Why is White Pride a taboo but other racial prides are ok? Isn't that a double standard?

[jamesbond]

[Winston]

It's because Whites (which as Contrarian stated before, is a racial caste designation), have no personal, nor profound history to boast. Sure, there are exceptions (the ancient Greeks, portions of the period of Roman hegemony), but overall, their history is rattled with rape, incest, pedophilia, homosexuality, feminism and intolerance for anyone that doesn't conform to the previously mentioned behaviors.

Blacks, and other groups have a right to be proud of their heritage, for there were millenniums of domination before pale skinned men brought their corruption to their shores.

Now, the war is waged on another level. He's hired other forces to be his public face now (i.e. the selection of Obama, so-called grass roots activism in the middle East and Africa), so he can plot and plan for a more sophisticated model of Jim Crow.

Much of the unrest in the states is do what white men percieve as the decline of their precious privilege (hence the reason why so many white men watch Fox news repeatedly and claim conservatism now).

But you forget that the White race invented everything and built modern civilization too. Without White people there would be no electricity for you to use today. In Asia and Africa, people still lived primitive lives before White European culture brought technology there. In Africa, before European colonization, the blacks hadn't even invented the wheel yet. So shouldn't you thank the White race for inventing stuff like electricity or airplanes, without which it would be hard to travel? And also for building technology, computers, smart phones, cars, trains, etc? And for inventing refined classical music?

[Winston]

Jared Taylor drops some bombshells about race relations in the US.



Jared Taylor interview.

[Winston]

The Jared Taylor interview above with the Irish guy has a lot of good points about the insanity and nonsense of forcing racial diversity and white guilt in Europe and America. For example, Ireland, Switzerland and Sweden never colonized other countries or enslaved black or brown people, so why should they be forced to have white guilt and welcome multiculturalism and mass immigration into their country? Makes sense. Liberal media has no response of course. You guys should listen to the interview above. It's very good and makes a lot of sense.

@Contrarian Expatriate listen to the interview above and let us know if it makes sense and contains a lot of irrefutable points that the stupid media can never refute or address.

[Moretorque]

The Jared Taylor interview above with the Irish guy has a lot of good points about the insanity and nonsense of forcing racial diversity and white guilt in Europe and America. For example, Ireland, Switzerland and Sweden never colonized other countries or enslaved black or brown people, so why should they be forced to have white guilt and welcome multiculturalism and mass immigration into their country? Makes sense. Liberal media has no response of course. You guys should listen to the interview above. It's very good and makes a lot of sense.

@Contrarian Expatriate listen to the interview above and let us know if it makes sense and contains a lot of irrefutable points that the stupid media can never refute or address.

One out of 40 whites used to test with a IQ of 140 or above, our rulers do not want this... I would say over the last few decades it has declined probably a good bit..

[Contrarian Expatriate]

The Jared Taylor interview above with the Irish guy has a lot of good points about the insanity and nonsense of forcing racial diversity and white guilt in Europe and America. For example, Ireland, Switzerland and Sweden never colonized other countries or enslaved black or brown people, so why should they be forced to have white guilt and welcome multiculturalism and mass immigration into their country? Makes sense. Liberal media has no response of course. You guys should listen to the interview above. It's very good and makes a lot of sense.

@Contrarian Expatriate listen to the interview above and let us know if it makes sense and contains a lot of irrefutable points that the stupid media can never refute or address.

You neglected to mention that white guilt and forced diversity programs are all self-imposed by whites. White universities indoctrinate white students on these policies and they make their way into law and public policy after only a few generations.

Seems to me that the problem is with whites more than anyone.

By the way, when I was in Alpharetta, a wealthy suburb of Atlanta, I noticed that most of the new wealth was not white. It was Indian, Iranian and Arab families moving into the posh homes and shopping in the expensive boutiques.

White politicians have engineered their own displacement by importing foreign people of color who are outdoing them by a mile. Poaching talent from abroad is not so bad always. But don’t cry about diversity when these people are doing better and contributing more in taxes than the vast majority of whites.

By the way, the huge, new homes were all being built by Mexicans. And blacks were working in the service sectors mostly but there was a healthy smattering of blacks among the rich there too.

[Cornfed]

You neglected to mention that white guilt and forced diversity programs are all self-imposed by whites.

Actually they are opposed on whites by Jews and a white traitor elite that wants to eliminate any potential competition.

[Contrarian Expatriate]

You neglected to mention that white guilt and forced diversity programs are all self-imposed by whites.

Actually they are opposed on whites by Jews and a white traitor elite that wants to eliminate any potential competition.

I assume “imposed” is the word you wanted. But no one was controlling the votes of whites who voted in Congress for these laws so it was on whites themselves.

And it was not about eliminating competition. It was about stacking the labor force at the top and especially at the bottom of the skills hierarchy.

The American economy would not have been nearly as powerful without foreign talent at the top, and willing laborers at the bottom.

[Cornfed]

But no one was controlling the votes of whites who voted in Congress for these laws so it was on whites themselves.

The bad guys were controlling the two party system that gave the voters effectively only two choices, and also control through donations the actions of whoever wins, so voting is largely irrelevant.

[Contrarian Expatriate]

But no one was controlling the votes of whites who voted in Congress for these laws so it was on whites themselves.

The bad guys were controlling the two party system that gave the voters effectively only two choices, and also control through donations the actions of whoever wins, so voting is largely irrelevant.

Federal and state laws provide for the two party system. 3rd parties and independents are heavily disadvantaged, by design, in terms of funding and ballot access so most candidates opt for one of the two.

And do you have evidence for this political "control?" I could agree if you said, "influence, " but control just makes your argument ridiculous beyond belief. Legislators vote differently on different issues so that blows your Jewish "control" argument out the window. If legislators were being magically controlled as you believe, they all would vote the same way or at least similarly.

[Cornfed]

Federal and state laws provide for the two party system. 3rd parties and independents are heavily disadvantaged, by design, in terms of funding and ballot access so most candidates opt for one of the two.

Exactly, so the voters really only get a choice between two probably largely identical candidates.

And do you have evidence for this political "control?"

How many members of Congress support cutting off aid to Israel. If anything like 535 people all agree on anything, let alone sending a fortune to some reviled Marxist-racist banana republic on the other side of the world, that would be overwhelming evidence of control.

[Contrarian Expatriate]

Federal and state laws provide for the two party system. 3rd parties and independents are heavily disadvantaged, by design, in terms of funding and ballot access so most candidates opt for one of the two.

Exactly, so the voters really only get a choice between two probably largely identical candidates.

And do you have evidence for this political "control?"

How many members of Congress support cutting off aid to Israel. If anything like 535 people all agree on anything, let alone sending a fortune to some reviled Marxist-racist banana republic on the other side of the world, that would be overwhelming evidence of control.

Well, don't try to back peddle now. You said that members of Congress are CONTROLLED so why aren't all or even most of these 535 people voting the same on Israel? Have you thought about that?

Your evidence of some masterminded plot is the fact that SOME members of Congress would oppose cutting off aid to Israel even though is it the best US strategic ally in the region? OOOOK....

Why stop there? The NRA has even stronger support in Congress that ensures gun rights. Is that too evidence of the "Jewish control" that you speak of? I think you might need to look up the term evidence also. Your feelings don't constitute evidence.

[Cornfed]

Federal and state laws provide for the two party system. 3rd parties and independents are heavily disadvantaged, by design, in terms of funding and ballot access so most candidates opt for one of the two.

Exactly, so the voters really only get a choice between two probably largely identical candidates.

And do you have evidence for this political "control?"

How many members of Congress support cutting off aid to Israel. If anything like 535 people all agree on anything, let alone sending a fortune to some reviled Marxist-racist banana republic on the other side of the world, that would be overwhelming evidence of control.

Well, don't try to back peddle now. You said that members of Congress are CONTROLLED so why aren't all or even most of these 535 people voting the same on Israel? Have you thought about that?

My point was that they largely were.

[Contrarian Expatriate]

Federal and state laws provide for the two party system. 3rd parties and independents are heavily disadvantaged, by design, in terms of funding and ballot access so most candidates opt for one of the two.

Exactly, so the voters really only get a choice between two probably largely identical candidates.

And do you have evidence for this political "control?"

How many members of Congress support cutting off aid to Israel. If anything like 535 people all agree on anything, let alone sending a fortune to some reviled Marxist-racist banana republic on the other side of the world, that would be overwhelming evidence of control.

Well, don't try to back peddle now. You said that members of Congress are CONTROLLED so why aren't all or even most of these 535 people voting the same on Israel? Have you thought about that?

My point was that they largely were.

Then "control" is not the correct term. The political contributors to pro-Israeli candidates does give INFLUENCE, but no one is controlling politicians for the benefit of Israel as you are alleging. Outside control of legislators would be impossible to enforce.

[Cornfed]

Then "control" is not the correct term. The political contributors to pro-Israeli candidates does give INFLUENCE, but no one is controlling politicians for the benefit of Israel as you are alleging. Outside control of legislators would be impossible to enforce.

This is semantics. One might say they have influence to the point of control.