Winston, do we still have 3 strike rule?

[Rock]

No I don't know what happened with Bitch Slapper. Did Zboy write an explanation about Bitch Slapper and what happened?

The three strike rule is not written in stone. It's just a guideline. Nothing is written in stone. For example, if you jaywalk or cross a street, technically it's illegal, but cops usually will not usually ticket you for that. Everything is discretionary.

Moderators can bend rules sometimes at their discretion. That's why we have moderators with a good sense of judgment, like me and Zboy.

I'll ask Zboy about what happened.

Why do you care Rock? Do you have a special sympathy for trolls and bullies or something? lol. You seem to have a soft spot for "bad guys". lol. That's not good you know.

It's the principle and an important one.

I thought we agreed that offending posts would be cited (evidence of the crime) and generally a 3 strike rule would be followed. That's a reasonable expectation on a forum which prides itself in eschewing any kind of PC constraints.

Here's the banning I'm talking about. According to zboy1, BitchSlapper threatened physical violence against someone here. That's a serious charge. But when BitchSlapper returned under alias to claim he never did any such thing, zboy1 just quickly deleted his 'defense post' instead of offering up the evidence. By the way, zboy1 also suggested you (Winston) tone down your violent rhetoric towards me lol.

viewtopic.php?t=14395&postdays=0&postor ... &start=180


If someone is publicly charged with a serious offense, the evidence of such charge should also be made public. That's the fair and reasonable thing to do.

Maybe you're right Rock. But how can you be arguing principles? What are your principles? What about the principles of saying mean nasty hurtful things to your friends (or hang out buddies rather) and not apologizing for them? Should someone who lacks empathy and sensitivity toward others be standing up for principles? Huh?

Also, every time you meet a nutcase or psycho, you salivate as if you get off on such people. They stimulate you in some odd way. In a sense, you seem to be fascinated by evil. So shouldn't you be one of the last people to be talking about principles or virtues? lol

If this was coming from a man of morally upright principles and virtues, it would hold more weight.

You know, if you want something done, you gotta get on someone's good side. It's part of the art of people skills and playing politics. If you worked in a US corporation, you'd know how to do that. You don't say mean hurtful things to people and then ask them for favors or to do things your way, you know? It doesn't work that way. You gotta learn to kiss a** and play politics if you want something done. That's how it is in this world. You can't just declare what you want like that without getting on someone's good side first.

Try to emulate someone with diplomatic tact and good people skills, like Bill Clinton. lol

You gotta learn to be more empathetic and humble, and realize that sometimes your judgments are wrong too, and others are right. You gotta consider other people's viewpoints too, and try to understand them.

How come when I went to the AFA office in Phoenix, everyone there was diplomatic, courteous, polite and professional? When I was there, I was thinking, "This is so refreshing, to be around mature gentlemen. How come Rock can't be like that?"

My "violent rhetoric" toward you? lol. I wasn't violent toward you. I was merely suggesting that we engage in the SPORT of boxing, while someone play the Rocky theme song in the background. lol. Then you could see and experience my "iron will" that is like Rocky Balboa. lol. It was an attempt to impress you and show you that I do have a warrior instinct deep down, perhaps from a past life. Why else do you think I've seen hundreds of documentaries on wars and military battles? Why else do you think I tend to be naturally good at fighting video games like Tekken with no practice?

I already explained why I called you naive chump. You make it out to be a lot worse than it really is. I'm generally quite rational and fair minded. And the principles are just to stick to what we agreed on or at least not deviate too much from it except perhaps in very exceptional cases. A moderator acting unilaterally banning someone with no warning and offering up zero proof of supposed infringement just seems to go very much against the spirit of this forum. It's not a small thing.

If I wanted to play politics and be diplomatic, I would have stayed in the corporate world where I was getting paid. I see a free speech forum like this one as a place where I don't have to worry so much about all that stuff, where I can speak my mind to a much greater degree. There are several posters here who are generally more argumentative and insulting than I am. I just stand out to you since my criticism addressed something you seem to be very sensitive about.

Yea, Simon was fun for awhile. But eventually, even I had to get away from him. Who are the other nutters?

[Cornfed]

Zboy:

you are without a doubt a slimy, lowlife piece of garbage.

I NEVER physically threatened anyone. Never. !

I never saw this alleged threat. Did anyone else see this threat? Does anyone know if there is any way to restore the deleted post (or confirm if one existed in the first place)? That would be ideal because it would either confirm that the poster arguably should have been banned or confirm that zboy1 is a lying scumbag. If it confirmed the latter then the ongoing nonsense that has plagued this forum could finally be solved in the way it should have been in the first place - by banning zboy1.

[FTS]

Of course you didn't see any threat. There was no threat. Zboy made the whole thing up.

I'll tell you why Zboy banned me:

Because he is thin-skinned, and can't handle the truth. Your typical, pathetic racial minority with a huge chip on his shoulder. For him, free speech doesn't apply when you call out Asians for their arrogance and stupid punk-ass behavior.

He is also a lying scumbag. The guy has no integrity, or ethics. That's why he will ban without warning, or evidence to back up his (false) claim.

Of course, Zboy will never admit the real reason. Hence, his totally false claim that I physically threatened a female poster. If you go back to the thread, you will see that I never even addressed her. The deleted post in question -- the one that inflamed Zboy's puny 3rd rate mind -- was directed at someone else.

He won't promote truth or free speech. My advice is to save all your posts, so that when he (or some other asshole moderator) bans and slanders you like he did to me, you can nail him on his bullshit.

BTW take a wild guess what my username stands for. That's what I think about this forum

[FTS]

This all began when a Chinese poster named Dragon played white knight to that AW and started mouthing off on white males: http://happierabroad.com/forum/viewtopi ... c&start=30

So then I called him out as a punk and a few other choice words, which pissed off Zboy, who apparently sticks up for his own kind. That's why he deleted my post and banned me LOL

[FTS]

Why don't you tell us what that deleted post really said? Because you haven't said that, yet. As for Zboy, I am sure as an administrator he is able to see even deleted posts and other things regular posters can't see or get back. He might be able to share a screenshot so as to enlighten us.

Well, then ask him, because I can't retrieve posts that he deletes.

My guess it stands for Fugly, Terrible & Shameless, which is what you are.

PS: I never even liked Danielle, she is awfully repetitive and part of me thinks she's not the person she claims to be. She makes new threads for every single brainfart she has and keeps bumping them up, then gives very short and boring replies to people, or gets cold feet and deletes old threads. She acts very strangely and I am not fond of her as a poster, but threatening someone with physical harm is a low blow. So tell me, again, what did you REALLY say?

The post in question really had nothing to do with her.

I called out some stupid Chinese punk, which aroused Zboy's Asian nationalist passions, so he banned me.

[Rock]

Why don't you tell us what that deleted post really said? Because you haven't said that, yet. As for Zboy, I am sure as an administrator he is able to see even deleted posts and other things regular posters can't see or get back. He might be able to share a screenshot so as to enlighten us.

Well, then ask him, because I can't retrieve posts that he deletes.

My guess it stands for Fugly, Terrible & Shameless, which is what you are.

PS: I never even liked Danielle, she is awfully repetitive and part of me thinks she's not the person she claims to be. She makes new threads for every single brainfart she has and keeps bumping them up, then gives very short and boring replies to people, or gets cold feet and deletes old threads. She acts very strangely and I am not fond of her as a poster, but threatening someone with physical harm is a low blow. So tell me, again, what did you REALLY say?

The post in question really had nothing to do with her.

I called out some stupid Chinese punk, which aroused Zboy's Asian nationalist passions, so he banned me.

BitchSlapper, did you say anything to the other guy (Chinese) which could be construed as a physical threat of any kind?

[FTS]

BitchSlapper, did you say anything to the other guy (Chinese) which could be construed as a physical threat of any kind?

No.

[FTS]

BitchSlapper, did you say anything to the other guy (Chinese) which could be construed as a physical threat of any kind?

No.

Maybe he saw your username as a physical threat and was afraid you'd slap a bitch lol.

Maybe you don't know what the f**k you're talking about.

[Renata]

I'm gonna kill all of you

... several members are already missing ...