WSJ: A Better World, Run by Women

[pandabear]

http://www.wsj.com/articles/a-better-wo ... 0?mod=e2tw

[Teal Lantern]

http://www.wsj.com/articles/a-better-wo ... 0?mod=e2tw

If the issue is power lines down, water mains broken, or the other dirty / dangerous jobs that keep civilization going, the only thing you'll see women "running" is in the other direction.

[OutWest]

http://www.wsj.com/articles/a-better-wo ... 0?mod=e2tw

The travesty is that the WSJ gives a podium to such a poorly informed idiotic feminist baboon.
No, the world will not be a better place with Hillary Rottenham Clinton, or any other Jezabel running things.

[zboy1]

If that article is true, why is that all the workplaces I've been in, the women tended to be really hostile towards each other? And most women-dominated workplaces became really difficult places to work in? Not to mention the women loved to back-stab and argue with each other, while the men had to endure all the commotion and bad feelings going on. Haha...

Also many women bosses I've encountered have a real disdain for men in general; they think men are beneath them, but I've never met a male boss like that very often...

Even a lot of women prefer to work with men, rather than with other females. Haha...Why is that the case then? This article was rubbish and an embarrassment to journalism everywhere.