There's no England Now...

[lone_yakuza]

.

[odbo]

Why isn't philosophical filipino banned (again) yet? He repeats the same anti-white bs he learned in college (before he flunked out) post after post after post. Like every angry asian-american male before him, he doesn't bother acting like a man by doing anything to change his situation, rather he chooses to validate the stereotypes that he is an effeminate bitch unworthy of a woman's respect by endlessly moaning about how much better everyone else has it.

He believes there is an Anglo-Saxon conspiracy in Hollywood to make White men seem attractive to women and Asian men seem wimpy and socially-awkward, in order to prevent unemployed 5 foot tall Pacific Islanders like him from getting laid with top-tier White women. The best part? He's not attracted to women of his own ethnicity. So what would he do if the Europeans/Americans never came to the Phillippines to modernize it (or rape and pillage according to him). And what if he was never brought over to an Anglo-Saxon country as an ungrateful refugee? Then he'd be really f***ed because he'd be on an island with ugly women he can't stand, and with no alternatives.

This brat doesn't appreciate how fortunate he really is. Oh well, he'll continue to moan about perceived injustices, and wonder why women don't love him for it, until he's middle aged. Maybe in the future Filipinos will be hard-working and build a wealthy nation, while Northern Europeans will be lazy and destitute, so western whores will be glad to service Pinoys for their currency.

[abcdavid01]

Isaan in Thailand has been run over by Ghengis Khan?

They have flat wide round faces, big nose and mouth



Anyway, this is award winning movie that talks about decline of western world

http://www.decadencedocumentary.com/

Low birth rates, ageing populations, debt-laden economies and immigration – the West consumes without consequence, loves without longevity and lives without meaning. Peak oil, climate change, the GFC is the world without.Decadence, a lush essay-style documentary filmed in ten countries, is about the world within, about us. About what we have gained and lost. About a new renaissance or a final dark age?

Movie is only available in Australia. Any way to get it in the US?

[Banano]

Isaan in Thailand has been run over by Ghengis Khan?

They have flat wide round faces, big nose and mouth



Anyway, this is award winning movie that talks about decline of western world

http://www.decadencedocumentary.com/

Low birth rates, ageing populations, debt-laden economies and immigration – the West consumes without consequence, loves without longevity and lives without meaning. Peak oil, climate change, the GFC is the world without.Decadence, a lush essay-style documentary filmed in ten countries, is about the world within, about us. About what we have gained and lost. About a new renaissance or a final dark age?

Movie is only available in Australia. Any way to get it in the US?

its on itunes,
torrents?
Any experts, where to get this movies for free?

[Mr S]

Isaan in Thailand has been run over by Ghengis Khan?

They have flat wide round faces, big nose and mouth



Anyway, this is award winning movie that talks about decline of western world

http://www.decadencedocumentary.com/

Low birth rates, ageing populations, debt-laden economies and immigration – the West consumes without consequence, loves without longevity and lives without meaning. Peak oil, climate change, the GFC is the world without.Decadence, a lush essay-style documentary filmed in ten countries, is about the world within, about us. About what we have gained and lost. About a new renaissance or a final dark age?

Movie is only available in Australia. Any way to get it in the US?

its on itunes,
torrents?
Any experts, where to get this movies for free?

I can't find it on any of the Bittorrent sites. However you can watch an earlier series done by the same main dude that did the movie. He probably took the same themes and just expanded upon them and internationalized them a bit. There are six episodes. I watched them before, worth watching if you're into understanding what is causing the slow decline of the West. If I can remember it has an Australian slant to the subject matter.

http://torrentz.eu/search?f=the+meaningless+of+life

[Mr S]

Click the link if you want the original source and have trouble reading limited paragraphing. I just copied and pasted it but I'm not gonna spend 15 min trying to paragraph it correctly since it didn't translate properly.

Alien nation: The new census reveals a Britain that would be unrecognisable even to our grandparents

Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... z2FEISy0nJ

The future will be another country. They will do things differently there.
The Census is not just a description of the state of things on a day in 2011, it is a prophetic document telling us where we are going, whether we like it or not. I don’t.
For the past 60 years or so, we have lived in a nation that was more or less familiar to anyone who had grown up in the pre-war Britain of 1939.
Even the devastation of conflict had not transformed it out of recognition.
People behaved, thought, worked, laughed and enjoyed themselves much as they had done for decades.
They lived in the same sorts of families in the same kind of houses. Their children went to the same kinds of schools.
And they had grown up in a land that was still identifiably the same as their grandparents had known.
And so it went back for centuries.
As recently as 1949, the prices of most goods were roughly the same, and expressed in the same money, as the prices of 1649.
A short-distance time-traveller between 1912 and 2012 might be perplexed and astonished, but he would not be lost.
That period is now coming to an end. I suspect that anyone in Britain, travelling between 2012 and 2112 would be unable to believe that he was in the same place.
What is the most significant single fact in the Census? I do not think there is one. Several are shocking or disturbing, if you are not fond of change, and delightful if you are.


But there are some, which taken together, prophesy a transformation to come.
Look at these – manufacturing is now only the fourth-biggest employer, after supplying and selling goods and services, health and social work and education.
So, in the nation that was once the ‘Workshop of the World’, we now have more teachers than industrial workers.

Alien nation: The latest census results reveal a nation almost unrecognisable to even our grandparents

Rise and fall: The Christian population is in decline while the number of Muslim residents is on the rise
London is rapidly becoming a separate nation, as different from England as Scotland or Wales are, with indigenous British people now in a minority, in some areas a very small minority indeed, and incidentally with extremes of wealth and poverty not known since Edwardian times.
Then of course there is the decline in Christianity, down by four million, from 72 per cent to 59 per cent; the growth in indifference to religion, with non-believers almost doubling to 14.1 million; and also of Islam, rising so fast that one British resident in 20 is now a Muslim.
The Muslim population is young, and keen on large families, while the Christian population tends to be older and less likely to have children.
This is very much a work in progress, far from complete. A lot of nominal Christians are no longer bothering to pretend to a faith they have never cared much about.
Do not be surprised if, in ten years, the gap between the number of professing Christians and the number of Muslims has grown much smaller.
The secularists, who have so enthusiastically sought to drive Christianity out of British life, may realise with a gulp of apprehension that they have only created a vacancy for Islam – a faith that is not at all troubled by Richard Dawkins.
Perhaps most significant of all is the accelerating disappearance of marriage as the normal state of life for grown-up people.
For the first time, fewer than half of adults are married.

Getting hitched: Homosexuals seem to be most enthusiastic about marriage just as heterosexuals tire of it
This means many things – a greater number of fatherless households, a greater number of cohabiting couples, the rapid disappearance of what was once a strong social force.
Since the stable married family is a fortress of private life and individuality, its retreat will mean the opposite of that: more state interference and surveillance, more conformism – and more conformists – and mass culture. Its main effect will be on the children.
Many of them will grow up outside what used to be normal, a lifelong two-parent home.
They will, as a result, be different sorts of people. Already, almost half of Britain’s 15-year-olds do not live with their ‘birth parents’; 300,000 sets of parents split each year.
I cannot believe this is not part of the reason for the so-called ‘riots’ of 2011, in which young men brought up without male authority ran wild.
These were equal-opportunity events, and their causes were home-grown, not imported. This will get much, much worse.
Again, conservatives will find this worrying and ill-omened. Liberal ‘progressives’, who have never had much time for the married family, seeing it as a sort of prison, will view it as a liberation.
Edmund Leach, giving his influential Reith Lectures in 1967, put it this way: ‘Far from being the basis of the good society, the family, with its narrow privacy and tawdry secrets, is the source of all our discontents.’
It is striking that just as homosexuals seem to be most enthusiastic about getting married, heterosexuals are tiring of the whole thing.
But now compare the giant political fuss over same-sex marriage with the numbers of people affected. See just what a tiny proportion of the country is involved.
While the decline of conventional marriage involves many millions, there are 105,000 people in civil partnerships, one-fifth of one per cent of the population, one person in 500.
And that is seven years after they first became available.

Foreign influx: Immigration still stands at 180,000 a year
I have deliberately left migration to the end. The figures are astonishing, with one in ten people in England and Wales now born abroad, and the rate of increase over the past few years equally astounding – almost half of these new citizens have arrived here since 2001.
And, in a figure that has not attracted the attention it should have, almost three million people live in households where no adults speak English as their first language.
The main significance of this is the speed of it. Even now, official immigration still stands at 180,000 a year. Probably these totals are an underestimate, as illegal migrants tend not to fill in forms.
But the really important fact is that this revolution is the result of a deliberate, planned attempt to change this country for ever, and we have the evidence of this.
On October 23, 2009, a former New Labour official called Andrew Neather wrote an article in the London Evening Standard which was that very rare thing – a genuine revelation of a political secret.
The crucial passage described ‘a major shift from the policy of previous governments’.

Canvassing: On Friday the Labour leader, Ed Miliband, was still trying to appeal to working-class voters whose views his metropolitan fat-cat party secretly despises.
It disclosed that a ‘big immigration report was surrounded by an unusual air of both anticipation and secrecy . . . there was a paranoia about it reaching the media . . . Earlier drafts I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural.
‘I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended – even if this wasn’t its main purpose – to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date. That seemed to me to be a manoeuvre too far.
‘Ministers were very nervous about the whole thing . . . There was a reluctance elsewhere in Government to discuss what increased immigration would mean, above all for Labour’s core white working-class vote . . .
‘Part by accident, part by design, the Government had created its longed-for immigration boom. But Ministers wouldn’t talk about it.’ Why not? Because Labour voters wouldn’t have liked it.
‘While Ministers might have been passionately in favour of a more diverse society, it wasn’t necessarily a debate they wanted to have in working-men’s clubs in Sheffield or Sunderland.’
On Friday the Labour leader, Ed Miliband, was still trying to appeal to working-class voters whose views his metropolitan fat-cat party secretly despises.
While praising immigration to his London audience, he pretended to be concerned about it by admitting there is ‘anxiety’ about the pace of change.
He promised (absurdly, since the EU has controlled our frontiers for many years) that ‘Britain must always control its borders’.
But he then swiftly dismissed the idea – which would be the only hope of future harmony – that migrants should assimilate, saying this was ‘wrong for our country’.
He proclaimed: ‘One Nation doesn’t mean one identity. People can be proudly, patriotically British without abandoning their cultural roots.’
Is this true? In the days when the USA still sought to assimilate its migrants, it certainly didn’t think so. It insisted that they became Americans in every way, and as soon as they could.
Half the point of American state schools was the creation of new young Americans.
Since that policy was abandoned 30 years ago, the USA has in reality ceased to be one country, with large areas speaking Spanish and retaining the customs and cultures of their homes, hostile or chilly to their American fellow citizens, who return the favour.
Any observant person in Britain can see the same process in such cities as Bradford, where multiculturalism has created two solitudes with their backs turned on each other.
Bit by bit, the people of this country are ceasing to have key things in common. They don’t share a religion, or a culture, or a history. Many don’t even share a language.
They don’t eat the same food or watch the same TV stations or have a common sense of humour.
They sometimes even disagree about whether to drive on the left.

Class difference: There's a widening gap between rich and poor with the rich having servants for the first time since the era of Downton
They come from completely different legal and political traditions.
In a strange paradox, many of the new Britons are more socially and morally conservative than their indigenous British neighbours, though their presence here is a sort of revolution in flesh and blood.
Many of the new migrants also have a completely different work ethic, not having grown up in our entitlement-based welfare state – which is why one of their main unspoken functions in Labour’s plan has been to keep wages down by providing a huge pool of cheap and willing unskilled labour.
Without mass immigration, the minimum wage would long ago have had to rise sharply, creating the crisis that all economists predicted when it was introduced.
As it is, we are fast becoming a low-wage, unskilled economy, with overcrowded cities, multi-occupied housing and hopelessly strained medical services, transport and schools.
There is also a widening gap between the rich, who can afford servants again for the first time since the era of Downton Abbey, and the poor, who have to be those servants.
The only way we will be able to sustain this is by becoming steadily cheaper, devaluing our currency through inflation and incidentally destroying the savings and pensions of the thrifty.
That will also kill off the welfare state, whose provisions and payouts will gradually shrink to the point where they are valueless.
We are also becoming a more violent, noisy and unrestrained culture, more drunk, more drugged, more indebted, more rootless and less particular.
Our language is increasingly internationalised and full of Americanisms (Mr Miliband thinks railway stations are called ‘train stations’), our landmarks, particularly the customary weights and measures with which millions grew up, are being extirpated in schools and on the media.
There is no sign that any of these developments are stopping, or even slowing. Far from it. They are accelerating. They were meant to.
The secret thinkers at the core of the Blair Government wanted to begin the world over again, at home and abroad, though they never dared to tell us how.
As their mighty, unstoppable project unfolds, Britain as we knew it will disappear, as they hoped it would. At least we know who to blame.

[abcdavid01]

Same as America, same as America.

[Intolerant]

It looks like Pakistan or North Africa.

[Jester]

Why isn't philosophical filipino banned (again) yet? He repeats the same anti-white bs he learned in college (before he flunked out) post after post after post. Like every angry asian-american male before him, he doesn't bother acting like a man by doing anything to change his situation, rather he chooses to validate the stereotypes that he is an effeminate bitch unworthy of a woman's respect by endlessly moaning about how much better everyone else has it.

He believes there is an Anglo-Saxon conspiracy in Hollywood to make White men seem attractive to women and Asian men seem wimpy and socially-awkward, in order to prevent unemployed 5 foot tall Pacific Islanders like him from getting laid with top-tier White women. The best part? He's not attracted to women of his own ethnicity. So what would he do if the Europeans/Americans never came to the Phillippines to modernize it (or rape and pillage according to him). And what if he was never brought over to an Anglo-Saxon country as an ungrateful refugee? Then he'd be really f***ed because he'd be on an island with ugly women he can't stand, and with no alternatives.

This brat doesn't appreciate how fortunate he really is. Oh well, he'll continue to moan about perceived injustices, and wonder why women don't love him for it.....

+1

[Jester]

Damn good thread here.

And a nice tune in the OP.

[Intolerant]

Why isn't philosophical filipino banned (again) yet? He repeats the same anti-white bs he learned in college (before he flunked out) post after post after post. Like every angry asian-american male before him, he doesn't bother acting like a man by doing anything to change his situation, rather he chooses to validate the stereotypes that he is an effeminate bitch unworthy of a woman's respect by endlessly moaning about how much better everyone else has it.

He believes there is an Anglo-Saxon conspiracy in Hollywood to make White men seem attractive to women and Asian men seem wimpy and socially-awkward, in order to prevent unemployed 5 foot tall Pacific Islanders like him from getting laid with top-tier White women. The best part? He's not attracted to women of his own ethnicity. So what would he do if the Europeans/Americans never came to the Phillippines to modernize it (or rape and pillage according to him). And what if he was never brought over to an Anglo-Saxon country as an ungrateful refugee? Then he'd be really f***ed because he'd be on an island with ugly women he can't stand, and with no alternatives.

This brat doesn't appreciate how fortunate he really is. Oh well, he'll continue to moan about perceived injustices, and wonder why women don't love him for it, until he's middle aged. Maybe in the future Filipinos will be hard-working and build a wealthy nation, while Northern Europeans will be lazy and destitute, so western whores will be glad to service Pinoys for their currency.

This. f***ing This.

+1

Rather than complaining about something 24/7, do something about it. For instance, Winston has been complaining about Taiwan for years about how he can't pick up girls there, and people have been telling him for YEARS to pack his bags and go to China. It's called 'happier abroad' for a reason.

Sitting on your ass all day as a keyboard warrior isn't going to solve anything by itself.

[Robert77]

I have no pity for western european or anglo-saxon imperalists. Them going around the world and f***ing everything up, raping, pillaging, destroying cultures, polluting, nuking, stealing national treasures, forcing religions/christianity upon others, etc. etc..

And then establishing a racial hierarchy and dating hierarchy where East Asian males are at the bottom through cowardly, underhanded, artificial means such as social engineering through Hollywood.

It's time for them to have a taste of their own medicine.

You reap what you sow.

This is something called karma.

I agree with you.... I travelled the world and got see some of the horrible f***ed up things western europeans have done in places like Africa, australia, india and the americas....

up to this day for example france makes billions outta causing trouble and wars in their old african colonies (just like the US used to do in latin america back in the 20th century).... then they're shocked because people from those war torn countries they messed up themselves, move to france..... THERE IS SOMETHING CALLED KHARMA

Back in the 70's there was barely any central american in the US, then the US under Reagan funded a massive war in central america against the commies where over 2 million central americans died and guess what? in less than 2 decades the number of central americans in the US jumped to over 4 million people!!!

and on top of that, why do some count the US as a white country? the US was never white.... it's rightfully of the red man

[ladislav]

What's up, Limey poofter? Too many bloody wogs in your country?

Well, whose fault is it that you allow unrestrained immigration and particularly that from your former colonies? And who asked you to colonize one fourth of the world making "new Britains" out there- Australia, NZ, Canada, etc and displacing and, most often, killing the locals?

Also whose fault is it that you consider a Pakistani or an Indian a "New Briton"? He sure don't look like a Briton to me! Germans would not consider a Kenyan or a Namibian African person a New German. Pakistanis would not consider some Brit a New Pakistani. Insane!

Also, whose fault is it that you allow anyone to buy property there and do not impose a tax if they are in the country for 180 days out of a year? That you do not have a strict language requirement for immigrants? In many countries, you cannot become a citizen if you do not know the language at a certain level and also, if you do not adopt a local name! They make sure that an immigrant assimilates completely and becomes one of them. That is, if they allow immigrants in, period!

In Argentina, the judge who grants you citizenship must make sure that you are integrated in the society, and in the Philippines, one of the requirements is that you speak the language and mingle with the locals. What's up, Britain? Too p***y to ask for that? Trembling from guilt and fear, and prostrating yourself before your colonial victims? Sticking your nose up a Pakistani's bottom because of pangs of conscience? Licking them dingle-berries off the rears of the Commonwealth members?

All the while beating up Polish and other E. Euro people ( EU nationals) who went to your country to work. All the while treating your own people like peons.

Pussies and nasty cowards, period! You are a nation that had conquered the weak- the Malays, the Indians, the poor Africans, and rode roughshod over them, sucking their blood.

Enjoy the fruits of your "labor", England,because as you built a New England on Indian land, so will the Indians ( pun intended) build a New India on your land. Ain't karma a motherf^&er?!

I can understand how this woman feels:



The victims of multiculturalism. The numbers are getting too large.



Oh, and the article forgot one thing- a huge out-flux of Brits to other countries. Hmm, so the Brits are outmigrating and moving to other lands, too? How come? Not patriotic enough to stay home and fix and protect your country? And then they moan about people moving to their land. I see!

You deserve what you got and you got what you deserve. As you sink even further into the morass that you yourself created, many people will be gloating! Enjoy your dying days, your death throes, Grandmother England, aka New Bangladesh!

Bwahahahahahahahah!

[Cornfed]

What's up, Limeys? Too many bloody wogs in your country?

Well, whose fault is it that they allow unrestrained immigration and particularly that from their former colonies?

The Jews'/Banksters'.