Our Message: You Can Transform Your Life and Solve Your Problems by Escaping America for a Better Life & Love Overseas! Discover Friendlier People, Social Connection, Saner Cultures, Lower Cost Living, Healthier Food, Greater Freedoms and More!
Ad blocker detected: Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker on our website.
White countries getting colonized isn't a good thing though, you have a bunch of inferior mutha fuckers from elsewhere who couldn't even make their own countries prosper. What happens when they fully take over white countries are they going to make those countries "Better" than the country they ran away from?
never said white countries getting colonized was a good thing. im just saying that whats good for the goose is good for the gander. white supremacists want to gloat about the western history of colonialism but then get mad when the same thing happens to the west. you cant have it both ways; you cant advocate celebrating a history of colonizing others while complaining about getting colonized yourself
There's nothing wrong with people being Pro-White if they are that proud of their heritage and culture. Negros are Pro-Black, Latinos are Pro-Hispanic. The self hating whites are the ones that bug me because they actually believe their own race is inferior to blacks and promote their own genocide.
theres nothing wrong with being pro-white, but being white supremacist and racist towards other is wrong. unfortunately ive never met a pro-white person who genuinely disavowed white supremacism and racism. saying youre "pro-white" is really just a codeword for white supremacist. this is my experience dealing with these types over and over. even you fit this stereotype, in the previous comment you were talking about "inferior motha fuckers".
White countries getting colonized isn't a good thing though, you have a bunch of inferior mutha fuckers from elsewhere who couldn't even make their own countries prosper. What happens when they fully take over white countries are they going to make those countries "Better" than the country they ran away from?
never said white countries getting colonized was a good thing. im just saying that whats good for the goose is good for the gander. white supremacists want to gloat about the western history of colonialism but then get mad when the same thing happens to the west. you cant have it both ways; you cant advocate celebrating a history of colonizing others while complaining about getting colonized yourself
If we agree that colonizing people is often a bad thing then it follows that it is bad when it happens to us. But of course this is not an equivalent process. Our pioneering ancestors didn't get flown over to a land of welfare offices and first world infrastructure and get eased into it. They had to fight for everything and build it from the ground up. Now we are expected to give it up to largely useless third world savages to the detriment of the entire world (since our advanced cultures that benefit everyone will be lost) all so that the tiny parasitical elite doesn't have to be held to any standards.
White countries getting colonized isn't a good thing though, you have a bunch of inferior mutha fuckers from elsewhere who couldn't even make their own countries prosper. What happens when they fully take over white countries are they going to make those countries "Better" than the country they ran away from?
never said white countries getting colonized was a good thing. im just saying that whats good for the goose is good for the gander. white supremacists want to gloat about the western history of colonialism but then get mad when the same thing happens to the west. you cant have it both ways; you cant advocate celebrating a history of colonizing others while complaining about getting colonized yourself
If we agree that colonizing people is often a bad thing then it follows that it is bad when it happens to us. But of course this is not an equivalent process. Our pioneering ancestors didn't get flown over to a land of welfare offices and first world infrastructure and get eased into it. They had to fight for everything and build it from the ground up. Now we are expected to give it up to largely useless third world savages to the detriment of the entire world (since our advanced cultures that benefit everyone will be lost) all so that the tiny parasitical elite doesn't have to be held to any standards.
western colonizers won against native people by using superior organization and technology, the (((tiny parasitical elite))) are also winning against the west by using superior organization and technology (IE mass media). so theres actually very little difference between these two unlike what youre saying. theres always a bigger fish, the conquerers eventually get conquered themselves, thats just the way reality works
western colonizers won against native people by using superior organization and technology, the (((tiny parasitical elite))) are also winning against the west by using superior organization and technology (IE mass media). so theres actually very little difference between these two
There is a radical difference between the two given that the white people were building stuff whereas the elites and their exotic pets are just plundering stuff. Of course there are going to be similarities as well.
western colonizers won against native people by using superior organization and technology, the (((tiny parasitical elite))) are also winning against the west by using superior organization and technology (IE mass media). so theres actually very little difference between these two
There is a radical difference between the two given that the white people were building stuff whereas the elites and their exotic pets are just plundering stuff. Of course there are going to be similarities as well.
you implied above that the effort the west put into colonizing the world justified what they were doing:
Wed 24 If we agree that colonizing people is often a bad thing then it follows that it is bad when it happens to us. But of course this is not an equivalent process. Our pioneering ancestors didn't get flown over to a land of welfare offices and first world infrastructure and get eased into it. They had to fight for everything and build it from the ground up. Now we are expected to give it up to largely useless third world savages to the detriment of the entire world (since our advanced cultures that benefit everyone will be lost) all so that the tiny parasitical elite doesn't have to be held to any standards.
and im telling you that IRL it doesnt matter how you win (direct combat or using indirect means like finance and media control), because winning is winning. there are no rules in reality and you were making an appeal to "just world" fallacy which I corrected you on. the west dominated the natives because of their superior organization and technology and likewise the jews are dominating the west because of their superior organization and technology. theres nothing unfair about this, its just reality
and im telling you that IRL it doesnt matter how you win (direct combat or using indirect means like finance and media control), because winning is winning. there are no rules in reality and you were making an appeal to "just world" fallacy which I corrected you on.
I thought you were implying some kind of moral equivalence between us building countries and the elite stealing them. It was you who would have been appealing to a just world. Obviously the moral issue is not ultimately going to matter if the elite win. Hopefully we can agree that the elite and their pets being exterminated is a good goal we should be working towards. It is a bonus that we can feel good about doing it.
western colonizers won against native people by using superior organization and technology, the (((tiny parasitical elite))) are also winning against the west by using superior organization and technology (IE mass media). so theres actually very little difference between these two
There is a radical difference between the two given that the white people were building stuff whereas the elites and their exotic pets are just plundering stuff. Of course there are going to be similarities as well.
you implied above that the effort the west put into colonizing the world justified what they were doing:
Wed 24 If we agree that colonizing people is often a bad thing then it follows that it is bad when it happens to us. But of course this is not an equivalent process. Our pioneering ancestors didn't get flown over to a land of welfare offices and first world infrastructure and get eased into it. They had to fight for everything and build it from the ground up. Now we are expected to give it up to largely useless third world savages to the detriment of the entire world (since our advanced cultures that benefit everyone will be lost) all so that the tiny parasitical elite doesn't have to be held to any standards.
and im telling you that IRL it doesnt matter how you win (direct combat or using indirect means like finance and media control), because winning is winning. there are no rules in reality and you were making an appeal to "just world" fallacy which I corrected you on. the west dominated the natives because of their superior organization and technology and likewise the jews are dominating the west because of their superior organization and technology. theres nothing unfair about this, its just reality
Well as a black man I don't spend my entire life faulting whites for everything, the Natives fought each other as well and if I'm not mistaken the Spanish even conquered a few groups of people as well. It's not like negros are going to make the world a better place, and the Jews can go f**k themselves. Seems like to me they want to conquer the West so they can enslave everyone else when the whites refuse to fight anymore. Because I know for a fact black mutha fuckers aren't going to fight shit. Hell the Jews been pimping negros out ever since they got into the entertainment industry. And after the jews get done with the West, they'll come f**k with you Asians next since you all seem to imitate the self defeat behavior of whites of the modern era. The fact is white people are too stupid to fight back because they don't care, and Asians in countries like Japan are failures that never got over losing WWII so they cuck to everything the West demand of them. The truth is Asians were war mongering conquerors as well as the Whites. The Japanese, Chinese, they all fought and conquered others at some point. All this talk about how something is not fair is a bunch of bullshit. You're basically justifying bullying people who are incapable of fighting back against someone who is trying to take something away from them. The whites may have done some bad things before in the past, but it's not like we niggas are treating each other any better. Try living in Chicago and Detroit.
western colonizers won against native people by using superior organization and technology, the (((tiny parasitical elite))) are also winning against the west by using superior organization and technology (IE mass media). so theres actually very little difference between these two
There is a radical difference between the two given that the white people were building stuff whereas the elites and their exotic pets are just plundering stuff. Of course there are going to be similarities as well.
you implied above that the effort the west put into colonizing the world justified what they were doing:
Wed 24 If we agree that colonizing people is often a bad thing then it follows that it is bad when it happens to us. But of course this is not an equivalent process. Our pioneering ancestors didn't get flown over to a land of welfare offices and first world infrastructure and get eased into it. They had to fight for everything and build it from the ground up. Now we are expected to give it up to largely useless third world savages to the detriment of the entire world (since our advanced cultures that benefit everyone will be lost) all so that the tiny parasitical elite doesn't have to be held to any standards.
and im telling you that IRL it doesnt matter how you win (direct combat or using indirect means like finance and media control), because winning is winning. there are no rules in reality and you were making an appeal to "just world" fallacy which I corrected you on. the west dominated the natives because of their superior organization and technology and likewise the jews are dominating the west because of their superior organization and technology. theres nothing unfair about this, its just reality
Well as a black man I don't spend my entire life faulting whites for everything, it's not like negros are going to make the world a better place, and the Jews can go f**k themselves. Seems like to me they want to conquer the West so they can enslave everyone else when the whites refuse to fight anymore. Because I know for a fact black mutha fuckers aren't going to fight shit. Hell the Jews been pimping negros out ever since they got into the entertainment industry. And after the jews get done with the West, they'll come f**k with you Asians next.
none of that disproves anything I said though. the jews are bad, so are whites, dont believe me? ask the native americans. the truth is, everyone sucks, it never ends. everyone ends up conquering everyone else, its unavoidable
I just refuse to condone pro-whites because IME theyre always hypocritical, arrogant and secretly white supremacists (instead of merely being pro-white, which is OK). theyre untrustworthy, dishonest and youre very naive if you want to cast your lot in with them (not that they have a chance of succeeding anyways)
We could add the dissidents who have been ruined by vexatious civil suits - Spencer, Anglin etc. Then there are those who were likely "turned" by threats thereof e.g. the TRS people. When you add it all up the evil bastard regime has pretty much cleaned house.
