Short of some calamity, it would guarantee that I would have. Of course people have been the victims of injustice, but they weren't always being wiped out like we are now.
Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?
Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?
Meet Loads of Foreign Women in Person! Join Our Happier Abroad ROMANCE TOURS to Many Overseas Countries!
Meet Foreign Women Now! Post your FREE profile on Happier Abroad Personals and start receiving messages from gorgeous Foreign Women today!
Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?
Cornfed wrote: ↑January 7th, 2018, 2:14 pmIt is generally not possible to raise a family in the West for reasons gone into above, regardless of your personal strength. However, the more important point is - have you really convinced yourself that attempting to defend your people from genocide is weak whereas running with the money and selfishly leaving younger people to their fate while hoping you die before everything falls apart is brave? Obviously the exact opposite is the case. At least some selfish boomer traitors are honest about the situation.OutWest wrote: ↑January 7th, 2018, 1:15 pmMaybe it can be turned around, or not, but being individually weak and not raising a strong family will certainly not make it any better. Options and the ability to influence outcomes do not come from a position of personal weakness. Simpering pathetic whiners do nothing. Most storm front types are in reality right out of Monty Python... "Tiny brained wipers of other men's bottoms... "
You are a pathetic loser. You deserve whatever you might get. You create your imaginary world of "white genocide" and then go on beating your meat. You have serious delusions about being some kind of savior for the white race suffering your conjured up genocide. I would expect to see you show up in some mass killing headline or more hopefully, stuck in some institution for the criminally insane before you can go far along in your vile imaginations. I think you have richly earned both banning and the Ignore selection.
Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?
Obviously you are too cowardly to come to terms with your own cowardice.OutWest wrote: ↑January 7th, 2018, 3:18 pmYou are a pathetic loser. You deserve whatever you might get. You create your imaginary world of "white genocide" and then go on beating your meat. You have serious delusions about being some kind of savior for the white race suffering your conjured up genocide. I would expect to see you show up in some mass killing headline or more hopefully, stuck in some institution for the criminally insane before you can go far along in your vile imaginations. I think you have richly earned both banning and the Ignore selection.
Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?
Probably the vast majority of people don't care much about other people. Look at some white nationalists who hate other whites who are poor. Just because someone is of the same race, it doesn't make them your friend or even your brother.
Besides that, we do not glory in the flesh like the Talmudists do. It's vanity, just like rooting for a football team.
Such a focus would really be a waste of life, especially if a person can't move on from it. Such bitterness will literally steal a man's life away, and he will waste away his 28,000 days on this earth, concerning himself with nonsense that he can't do anything about, and that he could easily overcome, if he simply would let go of the bitterness and move on. Bitterness itself will hold a person down, because it makes a person hateful, which in itself is a waste of energy and life.
Besides that, we do not glory in the flesh like the Talmudists do. It's vanity, just like rooting for a football team.
Such a focus would really be a waste of life, especially if a person can't move on from it. Such bitterness will literally steal a man's life away, and he will waste away his 28,000 days on this earth, concerning himself with nonsense that he can't do anything about, and that he could easily overcome, if he simply would let go of the bitterness and move on. Bitterness itself will hold a person down, because it makes a person hateful, which in itself is a waste of energy and life.
A good man is above pettiness. He is better than that.
Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?
You are quite right... Many opportunities to show kindness it's far more effective.Adama wrote: ↑January 7th, 2018, 3:27 pmProbably the vast majority of people don't care much about other people. Look at some white nationalists who hate other whites who are poor. Just because someone is of the same race, it doesn't make them your friend or even your brother.
Besides that, we do not glory in the flesh like the Talmudists do. It's vanity, just like rooting for a football team.
Such a focus would really be a waste of life, especially if a person can't move on from it. Such bitterness will literally steal a man's life away, and he will waste away his 28,000 days on this earth, concerning himself with nonsense that he can't do anything about, and that he could easily overcome, if he simply would let go of the bitterness and move on. Bitterness itself will hold a person down, because it makes a person hateful, which in itself is a waste of energy and life.
Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?
It's not typical boomer selfishness, it's typical white guy not giving a rat's ass once there's some wealth.
You still don't see the pattern how the Camerons, Blairs etc of the world, and even small timers like Kradmelder operate; and with all due respect, even you will, once you acquire some wealth, forget about it all and even call for the culling of your former "fellow" underemployed/poor whites as useless eaters. Mark my words.
Not that different from Nigerian dynamics at the end of the day really, except white guys are more innovative.
1)Too much of one thing defeats the purpose.
2)Everybody is full of it. What's your hypocrisy?
2)Everybody is full of it. What's your hypocrisy?
Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?
Kind of what I just referred to above.OutWest wrote: ↑January 7th, 2018, 6:43 pmYou are quite right... Many opportunities to show kindness it's far more effective.Adama wrote: ↑January 7th, 2018, 3:27 pmProbably the vast majority of people don't care much about other people. Look at some white nationalists who hate other whites who are poor. Just because someone is of the same race, it doesn't make them your friend or even your brother.
Besides that, we do not glory in the flesh like the Talmudists do. It's vanity, just like rooting for a football team.
Such a focus would really be a waste of life, especially if a person can't move on from it. Such bitterness will literally steal a man's life away, and he will waste away his 28,000 days on this earth, concerning himself with nonsense that he can't do anything about, and that he could easily overcome, if he simply would let go of the bitterness and move on. Bitterness itself will hold a person down, because it makes a person hateful, which in itself is a waste of energy and life.
Regarding gsjackson's point, cornfed was called a FED and banned from daily stormer if I recall correctly, for his crass venting feel-good-short-term approach.
1)Too much of one thing defeats the purpose.
2)Everybody is full of it. What's your hypocrisy?
2)Everybody is full of it. What's your hypocrisy?
Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?
The common thread with those people is that they are all boomers. The boomer economic model is to rob future generations through various Ponzi schemes. Once your living is predicated on this kind of plunder it seems that it gradually ends up turning your soul rotten and you end up trying to make a virtue of your own rottenness. That doesn’t mean every white person is like that.droid wrote: ↑January 7th, 2018, 11:41 pmIt's not typical boomer selfishness, it's typical white guy not giving a rat's ass once there's some wealth.
You still don't see the pattern how the Camerons, Blairs etc of the world, and even small timers like Kradmelder operate; and with all due respect, even you will, once you acquire some wealth, forget about it all and even call for the culling of your former "fellow" underemployed/poor whites as useless eaters. Mark my words
Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?
Even though I don't agree with most of what Cornfed says, I voted for him to stay because he is entertaining and seems to piss off the church ladies.
-
- Elite Upper Class Poster
- Posts: 3767
- Joined: June 12th, 2010, 7:08 am
- Location: New Orleans, LA USA
- Contact:
Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?
Ditto that, except I actually agree with much of his cultural critique. He is quite lazy, though, with the generalizations; e.g., boomers. A boomer snapshot:
Freshman orientation week 1968. Much of the class is sitting on the grass in the university gardens for a consciousness raising session. The facilitator plays a guitar and all are asked to sing along to Simon & Garfunkel's We've All Gone to Look for America. Peace, love, brotherhood, kumbaya, and let us begin together this voyage of understanding our culture at a profound level.
But standing on a nearby hill, arms folded and looking down contemptuously was another member of the class. I had met him, and we would be road roommates on the baseball team that year. Only half Jewish, but 100 percent edgy New Yorker. His look seemed to say: "You hippy dippies are pathetic. America is for being owned, not understood."
The future, of course, would belong to him. Fast forward to 2008, and he is briefly a household name as he golden parachutes away from the economic wreckage, the taxpayer bailed-out CEO of Bear Stearns (we -- taxpayers -- paid full price for the tanked company's crap stock). Though he certainly didn't need to make any more money, he landed a soft berth, back in baseball after a fashion, with the Jewish financial firm that owns the L.A. Dodgers. Back to larcenous business as usual.
Now, Cornfed is going to put us dupes who were sold a pottage of phony idealism in the same category as the predators who figured out how to make their way into the ruling class (tribal membership being the primary entree) and screwed the country right and left. By the time anyone in the generation still interested noticed that the idealism had morphed from actual social justice to cultural dissolution, it was too late to do much of anything about it. We'd been had coming and going, by those who consciously made it their business to trash and then own the United States. We're really only just starting to figure out what's been going on.
Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?
gsjackson wrote: ↑January 8th, 2018, 1:16 pmDitto that, except I actually agree with much of his cultural critique. He is quite lazy, though, with the generalizations; e.g., boomers. A boomer snapshot:
Freshman orientation week 1968. Much of the class is sitting on the grass in the university gardens for a consciousness raising session. The facilitator plays a guitar and all are asked to sing along to Simon & Garfunkel's We've All Gone to Look for America. Peace, love, brotherhood, kumbaya, and let us begin together this voyage of understanding our culture at a profound level.
But standing on a nearby hill, arms folded and looking down contemptuously was another member of the class. I had met him, and we would be road roommates on the baseball team that year. Only half Jewish, but 100 percent edgy New Yorker. His look seemed to say: "You hippy dippies are pathetic. America is for being owned, not understood."
The future, of course, would belong to him. Fast forward to 2008, and he is briefly a household name as he golden parachutes away from the economic wreckage, the taxpayer bailed-out CEO of Bear Stearns (we -- taxpayers -- paid full price for the tanked company's crap stock). Though he certainly didn't need to make any more money, he landed a soft berth, back in baseball after a fashion, with the Jewish financial firm that owns the L.A. Dodgers. Back to larcenous business as usual.
Now, Cornfed is going to put us dupes who were sold a pottage of phony idealism in the same category as the predators who figured out how to make their way into the ruling class (tribal membership being the primary entree) and screwed the country right and left. By the time anyone in the generation still interested noticed that the idealism had morphed from actual social justice to cultural dissolution, it was too late to do much of anything about it. We'd been had coming and going, by those who consciously made it their business to trash and then own the United States. We're really only just starting to figure out what's been going on.
Your social critique seems pretty well on. That said, the boomer generation has been ruinous in terms of their aggregate impact, often voting themselves benefit at the debt expense of future generations.
Starting with that premise, it makes a poor excuse for personal failures... "no white man can raise a family because the Jews are oppressing us" . If you point out that millions of white men are in fact overcoming and raising families, it just means they must have sold out to the hated jews, blacks and boomers.
From there, it becomes just another step to advocate mass murder, ( culling is the word Nazis use now) because after all, being a sorry-ass loser is all their fault.
In the mind of Nazis, anyone who does not agree with them is a coward and a sellout to the various hated groups. After all, REAL men are Nazis... Everyone else deserves to die... Fortunately, most of them are keyboard commandos and seem to be basement dwellers.
Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?
So thus we learn that it is possible for the regime to do ruinous things, but not possible for anyone to actually be the victims of the ruinous things. This might require further explanation.OutWest wrote: ↑January 8th, 2018, 3:46 pm
Your social critique seems pretty well on. That said, the boomer generation has been ruinous in terms of their aggregate impact, often voting themselves benefit at the debt expense of future generations.
Starting with that premise, it makes a poor excuse for personal failures... .
If we discount welfare cases and outlines such as insular religious communities, there are statistically very few, as evidenced by the sub-replacement birth rate. Many married men are likely experiencing a taste of hell and/or will subsequently be driven to jail, bankruptcy and suicide. Even if that weren't the case, the premise is stupid. It is like saying that the Black Death was no big deal because millions of people didn't die in it.If you point out that millions of white men are in fact overcoming and raising families,
However, if you think a normal marriage in the West is possible for a reasonably capable man, perhaps you could start a thread and explain how to avoid the pitfalls we have gone into on the forum. For example, suppose I want to marry a teenaged virgin (the historical norm) of similar intelligence and it were possible to wave a magic wand and cure all the character flaws I supposedly have. How would I go about this?
- Man With a Plan
- Freshman Poster
- Posts: 330
- Joined: April 15th, 2017, 6:14 pm
- Location: It could be worse.
Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?
I vote yes.
BACK IN IT! || Happier Abroad Discord Server now open!
Knowledge Seeker | Sleeping Revolutionary | Lone Wolf
Knowledge Seeker | Sleeping Revolutionary | Lone Wolf
Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?
No, cornfed should not be banned. He is correct in almost everything.
- publicduende
- Elite Upper Class Poster
- Posts: 5015
- Joined: November 30th, 2011, 9:20 am
Re: Poll: Should Cornfed be banned?
I had a few moments of scorn and tension with Cornfed. However, if the policy is to ban trolls and "entities" who are on this forum to purposely pollute or disrupt the flow of debate, CF doesn't subscribe to these definitions.
He might have extreme ideas about Zionist control of the world (which is partly true anyway), blacks and underprivileged minorities, and even relationships with underage girls. However I found his posts often well articulated. The man is bitter and disturbed, yet he is more often than not able to articulate his points in a rather insightful, if colourful and abrasive, manner.
If you want unbridled free speech, then you should be able to put up with the consequences of it, even in cases like CF.
If Winston bans him, he should then be banning at least another 10 long-time posters (not making names).
He might have extreme ideas about Zionist control of the world (which is partly true anyway), blacks and underprivileged minorities, and even relationships with underage girls. However I found his posts often well articulated. The man is bitter and disturbed, yet he is more often than not able to articulate his points in a rather insightful, if colourful and abrasive, manner.
If you want unbridled free speech, then you should be able to put up with the consequences of it, even in cases like CF.
If Winston bans him, he should then be banning at least another 10 long-time posters (not making names).
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post