Logical policy regarding blacks

[Cornfed]

When you think about it, the fact that blacks are an r-selected species automatically means the following policies must be implemented regarding them if we don’t want the entire world to turn into a worse version of Zimbabwe.

1. They should be physically separated from human populations.
2. They should be denied any human technology and assistance that might extend their lifespans or reduce attrition.
3. They should be culled back to a level where living in their natural state and habitat is sustainable.

I don’t see how there is any alternative to these conclusions. You may not like it, but there it is. What is the excuse for believing anything different and why is all discussion on the subject not concerned with how to accomplish these goals? Are we nothing more than filthy scum like the boomers who want to pass our problems on to future generations?

[statnerd]

They should just go back to Africa. That should become a new civil rights trend for the negroes, the "go back to Africa" movement.

[Cornfed]

Except that they are already way overpopulated in Africa and have spilled outside their natural bounds, so they would need to be deprived of human technology, removed from most areas and culled back.

[Moretorque]

What happened to motorcycle man Kaldmedler or what ever it was, the Jews probably put a hit out on him and had him hunted down in SA for fun ?

[Cornfed]

I'd be interesting in anyone who has a seriously different take on the subject, as the conclusion seems so unavoidable. We know we have to allow other r-selected species such as rats, frogs, rabbits etc. to have a high mortality rate and that feeding them to avoid this would have disastrous consequences, right? Well, how does this not apply to blacks?