Mein Kampf to be released in Germany first time since WWII

[Cornfed]

An alliance between Britain and Germany would have had an excellent chance of success as well due to the complementary nature of their respective abilities. In fact both of these scenarios were recommended by Hitler in Mein Kampf, but alas it was not to be since both Britain and Russia (and possibly Germany as well) were ZOG occupied territory.

[Moretorque]

Realistically, I think Germany's best chance at "winning" WW2 was to accept Stalin's terms in joining AXIS to form the Four Powers Pact in 1940. It would have remedied critical resource shortages in Germany & Italy, prevented the Eastern Front from occurring, and bypassed British-imposed trade embargo. But Hitler had other ideas.

Stunning.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German%E2% ... _agreement

Yes, you're right. Stalin could have picked up Iraq and Iran, and driven the Brits from India. For the Dardanelles (Turkey), a historic Russian obsession, Bulgaria could have stayed non-Commie, and joined the Axis as well.

Germans would have driven the Brits from the Mediterranean, prevented any invasion of the Continent, and fought an air and naval war with US/UK, had plenty of fuel and raw materials, and eventually "won" in the sense of making the US/UK side give up.

Most scenarios for German victory are "long shots" compared to this.

The Key thing to understand about Communism is it is just another name for a dictatorship, it's about getting the lower class to attack the middle class to get rid of the ruling elites competition so it is just the lower class and the elites so the elite can dictate totally to the lower masses in order to control them permanently and the middle step to get to the ruling class level is removed by removing the middle class. In theory this will make it so you cannot dislodge the top class.

This is being done now world wide for an attempt of the elite class to be able to rule forever, communism is easily the biggest lie of the last 160 years. It operates on the masses being real stupid. Why do you think they are dumbing everything up bad now including poisoning humanity.

[Jester]

no argument from me on anything u said here, mortorque.

very well said.

momopi's post and my reply were of course only about wargaming tactics, not endorsing the soviets in any way.

[Moretorque]

The old Mr. Peabody would be able to set me straight on this and make me look stupid, what happened to the world's smartest being ?

I must be missing something.

[fightforlove]

An alliance between Britain and Germany would have had an excellent chance of success as well due to the complementary nature of their respective abilities. In fact both of these scenarios were recommended by Hitler in Mein Kampf, but alas it was not to be since both Britain and Russia (and possibly Germany as well) were ZOG occupied territory.

Britain did not become allies with Germany because of Zionists. Britain never wanted to be in alliance with Nazi Germany. British military leaders and politicians were not comfortable with a single superpower taking over the Continent, plus Hitler's economic policies of National Socialism contrasted with Britain's Commonwealth/Laissez-Faire economic policies.

[Winston]

Realistically, I think Germany's best chance at "winning" WW2 was to accept Stalin's terms in joining AXIS to form the Four Powers Pact in 1940. It would have remedied critical resource shortages in Germany & Italy, prevented the Eastern Front from occurring, and bypassed British-imposed trade embargo. But Hitler had other ideas.

Stunning.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German%E2% ... _agreement

Yes, you're right. Stalin could have picked up Iraq and Iran, and driven the Brits from India. For the Dardanelles (Turkey), a historic Russian obsession, Bulgaria could have stayed non-Commie, and joined the Axis as well.

Germans would have driven the Brits from the Mediterranean, prevented any invasion of the Continent, and fought an air and naval war with US/UK, had plenty of fuel and raw materials, and eventually "won" in the sense of making the US/UK side give up.

Most scenarios for German victory are "long shots" compared to this.

There must have been a good reason why the Nazis and Allies didn't form an alliance. I didn't know that Stalin was considering joining the Axis powers. Why didn't he?

I also don't get why the Soviets invaded Eastern Europe. Didn't they have enough land already since Russia is the largest country in the world?

There are new revisionists now that say that Hitler invaded Russia as a preemptive strike because he received intelligence reports that Stalin was moving to invade Germany. Is that true? The argument is that the Nazi armies encircled the Soviet armies so easily in the first year of the invasion, which means that the Soviet armies were on the offensive, not defensive. Does that hold water?

Also, why was Winston Churchill so adamant on going to war with Germany? Hitler tried desperately to make a peace pact with Britain, because he wanted to invade Russia and didn't want a two front war. So why was Churchill so stubbornly against it?

I hate how Britain is portrayed as an innocent victim in American movies about WWII, when in fact they wanted the war and refused to make peace with Germany. So in a sense, all the London bombings and British troops that died were Churchill's fault. Yet Hollywood refuses to acknowledge this, even though historians do. I wish Hollywood would learn to be honest for once.

[Moretorque]

An alliance between Britain and Germany would have had an excellent chance of success as well due to the complementary nature of their respective abilities. In fact both of these scenarios were recommended by Hitler in Mein Kampf, but alas it was not to be since both Britain and Russia (and possibly Germany as well) were ZOG occupied territory.

Britain did not become allies with Germany because of Zionists. Britain never wanted to be in alliance with Nazi Germany. British military leaders and politicians were not comfortable with a single superpower taking over the Continent, plus Hitler's economic policies of National Socialism contrasted with Britain's Commonwealth/Laissez-Faire economic policies.

First off Britain's Political and military body was not running Great Britain the bank was and has been for some time now. They want world domination but on their terms and Hitler was not the way they wanted to do it, the model we are living under today goes back to the CITI and is an attempt not only for continental control but total world control through the financial system and owning the military complex to back it up.

[Moretorque]

Realistically, I think Germany's best chance at "winning" WW2 was to accept Stalin's terms in joining AXIS to form the Four Powers Pact in 1940. It would have remedied critical resource shortages in Germany & Italy, prevented the Eastern Front from occurring, and bypassed British-imposed trade embargo. But Hitler had other ideas.

Stunning.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German%E2% ... _agreement

Yes, you're right. Stalin could have picked up Iraq and Iran, and driven the Brits from India. For the Dardanelles (Turkey), a historic Russian obsession, Bulgaria could have stayed non-Commie, and joined the Axis as well.

Germans would have driven the Brits from the Mediterranean, prevented any invasion of the Continent, and fought an air and naval war with US/UK, had plenty of fuel and raw materials, and eventually "won" in the sense of making the US/UK side give up.

Most scenarios for German victory are "long shots" compared to this.

There must have been a good reason why the Nazis and Allies didn't form an alliance. I didn't know that Stalin was considering joining the Axis powers. Why didn't he?

I also don't get why the Soviets invaded Eastern Europe. Didn't they have enough land already since Russia is the largest country in the world?

There are new revisionists now that say that Hitler invaded Russia as a preemptive strike because he received intelligence reports that Stalin was moving to invade Germany. Is that true? The argument is that the Nazi armies encircled the Soviet armies so easily in the first year of the invasion, which means that the Soviet armies were on the offensive, not defensive. Does that hold water?

Also, why was Winston Churchill so adamant on going to war with Germany? Hitler tried desperately to make a peace pact with Britain, because he wanted to invade Russia and didn't want a two front war. So why was Churchill so stubbornly against it?

I hate how Britain is portrayed as an innocent victim in American movies about WWII, when in fact they wanted the war and refused to make peace with Germany. So in a sense, all the London bombings and British troops that died were Churchill's fault. Yet Hollywood refuses to acknowledge this, even though historians do. I wish Hollywood would learn to be honest for once.

Winston you need to get it through your head that the political bodies are there to take the heat and deflect all attention away from the hidden creditor with unlimited credit money who is writing the false history you are being spoon fed and is sitting on all the treaties of the conquered and terms of these treaties going back like over the last few centuries are not privy to the eyes of their conquered subjects. SOCIALISM!

[Winston]

You can download Mein Kampf at these links below in PDF format, which contain both volume 1 and 2.

http://mk.christogenea.org/references/m ... df-version

http://downloadmeinkampf.com/

The Ford version is supposed to be the most accurate and unbiased translation though, but it's not free.

http://www.hitler-library.org/mein-kamp ... lation.htm

Or you can listen to an audio version of it on YouTube:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=P ... A6420D9E77

A secret second book written by Hitler that was unpublished was discovered in 1958 but was not made available to the public until 1961. It goes into his war plans and strategies and racial theories. Here is info about it:





News reports about it:

http://www.theguardian.com/books/2003/jul/01/news

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/book ... -book.html

I think you can download it here:

https://archive.org/details/ZweitesBuch ... SecretBook

http://www.resist.com/Onlinebooks/ZweitesBuch.pdf

[GoingAwol]

Winston,
I understand that you hate America. Heck, there are lots of reasons to criticize America. But don't deny the truth. America was the deciding force in WW2. We had the best military force and were supplying our allies with supplies. Even before we entered the war we were risking American lives by sending supplies to Britain and Russia to help in their war efforts. Heck, we also provided volunteer fighter pilots for Britain during the Battle of Britain when they were desperately needed. Had we not been supplying supplies and aid to these countries they would have probably fallen before we even entered the war. When the U.S officially entered the war was when the tide changed, that is just a fact. And within a year of us invading Continental Europe the war ended. If you want to talk about Soviet Russia let's talk about the fact that they wouldn't help us when we were helping them. They refused to let America launch air raids on Japan from Russia despite the fact that we were saving their ass by sending them supplies and the fact that Japan was their enemy too. If they had cooperated we could have bombed Japan into submission and saved tons of American lives in the process. And this would have also helped end the pacific war sooner and would have allowed the u.s to put all of its military might against Germany and that would have helped end the war in Europe sooner as well. If anything Russia was a deadweight in the war effort. They just had numbers and were able to defeat the Nazis through a drawn out war of attrition.