Anti-human sex trafficking hysteria of the US media

[green1976]

You hear about North Korea women trafficked into China. There have a commodity North Korean men do not have, selling the cat.
You hear plenty of stories about how bad it is for these women.
But what about the men, they do not have this option, if they caught in China it is a death sentence.
The North Korean Women have it much better, they have a chance to live, something the men do not have.
They may or may not find happiness. They are prized by Chinese men as being very good wives.
It is better than starving to death. The North Korean men do not have this chance for a better life.
Yet you read how bad it is for all these women that are "trafficked", what a crock of shit, what about all the men who don't have the chance to sell the cat because they don't have a cat to sell.
Instead they starve or get beaten to death or worse.
North Korean women are used and abused in China and treated like slaves.
But it is a better life, they sure are not running back to North Korea.
North Korean men only have death.

We can point also the similarity in case of war where females has on many times being abducted and used as wives by the conquerors and the males has being killed thru the spade or by working exhaustion.
Most of death by violence are males who are themselves victims of others males.

Normally as an instinctive things,males are less prone to kill a female than a male.

Females are also being seen as having more value than a male,even in patriarchal society where the last wagon of the society are the poor men.

They always,as a feminist argument point to the fact that women get most of the time oppressed,especially getting raped or having to endure a dominant male.

Well if you check even in Muslim society where females should be so "subjugated" and "dominated" by males,those who have the worst time there are males who have no money,alone and without a family to help them..their financial situation make them unfit to have a wife,they are let wandering on the street and the society not protect them as female are.

I've read that the argument of why females are always more protected since the beginning of human existence,has to be that they bear the child and their survival is more important than males who can be replaced easily.

The polygamy where one male can have many females is an example.

Bringing on more on some Muslim societies where homosexuality is rampant because of the difficulty to interact with women,many young boys,those who are vagrant are more subject to sexual abuse and prostitution by pedophile than females.

It's so easy as it is done in our Western countries to always point at the so difficult life females have all around the world..but if you look clearly in the subject,things are not so dark or black for any other gender.

What is happening in our sphere,regarding how it is a problem now for a lot of guys to get chicks has a distant relationship on why males are less cared and why for example if a male has disappeared versus a female,he will get less attention in the media.

[tom]

Sex workers are protesting in outrage over A&E's new show
http://www.dailydot.com/lifestyle/sex-w ... 8-minutes/

Really anti trafficking is actually anti whoring. Its anti prostitution re-worded. American churches seem to be involved in this quite a bit. They will always bring up child prostitution but effectively its anti whore house busybodies. Most women take up whoring because the money is very good and the work is easy. Anti prostitution does help western womens insecureness, they sure don't want there men thinking there might be something better. They also really like the additional shaming tool in there guilt manipulation arsenal. And they don't want the competition of young fit women. Its the dream of countless third world whores to get traffic out of the county by some western guy. It would greatly improve the live of the girl and her extended family. But religious and other NGO's will do everything they can to deny this. Anti trafficking is a modern day witch hunt, mass media has effectively replaced the church in this regard.

[Ghost]

.

[jamesbond]

Corrupt Puritanism strikes again. This is why I say whether or not a country goes full retard feminist (though I repeat myself) has to do with what is embedded deep in the culture. Catholic countries aren't nearly as feminist/misandrist as Protestant ones.

Anglophone and "white" countries tend to be very feminist, while "brown" and "yellow" countries usually aren't, or if they are feminist in some ways they aren't really misandrist. Big simplifications, but there's how it starts. It seems with Protestant Puritanism, there was a massive work ethic culture created, culminating in an explosion of wealth and technology unmatched by any other time in history, but ended up corrupted, turning that Puritanism corrupt with the dichotomy of man bad/woman good.

This is exactly true, studies have been done that show the protestant countries are the most feminist in the world. The catholic countries are either not feminist at all or only slightly feminist.

The "Protestant work ethic" is a term used to describe the view that a person's duty is to achieve success through hard work and thrift, such success being a sign that one is saved. So you literally have to "work you way to heaven." The funny thing is, there is no mention in the bible that people have to work their way into heaven (you don't have to be a workaholic in order to get into heaven, contrary to what some people believe).

Puritanism was a concept started by protestants in the 16th century in which a strict code of conduct was established for people to adhere to. This included strict moral or religious principles, especially one opposed to emotional and sexual enjoyment.

The funny thing, puritanism is alive and well today in the United States. We are one of the few countries in the world that has not legalized prostitution. Also, the idea of man bad and women good started with the puritans and that idea is alive and well today in America.