Is the concept of "equality" a trojan horse for social and governmental control?
I just realized something about the concept of "equality".
Equality doesn't exist in nature. It's an artificial concept invented for social control and to appease the masses who feel oppressed. In effect, the concept of "equality" is like a TROJAN HORSE. It sounds good to the masses on the surface, especially to the oppressed working class, but with it comes CONTROL, lots of control. Social control, legal control, restriction on free speech, censorship, etc. all in the name of enforcing "equality". It seems to give the government an excuse to impose more control on people and society.
We saw this in the rise of Communism in Russia and China, and with liberalism in America. The Communist Revolution of Russia claimed to stand for equality and social justice, but actually brought a tyranny far worse than that of the Czar. Stalin was the worst dictator that Russia ever had. And liberalism in America brought tons of laws, censorship, political correctness, etc. which took away one's ability to be honest and truthful. It even tried to force employers not to discriminate based on age, race or sex, which is stupid because you can't force people not to discriminate. Laws can't do that. People who want to discriminate will do so anyway, though not openly. And laws cannot prevent that.
Liberals are stupid to think that they can force everyone to not be racist and to be colorblind. That will never work and is unrealistic. You can't force people to be colorblind and pretend that race doesn't exist or doesn't matter and that all races are the same and equal. No way. Gimme a break. No amount of laws or media propaganda can make everyone think that. It's totally delusional. And all in the name of social justice and quality of course.
I don't think liberals know that they are fighting for politically correct censorship. In their minds, they probably think they are warriors fighting for social justice and equality. Everyone in their own mind thinks they are in the right.
So why do people continue to believe in something so obviously false like the concept of "equality"? Why are Americans and liberals so obsessed with that word? If rocks aren't even all equal, then how can people be? I don't get it. It doesn't make sense.
In the final analysis, communism, socialism, and liberalism all seem to result in the same thing - tyranny, lots of government control and the loss of freedom and free speech. So in effect, the concept of "equality" is just a trojan horse for social state control. How come liberals don't realize this?
The Myth of Equality Between Genders, Races, and Peoples
Re: The myth of gender equality and equality itself
Check out my FUN video clips in Russia and SE Asia and Female Encounters of the Foreign Kind video series and Full Russia Trip Videos!
Join my Dating Site to meet thousands of legit foreign girls at low cost!
"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne
Join my Dating Site to meet thousands of legit foreign girls at low cost!
"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne
Meet Loads of Foreign Women in Person! Join Our Happier Abroad ROMANCE TOURS to Many Overseas Countries!
Meet Foreign Women Now! Post your FREE profile on Happier Abroad Personals and start receiving messages from gorgeous Foreign Women today!
Re: The myth of gender equality and equality itself
I don't understand something. We all know that:
Some people are smarter and wiser than others. Some people are richer and wealthier than others. Some people are stronger than others. Some people have more power than others. Some people are more attractive than others. Some people are more successful than others. Some people are healthier than others. Some people have more morals and virtues than others. Some people are taller than others. Some people are more likable and charming than others. Some people are better skilled in particular areas than others. Some people have more knowledge in a particular areas than others. Some people are more athletic than others. Some people are more refined and civilized than others. Some people are more educated than others. Some people are even above the law, such as powerful people. Etc. Etc.
And as we all know, we do not like everyone equally. No one does. Not even the most staunch liberals do. We all like some people better than others. We all like our friends more than our non-friends. No one denies this.
So how then is, "Everyone EQUAL" as Americans always claim? Where is the equality in all this??? Why are Americans and Westerners always obsessed with this word "equality' when it is clear that it does NOT EXIST anywhere in nature or reality, either in the animal kingdom or human society?! If it is totally nonexistent, then why do mainstream people treat it like a universal gospel truth and religion?! It's 100 percent ILLOGICAL!
Yet even the New Age movement and the Conspiracy/Truther movement adhere to the "gospel of equality" by constantly saying in their teachings that "No one is better than anyone else. No one is superior to anyone else, nor is anyone inferior to anyone else." which implies that they believe that everyone is equal too, along with liberal Americans.
Why is the American mainstream along with its alternative counterculture movements, so obsessed with a word that has no existence anywhere in reality? So weird and illogical. Totally irrational and downright delusional too, yet most people buy into it. Why?
Also, if men and women are "equal" in every way, as liberals and politically correct Western women demand, then:
1. How come in professional sports, they don't put teams of men and women together? Or an all male team vs. an all female team, if they are all "equal" as alleged? How come in professional tennis, they only have mixed doubles, or same sex doubles, but they don't have a team of two men vs. two women, if both genders are allegedly "equal"?
2. Why are women hardwired by nature to want a taller and stronger man than them? And usually one that makes more money than them too? Why don't they seek a man of equal height and strength and income, if both genders are "equal"?
3. If women can do anything men can do, then why can't they win any great military battles? For instance, why can't an army of women storm the beach of Normandy on D-Day like men did? We all know that an army of women would never be able to take the beachhead at Normandy from its German defenders, with their machine guns and cannons. And in fact, they would not be able to win any battles against armies of men. So how are women "equal" in every way, as liberals and social justice warriors vehemently claim?
These questions always stump liberals and feminists. I could give many other examples too. You get the point. So how are men and women "equal" in every way, as liberals and women claim? This claim is clearly indefensible, and laughable too, yet it is serious gospel truth in modern America and the Western world. It's not a joke. It's a doctrine of liberalism you are not allowed to question. What could be a bigger sign of insanity than to take a totally false doctrine and make it an unquestionable dogmatic truth? America is clearly wacko and out of touch with reality and common sense. It's an insane asylum run by the inmates, turning truth and falsehood upside down.
Yet have you noticed that it's only those of low class and low intelligence that try to claim that "everyone is equal"? Great thinker and intellects never make such an absurd claim. And upper class people and aristocratic classes don't claim that they are equal with everyone either. Only low class people believe in "equality", for obvious reasons, because they have something to gain by "equality" with the upper classes, but upper class people don't, for "equality" would mean that they are the same as the lower classes, which they do not believe. After all, how are rich people and poor people "equal" exactly? How is a refined, cultured, educated, civilized person equal to a degenerate, savage, barbaric, uneducated person? It makes no sense obviously. Nothing in nature is equal. Everything is different, in various ways. There is no equality in nature or in human society. Anyone can see this. So why deny it, just to cater to false standards of political correctness?
You know what's funny, in the alleged treatise for Jewish domination of the world, "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" -- in which virtually all of its predictions have come true -- it actually mentions how the word "equality" is a utopian socialist word that appeals to the ignorant masses, but has no basis in nature or reality. It talks about how utopian socialist concepts, though they have no basis in reality, always appeals to the dumb masses of Gentiles, which is sad but true. So even this infamous treatise confirms what I've said about "equality" and how it seems to be a false word used for mind control and manipulation of the masses by the elite.
In Protocol 1 it says:
"25. Far back in ancient times we were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," words many times repeated since these days by stupid poll- parrots who, from all sides around, flew down upon these baits and with them carried away the well-being of the world, true freedom of the individual, formerly so well guarded against the pressure of the mob. The would-be wise men of the GOYIM, the intellectuals, could not make anything out of the uttered words in their abstractedness; did not see that in nature there is no equality, cannot be freedom: that Nature herself has established inequality of minds, of characters, and capacities, just as immutably as she has established subordination to her laws: never stopped to think that the mob is a blind thing, that upstarts elected from among it to bear rule are, in regard to the political, the same blind men as the mob itself, that the adept, though he be a fool, can yet rule, whereas the non-adept, even if he were a genius, understands nothing in the political - to all those things the GOYIM paid no regard; yet all the time it was based upon these things that dynastic rule rested: the father passed on to the son a knowledge of the course of political affairs in such wise that none should know it but members of the dynasty and none could betray it to the governed. As time went on, the meaning of the dynastic transference of the true position of affairs in the political was lost, and this aided the success of our cause."
Some people are smarter and wiser than others. Some people are richer and wealthier than others. Some people are stronger than others. Some people have more power than others. Some people are more attractive than others. Some people are more successful than others. Some people are healthier than others. Some people have more morals and virtues than others. Some people are taller than others. Some people are more likable and charming than others. Some people are better skilled in particular areas than others. Some people have more knowledge in a particular areas than others. Some people are more athletic than others. Some people are more refined and civilized than others. Some people are more educated than others. Some people are even above the law, such as powerful people. Etc. Etc.
And as we all know, we do not like everyone equally. No one does. Not even the most staunch liberals do. We all like some people better than others. We all like our friends more than our non-friends. No one denies this.
So how then is, "Everyone EQUAL" as Americans always claim? Where is the equality in all this??? Why are Americans and Westerners always obsessed with this word "equality' when it is clear that it does NOT EXIST anywhere in nature or reality, either in the animal kingdom or human society?! If it is totally nonexistent, then why do mainstream people treat it like a universal gospel truth and religion?! It's 100 percent ILLOGICAL!
Yet even the New Age movement and the Conspiracy/Truther movement adhere to the "gospel of equality" by constantly saying in their teachings that "No one is better than anyone else. No one is superior to anyone else, nor is anyone inferior to anyone else." which implies that they believe that everyone is equal too, along with liberal Americans.
Why is the American mainstream along with its alternative counterculture movements, so obsessed with a word that has no existence anywhere in reality? So weird and illogical. Totally irrational and downright delusional too, yet most people buy into it. Why?
Also, if men and women are "equal" in every way, as liberals and politically correct Western women demand, then:
1. How come in professional sports, they don't put teams of men and women together? Or an all male team vs. an all female team, if they are all "equal" as alleged? How come in professional tennis, they only have mixed doubles, or same sex doubles, but they don't have a team of two men vs. two women, if both genders are allegedly "equal"?
2. Why are women hardwired by nature to want a taller and stronger man than them? And usually one that makes more money than them too? Why don't they seek a man of equal height and strength and income, if both genders are "equal"?
3. If women can do anything men can do, then why can't they win any great military battles? For instance, why can't an army of women storm the beach of Normandy on D-Day like men did? We all know that an army of women would never be able to take the beachhead at Normandy from its German defenders, with their machine guns and cannons. And in fact, they would not be able to win any battles against armies of men. So how are women "equal" in every way, as liberals and social justice warriors vehemently claim?
These questions always stump liberals and feminists. I could give many other examples too. You get the point. So how are men and women "equal" in every way, as liberals and women claim? This claim is clearly indefensible, and laughable too, yet it is serious gospel truth in modern America and the Western world. It's not a joke. It's a doctrine of liberalism you are not allowed to question. What could be a bigger sign of insanity than to take a totally false doctrine and make it an unquestionable dogmatic truth? America is clearly wacko and out of touch with reality and common sense. It's an insane asylum run by the inmates, turning truth and falsehood upside down.
Yet have you noticed that it's only those of low class and low intelligence that try to claim that "everyone is equal"? Great thinker and intellects never make such an absurd claim. And upper class people and aristocratic classes don't claim that they are equal with everyone either. Only low class people believe in "equality", for obvious reasons, because they have something to gain by "equality" with the upper classes, but upper class people don't, for "equality" would mean that they are the same as the lower classes, which they do not believe. After all, how are rich people and poor people "equal" exactly? How is a refined, cultured, educated, civilized person equal to a degenerate, savage, barbaric, uneducated person? It makes no sense obviously. Nothing in nature is equal. Everything is different, in various ways. There is no equality in nature or in human society. Anyone can see this. So why deny it, just to cater to false standards of political correctness?
You know what's funny, in the alleged treatise for Jewish domination of the world, "The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion" -- in which virtually all of its predictions have come true -- it actually mentions how the word "equality" is a utopian socialist word that appeals to the ignorant masses, but has no basis in nature or reality. It talks about how utopian socialist concepts, though they have no basis in reality, always appeals to the dumb masses of Gentiles, which is sad but true. So even this infamous treatise confirms what I've said about "equality" and how it seems to be a false word used for mind control and manipulation of the masses by the elite.
In Protocol 1 it says:
"25. Far back in ancient times we were the first to cry among the masses of the people the words "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," words many times repeated since these days by stupid poll- parrots who, from all sides around, flew down upon these baits and with them carried away the well-being of the world, true freedom of the individual, formerly so well guarded against the pressure of the mob. The would-be wise men of the GOYIM, the intellectuals, could not make anything out of the uttered words in their abstractedness; did not see that in nature there is no equality, cannot be freedom: that Nature herself has established inequality of minds, of characters, and capacities, just as immutably as she has established subordination to her laws: never stopped to think that the mob is a blind thing, that upstarts elected from among it to bear rule are, in regard to the political, the same blind men as the mob itself, that the adept, though he be a fool, can yet rule, whereas the non-adept, even if he were a genius, understands nothing in the political - to all those things the GOYIM paid no regard; yet all the time it was based upon these things that dynastic rule rested: the father passed on to the son a knowledge of the course of political affairs in such wise that none should know it but members of the dynasty and none could betray it to the governed. As time went on, the meaning of the dynastic transference of the true position of affairs in the political was lost, and this aided the success of our cause."
Check out my FUN video clips in Russia and SE Asia and Female Encounters of the Foreign Kind video series and Full Russia Trip Videos!
Join my Dating Site to meet thousands of legit foreign girls at low cost!
"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne
Join my Dating Site to meet thousands of legit foreign girls at low cost!
"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne
Re: The Myth of Equality Between Genders, Races and Peoples
It's liberals and feminists who started this myth that "everyone is the same" and "everyone is equal." Feminists even go so far as to say, there are no differences between men and women. 
"When I think about the idea of getting involved with an American woman, I don't know if I should laugh .............. or vomit!"
"Trying to meet women in America is like trying to decipher Egyptian hieroglyphics."
"Trying to meet women in America is like trying to decipher Egyptian hieroglyphics."
Re: The Myth of Equality Between Genders, Races and Peoples
Some funny graphic images and quotes about the myth and absurdity of gender equality. LOL
Check out my FUN video clips in Russia and SE Asia and Female Encounters of the Foreign Kind video series and Full Russia Trip Videos!
Join my Dating Site to meet thousands of legit foreign girls at low cost!
"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne
Join my Dating Site to meet thousands of legit foreign girls at low cost!
"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne
Re: The Myth of Equality Between Genders, Races and Peoples
Come on Winston, don't you know it's racist and sexist to say that there are differences between races and between men and women? 
"When I think about the idea of getting involved with an American woman, I don't know if I should laugh .............. or vomit!"
"Trying to meet women in America is like trying to decipher Egyptian hieroglyphics."
"Trying to meet women in America is like trying to decipher Egyptian hieroglyphics."
Re: The Myth of Equality Between Genders, Races and Peoples
More on BS Gender equality:
Why do women only want to date men taller than them, stronger than them and makes more money than them? Why not date men of equal strength and height? Because women are hypergamous. They will not date weaker men, but men will date weaker and shorter women. No equality there. Also, women's sexual value is much higher than men's too. On Facebook, females always get more attention and likes than males. We all know that. And people will pay for sex with women, but they won't pay for sex with men. There are no brothels for women. And there is no female version of Hugh Hefner. Obviously there is no equality there.
Do you see female auto mechanics or construction workers? Do you see male cheerleaders? How come women always depend on men to fix their cars, but never on women? Why don't men depend on women to fix their cars? Why don't pro sports leagues put men and women on the same team? Or have any men vs. women pro sports in baseball, football, basketball or even tennis? Where is the equality in all that? Feminists NEVER have a response to these questions.
Therefore, since women are hypergamous and have higher sexual value and sexual power than men, by trying to make them equal to men politically and economically, you give them MORE power than men. In effect, by trying to create gender equality, you create gender INEQUALITY. That becomes a disaster, because if all men and women were equal in money and power, then women would find no one to marry since their nature is to marry up, not down or equal. And men would find no wives to have children with, and thus the human race would go extinct. That's why equality could never work.
This simple logic was understood by ancient people all the way up to the Victorian Era, but modern liberal Americans are blind to it for some reason. Instead, they are filled with religious notions of equality for all, which is impossible and untrue. Nothing in nature or science is equal. A rabbit who says he is equal to the lion will be laughed at. It's all a delusion and con to make the ignorant masses focus on useless social issues perpetually without end, so they will accept socialism, communism and democracy, which all leads to the New World Order. All this shit from feminism and socialism was predicted and planned back in 1776. See "Proofs of a Conspiracy (1798)" by John Robison. It's not coincidental. The elite don't care about human rights or freedoms. But they know ignorant masses do, so they play on it and use it against them.
Why do women only want to date men taller than them, stronger than them and makes more money than them? Why not date men of equal strength and height? Because women are hypergamous. They will not date weaker men, but men will date weaker and shorter women. No equality there. Also, women's sexual value is much higher than men's too. On Facebook, females always get more attention and likes than males. We all know that. And people will pay for sex with women, but they won't pay for sex with men. There are no brothels for women. And there is no female version of Hugh Hefner. Obviously there is no equality there.
Do you see female auto mechanics or construction workers? Do you see male cheerleaders? How come women always depend on men to fix their cars, but never on women? Why don't men depend on women to fix their cars? Why don't pro sports leagues put men and women on the same team? Or have any men vs. women pro sports in baseball, football, basketball or even tennis? Where is the equality in all that? Feminists NEVER have a response to these questions.
Therefore, since women are hypergamous and have higher sexual value and sexual power than men, by trying to make them equal to men politically and economically, you give them MORE power than men. In effect, by trying to create gender equality, you create gender INEQUALITY. That becomes a disaster, because if all men and women were equal in money and power, then women would find no one to marry since their nature is to marry up, not down or equal. And men would find no wives to have children with, and thus the human race would go extinct. That's why equality could never work.
This simple logic was understood by ancient people all the way up to the Victorian Era, but modern liberal Americans are blind to it for some reason. Instead, they are filled with religious notions of equality for all, which is impossible and untrue. Nothing in nature or science is equal. A rabbit who says he is equal to the lion will be laughed at. It's all a delusion and con to make the ignorant masses focus on useless social issues perpetually without end, so they will accept socialism, communism and democracy, which all leads to the New World Order. All this shit from feminism and socialism was predicted and planned back in 1776. See "Proofs of a Conspiracy (1798)" by John Robison. It's not coincidental. The elite don't care about human rights or freedoms. But they know ignorant masses do, so they play on it and use it against them.
Check out my FUN video clips in Russia and SE Asia and Female Encounters of the Foreign Kind video series and Full Russia Trip Videos!
Join my Dating Site to meet thousands of legit foreign girls at low cost!
"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne
Join my Dating Site to meet thousands of legit foreign girls at low cost!
"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne
Re: The Myth of Equality Between Genders, Races and Peoples
Funny parody video about equality and political correctness in the future. lol
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XM-HJT8_esM[/youtube]
James Bond gets lectured on equality by his female superior. lol
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkp4t5NYzVM[/youtube]
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XM-HJT8_esM[/youtube]
James Bond gets lectured on equality by his female superior. lol
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkp4t5NYzVM[/youtube]
Check out my FUN video clips in Russia and SE Asia and Female Encounters of the Foreign Kind video series and Full Russia Trip Videos!
Join my Dating Site to meet thousands of legit foreign girls at low cost!
"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne
Join my Dating Site to meet thousands of legit foreign girls at low cost!
"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne
Re: The Myth of Equality Between Genders, Races and Peoples
Did you guys know that in the 1960's, TV shows were AGAINST gender equality? Here is an example:
In 1965, there was a TV show called "Gidget" with Sally Field. (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058806/) In episode 6 (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0588004/?ref_=ttep_ep6), Sally Field's character Gidget, a school girl, tried to prove herself equal with boys by signing up for auto shop class at school, a trade which was and still is strictly for males. When she messes up badly and funnily in the class while trying to change oil on a car, she embarrasses herself and quits. At the end of the episode, she admitted to her parents and brother that they were right and agreed that she should stick with being a girl and not try to be equal with boys.
So that TV show discouraged feminism and gender equality, and taught that girls should be girls and boys should be boys, as a moral lesson. In the 1960's, America still knew the difference between men and women, and was wiser and more real than the America of today, which is pretty much all about bullshit and political correctness, not truth. Back then, America still had decent family values, but that all started sliding downhill in the 1970's.
If you think the 90's were more progressive and today's liberalism is better, just take a look at the stats of the 1960's compared to today. Back then divorce rates were much lower. The nuclear family was more stable. Families were closer and had more values. Neighbors talked to each other. Friends were easier to make. People were more down to earth, authentic and real. They looked more wholesome, innocent and good natured too, which you can see on any 1960's TV show. In contrast, today there is moral decay in America, a breakdown of family values, a high divorce rate, and people on TV now look soulless, cold and unfeeling, not wholesome or innocent.
So if I had to pick whether people had better values back then or now, I'd definitely choose back then.
Here is a funny clip from that episode where Sally Field's character messes up when trying to change oil on a car to prove herself equal with boys. She looks adorable.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VwJDnOORbn8[/youtube]
In 1965, there was a TV show called "Gidget" with Sally Field. (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058806/) In episode 6 (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0588004/?ref_=ttep_ep6), Sally Field's character Gidget, a school girl, tried to prove herself equal with boys by signing up for auto shop class at school, a trade which was and still is strictly for males. When she messes up badly and funnily in the class while trying to change oil on a car, she embarrasses herself and quits. At the end of the episode, she admitted to her parents and brother that they were right and agreed that she should stick with being a girl and not try to be equal with boys.
So that TV show discouraged feminism and gender equality, and taught that girls should be girls and boys should be boys, as a moral lesson. In the 1960's, America still knew the difference between men and women, and was wiser and more real than the America of today, which is pretty much all about bullshit and political correctness, not truth. Back then, America still had decent family values, but that all started sliding downhill in the 1970's.
If you think the 90's were more progressive and today's liberalism is better, just take a look at the stats of the 1960's compared to today. Back then divorce rates were much lower. The nuclear family was more stable. Families were closer and had more values. Neighbors talked to each other. Friends were easier to make. People were more down to earth, authentic and real. They looked more wholesome, innocent and good natured too, which you can see on any 1960's TV show. In contrast, today there is moral decay in America, a breakdown of family values, a high divorce rate, and people on TV now look soulless, cold and unfeeling, not wholesome or innocent.
So if I had to pick whether people had better values back then or now, I'd definitely choose back then.
Here is a funny clip from that episode where Sally Field's character messes up when trying to change oil on a car to prove herself equal with boys. She looks adorable.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VwJDnOORbn8[/youtube]
Check out my FUN video clips in Russia and SE Asia and Female Encounters of the Foreign Kind video series and Full Russia Trip Videos!
Join my Dating Site to meet thousands of legit foreign girls at low cost!
"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne
Join my Dating Site to meet thousands of legit foreign girls at low cost!
"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne
-
starchild5
- Veteran Poster
- Posts: 2165
- Joined: December 20th, 2013, 2:32 am
Re: The Myth of Equality Between Genders, Races and Peoples
Everyone knows this scam except humans.
Gender Equality is a con...They have to create stuff to stop your growth in life as a human race.
The more BS the better it is for the elites.
Gender Equality is a con...They have to create stuff to stop your growth in life as a human race.
The more BS the better it is for the elites.
Re: The Myth of Equality Between Genders, Races and Peoples
Galatians 3 wrote: For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Re: The Myth of Equality Between Genders, Races and Peoples
Pandabear you said in earlier posts that hate all religions (especially Christians). So why are you quoting the bible here?pandabear wrote:Galatians 3 wrote: For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus. For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
"When I think about the idea of getting involved with an American woman, I don't know if I should laugh .............. or vomit!"
"Trying to meet women in America is like trying to decipher Egyptian hieroglyphics."
"Trying to meet women in America is like trying to decipher Egyptian hieroglyphics."
Re: The Myth of Equality Between Genders, Races and Peoples
Holy shit is this funny!Winston wrote:Funny parody video about equality and political correctness in the future. lol
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XM-HJT8_esM[/youtube]
"When I think about the idea of getting involved with an American woman, I don't know if I should laugh .............. or vomit!"
"Trying to meet women in America is like trying to decipher Egyptian hieroglyphics."
"Trying to meet women in America is like trying to decipher Egyptian hieroglyphics."
-
El_Caudillo
- Freshman Poster
- Posts: 293
- Joined: July 18th, 2016, 6:39 am
Re: The Myth of Equality Between Genders, Races and Peoples
As you know Winston (at least I think you know), I've been looking at the arguments for all races being equal are, and came across this book 'Guns, Germs and Steel'. The author basically argues that all peoples are as smart as each other - but environmental factors like the availability of domesticatable animals and plants as well as geographical isolation are crucial. I believe a lot of you theory of unequalness between races comes from experiences in Taiwan/China vs the Philippines. Along with the fertile crescent in the Middle East China was one of the first places to develop agriculture. And it was blessed with wild plants the could be domesticated - some places are not. Because of the East West axis of Eurasia China was also able to import crops and domestic animals from India and Europe.
Until the Spanish conquest the Philippines were pretty isolated. I don't think they had many large mammals on those islands which could have been domesticated? I'm not sure about wild plants. Their society would have been decimated by Spanish weapons and germs - and they were then basically under the yoke for four hundred years. Then the US took over. By then corruption endemic to all former Spanish colonies (except perhaps Chile) was embedded. Just look at the current war on drugs - tell me that doesn't seem like something out of Latin America?
I'm not writing an exhaustive case here, I'm just hinting that we need to look more carefully at the histories of various places before we judge. Sure at any given time societies and cultures are not the same nor equal - but perhaps each does have its own potential. I'm very interested in this idea that around 15000 years ago there were a number of great civilizations that knew much more than we do about certain things - and these civilizations were wiped out by a solar flare.
Until the Spanish conquest the Philippines were pretty isolated. I don't think they had many large mammals on those islands which could have been domesticated? I'm not sure about wild plants. Their society would have been decimated by Spanish weapons and germs - and they were then basically under the yoke for four hundred years. Then the US took over. By then corruption endemic to all former Spanish colonies (except perhaps Chile) was embedded. Just look at the current war on drugs - tell me that doesn't seem like something out of Latin America?
I'm not writing an exhaustive case here, I'm just hinting that we need to look more carefully at the histories of various places before we judge. Sure at any given time societies and cultures are not the same nor equal - but perhaps each does have its own potential. I'm very interested in this idea that around 15000 years ago there were a number of great civilizations that knew much more than we do about certain things - and these civilizations were wiped out by a solar flare.
Even Billy knows that, just ask Mr S!
Re: The Myth of Equality Between Genders, Races and Peoples
jamesbond wrote:Pandabear you said in earlier posts that hate all religions (especially Christians). So why are you quoting the bible here?
2 Timothy 3 wrote:All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness.
Re: The Myth of Equality Between Genders, Races and Peoples
Im watching the documentary about "guns, germs and steel" now. Its interesting. There are 3 episodes. See here:El_Caudillo wrote:As you know Winston (at least I think you know), I've been looking at the arguments for all races being equal are, and came across this book 'Guns, Germs and Steel'. The author basically argues that all peoples are as smart as each other - but environmental factors like the availability of domesticatable animals and plants as well as geographical isolation are crucial. I believe a lot of you theory of unequalness between races comes from experiences in Taiwan/China vs the Philippines. Along with the fertile crescent in the Middle East China was one of the first places to develop agriculture. And it was blessed with wild plants the could be domesticated - some places are not. Because of the East West axis of Eurasia China was also able to import crops and domestic animals from India and Europe.
Until the Spanish conquest the Philippines were pretty isolated. I don't think they had many large mammals on those islands which could have been domesticated? I'm not sure about wild plants. Their society would have been decimated by Spanish weapons and germs - and they were then basically under the yoke for four hundred years. Then the US took over. By then corruption endemic to all former Spanish colonies (except perhaps Chile) was embedded. Just look at the current war on drugs - tell me that doesn't seem like something out of Latin America?
I'm not writing an exhaustive case here, I'm just hinting that we need to look more carefully at the histories of various places before we judge. Sure at any given time societies and cultures are not the same nor equal - but perhaps each does have its own potential. I'm very interested in this idea that around 15000 years ago there were a number of great civilizations that knew much more than we do about certain things - and these civilizations were wiped out by a solar flare.
https://m.youtube.com/results?q=guns%20 ... steel&sm=1
This comment is funny.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ojU31yHDqiM
Apparently, Jared Diamond's theory is that plants, agriculture and cattle are the reasons why some societies are developed and others aren't. lol. What a hackneyed theory. It's as if he assumes that by nature, all societies ought to be equal even though in nature, there is no equality of any sort at all. lolI don't get why he compares everything back to New Guinea... The true question is why Africans have some of the most rich land when it comes to wildlife, minerals, etc, and they didn't advance at the same speed. It's complete shit saying Europeans are advanced only because of luck. Also, if its just Europeans and Asians, how the hell is India still a shit hole? They're between the two 'lucky' societies.
Check out my FUN video clips in Russia and SE Asia and Female Encounters of the Foreign Kind video series and Full Russia Trip Videos!
Join my Dating Site to meet thousands of legit foreign girls at low cost!
"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne
Join my Dating Site to meet thousands of legit foreign girls at low cost!
"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 4 Replies
- 8781 Views
-
Last post by odbo
-
- 0 Replies
- 1644 Views
-
Last post by jamesbond
-
- 0 Replies
- 781 Views
-
Last post by MrMan
-
- 0 Replies
- 947 Views
-
Last post by galii
-
- 0 Replies
- 2049 Views
-
Last post by PeterAndrewNolan