Why do people actually go to southeast Asia?

[WilliamSmith]

Its funny how douchebro alpha males just can't contain their frustration at the fact that Asian women refuse to go along with douchebro alpha male supremacism.

@Outcast9428
Hey, I wish you happiness as always (and think you're right on about Asian women being ideal for you), but you're completely delusional about how Asian women "refuse to go along with douchebro alpha male supremacism," since they're the most horrendously infamously easy lays for doofus geeky white beta males in the world. (In many countries, notably Japan, they're also super-easy for black American and Jamaican guys, LOL.)

Not sure why you said @Kalinago was anything like this so-called "douchebro alpha male supremacism" though, I thought he'd always been talking about how he just wants to find a nice traditional girl with good values??

[WilliamSmith]

Africa? It's a big place. Depends on where. I heard that Africa has the lowest IQ in the world at 70, lower than the Philippines' average IQ of 86. How can African women be smarter or classier?

@Winston
This biologic IQ topic is a whole fascinating "can of worms" to open some other time:
Personally I don't think those IQ scores mean !@#$ (but don't take that the wrong way: I'm not giving the politically correct jew-bullshit / SJW /Boasian Egalitarianism "everyone is the same" fraud answers satanic jews try to push on the world to promote race-mixing, so they can try to exploitatively divide and conquer everyone, I just literally don't think IQ scores are actually measuring much other than how well-trained you are in problem-solving exercises that they test for).

Reason I think so:
I once took one of those tests and scored not that far over on the right end of the distribution, because I couldn't do the math problems worth !@#$% at the time.
However, later I studied math, stats, and tons of other quantitative stuff and took the same test again, and scored well above the so-called "genius" level of IQ, which I also say is BS.
My point: I know damn well I'm neither a total imbecile or a "genius," LOL, and I know who I am and always have been, and I wasn't a biologic imbecile (ie.. slightly above the "American" national average) before, and I'm not above any "genius" level now, so the only thing that pole-vaulted me several standard deviations above my original score was that I'd been doing way more quantitative problem-solving exercises, despite my massive brain-inflammation from moving to a college town getting a raging hard-on over every decent-looking girl with a big butt who crossed my path....

So my opinion is that the IQ scores don't mean !@#$ unless you've brought all the test subjects up in a fairly homogeneous educational environment to start with.

If I'm wrong: If IQ scores supposedly test innate biologic intelligence in a meaningful way, why was I at once point tested only slightly above the American average (in other words, practically an imbecile), vs supposedly being well above the allged "genius" level less than 2-3 years later when I'd been doing lots of quantitative exercises?

Interesting discussion to continue some other time... there's probably other thread on this forum already about this?

Any oldtime members know which threads already delved into this subject?
@Cornfed
@gsjackson
@Winston
??
Enjoy free speech while it lasts my discontented friends, LOL.