Was Hitler actually the good guy? Is he wrongly demonized/vilified?

If you're a history buff, love to talk about history and watch the History Channel, this is the board for that.
Jester
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 7870
Joined: January 20th, 2009, 1:10 am
Location: Chiang Mai Thailand

Post by Jester »

Winston wrote:Check out this new radical film odbo told me about that presents Hitler's side of the story, which we were never told. Up til now, we've only heard one side of the story. How fair is that?
Ignored this thread before (I think) because (even though I don't believe the HoloHoax horsehit) I am not that interested in whether Hitler was a good guy or a militaristic hothead.

But now I've stumbled on this, riveted by it. Stunning, truthful.

Here it is:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vfdZtpx ... hsgbxg6lIQ
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vfdZtpx ... hsgbxg6lIQ[/youtube]
OutWest
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2429
Joined: March 19th, 2011, 12:09 am
Location: Asia/USA

Post by OutWest »

fschmidt wrote:How many threads on Hitler do you have, Winston? Why not just a create a new subforum called "The Hitler Fan Club"?

Of course you didn't respond to my post in your other recent Hitler thread, but for future reference, it's here:

viewtopic.php?p=168662#168662
If one suspends for a moment, any thought of the Jews, just the tens of thousands of Germans murdered by this man because they did not agree with him would kind of do it for
most rational folks. If every single account of the death of Jews was 100% false...the vast millions remain...Poles...Russians...handicapped...Gypsies...the all have their accounts of mass murder of their own...of course...all of these groups just made it all up and concocted a history for the events...
fschmidt
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 3470
Joined: May 18th, 2008, 1:16 am
Location: El Paso, TX
Contact:

Post by fschmidt »

Cornfed wrote:Would there have been a way to bring about positive outcomes in the circumstances without killing anyone?
Of course. Hitler's initial goal was to create one German homeland large enough to allow for the German diaspora. His original plan was to occupy land to the east including Poland and part of Russia (Ukraine actually). The problem with his initial plan is the same as the problem Israel has today, namely that one can't maintain second class citizens within one's borders in any sensible way. Hitler's plan for the slavs was basically the same as Israel's for the Palestinians. And of course the solution is obvious, just throw these people out. Hitler could have expanded Germany and thrown out all non-Germans with very few casualties. Israel could do the same today with the Palestinians. But since Nazism and Judaism are very similar ideologies, they both made / are making the same kind of mistakes.
Moretorque
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 6275
Joined: April 28th, 2013, 7:00 am

Post by Moretorque »

fschmidt wrote:
Cornfed wrote:Would there have been a way to bring about positive outcomes in the circumstances without killing anyone?
Of course. Hitler's initial goal was to create one German homeland large enough to allow for the German diaspora. His original plan was to occupy land to the east including Poland and part of Russia (Ukraine actually). The problem with his initial plan is the same as the problem Israel has today, namely that one can't maintain second class citizens within one's borders in any sensible way. Hitler's plan for the slavs was basically the same as Israel's for the Palestinians. And of course the solution is obvious, just throw these people out. Hitler could have expanded Germany and thrown out all non-Germans with very few casualties. Israel could do the same today with the Palestinians. But since Nazism and Judaism are very similar ideologies, they both made / are making the same kind of mistakes.


From what I am lead to believe they look the same because they were created by the same people? Eustace Mullins does a interview in New Orleans in 2005 and it was very telling. :shock:
Time to Hide!
User avatar
Winston
Site Admin
Posts: 37670
Joined: August 18th, 2007, 6:16 am
Contact:

Re: Has Hitler been overly demonized beyond what he deserves

Post by Winston »

New documentary about an 11 minute rare genuine recording of Hitler's private dialog with the leader of Finland, Mannerheim. It was recorded in a train where he was trying to sweet talk Mannerheim into helping the Nazis fight against Russia. Hitler did not know he was being recorded at the time.

Many people are surprised by this recording because Hitler sounds charming, relaxed and soft-spoken in it, not like the raving mad man that the US media depicts in his public speeches. Hitler explains in this recording that he didn't want war with the Soviet Union but felt he had to because the Soviets may take the oil fields of Romania and ruin the Nazi war machine. He explained why he went to war with Russia and sounded very calm and rational about it.



Here is the full recording with subtitles.

Check out my FUN video clips in Russia and SE Asia and Female Encounters of the Foreign Kind video series and Full Russia Trip Videos!

Join my Dating Site to meet thousands of legit foreign girls at low cost!

"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne
User avatar
Winston
Site Admin
Posts: 37670
Joined: August 18th, 2007, 6:16 am
Contact:

Re: Has Hitler been overly demonized beyond what he deserves

Post by Winston »

In the YouTube comments of the secret rare Hitler recording, someone made this interesting analysis of WWII strategy that makes sense:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8raDPASvq0

"Peter Macmillan 7 months ago
+Jim Summers
Hi Jim,

I appreciate your knowledge of this topic, even if I disagree with you about some things. You might find Roger Moorhouse's new book "The Devil's Alliance" interesting. it came out this month, and it examines some of the issues we've been arguing about. He's an academic historian, but he writes without jargon, and cites his sources clearly, so you can decide for yourself whether you agree with his conclusions.

He challenges the received wisdom about when Hitler first decided to attack Russia, and points out the attempts that Hitler made to entice the USSR into war with Britain or China, and his desire to negotiate the USSR out of trying to influence Eastern Europe. When that failed, Hitler opted for war for primarily strategic reasons, rather than ideological ones. He was better prepared for war than the USSR, which was busy playing catchup in the development of weapons and tactics.

While Molotov was in Berlin in November 1940, there was a Soviet military conference near Moscow. The survivors of Stalin's purges were trying to rebuild the Red Army and to renew the development of offensive doctrine, capabilities, and weapons without getting in trouble with the NKVD. They were years away from attacking East.I don't think the invasion of the U.S.S.R. was a justifiable preemptive strike. It was an opportunistic grab for territory, resources, and power. Many countries (the Confederacy in 1861, Japan in 1941, Israel in 1973, and the United States in 2003) have claimed that they attacked an enemy that was about to attack them. All of those claims are subject to debate. I think the German claim is an outright lie.

I think we agree about Stalin's ultimate desire to conquer Western Europe. We disagree about whether he had a plan for doing so. I don't think so, and I don't think Stalin wanted to provoke a war in 1941. German had already defeated France, Britain was in serious trouble, and the Red Army was not strong enough to take on the Wehrmacht. If Hitler hadn't decided to declare war on the United States, if he had treated the Ukrainians and others better, if he had taken the advice of his generals in the spring of 1942, if Goering hadn't mismanaged the Luftwaffe, if the Japanese hadn't pulled their troops from the Soviet border in time for the Soviets to transfer armies from the East to defend Moscow, if, if, if, the USSR would have been defeated. Despite these mistakes, Stalin barely survived.

If Germany had prevailed, U.S.-German Cold War would have been as bad (or worse) than the U.S.-U.S.S.R. one. The treatment of ordinary people would have been as bad (or worse) in a German-controlled Europe as it was in the Warsaw Pact. The Jews were mistreated in the U.S.S.R., but not exterminated as they were in Nazi occupied Europe.

Hitler and Stalin were both evil. The Left in the United States has minimized the evils of communism and Stalin, and the Right in the United States has minimized the evils of fascism and of Hitler. Both tend to ignore the civilians killed by Allied bombing, our complicity in the Holocaust, and other uncomfortable truths about World War Two.

I think that's my last word on the subject for awhile. It's been a pleasure reading and responding to your posts. I read what you wrote with interest, and I might revisit "Icebreaker" and "Chief Culprit" at some point. I hope you'll keep an open mind as you continue your own reading and research.

Peter"
Check out my FUN video clips in Russia and SE Asia and Female Encounters of the Foreign Kind video series and Full Russia Trip Videos!

Join my Dating Site to meet thousands of legit foreign girls at low cost!

"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne
User avatar
starchild5
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2165
Joined: December 20th, 2013, 2:32 am

Re: Has Hitler been overly demonized beyond what he deserves

Post by starchild5 »

Don't waste your time on Hitler propaganda....They will keep this news alive as long as Darwin's fake evolution theory stands up....

I thought we are way past this cycle of Psy-Ops.....For some years, they will make a person...good and then bad and then reverse...all B**lS**t upon more b**ls**t

Common guys....These people are not HUMANS....They are messing with your mind....They are so smart...They win on both sides of the equation....Even if Hitler was good, they will win..Like Christ and will create a religion around it...


What is the difference between Hitler and Christ...NONE...They were both created to screw humanity
....Fake LIGHT VS DARK Psy-op..F***CK the Psy-ops really....

--------------------

The war was not about Hitler...It was about YOU...YOU YOU YOU YOU....Humanity....getting raped and f***cked....and murdered brutally....

...There is a conspiracy with in a conspiracy....They want to keep the memories of Hitler alive so that Jewish fake holohoax could get some ground...

Please delete Hitler good or bad from humanity and see how Jew's themselves will cry wolf....They themselves want Hitler name to be alive for ever
User avatar
starchild5
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2165
Joined: December 20th, 2013, 2:32 am

Re: Has Hitler been overly demonized beyond what he deserves

Post by starchild5 »

Can't believe the story on this actor has over 130 posts already....WAKE THE F UP....What is wrong with you people...

What the F are you doing all day and night in your first world countries.... :lol: :lol: ....Its soo obvious... :P :P .....This whole story is to keep his name alive...else...The jew's wouldn't be able to score on holohoax...

They don't want your Kids to ask...HITLER ...WHO?
User avatar
Mr S
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2409
Joined: September 1st, 2007, 3:57 am
Location: Physical Earth, 3rd Dimensional Plane

Hellstorm - Exposing the real genocide of Nazi Germany

Post by Mr S »

Hellstorm - Exposing the real genocide of Nazi Germany

http://www.hellstormdocumentary.com/

"The object of life is not to be on the side of the majority but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." Marcus Aurelius, Roman Emperor and stoic philosopher, 121-180 A.D.
User avatar
Winston
Site Admin
Posts: 37670
Joined: August 18th, 2007, 6:16 am
Contact:

Re: Has Hitler been overly demonized beyond what he deserves

Post by Winston »

Check out this book that presents a fair and balanced evaluation and portrayal of Hitler. It goes deep into his good traits and bad traits, and paints a more realistic, complex image of Hitler rather than the cartoonish villain portrait that Western media paints.



Hitler: Beyond Evil and Tyranny

This fascinating and richly detailed new biography of Hitler reinterprets the known facts about the Nazi Fuehrer to construct a convincing, realistic portrait of the man. In place of the hollow shell others have made into an icon of evil, the author sees a complex, nuanced personality. Without in any way glorifying its subject, this unique revision of the historical Hitler brings us closer to understanding a pivotal personality of the twentieth century.

Here's a great review of it:

http://www.amazon.com/review/R24N5M1DY4XIKY/

"127 of 145 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars A much needed corrective history, November 7, 2011
By BMSMEAR
This review is from: Hitler: Beyond Evil and Tyranny (Hardcover)

Prof. Stolfi has written a much needed corrective interpretive
history of Adolf Hitler - a history free of the socially mandated operating
assumption and pre-conceived conclusion of Hitler as fundamentally evil;
that 'evil' is the appropriate and only filter with which to interpret all of Hitler's
actions, values and aspirations. This typical approach inevitable leads to
authorial moralizing complete with an endless string of
condemning adjectives re: Hitler, i.e. psycho, barbaric, evil, crazy, insane,
egomaniacal. This is not only tiresome, but un-enlightening,
un-academic, and useless in reaching meaningful conclusions about Hitler
and his motivations. Hitler winds up as a buffoonish cartoon rather than a complex human
being with sincere motives.

Prof. Stolfi courageously uses a more realistic approach to his subject,
applying a new filter to interpret Hitler and reaching conclusions that immediately
strike the reader as realistic and more accurate than the pre-packaged
condemnations of previous authors. The end result is a broader portrait of a
three-dimensional human, rather than a cartoonish figure.

Prof. Stolfi and Prometheus publishers are owed a great debt of gratitude
for this book: serious social sanctions are typically applied to Hitler biographers
who use any interpretive filter other than 'Hitler as evil': sanctions including
boycott, ad hominum attack, accusations of prejudice, pressure to terminate employment,
etc. In taking the risk, they've provided the public with the rarist commodity - real
history rather than dogmatic ideology masquerading as history."

In the comments section, some great points were made about Hitler's great accomplishments and innovations in the area of economic recovery that the world should learn from:

"BaylessKtol says:
from My new order, by Adolf Hitler, edited w/ commentary by Raoul de Roussy de Sales. This comment by de Sales is on p. 133:

"It was always one of Hitler's greatest boasts that of all civilized countries Germany had been the only one to find a cure for this world evil, unemployment. . . .Unemployment was cured, according to him, as soon as the concept that the wealth of a country was not its gold nor its capital, but its powers of production and its labor, was accepted. Germany having no gold and being, in fact, financially bankrupt, the problem had to be solved by unorthodox methods. And there is no disputing the fact that the system evolved by the German economists and financiers under the pressure of necessity did succeed in producing an apparent recovery which baffled the world. In a very short time after Hitler's advent to power, not only was unemployment wiped out, but a shortage of labor began to appear. The problem of capital was also solved by the simple process of a disguised, but nonetheless real, centralization of control in the hands of the government. Employers and industrialists became, in fact, mere managers, operating under the direction of the State."
=====

That last sentence -- that Hitler & the NSDAP government took over management of Germany's financial and economic affairs from "employers and industrialists" -- a great majority of whom were Jewish and also Anglo -- may have been the event that precipitated Louis Brandeis's declaration to Rabbi Stephen Wise, "within a fortnight of der Fuhrer's rise to power" [on Jan. 30, 1933] that "All Jews must leave Germany." [see p. 78, 1984 ed. of Edwin Black's The Transfer Agreement--25th Anniversary Edition: The Dramatic Story of the Pact Between the Third Reich and Jewish Palestine ]Brandeis may have interpreted the signals correctly: no longer would Germany be the piggy bank for exploitation by American & Jewish bankers."

Another commentator presented some shocking facts about the alleged Holocaust extermination of the Jews.

"Bulldog says:
Wow, the comments in this thread make me want to bang my head against a wall.

1) If you look at modern historical books you would come to the conclusion that everyone who died in the camps were Jews (they weren't) and that Hitler personally killed them all.

2) Look up the voyage of the damned. They made a movie about it for those of you who are confused by big words. Basically the Nazi's shipped off a boatload of Jews and no other country would take them. In the words of the Canadian government (Mr. Nice guys) "why should we have to deal with Germany's Jew problem." If antisemitism wasn't rampant, the Nazi's couldn't have rounded them up.

3) Don't you think we should learn from history? Instead of demonizing the man and basically making it out like he's Satan incarnate, why not take a step back and look at how this man developed, how he (and the Nazi party) came to power, how they went from being democratically elected to being a totalitarian government. Good things came out of the Nazi years as well, before the Nazi's inflation was so out of control that employees wanted to be paid in bread because money was basically worthless. Hitler brought prosperity, the autobahn and the Volkswagen. Maybe by actually learning the whole story, we can prevent something like this from happening again, the way the US economy is going, it would be quite easy for another Hitler to move in, blame the Arabs, and away we'd go again."

This commentator explains what made Hitler great and why the Holocaust was not premeditated:

"Nichidoku says:
Firstly, mind you one point: A world historical figure means someone having rendered huge impact on world history, regardless of one's political nature i.e. being either a good saint or a bad evil. Thus whatever Hitler's conviction, he is indisputably a world historic figure, and a super-sized one. It seems you have pathetically failed to understand the definition of a basic term of common sense. Pity on you.

Secondly, I would like to state my opinion on Hitler. I believe he is one of the greatest statesmen and the most brilliant strategist on throughout the human history, as well as a remarkable artist, a self-educated intellectual and great book reader. He is both intelligent and diligent and lives a simple and plain private life. He has a genuine and irrepressible desire to love and help his fellow German people, reclaim the honor, revive the vitality and restore the power and prestige of his beloved German nation which is nothing wrong as any capable and ambitious national leader, and for such good intentions and lofty aims he has committed himself fully and selflessly, has done a lot of things concretely and has made substantial achievements politically, economically and socially which are truthful and undeniable facts.

Hitler's only material fault is to order the elimination of many Jews in Europe. But there are several clarifying points that needs to be brought into perspective for a fair, in-depth and comprehensive understanding of this seemingly inexcusable matter:

1. the number of 6 million is grossly inflated.
2. Jews as a collective elitist body on the world stage did do lots of bad things to the native societies where they inhabit as evidenced by their ruthless and relentless effort of controlling, monopolizing and manipulating political and economic, and cultural life of many European countries and US, both in that age and at today, with ulterior motives and dirty means which naturally invite legitimate opposition and protest from the native peoples.
3. The Holocaust is not really a premeditated agenda. Hitler, for all his animus toward the Jewish, didn't intend to physically exterminate Jews in the first place. In fact he initially cooperated with Zionist movement to encourage and help Jews in Germany to relocate in their cradle place the Midddle East. Only when the war time situation escalated and deteriorated, Hitler lost his patience and rationality and started to order to wipe out many Jews in that regard as a "final solution"."

Some more interesting revelations:

"VMeister says:
Mr. King - Might I add that FDR was also enamorate with Hitler. Both leaders were amazed (and jealous) at Germany's recovery from the depression under Hitler's stewardship. Both Churchill and FDR's aggressiveness against Germany in later half of 1930's was attributed to a certain degree by bankers, however it was largely due to pressure by jewish interest groups. Nice example of this, as reported by an outsider: google "jerzy potocki jews."
Churchill's connection with jews extend back in his family's history. I suspect, some of Churchill's positions within the British govt might have been promoted by them - including Chancellor of the Exchequer, a post that hardly fits Winston's background. His love of jews and Zionism are best represented by letters to Zionist leader Theodr Herzl during and after war (Churchill did win, post war, Herzl Award). Another aspect that is not usually highlighted is that aristocratic Churchill/FDR resented the success of the "non-establishment" leader of Germany.
On the side, to get an accurate flavor or zeitgeist of the period, read Henry Ford's book "International Jew." This is an excellent and rather unbiased book that is both well written and researched. It is an eye opener - very relevant to today. Google "International Jew Study Hour" to hear a reading/commentary of this book.
Ah, the "footnotes" of history carry the truth."
Check out my FUN video clips in Russia and SE Asia and Female Encounters of the Foreign Kind video series and Full Russia Trip Videos!

Join my Dating Site to meet thousands of legit foreign girls at low cost!

"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne
User avatar
Winston
Site Admin
Posts: 37670
Joined: August 18th, 2007, 6:16 am
Contact:

Re: Has Hitler been overly demonized beyond what he deserves

Post by Winston »

Momopi,
Can you shed light on this? I'm confused about something. The Neo-Nazi documentaries claim that during The Battle of Britain, Churchill was the one who first bombed civilian cities in Germany, which resulted in Hitler bombing London rather than just military targets. But American documentaries such as "Why We Fight" (produced by Frank Capra and the US Army) claim the reverse: That Hitler was the one who first started bombing London, which resulted in Churchill retaliating and bombing German civilian cities. What's the truth on this matter?

Also, why didn't the Allies declare war on Russia for invading Poland too? And why did the Allies let Stalin capture Eastern Europe after WWII? Why didn't they fight to liberate Eastern Europe from Stalin too?
Check out my FUN video clips in Russia and SE Asia and Female Encounters of the Foreign Kind video series and Full Russia Trip Videos!

Join my Dating Site to meet thousands of legit foreign girls at low cost!

"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne
droid
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 3127
Joined: September 19th, 2013, 11:38 pm

Re: Has Hitler been overly demonized beyond what he deserves

Post by droid »

. .Unemployment was cured, according to him, as soon as the concept that the wealth of a country was not its gold nor its capital, but its powers of production and its labor, was accepted.
Please see
https://archive.org/stream/GottfriedFed ... 9_djvu.txt


"g. Social-Democracy is doomed because it is based on Marxist ideology, which does not recognize the radical difference between industrial capital and loan-capital. Social- Democratic government, as a moderate application of Marxism that fails, paves the way for Communism"
1)Too much of one thing defeats the purpose.
2)Everybody is full of it. What's your hypocrisy?
User avatar
Winston
Site Admin
Posts: 37670
Joined: August 18th, 2007, 6:16 am
Contact:

Re: Has Hitler been overly demonized beyond what he deserves

Post by Winston »

Btw regarding that long documentary that Mr S posted, "Adolf Hitler: The Greatest Story Never Told", I found a lot of inaccuracies, biases and false assumptions in it. So I posted this review of it on its IMDB page:

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3526810/

"I watched about 80 percent of this long documentary series on YouTube before it was taken down. It was very interesting to hear the other side. But it's way too one-sided and biased and tries to portray Hitler as a saint who never did anything wrong. Yeah right. It also ignores a lot of important facts and distorts events too. That means it's definitely NOT an objective or unbiased search for the truth.

First, it assumes that Hitler was 100 percent honest and never lied. There is no basis for that assumption. It seems to have a personal bias and agenda to portray him as an innocent saint. It assumes that any excuse Hitler made to invade a country must be completely true and honest. For example, Hitler claimed that the German population at Danzig in Poland were being persecuted, as his excuse to invade Poland. All warmongers make excuses to invade or attack, but that doesn't make them true. Hitler could have used shills or agents to stir up trouble in Danzig, as US historians claim, to try to make Poland look like an oppressor.

Hitler also broke many peace treaties and invaded many nations in Europe which were neutral and never declared war on Germany - such as Belgium, Holland, Poland, Greece, etc. - without provocation. Yet this is all ignored and not justified or explained away. So how could Hitler be the innocent victim then, as this film portrays, when he was clearly the aggressor and invaded neutral nations? Am I missing something?

And if Hitler was so honest, then why did he break many promises to never invade those countries and violate many peace treaties he made, including the one with Stalin? Again, am I missing something?

Hitler did claim that the reason he invaded Russia was because they were going to invade him too. No one disputes that. But that's merely Hitler's claim and excuse to invade. There is no proof that it was true. Dennis Wise merely assumes that everything Hitler said must be automatically true by default. That's an unwarranted assumption. Many invading nations have used the "preemptive strike" excuse (including the US invasion of Iraq) but it doesn't make it true. Yet this documentary takes Hitler's words as fact and gospel truth without basis.

The maker of this documentary, Dennis Wise, obviously lacks any critical thinking skills and has an obvious bias and agenda. He is not a neutral objective truth seeker at all.

Moreover, this documentary is not professionally produced at all. It consists of old vintage stock footage from WWII and lots of scrolling text running on the screen without any professional narration (except those used in clips from other documentaries), only background music. Anyone could use a free program like Windows Movie Maker to create such a documentary. It involves no cost, only time. Furthermore, much of the scrolling text contains assertions and quotes that are not sourced or documented, so their authenticity is suspect. When it comes to text scrolling on the screen, anyone can write anything, it doesn't have to be accurate or sourced. So the credibility of this documentary is highly suspect.

That being said, I agree that it is also unfair and biased for Western media and history to portray Hitler as a cartoon villain or mythological devil rather than a complex historical figure. So I do agree that Western historians and media are too biased against Hitler and that we need to have an understanding of Hitler's side, including his reasons and motives and whether he was right about some things. Merely demonizing him does not help the world understand him at all.

However, that doesn't mean that we should adopt the extreme opposite view that Hitler was a saint who did no wrong, as Dennis Wise has. Neither extreme is accurate. This long documentary by Dennis Wise is way too one-sided and tries to portray Hitler as an innocent victim and refuses to acknowledge any of his wrongdoings or faults. So it is not fair or neutral at all. Still, I'll give it 5 stars though, for presenting a lot of data from Hitler's side that most people don't know, so it is somewhat informative at least, even if it's too biased in the other direction.

For a more balanced and fair assessment of Hitler, and of his good traits and bad traits, and his complex motivations and character, I suggest you read the book, "Hitler: Beyond Evil and Tyranny" by Professor Stolfi which you can find on Amazon.com."

What's funny is that almost all the reviews on IMDB rate it one star, but the front page lists its rating as 8 stars. How can that be?

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3526810/reviews?ref_=tt_urv

You can see the whole documentary, all 27 parts, on this site that hosts it:

http://thegreateststorynevertold.tv/

It's still up on YouTube at the link below. But it keeps getting taken down and re-uploaded, so if it gets taken down again, just go to the link above.

"Adolf Hitler - The Greatest Story NEVER Told" Parts 1-27
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vnu5uW9No8g
Check out my FUN video clips in Russia and SE Asia and Female Encounters of the Foreign Kind video series and Full Russia Trip Videos!

Join my Dating Site to meet thousands of legit foreign girls at low cost!

"It takes far less effort to find and move to the society that has what you want than it does to try to reconstruct an existing society to match your standards." - Harry Browne
droid
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 3127
Joined: September 19th, 2013, 11:38 pm

Re:

Post by droid »

OutWest wrote: If one suspends for a moment, any thought of the Jews, just the tens of thousands of Germans murdered by this man because they did not agree with him would kind of do it for
most rational folks. If every single account of the death of Jews was 100% false...the vast millions remain...Poles...Russians...handicapped...Gypsies...the all have their accounts of mass murder of their own...of course...all of these groups just made it all up and concocted a history for the events...
But you can't, that's like suspending thoughts on "force" when dealing with newtonian physics.
1)Too much of one thing defeats the purpose.
2)Everybody is full of it. What's your hypocrisy?
momopi
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 4898
Joined: August 31st, 2007, 9:44 pm
Location: Orange County, California

Re: Has Hitler been overly demonized beyond what he deserves

Post by momopi »

Winston wrote:Momopi,
Can you shed light on this? I'm confused about something. The Neo-Nazi documentaries claim that during The Battle of Britain, Churchill was the one who first bombed civilian cities in Germany, which resulted in Hitler bombing London rather than just military targets. But American documentaries such as "Why We Fight" (produced by Frank Capra and the US Army) claim the reverse: That Hitler was the one who first started bombing London, which resulted in Churchill retaliating and bombing German civilian cities. What's the truth on this matter?
Also, why didn't the Allies declare war on Russia for invading Poland too? And why did the Allies let Stalin capture Eastern Europe after WWII? Why didn't they fight to liberate Eastern Europe from Stalin too?

1. The reality in early WW2 era is that bombers were very inaccurate. In 1941 the RAF reported statistically, only 22% of RAF bombers found its way within 5 miles to target, and when the target is heavily defended by AA guns, the rate drops to 7%. So if you sent 100 bombers and only 22 hit within 5 mile radius, where the did the other 78 drop their payload?

2. Even before the end of WW2 the so called "allies", which included the USSR, were busy planning to divvy up the spoils of war. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percentages_agreement

The fate of millions of people in Eastern Europe being drafted on a napkin between Churchill and Stalin. Such is the fate of being shrimp countries.

Image

Image

3. None of this crap really matters today. Instead of wasting time talking about dead & buried people, you should be planning your next trip to chase pretty young girls that are actually breathing.
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “History”