On the bogus employment stats:Cornfed wrote: ↑August 4th, 2018, 3:13 pm1. For example, suppose an employer has one full time employee. Suppose he is required to provide full time employees with health care insurance and the costs rise, so he cuts the employee’s hours in half and hires some unemployed guy to do the other half. In the past this would be counted as the loss of a job or no change in the job situation. Now it would be counted as one less unemployed person and one job created.flowerthief00 wrote: ↑August 4th, 2018, 3:02 pmPlease explain.
That's their own loss when the rest of us are using our smartphones productively. Cheaper and non-shitty are positive qualities we want in our technology.Yes because it turns females into phone zombies and e-sluts.
Only if they allow it to. It can also enrich their lives
I knew you were going to say neural nets. That's still procedural programming, as are whatever procedures act upon them.Neural nets and such. You would want to just read about AI.
2. Females are simple creatures and when they are exposed to smartphones they get worse. What they might do in some ideal parallel universe is irrelevant.
3. This sounds like a philosophical argument about whether the universe is ultimately deterministic, which is irrelevant. The point is that AI allows the machine to do things in ways the programmer doesn’t understand or envisage.
http://www.unz.com/proberts/americans-l ... d-of-lies/