Why is Patriarchy considered evil, bad, oppressive but Matriarchy considered good, natural, wise by New Agers?
Posted: November 26th, 2017, 11:43 am
I've been wondering something lately which pisses me off and is totally unjust. Why does literally everyone demonize and vilify male patriarchy, as though it were something evil like Nazism that everyone ought to condemn. Yet if you think about it, male patriarchy is perfectly logical and easy to justify. Do any of you wonder about this too? Why does no one point out the obvious?
I mean think about it. Men have obviously EARNED the the RIGHT to lead and govern the world by the fact that they built, designed and created everything all around you in civilization. Literally everything! Duh. Everything you can think of was built, designed and invented by MEN, not women. Such as roads, bridges, canals, buildings, skyscrapers, houses, cars, planes, trains, machines, computers, telecommunications, TV, radio, internet technology, cell phones, smart phones, etc. Everything. Even the sewing machines and hair dryers women use were designed by men. Thus there's definitely no equality here. This is super obvious! Does anyone ever consider this?!
Basic logic and wisdom says that if one designs and creates something, then that person should be the leader and manager of it. That's why patents exist. This is a right and makes sense too. Unfortunately women have no technological inventions to speak of in the last 2,000 years of history. At least not in general and nothing noteworthy.
Men build cities, empires, naval fleets, armadas, roads, mass transportation, etc. And they win great battles in war. Women do none of these things. Men are conquerors, builders, designers, creators, inventors, innovators, philosophers, thinkers, warriors, etc. Women are merely nurturers and sex objects. They are what they are. Why deny it? Why not appreciate and respect this? Why not be the BEST of what you are? Rather than try to pretend to be something you're not? Reality is reality. So what's the problem???
Men also dominate in most talents and skills, both mental and physical. For example, the best male athletes will usually beat the best female athletes in sports. And the best male chess players will usually beat the best female chess players. Men tend to excel in sports, combat, physical strength, chess, logic, computer programming, philosophy, innovation, inventing new technologies, new ideas, etc. Men are simply better at most things, both mental and physical. So how is that not superior? This definitely fits the definition of superiority, at least in terms of most skills and talents. So it's definitely not comparable with the earth being flat as New Agers claim.
For example, we all know that the best male athletes will win over the best female athletes in most sports such as football, baseball, basketball, volleyball, hockey, etc. Even in tennis men and women cannot compete. There's mixed doubles of course but not doubles in the form of two men vs two women. There's a reason for that. There's a reason why pro sports are gender segregated. Why does no one talk about it openly? Its a totally taboo subject to mention even though it's obvious. No one even dares to mention that men are stronger or better at sports anymore, even though everyone knows it. Lol. People are so gutless these days. As Clint Eastwood said, "People today are such pussies."
Now, women may have a slight edge in graceful sports like figure skating or ballet, however there are men who are very good at those artistic sports too.
Even chess tournaments are segregated by gender. They don't have men and women playing in the same tournament. Gee I wonder why. The best male chess player will also l usually beat the best female chess player. What does that tell you? And the best computer programmers and software designers are males too. So are auto mechanics, repairmen, etc. When you call someone to fix your house or car, who shows up, a man or woman? We all know the answer.
So clearly men dominate in mental cerebral activities too. After all there's no female equivalent of Albert Einstein, Nikola Tesla, Thomas Edison, Leonardo da Vinci, Benjamin Franklin, Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, etc. So if men dominate in most physical and mental abilities, how are they not superior? I don't get it.
Women are only good at traditional female stuff like sewing, cooking, fashion, baby care, teaching elementary school and at getting attention with their looks. That's why they get more likes on Facebook than men do. And they get more attention on YouTube too, using only their looks and bodies. But they never build, invent or create anything in civilization or technology, besides having babies of course. Its a basic fact. Everyone knows this deep down. So whats the friggin basis for equality?!
Yet even all the men in the truth movement and new age movement demonize the patriarchy as though it were something evil and say that male superiority is as bogus as flat earth. Lol. Wtf? I don't get it. Do you? Doesn't that piss you off? Why is everyone in on it? Why doesn't anyone point out the obvious falsity in all this?
There's simply no basis in giving women equal power or total equality when they haven't earned it. Women did not build anything or invent anything or win any battles, etc. So what right do they have to lead and govern society? It makes no f***ing sense. Yet Hollywood now show women in leadership positions in most movies. Like Princess Leia is now General Leia in the latest Star Wars flick?! Wtf?!
Now I'm not saying that women should have to be subservient to men or that they shouldn't have rights or opportunities or be treated with respect. Of course they should. They are human beings. But that doesn't mean they should be totally equal to men in every way, especially since they are clearly not and have not earned it. No way. Thats taking it too far and is downright delusional.
Clearly men have earned the right to lead and govern in this world, since they built and invented literally everything around you in civilization, both past and present. So what right do women have to equality? It makes no f***ing sense yet everyone accepts equal power as gospel truth! It's totally insane yet you are not allowed to question it lest you be condemned.
We all know that giving someone something they didn't earn will spoiled them. Like when you give free money to someone they won't appreciate it if they didn't earn it. Same with equality. If you give women UNEARNED equality and UNEARNED power, then they won't appreciate it. It'll just make them spoiled and bitchy, which is exactly what they've become. So true huh?
I get more and more insights like this everyday. Truth is so enlightening but its so lonely too. Lol
Btw, when i saw Princess Leia become a general in the last Star Wars movie, I was perplexed. Wtf did she do to become a general? Just because she has a p***y she gets to be general? What the f**k kind of f***ed up logic is that?! Yet none of the male freethinkers in the truth movement would dare point this out. Lol.
A general has to earn the right to be general. He has to prove himself by winning great battles, like Napoleon did. Princess Leia didnt do any of that of course. Its stupid. How come no one pointed out the stupidity of this? Because any female with a p***y ought to be a leader or general, even if they aren't qualified? What kind of f***ed up logic is that?!
Since when has there ever been a great female general in world history? Can you find even one? Lol. I can't. The last time there was a female general I think was 2,000 years ago in ancient Britain when the Romans invaded it. The Briton tribes were a matriarchy with a female general and leader named Budabago (sp?) or something. Well she and her men got totally whipped and clobbered of course.
There's never ever been even a decent female general. So how could Hollywood even imagine one? Lol. Its as silly as having me being a cheerleader for the Dallas Cowboys. Totally nonsensical and out of place. Hollywood must be so desperate for women to lead. Too bad they lost the presidential election when Hillary lost. Lol.
America is a hypocrite. It claims women are equal to men in every way. Yet if they really believed that then pro sports would be all coed. The NFL and NBA would put female athletes with male athletes. Yet this would be so ridiculous that even feminists do not propose it. And the US military would put women on the front line in combat. Yet no one wants that. Why not? Aren't they totally equal in every way? Lol. Friggin hypocrites.
Everyone knows all this above. Its common sense. Yet no one dares to point this out or challenge this hypocrisy. Crazy isn't it? Doesn't that piss you off and make you wonder whats wrong with everyone?! Do you ever ponder these things secretly too? Yet you know there are very few people you can bring up these things with of course, because its so friggin taboo! Lol
Regardless, anyone who faces the honest facts above can see that men have definitely EARNED the right to lead, govern and rule. Theres definitely no gender equality here, at least not in terms of talents, skills, strength, intelligence and power.
Thus the right of male patriarchy is completely justified, logical and clear. Theres no valid reason to argue against it. Sure some men may be bad people and abuse others or mistreat others. But thats life and is true of anyone in authority or power, not just men. It doesn't mean patriarchy is bad in general. Only that some individuals are bad and corrupt. Not that the male gender is bad in general.
Every group, society or organization must have people who manage, administrate, govern and lead or else it cannot function. Just because some leaders are bad doesn't mean no one should be leaders or all authority should be abolished. You simply need to get good leaders who are wise and just. Not do away with leaders in general. Leaders also need to be qualified. And based on the above there's no doubt that qualified men are better at leadership than women are in general.
I mean think about it. Men have obviously EARNED the the RIGHT to lead and govern the world by the fact that they built, designed and created everything all around you in civilization. Literally everything! Duh. Everything you can think of was built, designed and invented by MEN, not women. Such as roads, bridges, canals, buildings, skyscrapers, houses, cars, planes, trains, machines, computers, telecommunications, TV, radio, internet technology, cell phones, smart phones, etc. Everything. Even the sewing machines and hair dryers women use were designed by men. Thus there's definitely no equality here. This is super obvious! Does anyone ever consider this?!
Basic logic and wisdom says that if one designs and creates something, then that person should be the leader and manager of it. That's why patents exist. This is a right and makes sense too. Unfortunately women have no technological inventions to speak of in the last 2,000 years of history. At least not in general and nothing noteworthy.
Men build cities, empires, naval fleets, armadas, roads, mass transportation, etc. And they win great battles in war. Women do none of these things. Men are conquerors, builders, designers, creators, inventors, innovators, philosophers, thinkers, warriors, etc. Women are merely nurturers and sex objects. They are what they are. Why deny it? Why not appreciate and respect this? Why not be the BEST of what you are? Rather than try to pretend to be something you're not? Reality is reality. So what's the problem???
Men also dominate in most talents and skills, both mental and physical. For example, the best male athletes will usually beat the best female athletes in sports. And the best male chess players will usually beat the best female chess players. Men tend to excel in sports, combat, physical strength, chess, logic, computer programming, philosophy, innovation, inventing new technologies, new ideas, etc. Men are simply better at most things, both mental and physical. So how is that not superior? This definitely fits the definition of superiority, at least in terms of most skills and talents. So it's definitely not comparable with the earth being flat as New Agers claim.
For example, we all know that the best male athletes will win over the best female athletes in most sports such as football, baseball, basketball, volleyball, hockey, etc. Even in tennis men and women cannot compete. There's mixed doubles of course but not doubles in the form of two men vs two women. There's a reason for that. There's a reason why pro sports are gender segregated. Why does no one talk about it openly? Its a totally taboo subject to mention even though it's obvious. No one even dares to mention that men are stronger or better at sports anymore, even though everyone knows it. Lol. People are so gutless these days. As Clint Eastwood said, "People today are such pussies."
Now, women may have a slight edge in graceful sports like figure skating or ballet, however there are men who are very good at those artistic sports too.
Even chess tournaments are segregated by gender. They don't have men and women playing in the same tournament. Gee I wonder why. The best male chess player will also l usually beat the best female chess player. What does that tell you? And the best computer programmers and software designers are males too. So are auto mechanics, repairmen, etc. When you call someone to fix your house or car, who shows up, a man or woman? We all know the answer.
So clearly men dominate in mental cerebral activities too. After all there's no female equivalent of Albert Einstein, Nikola Tesla, Thomas Edison, Leonardo da Vinci, Benjamin Franklin, Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, etc. So if men dominate in most physical and mental abilities, how are they not superior? I don't get it.
Women are only good at traditional female stuff like sewing, cooking, fashion, baby care, teaching elementary school and at getting attention with their looks. That's why they get more likes on Facebook than men do. And they get more attention on YouTube too, using only their looks and bodies. But they never build, invent or create anything in civilization or technology, besides having babies of course. Its a basic fact. Everyone knows this deep down. So whats the friggin basis for equality?!
Yet even all the men in the truth movement and new age movement demonize the patriarchy as though it were something evil and say that male superiority is as bogus as flat earth. Lol. Wtf? I don't get it. Do you? Doesn't that piss you off? Why is everyone in on it? Why doesn't anyone point out the obvious falsity in all this?
There's simply no basis in giving women equal power or total equality when they haven't earned it. Women did not build anything or invent anything or win any battles, etc. So what right do they have to lead and govern society? It makes no f***ing sense. Yet Hollywood now show women in leadership positions in most movies. Like Princess Leia is now General Leia in the latest Star Wars flick?! Wtf?!
Now I'm not saying that women should have to be subservient to men or that they shouldn't have rights or opportunities or be treated with respect. Of course they should. They are human beings. But that doesn't mean they should be totally equal to men in every way, especially since they are clearly not and have not earned it. No way. Thats taking it too far and is downright delusional.
Clearly men have earned the right to lead and govern in this world, since they built and invented literally everything around you in civilization, both past and present. So what right do women have to equality? It makes no f***ing sense yet everyone accepts equal power as gospel truth! It's totally insane yet you are not allowed to question it lest you be condemned.
We all know that giving someone something they didn't earn will spoiled them. Like when you give free money to someone they won't appreciate it if they didn't earn it. Same with equality. If you give women UNEARNED equality and UNEARNED power, then they won't appreciate it. It'll just make them spoiled and bitchy, which is exactly what they've become. So true huh?
I get more and more insights like this everyday. Truth is so enlightening but its so lonely too. Lol
Btw, when i saw Princess Leia become a general in the last Star Wars movie, I was perplexed. Wtf did she do to become a general? Just because she has a p***y she gets to be general? What the f**k kind of f***ed up logic is that?! Yet none of the male freethinkers in the truth movement would dare point this out. Lol.
A general has to earn the right to be general. He has to prove himself by winning great battles, like Napoleon did. Princess Leia didnt do any of that of course. Its stupid. How come no one pointed out the stupidity of this? Because any female with a p***y ought to be a leader or general, even if they aren't qualified? What kind of f***ed up logic is that?!
Since when has there ever been a great female general in world history? Can you find even one? Lol. I can't. The last time there was a female general I think was 2,000 years ago in ancient Britain when the Romans invaded it. The Briton tribes were a matriarchy with a female general and leader named Budabago (sp?) or something. Well she and her men got totally whipped and clobbered of course.
There's never ever been even a decent female general. So how could Hollywood even imagine one? Lol. Its as silly as having me being a cheerleader for the Dallas Cowboys. Totally nonsensical and out of place. Hollywood must be so desperate for women to lead. Too bad they lost the presidential election when Hillary lost. Lol.
America is a hypocrite. It claims women are equal to men in every way. Yet if they really believed that then pro sports would be all coed. The NFL and NBA would put female athletes with male athletes. Yet this would be so ridiculous that even feminists do not propose it. And the US military would put women on the front line in combat. Yet no one wants that. Why not? Aren't they totally equal in every way? Lol. Friggin hypocrites.
Everyone knows all this above. Its common sense. Yet no one dares to point this out or challenge this hypocrisy. Crazy isn't it? Doesn't that piss you off and make you wonder whats wrong with everyone?! Do you ever ponder these things secretly too? Yet you know there are very few people you can bring up these things with of course, because its so friggin taboo! Lol
Regardless, anyone who faces the honest facts above can see that men have definitely EARNED the right to lead, govern and rule. Theres definitely no gender equality here, at least not in terms of talents, skills, strength, intelligence and power.
Thus the right of male patriarchy is completely justified, logical and clear. Theres no valid reason to argue against it. Sure some men may be bad people and abuse others or mistreat others. But thats life and is true of anyone in authority or power, not just men. It doesn't mean patriarchy is bad in general. Only that some individuals are bad and corrupt. Not that the male gender is bad in general.
Every group, society or organization must have people who manage, administrate, govern and lead or else it cannot function. Just because some leaders are bad doesn't mean no one should be leaders or all authority should be abolished. You simply need to get good leaders who are wise and just. Not do away with leaders in general. Leaders also need to be qualified. And based on the above there's no doubt that qualified men are better at leadership than women are in general.