If you marry a woman, make sure she has a strong maternal instinct

[pitbull]

I never to my knowledge personally insulted you or your life choices, let alone your relatives, so where is this nasty-ness coming from?

This isn't the first time you've started a thread declaring that all "manly men" (or whatever term you currently use to describe men whose behavior you approve of) want to have as many children as possible with women as young as possible and anyone who thinks or acts differently is a pitiful weakling faggot, or something along those lines.

Stupid was a bit harsh, I admit, though please don't think I'm apologizing. Simple-minded would be a more accurate term to describe you. The fact that your wife married you for love rather than money proves beyond all doubt she is also simple-minded. As for the children, you're correct that I went too far assuming they will always be stupid/simple-minded, because they might rebel against your simple-minded ways when they get older.

Getting back to pets, the fact that they never grow up is an advantage. The parental urge is mostly directed towards infants. Once a human child is mostly able to manage on its own (6 years and up or so), they no longer really satisfy the parental urges, and once they become teenagers, they are a downright nuisance, as you will eventually discover. As adults, they may or may not be good friends, but they most certainly don't satisfy parental urges. You'll need young grandchildren for that. Meanwhile pets always satisfy those parental urges. If a pet misbehaves or becomes disabled, off they go to the gas chamber at the vet's office and you get a new one.

Yes, the Dutch are very simple-minded people

http://culturewhiz.org/trip-reports/bla ... its-people

Here's another great article


http://culturewhiz.org/trip-reports/dating-dutchman

[MarcosZeitola]

Stupid was a bit harsh, I admit, though please don't think I'm apologizing. Simple-minded would be a more accurate term to describe you. The fact that your wife married you for love rather than money proves beyond all doubt she is also simple-minded. As for the children, you're correct that I went too far assuming they will always be stupid/simple-minded, because they might rebel against your simple-minded ways when they get older.

I actually pity you for the sad way in which you view the world, if you are one of those people who does not believe in love and actually consider those who do 'simple minded'. I hope you enjoy your retirement and all that, for your sake, but I genuinely pity you if that's your outlook... basically any woman who isn't an immoral gold digger is 'simple-minded' if she marries any man with less than stellar finances?

Getting back to pets, the fact that they never grow up is an advantage. The parental urge is mostly directed towards infants. Once a human child is mostly able to manage on its own (6 years and up or so), they no longer really satisfy the parental urges, and once they become teenagers, they are a downright nuisance, as you will eventually discover. As adults, they may or may not be good friends, but they most certainly don't satisfy parental urges. You'll need young grandchildren for that. Meanwhile pets always satisfy those parental urges. If a pet misbehaves or becomes disabled, off they go to the gas chamber at the vet's office and you get a new one.

If that is your attitude towards having pets, it's a good thing you're not having any of those, either. Damn you're one heartless jaded motherf***er.

[Cornfed]

I actually pity you for the sad way in which you view the world

It is interesting that boomer culture would obviously result in complete human extinction within a few generations if universally practised and yet boomers genuinely can’t see why anyone would have any objection other than stupidity. Maybe the Jews etc. bringing about white genocide jfigure they are just literally giving their customers what they want.

[Shemp]

basically any woman who isn't an immoral gold digger is 'simple-minded' if she marries any man with less than stellar finances?

The proof your wife is simple-minded is because she chooses to spend her life with a simple-minded husband. If she were desperate, and put up with your simple mindedness to avoid starvation, that would be one thing, but to listen to you willingly? That tells me all I need about her.

[Cornfed]

basically any woman who isn't an immoral gold digger is 'simple-minded' if she marries any man with less than stellar finances?

The proof your wife is simple-minded is because she chooses to spend her life with a simple-minded husband. If she were desperate, and put up with your simple mindedness to avoid starvation, that would be one thing, but to listen to you willingly? That tells me all I need about her.

Who would she otherwise spend her life with? A boomer POS like you? Oh, but you wouldn't want to spend your life with her because you are taken care of by the system, much like feminists. f**k you.

[MarcosZeitola]

The proof your wife is simple-minded is because she chooses to spend her life with a simple-minded husband. If she were desperate, and put up with your simple mindedness to avoid starvation, that would be one thing, but to listen to you willingly? That tells me all I need about her.

You are just making a lot of assumptions, as always. It's easy to make assumptions online. You have no idea of the things we discuss. It's not politics, or my views on how a family should run or what I think of society... besides the regular, mundane subjects of every day life, we talk about culture, literature, travel plans, you name it. As it just so happens I spent most of the afternoon critiquing some of my wife's poetry. She's quite good.

Just because she is not sucking her superior's dick in a corporate job and coming home every night to an empty apartment filled with cats doesn't mean she is dim-witted. She is an intelligent and highly educated woman and the job I have pays for us and our three kids, and leaves enough for her to also enroll further classes, courses and pursue her creative goals.

She could have been an ummarried childless spinster with perhaps a slightly fuller wallet and you would consider her more successful and intelligent for it? I don't know how you measure success or happiness or what makes a person 'simple-minded' in your opinion, but I would say my wife's ability to think out of the box while at the same time adhering to certain traditional principles on families and households and how they ought to be run, does not qualify her for the status as 'dim-witted'. What you are doing is repeating the feminist mantra that any woman who isn't a green-haired pansexual childless degenerate is 'unfulfilled', and 'oppressed' by her man, and therefore stupid for allowing herself to be oppressed.

Who would she otherwise spend her life with? A boomer POS like you? Oh, but you wouldn't want to spend your life with her because you are taken care of by the system, much like feminists. f**k you.

The whole ideal of women pursuing careers and monetary success over marriage, motherhood and raising the next generation while engaging in various acts of degeneracy for the duration of their fertile years is something 'retiredfrank' seems to advocate for some reason. Funny how this is exactly the same narrative as feminism stands for.

[Shemp]

You're right, Marcos, I don't know your wife is simple minded, though I do know you are. Possibly your wife enjoys having a husband much less intelligent than her. Many good reasons for an intelligent spouse to choose a good looking simpleton as a mate. Just as many good reasons for an intelligent human to pick a cute looking but stupid animal as surrogate child, versus an intelligent real child.

[MarcosZeitola]

You're right, Marcos, I don't know your wife is simple minded, though I do know you are. Possibly your wife enjoys having a husband much less intelligent than her. Many good reasons for an intelligent spouse to choose a good looking simpleton as a mate. Just as many good reasons for an intelligent human to pick a cute looking but stupid animal as surrogate child, versus an intelligent real child.

So now you go after me for my looks, 'good looking simpleton', really? You're like a woman critising another man you've never met first for his intelligence, then his looks. When nothing I wrote in my post here was even negative against you personally, it was specifically about women who choose not to have children and why such women are flawed.

The urge to mother children is natural to a woman, perhaps less so to a man. I couldn't care less about what you do or do not do with your life, but it seems like you are feeling personally attacked by my post for some weird reason even though the title makes it very clear it's about women, not men. So what's the problem? You are feeling ridiculously offended on behalf of childless career women...

[Winston]

MarcosZeitola is a stupid sort of man, which is why he found happiness married to a stupid wife with stupid neighbors in a country known for stupidity. People with more intelligence would be miserable, absolutely miserable, living like Marcos, and we would also be miserable trying to have children in a developed country, given how screwed up things are in all developed countries nowadays. So pets is a good alternative, for those with unsatisfied parental urges. (Full disclosure: I don't have pets myself, mainly because I'm always traveling.)

Of course if all the intelligent people do like me and the single career women Marcos condemns, then the future will consist of nothing but stupid but fast breeding Africans and Filipinos and Filipino/European half breeds like Marcos children. So what? My purpose is my own happiness while I'm alive, not the future of society, and as noted, having children would have likely reduced rather than increased my happiness. I certainly don't care about my precious genes dying out. Though I'm happy someone else is having children to support me in my old age via social security.

@retiredfrank please don't insult Marcos' wife and children, especially with racist remarks like that. Thanks.

[MarcosZeitola]

@retiredfrank please don't insult Marcos' wife and children, especially with racist remarks like that. Thanks.

It's the realization of his own life's complete and utter futility and pointlessness hitting him, that's making him lash out like that. It's a common theme among aging childless folks who live empty lives of debauchery and hedonism. Especially when they don't even have any companionship or friendship beyond sugar babies and escorts paid to like them. Hell, ol' Frank claims he doesn't even "need friends or socializing", no wonder he is miserable. I'm not mad at how he always drags me into his posts, I will admit I was mildly annoyed at first but honestly at this point I just pity him.

[tom]

You should avoid SJW/feminist like the plague. The primary hack these ideologies employ is to hijack the maternal mother child relationship replacing it with some lunatic cause. It is why abortion is a far bigger issue with the SJWs and feminists whose core is primarily made up of single women, they need women to stay single.

The religous right claims abortion is murder but this is complete bullshit. It's not the real issue. The real issue is women are disobeying God's first primary commandment. God has tasked women with the production of the future, to be fruitful and multiply. God has given women the power to gossip, to rally and shame. Creating a positive mythos wich is divine law. The coercive totalitarian tool is called the Holy Spirit.

[Contrarian Expatriate]

The urge to mother children is natural to a woman....

No! Such an urge is natural to HEALTHY women only, and that is why it is increasingly absent in Western women, especially the white ones who treat their dogs like precious jewels and babies like nuisances.

[tom]

Women who do not heed God's word will have their genetic legacy erased for eternity



The truth is women are not concerned with nature but rather they are primarily concerned with manipulating men.

SJW/feminist find the victim narrative tremendously appealing as it lets them blame someone else, they do not have to take any personal responsibility, it lets them off the hook in a variety of ways. This has been very beneficial to them, so they will continue to employ grievance mongering tactics. If you give in to these tactics it will never end as they will never considered the debt discharged. Rather giving in is an admission of guilt which multiplies the variations of a grievance. The way to stop this is stop giving in.

[MrMan]

The best women out there are women who are caring, loving and nurturing towards children. To marry a woman who does not have these qualities is to waste your time because any woman who will go "awww!" when seeing a little dog walk by and not have the same reaction for an infant human, is a likely a self-centered and materialistic c**t you should not waste your time on.

If you are dating anyone be sure of her interests. If she is overly attached to pets, be it dogs, cats or whatever, NEXT her. Don't waste your time, this is not a good woman. She lives for her own pleasure and her own success, and will in you little more than a stepping stone to achieve her dreams. Know the warning signs and know what type of women to avoid, it'll save you a lot of shit down the line.

Right now the biggest bane of society world-wide is the rise of women who love their pets as much or more as they love their (hypothetical) children. In 2019, and mostly in the West, you now have couples splitting up and fighting over who gets custody of the f***ing cat... It's completely insane that the world has come to this, but if you wish to not be part of the problem, either stay single or avoid this type of woman like the plague, for your own sanity and for the good of society as a whole.

It bothers me to see people who care more about animals than they do about people. A woman who says 'aww' about a dog but doesn't care for babies would be like that. There are also women who are 'prochoice' but pro animal rights. How about some care and loyalty to our own species and our own children. How many cats look at puppies or baby rats and say, 'awwww?'

I am not much of an animal person. Hypothetically, I wouldn't mind a dog outside or a horse of course if I were set up in appropriate location with a stable, etc. But I don't want cats or dogs in my house leaving hair on my coach or in my kitchen. It's just my thing.

But if a girl loves animals, I don't think that's a sign that she doesn't like babies, too, if that's what you are getting at.

My wife is from Indonesia, and we had some expat friends we hung out with some in Jakarta when we were younger. A couple of the young ladies we hung out with back there were in their late 20's into their early 30's working there. They ended up not marrying....yet as far as I know. I saw one about a year ago in Jakarta after she'd gone back there and another I am Facebook friends with, and she was still single last year. They would have to be in their 40's now. One of those woman was rather attractive, maybe an 8, back in the late 1990's. I wouldn't say she was chubby, but just puffy enough to see that she could get fat when she got older, and she has.

One time she said in my wife's hearing that she didn't like kids. Later, my wife told me Indonesians think it is really bad to say you don't like kids. They think someone who says that is not a good person. Later, a group of us went to an orphanage and there was a little baby there. I held the baby for a while, who seemed to enjoy that. Someone probably adopted the baby before the orphanage owner got busted on charges for selling children, we read in the paper. I think that may be the context where the topic came up, but I asked her about the not liking kids thing, and she said she would like her own children, just not other people's.

I wonder if dislike of children was a factor in no man ever marrying her. If a man wants to have children and the girl he's dating says she doesn't like kids, what's the point in considering marriage with her?

[MrMan]

The best women out there are women who are caring, loving and nurturing towards children. To marry a woman who does not have these qualities is to waste your time because any woman who will go "awww!" when seeing a little dog walk by and not have the same reaction for an infant human, is a likely a self-centered and materialistic c**t you should not waste your time on.

If you are dating anyone be sure of her interests. If she is overly attached to pets, be it dogs, cats or whatever, NEXT her. Don't waste your time, this is not a good woman. She lives for her own pleasure and her own success, and will in you little more than a stepping stone to achieve her dreams. Know the warning signs and know what type of women to avoid, it'll save you a lot of shit down the line.

Right now the biggest bane of society world-wide is the rise of women who love their pets as much or more as they love their (hypothetical) children. In 2019, and mostly in the West, you now have couples splitting up and fighting over who gets custody of the f***ing cat... It's completely insane that the world has come to this, but if you wish to not be part of the problem, either stay single or avoid this type of woman like the plague, for your own sanity and for the good of society as a whole.

It bothers me to see people who care more about animals than they do about people. A woman who says 'aww' about a dog but doesn't care for babies would be like that. There are also women who are 'prochoice' but pro animal rights. How about some care and loyalty to our own species and our own children. How many cats look at puppies or baby rats and say, 'awwww?'

I am not much of an animal person. Hypothetically, I wouldn't mind a dog outside or a horse of course if I were set up in appropriate location with a stable, etc. But I don't want cats or dogs in my house leaving hair on my coach or in my kitchen. It's just my thing.

But if a girl loves animals, I don't think that's a sign that she doesn't like babies, too, if that's what you are getting at.

My wife is from Indonesia, and we had some expat friends we hung out with some in Jakarta when we were younger. A couple of the young ladies we hung out with back there were in their late 20's into their early 30's working there. They ended up not marrying....yet as far as I know. I saw one about a year ago in Jakarta after she'd gone back there and another I am Facebook friends with, and she was still single last year. They would have to be in their 40's now. One of those woman was rather attractive, maybe an 8, back in the late 1990's. I wouldn't say she was chubby, but just puffy enough to see that she could get fat when she got older, and she has.

One time she said in my wife's hearing that she didn't like kids. Later, my wife told me Indonesians think it is really bad to say you don't like kids. They think someone who says that is not a good person. Later, a group of us went to an orphanage and there was a little baby there. I held the baby for a while, who seemed to enjoy that. Someone probably adopted the baby before the orphanage owner got busted on charges for selling children, we read in the paper. I think that may be the context where the topic came up, but I asked her about the not liking kids thing, and she said she would like her own children, just not other people's.

I wonder if dislike of children was a factor in no man ever marrying her. If a man wants to have children and the girl he's dating says she doesn't like kids, what's the point in considering marriage with her?