Does the dating desert really cover all First World nations?

[traveller]

I'm reading a lot of things about American women being selfish, anti social, and such, but at the same time it appears, I'm also reading that Australian women are also snobby and stuck up. Both America and Australia are first world countries. There are also a lot of other similarly rich countries as well. And I am starting to get a feeling that, according to what is being said, that the entire First World realm is a social and dating desert, and that anywhere on the Earth, where there's money and modern technology, especially enough to provide services for people with disabilities, there's a social desert.

Most of the countries here where a lot of guys are going to apparently are second and third world countries. And apparently, both Fiji and the Philippines are both third world countries. Last time I checked, by the way, China is a second world country.

Does anyone else think that the snobbish nature of all women in any society covers the entire First World?

[chanta76]

There is a correlation as the country gets richer the girls and well also guys act more stuck up. Western guys are also snobbish..I mean American western guys think they are the best. Plus I think it's more of a white people thing...maybe white people are just inherently more stuck up just because they think the white race is the best.

[w.p.o.]

There is a correlation as the country gets richer the girls and well also guys act more stuck up. Western guys are also snobbish..I mean American western guys think they are the best. Plus I think it's more of a white people thing...maybe white people are just inherently more stuck up just because they think the white race is the best.

TROLL ALERT!!!! (and I'm not even white)

[w.p.o.]

I'm reading a lot of things about American women being selfish, anti social, and such, but at the same time it appears, I'm also reading that Australian women are also snobby and stuck up. Both America and Australia are first world countries. There are also a lot of other similarly rich countries as well. And I am starting to get a feeling that, according to what is being said, that the entire First World realm is a social and dating desert, and that anywhere on the Earth, where there's money and modern technology, especially enough to provide services for people with disabilities, there's a social desert.

Most of the countries here where a lot of guys are going to apparently are second and third world countries. And apparently, both Fiji and the Philippines are both third world countries. Last time I checked, by the way, China is a second world country.

Does anyone else think that the snobbish nature of all women in any society covers the entire First World?

It's only in the western countries where women are horrible. The US, canada, UK, austrailia, new zealand, and south africa (scandanavia to an extent). Any country that's contaminated with feminism (loud, fat, angry, obnoxious, ignorant, hateful, love a$$holes and hate nice guys) is the worse place for a guy. In these countries, the laws allow the woman to basically get away with murder with no accountability. This is especially in the states. The divorce rate is 65% (highest on earth). Once upon a time, you had to have grounds for divorce. Now you don't. Just tell the divorce lawyer you're bored and you're sitting pretty with the car, house, alimony, custody of the kids while the guy (no fault of his own) gets nada. There's divorce lawyer advertisements on billboards on the side of the roads for goodness sake! Who would've known someone could have a career as a 'divorce attorney'?! They can accuse a guy of rape without presenting a spec of evidence/proof. A guy will have to prove he is innocent. They guy (who's done nothing) is looked upon as a creep, yet the woman doesn't get any punishment for lying and changing her story 5,6,7 times!

This is just 1% why western (and westernized) girls/women - regardless of their race/nationality - are internationally despised. They are also the only people on earth whom are boycotted. If you don't know, you better start reading.

Btw, african american women ARE THE WORSE. I know this first hand. I grew up in an all black neighborhood. Let me tell you, I don't wish that on nobody. google tommy sotomayor to get a better idea how bad western black women are.

[w.p.o.]

simply put: You gotta be out of your freakin mind to get involved with a western woman.

[Jester]

And I am starting to get a feeling that, according to what is being said, that the entire First World realm is a social and dating desert, and that anywhere on the Earth, where there's money and modern technology, especially enough to provide services for people with disabilities, there's a social desert......

Does anyone else think that the snobbish nature of all women in any society covers the entire First World?

It's better socially outside the AngloZone and Germanic countries.

Eastern Europe (former Warsaw Pact, Former Yugoslavia) and FSU will be much better.

France will be better as well. French people are nice, intelligent, positive, unlike Germanics and Anglos.

Small towns in the South aren't bad either. (Small towns in the USA vary greatly from place to place. Some are "redneck" and trashy, some gentle and kind and decent.)

In your case, if I had a disability and was determined to leave the USA, I would go to France or Quebec. But as a newcomer you'll probably need an on-the-books local job working for a corporation, in order to get inducted into the social welfare system right away. An alternative would be to get into a university that had health care etc. then get the local job on graduation.

Good luck.

[TruthOrConsequences]

Remember the whole "Third World" or "First World" concept does not apply anymore..

Some French economist came up with it in the 50's where you really did have The West and all of its vassal states as supposedly the "First World."
Socialist, and yes, socialist Warsaw Pact along with China made up Second World, and everybody else was Third.

Now it has taken on a different meaning, and it is dumb to hear people say that to describe that a country is poor..

[Eric]

No. It really is, just America. Face the music. This is by far the most horrible country to do anything socially, spiritually, emotionally...other than make money and business - as if one just lived to do that; like a robot. Even when you do try to muster enough courage to talk to someone next to you; your fellow man, the people are "weaponized" all around you, so it's hopeless. You will have 12 people standing around you judging you, silently plotting ...comparing themselves to you, feeling insecure, and just further dividing themselves...
Even if you liberate yourself here, you're still stuck in a sea of people who aren't... where the game is rigged.


I guess that's what the masters think of this place.
The richer and whiter a place is - the more they must destroy it and keep us fettered down and weak, and dividing amongst ourselves. Someone in the nwo really hates white folks.

[traveller]

It's better socially outside the AngloZone and Germanic countries.

Eastern Europe (former Warsaw Pact, Former Yugoslavia) and FSU will be much better.

France will be better as well. French people are nice, intelligent, positive, unlike Germanics and Anglos.

Small towns in the South aren't bad either. (Small towns in the USA vary greatly from place to place. Some are "redneck" and trashy, some gentle and kind and decent.)

In your case, if I had a disability and was determined to leave the USA, I would go to France or Quebec. But as a newcomer you'll probably need an on-the-books local job working for a corporation, in order to get inducted into the social welfare system right away. An alternative would be to get into a university that had health care etc. then get the local job on graduation.

Good luck.

Any country I would ever relocate to has to be tropical. In other words, it absolutely has to have palm trees.

[Jester]

It's better socially outside the AngloZone and Germanic countries.

Eastern Europe (former Warsaw Pact, Former Yugoslavia) and FSU will be much better.

France will be better as well. French people are nice, intelligent, positive, unlike Germanics and Anglos.

Small towns in the South aren't bad either. (Small towns in the USA vary greatly from place to place. Some are "redneck" and trashy, some gentle and kind and decent.)

In your case, if I had a disability and was determined to leave the USA, I would go to France or Quebec. But as a newcomer you'll probably need an on-the-books local job working for a corporation, in order to get inducted into the social welfare system right away. An alternative would be to get into a university that had health care etc. then get the local job on graduation.

Good luck.

Any country I would ever relocate to has to be tropical. In other words, it absolutely has to have palm trees.

Fair enough, Your demands are not beyond attainability.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_islands_of_France

Choose an island, make sure it is considered part of France, as some are.

Let us know where you are headed. You will inspire others.

[traveller]

Also, I would highly prefer to live somewhere where homeownership is a reality and where there are no rents of land (aka "property taxes") to worry about. And as of now, I know of six places worldwide where you will find that. They are; Fiji, Palau, Saipan, St. Maarten, Turks and Caicos, and the Cayman Islands.

[mattyman]

Regarding the note of snobby, stuck-up unfriendly women

I'm from the UK and I can certainly say that Spain is a different kettle of Fish in that regard (well, I'm speaking specifically about Andalucia; Granada, Malaga and Seville), and Spain is considered a developed country. The girls in that part of the world are without doubt easier to talk to, to meet, and are much much warmer and generally don't have that stuck-up look on their face. Go to any UK city, then go to any of those cities in souther Spain, you'll notice a difference. So no, it certainly doesn't apply to all first world countries (and least the difficulties meeting girls are not equal everywhere).

It was quite refreshing how friendly the women are there. I remember using the ticket machines at the bus station, getting stuck, and a couple of girls in the adjacent queue came into help me, smiling. It's so refreshing how warm they are.

The biggest difference I noticed in public was the lack of resting bitch faces compared to the UK. That was hugely noticeable. Whether it's a dating desert, I wasn't there long enough to find out, though it's definitely easier to meet girls.

Spain is probably not as polluted by feminism and it's toxic doctrine as the anglo and Scandinavian countries are.

[Jester]

Also, I would highly prefer to live somewhere where homeownership is a reality and where there are no rents of land (aka "property taxes") to worry about. And as of now, I know of six places worldwide where you will find that. They are; Fiji, Palau, Saipan, St. Maarten, Turks and Caicos, and the Cayman Islands.

Now you're just an idiot.

Been there, done that.

But still, nevertheless, you are an idiot.

None of the places you just mentioned have a social-welfare safety net aka public health care.

You are an idiot.

Sorry to have to tell you, but you are an idiot.

I suggest you stop "thinking" and "researching", because...
...you are an idiot.

[Jester]

Regarding the note of snobby, stuck-up unfriendly women

I'm from the UK and I can certainly say that Spain is a different kettle of Fish in that regard (well, I'm speaking specifically about Andalucia; Granada, Malaga and Seville), and Spain is considered a developed country. The girls in that part of the world are without doubt easier to talk to, to meet, and are much much warmer and generally don't have that stuck-up look on their face. Go to any UK city, then go to any of those cities in souther Spain, you'll notice a difference. So no, it certainly doesn't apply to all first world countries (and least the difficulties meeting girls are not equal everywhere).

It was quite refreshing how friendly the women are there. I remember using the ticket machines at the bus station, getting stuck, and a couple of girls in the adjacent queue came into help me, smiling. It's so refreshing how warm they are.

The biggest difference I noticed in public was the lack of resting bitch faces compared to the UK. That was hugely noticeable. Whether it's a dating desert, I wasn't there long enough to find out, though it's definitely easier to meet girls.

Spain is probably not as polluted by feminism and it's toxic doctrine as the anglo and Scandinavian countries are.

That's really great to hear. Thanks.

[chanta76]

w.p.o.

I been posting here a long time. Longer than you so I don't think I'm troll. Nor have a reputation as a troll.

I'm Asian and traveled around Asia but live in USA as of now. I been to South Korea, Thailand , Japan , Indonesia(briefly) and I did visit Singapore. I traveled around the North America.
.I'm married now so I don't approach women anymore.

What I notice is this? When I was in Asia in the wealthy Asian countries like South Korea and Japan the girls were easier approach compared to let say USA but there was stuck up girls or girls with bitchy attitude even in those countries. However, I notice a correlation between the wealthy Asian countries vs the poorer ones. Notice why most expats gravitates to the poorer Asian countries like the Philippines. Poverty makes people more humble...

Most white nations (UK, USA , Western Europe) are first world countries and because the white people think they are the center of attention . White women act more stuck up. That's why even in the poorer white countries like Russia and Ukraine the white girls act stuck up.

Name a white country that is first world where the people are humble and the girls are not stuck up? There is none. It's not just USA...you hear stories of Aussie men complain about Aussie women..

Wealthy Asian countries are not too far behind.