and looks, or following.

Usually, people like Cornfed are like that because racial pride is literally ALL they have-- meaning, they have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING of substance going for themselves. I am talking about racial supremacists of ANY race, not just white, because there is plenty of that type in the black community as well. People like that are usually just sad and pathetic.

Cornfed · Post by **Cornfed** » June 18th, 2014, 3:32 pm

The_Hero_of_Men wrote:Usually, people like Cornfed are like that because racial pride is literally ALL they have-- meaning, they have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING of substance going for themselves. I am talking about racial supremacists of ANY race, not just white, because there is plenty of that type in the black community as well. People like that are usually just sad and pathetic.

Essentially the entire population of contemporary East Asia is far more racist than me, as were most white people before the last few decades of brainwashing. Moreover, pretty much everyone doesn't like blacks right now - they are just not allowed to say so. However, you see it reflected in property prices and such. So, according to you, essentially everyone living in the world prior to WWII, as well as essentially everyone living in East Asia today, has nothing much going for them. Does this make a lot of sense?

Zionosis · Post by **Zionosis** » June 18th, 2014, 3:36 pm

The_Hero_of_Men wrote:
MarcosZeitola wrote:
Chad N. Froyda wrote:All of your rants just prove what is being said about you and those like you: you claim superiority while lacking the wherewithal to do anything productive for yourself.
He doesn't do an awful lot to promote his own idea of white racial superiority, that much is for certain. As a white man myself I am quite uncomfortable having my race represented so vocally by a man so utterly unfit. Maybe if he actually had a bit of success with women I would take Corny a little more seriously. However all I hear him talk about "blacks contaminating the gene pool" by "stealing our white women" and all that jazz.

It makes me wonder if Cornfed saw himself cheated out of contributing to our gene pool when a black 'inferior' dude stole a lady he was interested in? That sure would explain a lot. Maybe she lived nearby and he saw her pushing a stroller with a mocca colored baby in it every day, driving him insane and turning him into a David Duke on steroids type of guy minus the actual charisma and looks, or following.
Usually, people like Cornfed are like that because racial pride is literally ALL they have-- meaning, they have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING of substance going for themselves. I am talking about racial supremacists of ANY race, not just white, because there is plenty of that type in the black community as well. People like that are usually just sad and pathetic.

You are aware that in places like Japan blacks are viewed very negatively. So I guess according to you they are all sad losers. Better remove your link pic because that's a creation of the Japanese. Blacks are even viewed negatively in Korea also and China.
In Russia they also aren't viewed positively.

What I find in real life is that low IQ idiots think of blacks as just like them and I guess they are more like them that's why they relate to them. Smart white people view blacks for what they are and east Asians have high IQ's and also obviously see blacks for what they are.

Go ahead and breed off with blacks or maybe you already are one. Please don't listen to any of us. Just go find the lowest IQ black woman and make some kids with her. Good riddance.

Here in Australia where I live barely anyone likes the Australian aboriginals either. The only people that accept them are low IQ outcast whites that typically like the abo's live in government housing in the poorest part of the town where the crime is really high. You know, Your sort of people that have a lot going for them. lol

davewe · Post by **davewe** » June 18th, 2014, 4:16 pm

Zionosis wrote:
Here in Australia where I live barely anyone likes the Australian aboriginals either. The only people that accept them are low IQ outcast whites that typically like the abo's live in government housing in the poorest part of the town where the crime is really high.

What about Crocodile Dundee. He loved them

abcdavid01 · Post by **abcdavid01** » June 18th, 2014, 4:22 pm

I don't know Zionosis. There are a lot of dumb people who hold less than PC views on race. That's because they know things through instinct. I think the real problem is ivory tower liberals who live in a fantasy world far away from any real blacks. That's who dictates racial policy, people of moderate intelligence. The truth lies at the high end and the low end of intelligence. True intelligence confirms instinct with reason. Liberals are all about deconstruction, so they use intelligence to destroy instinct and go no further. It's a fatal flaw. We can see this reflected in gender differences too; women are of moderate intelligence and men are over represented on both ends of the intelligence scale. Men are more likely than women to be either retarded or geniuses.

Cornfed · Post by **Cornfed** » June 18th, 2014, 4:31 pm

This thread seems to have drifted off topic. There are other threads about why blacks should not be running around loose in human society. The point here is not about the merits of the particular ideas being expressed but rather the right of posters to express any ideas they want under the principle of free speech.

abcdavid01 · Post by **abcdavid01** » June 18th, 2014, 4:36 pm

So why should you be the only one banned Cornfed? Fscmidt holds similar views to Cornfed and zboy suggested he be a moderator. Is it simply a matter of tone? That sounds hard to correct for. If it's based on feelings then it's illogical.

Contrarian Expatriate · June 18th, 2014, 4:51 pm

MarcosZeitola wrote: It makes me wonder if Cornfed saw himself cheated out of contributing to our gene pool when a black 'inferior' dude stole a lady he was interested in?

Bingo!

Contrarian Expatriate · June 18th, 2014, 4:53 pm

The_Hero_of_Men wrote: Usually, people like Cornfed are like that because racial pride is literally ALL they have-- meaning, they have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING of substance going for themselves.

Double Bingo!!!

Cornfed · Post by **Cornfed** » June 18th, 2014, 4:59 pm

Contrarian Expatriate wrote:
MarcosZeitola wrote: It makes me wonder if Cornfed saw himself cheated out of contributing to our gene pool when a black 'inferior' dude stole a lady he was interested in?
Bingo!

As if I would consider associating with mudsharks. I don't see why there is this reluctance on the part of blacks accept that they are a lower genetic element that most sane humans would not want in their gene pool.

abcdavid01 · Post by **abcdavid01** » June 18th, 2014, 5:03 pm

Forty-five people voting and it's still neck and neck! Seriously though, I want someone to answer this. Marcos already gave an explanation of why I'm okay as a race realist. Why is is fschmidt good enough for zboy to think he could be a mod when he holds views similar to Cornfed. Is it tone? If so, when does discretionary become arbitrary?

Cornfed · Post by **Cornfed** » June 18th, 2014, 5:07 pm

abcdavid01 wrote: Why is is fschmidt good enough for zboy to think he could be a mod when he holds views similar to Cornfed.

He doesn't really on racial or conspiracy issues.

abcdavid01 · Post by **abcdavid01** » June 18th, 2014, 5:34 pm

Cornfed wrote:
abcdavid01 wrote: Why is is fschmidt good enough for zboy to think he could be a mod when he holds views similar to Cornfed.
He doesn't really on racial or conspiracy issues.

Well obviously if he was a mod he wouldn't ban you. So it's odd that zboy would think Mr. Schmidt's good enough.

Cornfed · Post by **Cornfed** » June 18th, 2014, 5:39 pm

abcdavid01 wrote:Well obviously if he was a mod he wouldn't ban you. So it's odd that zboy would think Mr. Schmidt's good enough.

Yes, the whole issue doesn't make any sense if you try to think it though. It is a case of Winston being an unprincipled jerk and trying to do the most expedient thing possible.

Contrarian Expatriate · June 18th, 2014, 5:54 pm

Cornfed wrote:
Contrarian Expatriate wrote:
MarcosZeitola wrote: It makes me wonder if Cornfed saw himself cheated out of contributing to our gene pool when a black 'inferior' dude stole a lady he was interested in?
Bingo!
As if I would consider associating with mudsharks. I don't see why there is this reluctance on the part of blacks accept that they are a lower genetic element that most sane humans would not want in their gene pool.

I guess you can consider me a "mudshark-maker" extraordinaire.

And the only thing you can do about it is continue to whine and cry.