Sexbots and virtual sex. Women becoming obsolete?

Discuss and talk about any general topic.
The_Adventurer
Experienced Poster
Posts: 1383
Joined: August 23rd, 2007, 9:17 am

Re: Sexbots and virtual sex. Women becoming obsolete?

Post by The_Adventurer »

drronnie wrote: I already seem some incels will be jumping in joy
They already got the suits going in Japan.

Image
“Booty is so strong that there are dudes willing to blow themselves up for the highly unlikely possibility of booty in another dimension." -- Joe Rogan


Meet Loads of Foreign Women in Person! Join Our Happier Abroad ROMANCE TOURS to Many Overseas Countries!

Meet Foreign Women Now! Post your FREE profile on Happier Abroad Personals and start receiving messages from gorgeous Foreign Women today!

JohnDoeBigBaller
Freshman Poster
Posts: 417
Joined: May 14th, 2016, 11:59 am

Re: Sexbots and virtual sex. Women becoming obsolete?

Post by JohnDoeBigBaller »

traveller wrote:p*** is very boring! All they ever do is physically abuse women in every one of those p**n videos. Every single video is just the same repetitive copypaste junk. First the hard, crushing grabbing of her breasts as if trying to pop them like balloons, pinching and biting and pulling her nipples as if trying to tear them off, the slapping, and then him, boom! boom! boom! boom! boom! boom! boom! boom! into her rear. There's like no gentle romance in p**n! It's nothing but that same boring abuse repeated from video to video, website to website, and category to category.
who the f**k wants gentle romance anymore, in real life or fake life either? Unless you can pound a girl's damn brains out, she will just leave you and go for someone else who CAN f**k her goddamn brains out!
Adama
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 6193
Joined: August 23rd, 2009, 2:37 pm

Re: Sexbots and virtual sex. Women becoming obsolete?

Post by Adama »

retiredfrank wrote:I wrote about this on S Parc RealDoll thread, but I'll elaborate here. Truly satisfying masturbation requires the man to imagine himself as the woman, while still remaining a man. That is, the man needs to f**k himself in his virtual v****a, using his own penis. The bottom of the virtual v****a is the bottom end of the penile shaft, buried deep in the body. By focusing the sexual energy at this point, it will rise up the backbone, and so be recirculated rather than lost.

The man might also need to loosen his anal region up, if he has an energy block there due to homophobia, since blocks at the anus will also affect the virtual v****a, but the man should NOT eroticize the anus excessively like homosexuals do, because that's another way to lose energy. A dildo is the normal way to loosen the anus. Loosening the anus (together with more fiber in the diet) will also help reduce hemorrhoids.

These sex dolls encourage focusing on the tip of the penis, so that energy is lost rather than recirculated.
So your advice is for men to insert dildos inside their own rectums? To enhance sexual pleasure? And this is good for your roids? Now I see why you wouldn't mind sharing a woman with two or three other men, and also why you'd be willing to pay for the privilege to share a woman three or four ways. Now I see why you don't like labels either. It must be a ton of fun to be a man and go bugger up with your own butt though right. Why not? If it feels good...
A good man is above pettiness. He is better than that.
Adama
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 6193
Joined: August 23rd, 2009, 2:37 pm

Re: Sexbots and virtual sex. Women becoming obsolete?

Post by Adama »

drronnie wrote:The way women are over pricing themselves I see men will be going more and more their own way and will use virtual sex or sexbot to let off their steam. Why would I want to waste time with an emotional burden when I can have it without the hassle? I would rather have a real woman too for intimacy but nowadays its almost impossible. I still think sexbots or real doll are kind of creepy but I think in 20 years it will be a normal thing.
I think it would only further free up women for those who are willing to engage with them. That is, along with the percentage of men who aren't interested in women primarily, if there are fools who retreat into their caves with their dolls, well that will increase the available pool of women.

But I don't think it will catch on, because at most it is just a fancy masturbation tool. Mongers still demand variety. And regular Joes still want that feeling of having conquered.
A good man is above pettiness. He is better than that.
User avatar
Shemp
Experienced Poster
Posts: 1644
Joined: November 22nd, 2014, 7:45 pm

Re: Sexbots and virtual sex. Women becoming obsolete?

Post by Shemp »

Adama wrote:
retiredfrank wrote:I wrote about this on S Parc RealDoll thread, but I'll elaborate here. Truly satisfying masturbation requires the man to imagine himself as the woman, while still remaining a man. That is, the man needs to f**k himself in his virtual v****a, using his own penis. The bottom of the virtual v****a is the bottom end of the penile shaft, buried deep in the body. By focusing the sexual energy at this point, it will rise up the backbone, and so be recirculated rather than lost.

The man might also need to loosen his anal region up, if he has an energy block there due to homophobia, since blocks at the anus will also affect the virtual v****a, but the man should NOT eroticize the anus excessively like homosexuals do, because that's another way to lose energy. A dildo is the normal way to loosen the anus. Loosening the anus (together with more fiber in the diet) will also help reduce hemorrhoids.

These sex dolls encourage focusing on the tip of the penis, so that energy is lost rather than recirculated.
So your advice is for men to insert dildos inside their own rectums? To enhance sexual pleasure? And this is good for your roids? Now I see why you wouldn't mind sharing a woman with two or three other men, and also why you'd be willing to pay for the privilege to share a woman three or four ways. Now I see why you don't like labels either. It must be a ton of fun to be a man and go bugger up with your own butt though right. Why not? If it feels good...
There is nothing in my original post about getting pleasure from a dildo in the rectum, and in fact I specifically warn about not eroticizing the anus. Loosening the anus is about eliminating blockages that prevent energy flowing from penis to backbone. You're the one who gets excited about pleasure from dildos in the rectum and is worried about sharing a woman with other men, which is exactly what all the mongers on this forum do (including Winston, Ghost, and probably others).

Methinks you are having a gay panic attack Adama...
Ghost
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 5983
Joined: April 16th, 2011, 6:23 pm

Post by Ghost »

.
Last edited by Ghost on July 30th, 2019, 9:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
S_Parc
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2499
Joined: November 12th, 2010, 11:01 am

Re: Sexbots and virtual sex. Women becoming obsolete?

Post by S_Parc »

Ghost wrote:
retiredfrank wrote:You're the one who gets excited about pleasure from dildos in the rectum and is worried about sharing a woman with other men, which is exactly what all the mongers on this forum do (including Winston, Ghost, and probably others).
I have a problem with it when it comes to marriage. It's principle, like how I wouldn't pay full price for a used car.
As a happily married man, I don't recommend marriage for over 80% of the population.
Many years ago, the Best Picture of 1999, "American Beauty", telegraphed the message of Happier Abroad to the world.

Beware of long term engagements with AWs, you may find yourself in a coffin.

AB discussion thread

BTW, despite settling down with an AW, myself, the warning is still in effect.
User avatar
MarcosZeitola
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 4268
Joined: May 31st, 2014, 12:13 pm
Location: Europe

Re: Sexbots and virtual sex. Women becoming obsolete?

Post by MarcosZeitola »

S_Parc wrote:As a happily married man, I don't recommend marriage for over 80% of the population.
There's not enough American-women hating lesbians out there for all of us, S_Parc. You just got lucky. ;)
On "Faux-Tradionalists" and why they're heading nowhere: viewtopic.php?style=1&f=37&t=29144
S_Parc
Veteran Poster
Posts: 2499
Joined: November 12th, 2010, 11:01 am

Re: Sexbots and virtual sex. Women becoming obsolete?

Post by S_Parc »

MarcosZeitola wrote:
S_Parc wrote:As a happily married man, I don't recommend marriage for over 80% of the population.
There's not enough American-women hating lesbians out there for all of us, S_Parc. You just got lucky. ;)
If 80% can be happy with hoes and s*xbots, then the remaining 20% have a shot at marital happiness, given the fact that it'll no longer be mainstream but a larger than average sized sect of society and thus, it'll be taken more seriously by women in general (irrespective of culture), then just a ploy at controlling and manipulating men. This will effectively kick psycho women like my sister, out of the marriage market forever.

Likewise, for men, they'll no longer be motivated by *young, dumb, & full of cum* hormones but instead, will be looking for long term friendship and building a family.
Many years ago, the Best Picture of 1999, "American Beauty", telegraphed the message of Happier Abroad to the world.

Beware of long term engagements with AWs, you may find yourself in a coffin.

AB discussion thread

BTW, despite settling down with an AW, myself, the warning is still in effect.
User avatar
tom
Junior Poster
Posts: 709
Joined: November 9th, 2007, 2:40 pm

Re: Sexbots and virtual sex. Women becoming obsolete?

Post by tom »

Sexbots will be the way a real human like androids will be created.

As some of you may know the prime driver of many of the basic internet technologies was porn. This was in the 1980's (pre internet) and 1990's.

The concepts and physical industries of Hollywood was actually created by D. W. Griffith. D. W. Griffith is the founder of Hollywood. Before Hollywood there was the nickelodeon. When Griffith first decided to see a nickelodeon he and another person went around the block three times before they got enough nerve up to walk in to see a nickelodeon. Why? Porn. The basic technologies of filming were developed in the nickelodeon era.

The same thing is happening with sex bots. They will be the first human like androids with interactive AI. This is going to be a colossal industry once that threshold is crossed. Its impact will go far beyond the sex bot role.

Feminist have written various hits pieces projecting their fears and self dejection which causes them to lie aggressively about sex bots. Projection of guilt onto men, denial, false/straw-man issues about female sex bot are actually about female insecurity that a sex bot will be so good that women will not be able to compete.

Right now sex bots are essentially automatons, they offer zero competition to flesh and blood women. To make this real the female brain will have to be fully reversed engineered. Hidden sub systems like the algorithms driving hypergamy and a vast array of other hidden systems. Right now the there is tremendous progress is being made. This would have to be translated to an AI system and integrated with a mechanical body and sensors. 30 years minimum but probably more like 50 before women would have real minimal competition.

Perfect female sex bots will also be able to control and inspire men to greatness or exploit them for nefarious actors. For women it will not be possible to get an equivalent male sex bot. The reason is simple, for a male sex bot to be irresistible to women it would have to be quite dangerous, think 50 Shades of Grey. This is fundamental. Creating a bumper crop of Treminators and turning them loose with no restrictions is not going to be supported by anyone.

There will be a creation of a bumper crop of beautiful, agreeable, nurturing, emotional and neurotic sex bots who will excel at the caring professions. The full effects of this will be hard to predict. Women are in no way remotely ready for this. Inventing new ways to be a victim and denial of problems. Hating and blaming men. Exploiting pathological mass hysteria. This has been the current response to changes brought by modernity. Current feminism clearly is a path of failure.
משה בן יצחק
User avatar
jamesbond
Elite Upper Class Poster
Posts: 11251
Joined: August 25th, 2007, 10:45 am
Location: USA

Re: Sexbots and virtual sex. Women becoming obsolete?

Post by jamesbond »

Feminists are already trying to get legislation passed to ban sex robots. They say female sex robots are "oppressive" to real women.
"When I think about the idea of getting involved with an American woman, I don't know if I should laugh .............. or vomit!"

"Trying to meet women in America is like trying to decipher Egyptian hieroglyphics."
suprmon
Freshman Poster
Posts: 131
Joined: October 16th, 2014, 10:15 pm

Re: Sexbots and virtual sex. Women becoming obsolete?

Post by suprmon »

JohnDoeBigBaller wrote:
June 15th, 2016, 3:19 pm
traveller wrote:p*** is very boring! All they ever do is physically abuse women in every one of those p**n videos. Every single video is just the same repetitive copypaste junk. First the hard, crushing grabbing of her breasts as if trying to pop them like balloons, pinching and biting and pulling her nipples as if trying to tear them off, the slapping, and then him, boom! boom! boom! boom! boom! boom! boom! boom! into her rear. There's like no gentle romance in p**n! It's nothing but that same boring abuse repeated from video to video, website to website, and category to category.
who the f**k wants gentle romance anymore, in real life or fake life either? Unless you can pound a girl's damn brains out, she will just leave you and go for someone else who CAN f**k her goddamn brains out!
Not all men act neaderthals like that! It's no wonder many women in this have the negative images about men that they do and are so bitter at men! Nobody can take away a man's general trait, but it doesn't mean a man has treat women like a piece of meat!
Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “General Discussions”