Do You Have a Hard Time Empathizing with People?

[George]

The average person is worse than an animal, so why not screw him over? I see no reason.

This is something you would expect a Jew to say, or at least secretly think. It's been the modus operandi of Jews (who are probably the most ethno-centric people in the world) on a wide scale.

Am I wrong? How is the average person better than an animal? I would really like to know.

If you read my other posts in this thread, you would know that my comment here isn't ethno-centric at all. I don't care about ethnicity, I care about behavior.

It's normal for all ethnic/racial groups to be feel they are the center of their universe. But Jews are ethno-centric to an usually high degree. They are an extremely self-conscious group, extremely sensitive about themselves as different and unique from the rest. They have a highly developed "us vs. them" mentality, and so will tend to put their self-interests as a group above all others.

We are talking about generalized behaviors of GROUPS. So whether or not you care about ethnicity, your rapacious, callous, predatory, amoral attitude towards the average person is perfectly consistent with a highly ethno-centric people, i.e., the Jews.

[fschmidt]

It's normal for all ethnic/racial groups to be feel they are the center of their universe. But Jews are ethno-centric to an usually high degree. They are an extremely self-conscious group, extremely sensitive about themselves as different and unique from the rest. They have a highly developed "us vs. them" mentality, and so will tend to put their self-interests as a group above all others.

We are talking about generalized behaviors of GROUPS. So whether or not you care about ethnicity, your rapacious, callous, predatory, amoral attitude towards the average person is perfectly consistent with a highly ethno-centric people, i.e., the Jews.

The "us vs. them" mentality makes perfect sense when applied culturally, not ethnically. Every successful culture in history has done this. It is unfortunate that in modern times virtually all groups define themselves ethnically instead of culturally. This applies to Jews, Japanese, white nationalists, etc.

I just realized that my thoughts on people in general is consistent with my opposition to racism. After all, just assuming that humans as a species are superior to animals is much like assuming one's racial group is superior to others. One is racism, the other speciesism. I don't believe in judging any living creature based on its birth, only based on its actions. And based on the actions of modern people, I place them below most animals that I have seen. I have yet to hear a coherent argument against this judgement.

[Hackenfall Backslash]

The "us vs. them" mentality makes perfect sense when applied culturally, not ethnically. Every successful culture in history has done this. It is unfortunate that in modern times virtually all groups define themselves ethnically instead of culturally. This applies to Jews, Japanese, white nationalists, etc.

Yes. Especially the whites. They go on about the Jews and their "agenda", but when you point their history, you're met with "it was conquest, it's not like marxism/white genocide". I don't define myself by race at all. You can say all you want about the ethnic group I appear to be, and I won't say shit. I'm not an "opportune objective" -- I don't take this stance only when it suits me; I take it 100% of the time. I relinquish the good and the bad. This is off-topic, but I want to make sure I establish my lack of hypocrisy.

I just realized that my thoughts on people in general is consistent with my opposition to racism. After all, just assuming that humans as a species are superior to animals is much like assuming one's racial group is superior to others. One is racism, the other speciesism. I don't believe in judging any living creature based on its birth, only based on its actions. And based on the actions of modern people, I place them below most animals that I have seen.

As a misanthrope and someone with anti-natalist views, I have to agree. Humans are the most harmful species to this planet, and potentially others if this space thing ever gains traction. Humans can't be superior to animals. Look at how both live. One can live in the jungles, deserts and mountains, the other needs concrete, combustion and nuclear energy.

I have yet to hear a coherent argument against this judgement.

Sadly, you aren't going to. The fellow there has no clue what he's talking about. It's more "teh jooz" nonsense. There was NOTHING ethnocentric about your post. That is unless humans are an ethnicity and not a race or species. Even then, you said "the average person is worse than an animal, so why not screw him over?" Wouldn't that be more along the lines of narcissism or sociopathy than ethnocentricism?

[George]

It's normal for all ethnic/racial groups to be feel they are the center of their universe. But Jews are ethno-centric to an usually high degree. They are an extremely self-conscious group, extremely sensitive about themselves as different and unique from the rest. They have a highly developed "us vs. them" mentality, and so will tend to put their self-interests as a group above all others.

We are talking about generalized behaviors of GROUPS. So whether or not you care about ethnicity, your rapacious, callous, predatory, amoral attitude towards the average person is perfectly consistent with a highly ethno-centric people, i.e., the Jews.

The "us vs. them" mentality makes perfect sense when applied culturally, not ethnically. Every successful culture in history has done this. It is unfortunate that in modern times virtually all groups define themselves ethnically instead of culturally. This applies to Jews, Japanese, white nationalists, etc.

I just realized that my thoughts on people in general is consistent with my opposition to racism. After all, just assuming that humans as a species are superior to animals is much like assuming one's racial group is superior to others. One is racism, the other speciesism. I don't believe in judging any living creature based on its birth, only based on its actions. And based on the actions of modern people, I place them below most animals that I have seen. I have yet to hear a coherent argument against this judgement.

LOL You know how to obfuscate well and fool the well-meaning but clueless gentiles - a very clever Jew. But then your people were always clever. Otherwise, how could they have run rings around the dumb goy for so long?

Your opposition to racism is just smoke and fog. Your people running Hollywood spew filth and depravity to a mass audience everyday. They also oppose racism, just like you. And that's understandable: a racially aware and cohesive local population would NEVER allow the Jewish controllers of the mass media and banking system to get away with what they're doing. That's why your people has to keep pumping out anti-racism and other liberal garbage in movies and news stories to brainwash the masses.

Yeah you people definitely have an "us vs them" mentality, big time. Your Jewish religion teaches that gentiles are animals, fit to be screwed over. That's how your people did a number on gentiles. That's how your people fleeced us. Yes it's no surprise a Jew like you would have no qualms screwing over "average people" most of whom are Gentiles.

But hey let's be fair. I mean your people are so sociopathic, you even screw over YOUR OWN PEOPLE, Bernie Madoff style LOL

[fschmidt]

Yes. Especially the whites. They go on about the Jews and their "agenda", but when you point their history, you're met with "it was conquest, it's not like marxism/white genocide". I don't define myself by race at all. You can say all you want about the ethnic group I appear to be, and I won't say shit. I'm not an "opportune objective" -- I don't take this stance only when it suits me; I take it 100% of the time. I relinquish the good and the bad. This is off-topic, but I want to make sure I establish my lack of hypocrisy.

Yes, same here.

As a misanthrope and someone with anti-natalist views, I have to agree. Humans are the most harmful species to this planet, and potentially others if this space thing ever gains traction. Humans can't be superior to animals. Look at how both live. One can live in the jungles, deserts and mountains, the other needs concrete, combustion and nuclear energy.

I think people can be superior to animals with the right religion. A sound religion can cause decent behavior including consideration for others and for the environment. Shinto is an example of a religion that respects the environment.

Sadly, you aren't going to. The fellow there has no clue what he's talking about. It's more "teh jooz" nonsense. There was NOTHING ethnocentric about your post. That is unless humans are an ethnicity and not a race or species. Even then, you said "the average person is worse than an animal, so why not screw him over?" Wouldn't that be more along the lines of narcissism or sociopathy than ethnocentricism?

Narcissists and sociopaths screw everyone over, and that isn't my position. I won't screw over anyone who belongs to a sound moral culture. I am a culturalist, I discriminate by culture.